forum

The Church of Suisei Hoshimachi

posted
Total Posts
235
Topic Starter
Meah

Sui-chan is cute today too


♡ Although we haven't yet met in person, I can't help but feel that I know you better than I have ever known anyone. From the very first time I've watched your stream, there was some kind of spark. Even though you were only playing tetris and killing people, I could tell that you care about me cause you said thank you after I send sc shile you were playing. I find myself checking my notifications too often. I can't help it. You have become a light in my life. A day without your content or videos or anything about you is like a day without sun. ♡

♡ There is no other word for it but love. There are many people out there who may not believe love can happen online, but I promise you it has. I now think that this is the best way to fall in love. Falling in love with one's soul first is so powerful. It is so much more than the love that develops from trivial surface qualities and then quickly fades once one looks more deeply. Please know that I love you with a very deep, honest love. ♡

♡ Thinking of you makes my life better and I can't wait until your next livestream. ♡
Tad Fibonacci
Aight
Ashton
Are they bald?
abraker
peak masculinity
q9za
Aight
Flanster
And they don't give a flying fuck about you ♥
Topic Starter
Meah
Isshiki Kaname
Thought Tad would get triggered.
Penguin
"Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships, where one person extends emotional energy, interest and time, and the other party, the persona, is completely unaware of the other's existence."
Winnyace

Penguin wrote:

"Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships, where one person extends emotional energy, interest and time, and the other party, the persona, is completely unaware of the other's existence."

sh-she's real shut up.
Penguin
"Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships, where one person extends emotional energy, interest and time, and the other party, the persona, is completely unaware of the other's existence."
q9za
Is this really god's will? What future has he planned for us.
Winnyace

q9za wrote:

Is this really god's will?
most likely not, but who cares?
q9za

Winnyace wrote:

most likely not, but who cares?
Good point. Time to tell the priest.
Tad Fibonacci
God is dead.

And we killed that motherfucker.
ColdTooth
ok
abraker
dejavu
q9za

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

God is dead.

And we killed that motherfucker.
Nietzche meant that the usage of Churches is going down, not the actual god.

Church is temporary, osu! is forever. My god never dies.
Topic Starter
Meah

Sui-chan is cute today too
q9za

Meah wrote:


Sui-chan is cute today too

Is this thing the god you follow? Admirable.
Topic Starter
Meah
Yes
Winnyace

Meah wrote:

Sui-chan is cute today too
that's brilliant!

but Kaos is just as cute
levesterz
Fubuki no 1
Tad Fibonacci

q9za wrote:

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

God is dead.

And we killed that motherfucker.
Nietzche meant that the usage of Churches is going down, not the actual god.

Church is temporary, osu! is forever. My god never dies.
I know. I read about it.
Though the phrase questions the belief in God as well.
Like, if say God is a real being and has existed. And then one day, he dies. Would people then stop believing in him? Or would their beliefs only become stronger?
If their beliefs became stronger, then you can say that one of the requirements to be a God is to die first.
Then isn't it ironic that people worship a dead being that has no authority over the living world and let it determines how they should behave and live their lives?

Even though Christianity is important in the development of civilization, it is not without flaws.
It teaches people to be "good", act "good" and you'll go to heaven when you die. Act "bad" and you'll go to hell.
It downplays the importance of life with promises of a better afterlife.

Why make the best of what you have and strive, when you can just act good but live a boring and stagnant life with little to no meaning or achievements. You'll get to be in Heaven when you die anyways.
Topic Starter
Meah

Winnyace wrote:

Meah wrote:

Sui-chan is cute today too
that's brilliant!

but Kaos is just as cute
Mosh mosh fbi desu

_______
☄ Apex stream ⤵️
https://youtu.be/WY3AebSp4a4
Penguin

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

Even though Christianity is important in the development of civilization, it is not without flaws.
It teaches people to be "good", act "good" and you'll go to heaven when you die. Act "bad" and you'll go to hell.
It downplays the importance of life with promises of a better afterlife.

Why make the best of what you have and strive, when you can just act good but live a boring and stagnant life with little to no meaning or achievements. You'll get to be in Heaven when you die anyways.
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.

Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.

I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
Rizevim
uhh.. who?
Winnyace

Meah wrote:

Mosh mosh fbi desu
shhh shut up.
Westonini
Meah is cuter tho
burakku_old_1

Winnyace wrote:

Penguin wrote:

"Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships, where one person extends emotional energy, interest and time, and the other party, the persona, is completely unaware of the other's existence."

sh-she's real shut up.
That stuttering is very very weird when it's done in english, indeed.
Tad Fibonacci

Penguin wrote:

A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.

Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.

I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
I agree.
That's why, even though I like and support some religion, I will never be religious myself.

I don't believe you have to be religious to be a good person, nor to have a sense of fulfillment in your life.
It can provides both, but religion can also rob people of both given the situation.
Topic Starter
Meah

Sui-chan wa.. kyou mo kawaii!
Topic Starter
Meah

Westonini wrote:

Meah is cuter tho
No no, Sui-chan is!
haha i rolypoly
i love you meah
Penguin

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

Penguin wrote:

A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.

Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.

I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.
I agree.
That's why, even though I like and support some religion, I will never be religious myself.

I don't believe you have to be religious to be a good person, nor to have a sense of fulfillment in your life.
It can provides both, but religion can also rob people of both given the situation.
100% agree

nice talk
q9za

Penguin wrote:

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

Even though Christianity is important in the development of civilization, it is not without flaws.
It teaches people to be "good", act "good" and you'll go to heaven when you die. Act "bad" and you'll go to hell.
It downplays the importance of life with promises of a better afterlife.

Why make the best of what you have and strive, when you can just act good but live a boring and stagnant life with little to no meaning or achievements. You'll get to be in Heaven when you die anyways.
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.

Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.

I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.

You are both very right, but something you have to keep in mind is that religion can be used, and has been used as means of applying rules and good morals. It is true that without religion the world could perhaps be a better place, as religion is currently being used as a means of profiting instead of applying law and morals. Law would've of-course formed without the creation of religions, and people would've most likely found a way to profit off of laws.

The toxicity of religion stems from the selfishness of an individual, basically when someone wants to profit money from religion, they accept donations, and this can also be used to profit not only in currency but in anything else. In the past the pope used to crown the prince and choose who holds power and who doesn't, of-course the pope used to hold power to certain degree too. Slowly the power of religion declined as people stopped being ignorant and easily manipulated.

I say in the future the world will see a massive decline in church usage and religion as a whole will decrease in popularity. Though countries that people can still be manipulated in can still be found, the most popular Mafia/militia~ thing in my country is literally called The People of God (or the followers of God).

As long as people don't acquire all their needs, they will cling to someone or something to provide for them comfort. A coping mechanism, called religion.
Topic Starter
Meah

click squares wrote:

i love you meah
Same, I love Meah too but I love Sui-chan more


_____
Sui-chan wa... Kyou mo kawaii!
q9za
Sui-chan can into space, no spacesuit.
Topic Starter
Meah

q9za wrote:

Sui-chan can into space, no spacesuit.
No


Sui-chan wa... kyou mo kawaii!
q9za
Now that's pretty hot.
Tad Fibonacci

q9za wrote:

Sui-chan can into space, no spacesuit.
I believe she's already went to space.
To a Next Color Planet.

q9za
oh god.
Winnyace

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

q9za wrote:

Sui-chan can into space, no spacesuit.
I believe she's already went to space.
To a Next Color Planet.

let's talk to NASA to put her on a spaceship.
q9za

Winnyace wrote:

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

q9za wrote:

Sui-chan can into space, no spacesuit.
I believe she's already went to space.
To a Next Color Planet.

let's talk to NASA to put her on a spaceship.
Nah man, we don't want her to sing happy birthday to herself like curiosity rover did.
ColdTooth
fucking weebs
haha i rolypoly

q9za wrote:

Penguin wrote:

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

Even though Christianity is important in the development of civilization, it is not without flaws.
It teaches people to be "good", act "good" and you'll go to heaven when you die. Act "bad" and you'll go to hell.
It downplays the importance of life with promises of a better afterlife.

Why make the best of what you have and strive, when you can just act good but live a boring and stagnant life with little to no meaning or achievements. You'll get to be in Heaven when you die anyways.
A lot of religious people I've spoken to and have seen talk tend to have the belief that people can't have morals without "god." I completely disagree. Secular morality is a very interesting subject to study that type of stuff.

Also, religious morality is completely subjective since there are numerous amounts or religions that all have contradicting moral beliefs. The same is true with cultures all around the world. Morals are extremely subjective, so why should one religion's morals out rule the others? From my experience, religious people tend to see the world and their "rules" as black and white, when it very well isn't.

I've had a belief for a while that religion can be good for the individual, but is very likely to become corrupt and toxic as a whole. Here in America religion and politics are so intertwined with each other, which has created a very toxic and unstable environment.

You are both very right, but something you have to keep in mind is that religion can be used, and has been used as means of applying rules and good morals. It is true that without religion the world could perhaps be a better place, as religion is currently being used as a means of profiting instead of applying law and morals. Law would've of-course formed without the creation of religions, and people would've most likely found a way to profit off of laws.

The toxicity of religion stems from the selfishness of an individual, basically when someone wants to profit money from religion, they accept donations, and this can also be used to profit not only in currency but in anything else. In the past the pope used to crown the prince and choose who holds power and who doesn't, of-course the pope used to hold power to certain degree too. Slowly the power of religion declined as people stopped being ignorant and easily manipulated.

I say in the future the world will see a massive decline in church usage and religion as a whole will decrease in popularity. Though countries that people can still be manipulated in can still be found, the most popular Mafia/militia~ thing in my country is literally called The People of God (or the followers of God).

As long as people don't acquire all their needs, they will cling to someone or something to provide for them comfort. A coping mechanism, called religion.
ok
q9za
you really gotta hit us with that "ok"
Topic Starter
Meah
Suisei was from the space, no space suit. She's a comet


Sui-chan waaaa?..... Kyou mo kawaii
Winnyace
k
[Sick]Catcat
三☆
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply