Got myself a new NVidia GeForce GT 610, and I'm breaking it in after I update the driver.
So, on topic, what graphics card do YOU use?
So, on topic, what graphics card do YOU use?
The ATI Radeon x300 is the oldest one I remember owning, which I hope I don't still have, but that came out in like 2004 or 2005 so I'm not even doing your laziness justiceVext wrote:
Well, first I was gonna put some ancient one from 1995 or something, but then I was like "...Too lazy, I'll just put my actual one".
eternityglacier wrote:
NVidia GeForce GT 610
eternityglacier wrote:
610
eternityglacier wrote:
10
Vext wrote:
lol E-peen thread.
And then there were some stuff that allowed you to use nVidia card as a physX card and a seperate (AMD) card as your main GPU. nVidia later prevented usage of that in their later drivers, but with certain driver versions, it's still possibleIppE wrote:
Once upon a time, you were able to get SLI/Crossfire with ATI gpu and a nvidia gpu.
The software that allowed this was never heard of afterwards.
hehe. he.eternityglacier wrote:
So, On-Topic, what graphics card do YOU use?
well, why not, that's what it needs to do so why does it matter if u said it?and ofc I am dumb with these so I just played safe :3IppE wrote:
5/5 copypaste of what I said to you on irc :3Zertap wrote:
Well I use it to run third (and maybe 4th) monitor on it. (It doesn't need any more power than to run them in 2d mode at 60hz)
How on earth could you call a GPU not sensible D:IppE wrote:
Because spending money on sensible things is too mainstream.Emaal wrote:
why do you all have these mlg gpu's
Sorry to hear that.Kazuo wrote:
i dont even have one
Anything to get away from having a bad integrated graphics card (it was a GeForce 6150SE, very bad for gaming and even osu)Card N'FoRcE wrote:
NVidia Riva TNT2 M64, 32MB
Ok, that was ten years ago, i'm using an overclocked Gigabyte GTX560 right now. Still, that TNT2 was an amazing card.
Why would you even buy a GT610? I'm kinda curious about how much it costed you and what card you were using before.
I'm serious, low end graphics cards aren't really worth even the 30/40$ you spend for them.
I don't actually know.Mr Color wrote:
Intel HD Graphics 4000.
Shouldn't this be in General Discussion? Threads of "post your x" generally hang there. Not that I'm complaining, but hey, it just crossed my mind.
See above.Wojjan wrote:
hehe. he.eternityglacier wrote:
So, On-Topic, what graphics card do YOU use?
Yeah this should go there.
/) Brohoof for matching graphics cardsZertap wrote:
nVidia GTX 580 by ASUS (Direct CU ll)
Also getting GT 610.
Why!? may you ask
Well I use it to run third (and maybe 4th) monitor on it. (It doesn't need any more power than to run them in 2d mode at 60hz)
Now THAT'S something like what I want to get later on, but for now, I'll stick with the GT610. It runs better than my integrated graphics at least. I can even run fullscreen 3D games at around max resolution with near max graphics settings with only some spike lags, rather than requiring to be in OpenGL (in this game) or DirectX 8 (games like TF2) at lowest graphics settings possible, and STILL have major FPS lag.RBRat3 wrote:
Radeon HD 6950 or as I like to call it "Back fat betty"