Leorda wrote:

NI HAO
NI HAO~

General
1) Your spinner-approachcircle are completely ODD for ME. Those white color in spinner-approachcircle are doesn't pretty enough, can you make another one?
2) Can you make a custom spinner? (spinner-circle, spinner-metre, and spinner-background) Copy those spinner in templateskin, paste into this beatmap files and stay, is make no sense. Try make something difrent or remove them (you don't need the original skin from osu! Copy and paste here is just make a custom spinner like change the color, make something interesting, etc. Not copy and paste for collection skin). But just a suggestion ;-;
removed the spinner elements= =..
3) You should double-check the spinner for all diff, and make sure ALL the spinner is turn on the new combo. Because you get 300 katu in spinner, if you get 100 point on last combo. Example, you get 100 point in 00:20:716 (4) and then, you get 300 katu in spinner when the spinner metre is full. That is call spinner bug.
all checked and fixed
4) I think you should make an easy diff. Normal diff are not beginner-friendly. If you make an easy diff, beginner player can play easy diff, so you should make an easy diff
maybe I'll map one later, thanks for advice><

Normal
00:54:418 (1) - Move 2 grid up. It's kinda bit messy if this overlapped with 00:53:548 (2,3) fixed
01:04:852 (1) - Not stack perfectly with 01:03:983 (6) fixed
01:06:591 (1) - Remove new combo? ok~
01:43:983 (1) - I think 1/4 repeating slider are inapproriate for normal diff, but I don't know if 1/4 repeating slider is unrankable. It's up to you, but some modder are mentions that 1/4 repeating slider in normal diff is inapproriate. You can change that if you want or ask some MAT or BAT, I guess....... changed into 3 circles..
02:02:244 (3) - Move down a bit, to avoid some overlapping fixed
02:13:548 (1) - Same issue as 01:43:983 (1) changed into 1/2 repeating
02:26:374 (2) - Placing at red ticks has a wrong sound. Perhaps, move forward to white tick? I think it sounds nothing wrong...sry
03:01:374 (x) - Add note here? It's feels empty for me
03:03:113 (x) - ^
03:04:852 (x) - ^
= = when I tried adding notes, the spacing got all screwed up and I'm not experienced enough to get it back into normal...sry
03:06:591 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - No jump at normal diff! It's difficult for average player fixed

Hard
00:40:504 (2,3,4,5) - These acceleration spacing makes me chaos, IMO hmm.. I'll change it if one more person complain about this.
00:42:244 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This jumps are hard to read and silly, change something better >.<
sry but I probably won't change this 0.0
03:16:809 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This jumps are hard to read and silly, change something better >.< ok~

yongtw123 wrote:

Hi hi~

[Normal]
00:23:983 (1,2) - In my opinion, no. For the easiest difficulty, stacks using blue ticks are just unfriendly and unintuitive. Either 1) Use sliders, or 2) put 00:25:178 (2,2,2) - on white ticks.
maybe unfriendly and unintuitive, but it follows the vocal, so I'm not sure if I should change this.
02:26:374 (2) - I expected this to start on 02:26:591? (And truly 02:26:374 (2,3) don't fit the music.)
ok.
03:05:287 (1,1,2) - at least make these evenly spaced
ok. fixed
03:23:983 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - same problem with the first one
same.
03:51:809 (1) - ends with a "thud" (normal-hitnormal2.wav)? Try remove the "thud" sound.
removed, sounds nice~

Ok this diff is too hard to be a normal but too easy to be a hard lol
so what're you trying to express..? should I name it "Normal#"(reads "Normal Sharp", like how you pronounce "C#") or something? well I did it, for the lulz maybe, who knows

[Hard] Warning: some are purely opinions below
00:18:765 (3) - oh my starting from here the rhythm is quite bad... Before I explain please try the below:
(image here)

First of all I highly suggest you to follow the vocal. Then if necessary place the doublets in order to match the drumming in background.
00:24:852 (1) - the "thud" (normal-hitnormal2.wav) at end of slider sounds weird to me
ok. removed
00:25:178 (2) - ok, notice the drumming at 00:25:287? You should sync your hitsound to that, not here 00:25:504.

yongtw123 wrote:

But I strongly recommend you to follow the vocal as close as you can.

*Cirno is left deep in philosophical♂ thoughts.
00:25:722 (1,2) - same as above (PS. actually 01:25:722 (1,2) is a nice way to solve this)
was it my eyes and ears that screwed up, or 00:25:722 (1,2) and 01:25:722 (1,2) are actually identical in timeline? I can't quite understand, sorry
00:26:591 (1,2,3,4) - make these a 5-note combo?
ok
00:47:896 (x) - add a note?
ok
00:47:461 (1) - uh...you are creating your own rhythm again... I tried to not drastically change them... (and stack notes properly please)
(image here)(image here)
..you mean 00:49:200 (1)? used image 1. I didn't figure out where image 2 is located, thus I can't do anything (stacking fixed

I think I should stop commenting on the rhythm. (Oh.
But I strongly recommend you to follow the vocal as close as you can.
And try not to introduce rhythm that is not present in the music itself.

03:46:591 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - looks not so pretty, find a better geometry
re-arranged, should be a good hexagon now

======================

Hitsounds are cool, and patterns are nice, but I'd like to see improvements on rhythm in [Hard] before I give a star.

Good luck!
thanks~

jericho2442 wrote:

Normal# you need to rename this to just Normal, Normal# is silly ok
00:50:939 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - for the easiest diff of the set this is too much :/ removed (2,4)
00:55:722 (4,5) - i would advise to unstack these, due to the stream before it it makes it hard to read for a normal diff ok
01:13:983 (1,2,3,4,5) - infact all the streams like this would be better made more simple. removed (2)

Hard
00:20:178 (4,5,1,2) - i dont like how these 2 patterns are stacked, makes it hard to read I'm not that sure
00:45:722 (1,2,3,4) - this spacing change is very unexpected, its using such a small spacing for only one combo time in the map before going large again after coming from a large spacing, i do really advise to give this part abit larger spacing ok, whatever
00:53:548 (2) - slowdown slider is pretty much unreadable due to no sliderticks and no musical reason for it, they would play much better remapped as normal speed sliders tbh ok
00:55:288 (2) - same ^
00:58:874 (4,5,6) - unstack this, almost impossible to notice the timing as it is :/ moved (5,6) away but (5,6) remain stacked
01:08:657 (2) - reason for this slowdown? seems totally pointless made it 1.0x
01:34:852 (1) - again this slowdown slider really felt pointless :/ ^
02:06:265 (4,5,1,2) - i dont like how these 2 patterns are stacked, makes it hard to read I'm not that sure, unchanged as before
03:05:722 (4) - any reason for this slowdown? the vocal imo
03:16:374 (4,5,1) - i would advise to make the spacing for these 3 notes the same, feels odd them being soo different ok
03:19:635 (5) - again this slowdown slider did not really suit :/ I added it before because of the 'feel' of the vocal imo

Garven wrote:

[General]
02:51:374 - I don't like this break. It feels interruptive of general playing flow. Just map through it. Sorry but I didn't get your point 0.0

[Normal#]
00:23:983 (1,2) - This... isn't very nice for the easiest difficulty. Even iffy on the Normal considering the rhythms you'd been using up to this point. alright, you're the boss
00:25:722 (1,2,1,2) - ^ and these would be better as sliders ok
00:50:939 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Not in the easiest difficulty, please removed (2,4)
00:52:678 (1,2) - Strange going from a stacked end to 00:54:418 (1,2) - I'd prefer non-stacked stuff on slider ends for the easiest diffs though. unstacked
01:13:983 (1,2,3,4,5) - This could be simplified easily enough removed (2)
01:21:374 (4,1) - The 4-repeat makes it end in an ugly spot, and it's not very newbie-friendly as a pattern either. Short repeating slider at an uneven repeat value with a note 1/2 after? Hmm.. Sorry but I didn't get what you mean by this.
01:41:374 (4) - New combo ok
01:43:113 (6,7) - Similar to thing earlier, though just not noob friendly. +1 repeat, deleted (7) and unstacked (8,9) (now (4,5))
02:12:678 (2,3,4,5) - This could be simplified easily enough removed (3)
02:28:113 (1) - Start this at 02:28:331 - ok
02:28:331 - wtf is with the sudden dynamic change here? Bad mixer or something... anyway 0.0 what?
03:00:070 (1) - Too soon after a spinner for the easiest difficulty. 02:56:157 (1) - end at 02:59:200 -
03:13:548 (1) - ^ 03:10:070 (1) - end at 03:12:678 -
03:23:983 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Sliders, please ok
03:26:374 (1,2,3,4,5) - Simplify the rhythm a bit removed (1)
03:32:678 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ removed (2,4)
03:41:374 (1) - Too soon after a spinner 03:37:896 (1) - end at 03:40:504 -
03:47:461 (4,1) - Same thing as last time
In general the map was kind of bland since you were mapping primarily to the beat. Going 1/1/1/1/1/1/1 for a large majority, with some sparse 1/2 rhythms didn't really feel like it was interpreting the music very well to me. ...whatever.

[31's Taiko]
01:31:918 (337,340,344) - Kind of strange rhythms, but okay
02:51:157 - The storyboard doesn't really fit here for the taiko diff, tbh
I know nearly nothing about taiko, so I won't change anything in this diff unless you say it's unrankable, sorry.

[Hard]
Insaneb more like.
00:24:852 (1,1,1,1) - These really necessary? You don't even add a hit sound to the end to help justify the slider. Feels better as normal hits to me. added hitsounds as later occurrences.
00:30:070 (6) - This felt better as a 4-hit slider ok
00:50:939 (1,2) - Kind of weird seeing these stacked like this considering how you mapped this rhythm earlier in the map... maybe :/ not sure
01:34:852 (1) - I don't understand why this is .5x when there's no musical difference here. The speed up right afterward feels sudden and kind of awkward in comparison. Maybe do that slower section in the song from 01:30:939 - at .8x or so. It'd play smoother. fixed as stated in the reply to jericho2442 in the spoilerbox before.
02:11:374 - Aaah, why are you omitting notes from an obviously superior rhythm choice? That or make them more like 03:10:070 (1) - so they read better. made like 03:10:070 (1). adding a note here don't sound much superior to me, sorry ;_;
02:15:287 (2,2) - Suddenly opt out of the new combo for a slowdown? I think you meant 'add new combo'? then fixed
03:34:418 (1,2) - Hit sounding suddenly gets kinda bland here due to the slider use. ...maybe

Considering the big jump in difficulty between the sets, I'd recommend making another diff that would help the spread a bit better.
...I have no idea about how to map another difficulty out of this song ;_;