Got linked to the full version yesterday. It is still stuck in my head...whymeman wrote:
Wtf.... 3 Hours and 40 Minutes? Also, something to laugh at. Thanks for getting the song stuck in my head TBTE :~\osu_gangster wrote:
Nyan Cat
Got linked to the full version yesterday. It is still stuck in my head...whymeman wrote:
Wtf.... 3 Hours and 40 Minutes? Also, something to laugh at. Thanks for getting the song stuck in my head TBTE :~\osu_gangster wrote:
Nyan Cat
dNextGen wrote:
nyan cat so lame but whatever
Could someone explain what just happened?Lunah wrote:
dude put that in spoilersPokebis wrote:
The movie is going to be about crappy high-school hurr-durr drama and how words are the most powerful thing ever and makes emotionally unstable teens with no future ahead of them cry because they can't handle them instead of being about password security which is a much bigger threat that can be lessened with proper education media to the American masses.
That is amazing! I wanna attempt that. Sucks it doesnt actually run off a fuel and make compression like a real motor but still amazing.whymeman wrote:
If I had that many legos to do this, it would have been awesome.
Maybe you would pay for it IF YOU HAD A SOUL. Seriously though, if we pretend that piracy is an impossible thing, you wouldn't just be ignoring all of the media you're pirating now, would you? I bet you'd buy at least some of it. Eliminating piracy entirely is a pretty impossible thing, so making consumers feel worse about pirating and better about supporting the people in the business who are apparently lacking in job security due to the evil ways of piracy or something is a more realistic way of handling it, don't you think?RemmyX25 wrote:
It's so stupid because whether I pirate or not, chances are I wouldn't pay for it anyways, so they don't get any money from me either way, rendering them without a job.
Nice logic there.
Actually, around half of the things I currently am a big fan of I probably wouldn't be aware of without piracy. I've also bought things I wouldn't have otherwise if I hadn't pirated them first. And I've shown pirated games I wasn't going to buy to friends and they end up going to buy the game.Jarby wrote:
Maybe you would pay for it IF YOU HAD A SOUL. Seriously though, if we pretend that piracy is an impossible thing, you wouldn't just be ignoring all of the media you're pirating now, would you? I bet you'd buy at least some of it. Eliminating piracy entirely is a pretty impossible thing, so making consumers feel worse about pirating and better about supporting the people in the business who are apparently lacking in job security due to the evil ways of piracy or something is a more realistic way of handling it, don't you think?
I am now interested in this showwhymeman wrote:
I need to watch this show.whymeman wrote:
Same, also laughed about it via skype with someone.Loginer wrote:
Watched Cyberbully with /g/. It was amazing.
He means your universal offset is wrong or the map is badly timed.Randy96 wrote:
not sure what you mean but it could be the bad recording
When I made that map I never expected someone to use other samplesets >.>Randy96 wrote:
Futile attempt at publicity
They have a new album called "Bad Choices Made Easy."awp wrote:
That's not from their Shit album, right? (I forget the name.) I didn't know they still made music under that name
go go MastodonSushi wrote:
My drums debut
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/26886Teta wrote:
I'm so mapping this.
That is the least entertaining use of lag as a gag that I have seen...Mr Color wrote:
Disregarding that...
Most of these have already been posted and the rest are shit. Please review what you're posting before you do something like that.theowest wrote:
Shitlong post
Shut your face.theowest wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/26886Teta wrote:
I'm so mapping this.
map a better map than that one please. thank u
hey! It's not like I would go through every post here and everyone has got their own opinions on what's good. For example, I think my little pony's are shit.Pokebis wrote:
Most of these have already been posted and the rest are shit. Please review what you're posting before you do something like that.theowest wrote:
Shitlong post
that's just my opinion.Firo Prochainezo wrote:
Shut your face.theowest wrote:
map a better map than that one please. thank u
Two of your videos appear two pages ago. On the same page.theowest wrote:
I'm not going to look through the thread
I did go through this thread but I somehow missed that page.. still, you have to respect others opinions.. What you said hurt.. A LOT.Pokebis wrote:
Two of your videos appear two pages ago. On the same page.theowest wrote:
I'm not going to look through the thread
There's also some really good content in this thread, so it's worth a few cruises through it.
wow.. That's like one of the oldest clips on youtube.. I don't think nobody's seen it already.Pokebis wrote:
The rare occasion of a cover being better than the original song.
theowest wrote:
wow.. That's like one of the oldest clips on youtube.. I don't think nobody's seen it already.
2009Are you aware of how long Youtube has been around? And if nobody has seen it already it makes sense to post it, right?
I was just trolling. Now you know how it feels to get shit on for posting videos.Pokebis wrote:
theowest wrote:
wow.. That's like one of the oldest clips on youtube.. I don't think nobody's seen it already.2009Are you aware of how long Youtube has been around? And if nobody has seen it already it makes sense to post it, right?
umad?Pokebis wrote:
Yeah, I was crying for a minute there until you told me it was a test.
I sure learned my lesson.
If you intend to keep doing this crap then at least use a spoiler box.theowest wrote:
I'm sure many of these videos have been posted before. I'm sorry for that. I can't help it. Was this too much? Please let me know.
Anybody else have the urge to murder the president and buy more rice now?Xgor wrote:
Japan sure likes to mess with our brains
Vext wrote:
Anybody else have the urge to murder the president and buy more rice now?
That bird is adorable.theowest wrote:
quicky
It really is.Shellghost wrote:
That bird is adorable.
Teta wrote:
So fake.
But let's not discuss this here, this is a place for youtube videos. Not discussions of what's real or fake.Notch wrote:
“But Notch, it’s NOT a scam!”
I’ve been getting a bunch of feedback that my last blog post is wrong for various reasons, and I’d just like to say that I would absolutely LOVE to be proven wrong. Being wrong is awesome, that’s how you learn.
If you want to read my reasoning behind various assumptions, click “read more”.
Why I assume it’s voxels and not point clouds:
* Voxels store only the information about each point, and their positions are implicit in the location of where the voxel is stored. Point cloud data stores both the information about each point and the position of each point.
* They mention “64 atoms per cubic millimeter”, which is 4*4*4 points per mm^2. While it’s possible they only refer to the sampling frequency for turning polygonal structures into point data, the numbers are just too round for me to ignore as a programmer.
* All repeated structures in the world are all facing the same direction. To me, that means they aren’t able to easily rotate them arbitrarily.
About the size calculation:
* I was trying to show that there was no way there was that much UNIQUE data in the world, and that everything had to be made up of repeated chunks.
* One byte per voxel is way lower than the raw data you’d need. In reality, you’d probably want to track at least 24 bits of color and eight bits of normal vector data per voxel. That’s four times as much data. It’s quite possible you’d want to track even more data.
* If the data compresses down to 1%, it would still be 1 700 three-terrabyte hard drives of data at one byte of raw data per voxel.
Animated voxels:
* Holy crap, people sent me videos of this actually being done!
* I was wrong! :D
* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkn6ubbp1SE
* (But please note that just that single animated character runs at 36 fps)
Why it’s a scam:
* They pretend like they’re doing something new and unique, but in reality a lot of people are researching this. There are a lot of known draw-backs to doing this.
* They refuse to address the known flaws. They don’t show non-repeated architecture, they don’t show animation, they don’t show rotated geometry, and they don’t show dynamic lighting.
* They invent new terminology and use superlatives and plenty of unverifiable claims.
* They say it’s a “search algorithm”. That’s just semantics to confuse the issue. Sparse voxel octrees is a search algorithm to do very fast ray casting in a voxel space.
* They seem to be doing some very impressive voxel rendering stuff, which could absolutely be used to make very interesting games, but it’s not as great as they claim it is. The only reason I can see for them misrepresenting it this bad is that I assume they’re looking for funding and/or to get bought up.
If these guys were being honest with the drawbacks and weaknesses of their system, I’d be their biggest fan. As it is now, it’s almost like they’re trying NOT to be trustworthy.
All this said, voxels are amazing. So is raytracing and raycasting. As computers get more powerful, and storage gets faster and cheaper, we will see amazing things happen.
And a final word to the engineers who worked on this: Great job, I am impressed! But please tell your marketing department to stop lying. ;)
Oh god, no wonder I don't watch anime...theowest wrote:
uguu~ ;w;
HAHA. that's somewhat the reason why I don't watch much anime either..GladiOol wrote:
Oh god, no wonder I don't watch anime...theowest wrote:
uguu~ ;w;
Oh god, no wonder I don't watch anime...Annoying little bitches.
Exactly. They just need to stop being annoying and start making me more dinner, god damnit.Firo Prochainezo wrote:
Oh god, no wonder I don't watch anime...Annoying little bitches.
Oh this I luve.Esupanitix wrote:
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEH
...Hi.