if there are two people that ping me the worst so far, they are I AM VERY SMART and samx500. Also, if both scum, these 2 are probably not aligned.
bro defeatism gets u nowhere. Your reaction is inherently bad in the sense that assuming you're town, you want the number of townies to decrease. It's losing for your faction if you're town, and if you're not town, you're clearly doing this for the show of it and to get people off you (by the logic scum shouldn't want to die). I'm looking for suspects right now, and not an elimination.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
"I am not trying to eliminate you" and you're doing the exact opposite by voting me. The moment a player vote someone, everyone will follow them for no reason because it's the only thing to do. I just said that GamlA was safe because too many votes in a short period of time and everyone is already on me.samX500 wrote:
I am not trying to eliminate you, I just want to make people talk so that this game goes anywhere. If you don't talk, you are not helping town find who the scums are.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
But of course I am defending my scum partner, of course.
Just f*ck this and kill me already 🖕
uhhhhhhhhhh why are you talking about claiming this early, this is quite a vanilla setup.Joon Yorigami wrote:
should we make claims or
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
why is there a shocking lack of content in this game apart from literal LOLwagons. or is this how the sitemeta is?
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
I just realized both of the wagons so far have self-voters. WTF. Guys play the damn game.
my apologiesShaun_CCGeek wrote:
okay so roughly 3 days till deadline and we are just past RVS... uh... people should probably exist here.
I am unsure how a sarcastic apology applies to all three of the quoted posts, when the first question is not something that demands one, the second qn is not even directed at you, and the third one I can probably understand, but surely you can interact with some kind of content than filler to disprove me?ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
why is there a shocking lack of content in this game apart from literal LOLwagons. or is this how the sitemeta is?Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
I just realized both of the wagons so far have self-voters. WTF. Guys play the damn game.my apologiesShaun_CCGeek wrote:
okay so roughly 3 days till deadline and we are just past RVS... uh... people should probably exist here.
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
nahShaun_CCGeek wrote:
I am unsure how a sarcastic apology applies to all three of the quoted posts, when the first question is not something that demands one, the second qn is not even directed at you, and the third one I can probably understand, but surely you can interact with some kind of content than filler to disprove me?ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
why is there a shocking lack of content in this game apart from literal LOLwagons. or is this how the sitemeta is?Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
I just realized both of the wagons so far have self-voters. WTF. Guys play the damn game.my apologiesShaun_CCGeek wrote:
okay so roughly 3 days till deadline and we are just past RVS... uh... people should probably exist here.
first day clusterfuck + first ever game of mafia for half of the players here.samX500 wrote:
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
lmao, well we'll just have to wait and see who gets killed or smthShaun_CCGeek wrote:
like i think the only way this game progress is by having I AM VERY SMART interact with us, because that's our only promising lead rn
That’s what I saidsamX500 wrote:
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
maybe the aggressive reaction can just be their teammate throwing them under the bus without putting suspicion on anyone else; but I don't really know if there's any merit in my theoryYyottaCat wrote:
Judging by I AM VERY SMART’s aggressive reaction I don’t think they’re scum, but maybe it can go to a policy elimination if they refuse to help.
Reviewing the posts, I am looking at nominomu. They’re 4th on the wagon both times and on the second wagon, they said “i think i agree” which is a very vague statement and unclear whether they agree or not. That would not be a valid reason for a vote. That’s just a speculation though.
UNVOTE
WELVMYUKA can you answer that post? Why did you "follow the vote" after people began unvoting Gam1A?samX500 wrote:
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
The vote is found to be invalid. I'll take this as an UNVOTE.WELUVMYUKA wrote:
VOTE: IDK
Don't replace me.heipizhu wrote:
Julian_Kaiser,Joon YorigamiandClevelandMyBrostill haven't confirmed their role yet, and [RUE]Bambinex is V/LA from 7 July to 21 July.
I'll start looking for a replacement for [RUE]Bambinex now, and I'll also look for replacement for Julian,Joon and Clevelandif the31 players aren't able to confirm in 24 hours.
CleverlandMyBro and Joon Yorigami have confirmed
I'm not completely invalidating this, but an alternative explanation for the Sam kill is to put pressure on WELUVMYUKA based on their inexperience in Mafia.YyottaCat wrote:
Let’s take a closer look here.
Sam’s last action was to make an inquiry on WELUVMYUKA. This leaves some possibility for them to convince their teammate to help with taking a vengeful action.
Scenario 2 would be the most likely one TBH.Kobold84 wrote:
Hm, interesting, a lot happened during the night it seems. Considering the ice kill went through and fire kill did not, they clearly did not target the same person. Still not sure about all the rules, so can be wrong about some scenarios, but the following must've happened:
1) fire planet could not figure out who to target, which is quite possible due to IAVS dying;
2) the second fire planet member was/is inactive during the night and did nothing while IAVS is dead, which is also possible, especially because the night only ended AFTER the deadline;
3) fire planet actually did target someone and the town doctor saved them, seems quite possible, now we only need to consider WHO exactly was saved and WHY, but the doctor should probably not reveal themselves yet.
make sure to bookmark with notifications wwJulian_Kaiser wrote:
Apologies for not responding to the game since its initialisation, I missed out as I had forgotten about the existence of this game. Moreover, I was inactive on the forums throughout the past months and I just realised that I had signed up for participation when I checked my messages.
It seems I have missed out on the previous day.
Why Me?? i did nothing wrong 😭😭WELUVMYUKA wrote:
Idk say what VOTE: AIR(
I didn't vote for you, I voted for air, I'm Sorry I didn't know your name was airAireunaeus wrote:
Why Me?? i did nothing wrong 😭😭WELUVMYUKA wrote:
Idk say what VOTE: AIR(
I'm so sorryAireunaeus wrote:
Why Me?? i did nothing wrong 😭😭WELUVMYUKA wrote:
Idk say what VOTE: AIR(
Nahh all good, i get it 😄WELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'm so sorryAireunaeus wrote:
Why Me?? i did nothing wrong 😭😭WELUVMYUKA wrote:
Idk say what VOTE: AIR(
I still think this can be true soJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
why do you think inactivity = scum? in fact i think his lack of activity may suggest he's just a townie. if he WAS a scum then he wouldn't act so nonchalantly to being absolutely inactive throughout day 1. plus his last post was from 4 days ago.Joon Yorigami wrote:
I still think this can be true soJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
Vote: Julian_Kaiser
no action for fire planet last night (or at least I think that's the case)ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
why do you think inactivity = scum? in fact i think his lack of activity may suggest he's just a townie. if he WAS a scum then he wouldn't act so nonchalantly to being absolutely inactive throughout day 1. plus his last post was from 4 days ago.Joon Yorigami wrote:
I still think this can be true soJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
Vote: Julian_Kaiser
but sure. lets say he IS scum. now what i want to know is why do you think he is fire planet.
Are you absolutely sure that it couldn't be anyone else?Joon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
its honestly the best lead we have right now. unless someone else is silenced for the entire duration of the night then its very possible julian is fire planet.GamlA wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that it couldn't be anyone else?Joon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
can you at least give insights on current posts about what you thinkAireunaeus wrote:
Noone to suspect right now, lack of activity
especially thisJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
hey, it's already night, you can't speak in publicJoon Yorigami wrote:
can you at least give insights on current posts about what you thinkAireunaeus wrote:
Noone to suspect right now, lack of activityespecially thisJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
i don't think kaiser is really a scum due to him being inactive in this game. he could be one but it highly doubt it. gamla is definetly not a scum either. and we can also confirm that noumi is also not a scum. he rarely posts there and only posts if heipizu prodds himJoon Yorigami wrote:
can you at least give insights on current posts about what you thinkAireunaeus wrote:
Noone to suspect right now, lack of activityespecially thisJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
so that leaves just you then.Aireunaeus wrote:
so my suspects are pretty much noone
I haven't been online much because of too much busy things going around, and school and other activities.ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
its honestly the best lead we have right now. unless someone else is silenced for the entire duration of the night then its very possible julian is fire planet.GamlA wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that it couldn't be anyone else?Joon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
@Julian_Kaiser clear yourself
There's a chance this isn't satire.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
But of course I am defending my scum partner, of course.
Not entirely sold on this idea of inactivity = vanilla, if the last game taught me anything it's that being inactive doesn't clear your status. "definitely not a scum" is a very strong sentence, but that's just wishful thinking, if anything that makes you suspicious.Aireunaeus wrote:
i don't think kaiser is really a scum due to him being inactive in this game. he could be one but it highly doubt it. gamla is definetly not a scum either. and we can also confirm that noumi is also not a scum. he rarely posts there and only posts if heipizu prodds himJoon Yorigami wrote:
can you at least give insights on current posts about what you thinkAireunaeus wrote:
Noone to suspect right now, lack of activityespecially thisJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
so my suspects are pretty much noone
I said "definitely not a scum" because gamla felt pessimistic at the end and decided to vote himself cuz he thought he would be voted out. That's why I doubt that he's not a scum at all. (But ngl his PFP really fits as a fire planet lol)Kobold84 wrote:
Not entirely sold on this idea of inactivity = vanilla, if the last game taught me anything it's that being inactive doesn't clear your status. "definitely not a scum" is a very strong sentence, but that's just wishful thinking, if anything that makes you suspicious.Aireunaeus wrote:
i don't think kaiser is really a scum due to him being inactive in this game. he could be one but it highly doubt it. gamla is definetly not a scum either. and we can also confirm that noumi is also not a scum. he rarely posts there and only posts if heipizu prodds himJoon Yorigami wrote:
can you at least give insights on current posts about what you thinkAireunaeus wrote:
Noone to suspect right now, lack of activityespecially thisJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
so my suspects are pretty much noone
So this implies that the Ice Planets are able to recognise potential threats. Sam and Yyotta were very vocal in the previous days, so I understand.Kobold84 wrote:
Interesting, interesting. So far, ice planet kills are very methodical, I can understand what they're doing and why.
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
What do you mean with "we"? That’s kinda suspicious what you’re using. At least for meGamlA wrote:
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
I see, I never really played mafia type games online before. So I have no ideaGamlA wrote:
So this implies that the Ice Planets are able to recognise potential threats. Sam and Yyotta were very vocal in the previous days, so I understand.Kobold84 wrote:
Interesting, interesting. So far, ice planet kills are very methodical, I can understand what they're doing and why.
Seeing as IAVS was even more pessimistic, this really doesn't explain much. Personally, I don't suspect him that much, but not for this reason.Aireunaeus wrote:
I said "definitely not a scum" because gamla felt pessimistic at the end and decided to vote himself cuz he thought he would be voted out. That's why I doubt that he's not a scum at all. (But ngl his PFP really fits as a fire planet lol)Kobold84 wrote:
Not entirely sold on this idea of inactivity = vanilla, if the last game taught me anything it's that being inactive doesn't clear your status. "definitely not a scum" is a very strong sentence, but that's just wishful thinking, if anything that makes you suspicious.Aireunaeus wrote:
i don't think kaiser is really a scum due to him being inactive in this game. he could be one but it highly doubt it. gamla is definetly not a scum either. and we can also confirm that noumi is also not a scum. he rarely posts there and only posts if heipizu prodds himJoon Yorigami wrote:
can you at least give insights on current posts about what you thinkAireunaeus wrote:
Noone to suspect right now, lack of activityespecially thisJoon Yorigami wrote:
wait is it possible that julian is the other fire planet due to inactivity for day 1
so my suspects are pretty much noone
For that we'd have to notice connections between players or try to single out anyone suspicious. For the former, I didn't really notice anything odd, I think the winning strategy for them is to try to be as dead/neutral as possible during the day, because if we don't vote, there's no chance we get them and they will continue to kill us each night.GamlA wrote:
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
ok ok i'll actually do something... i've noticed that the ice planets seem to be knocking out accusatory players that encourage the game to move on (samx and yyottacat), that matches what youre saying (but it does put some suspicion on me though). im a bit suspicious of aireunaeus, he seems to disencourage voting and also he protects the less active players (again, me lmao)Kobold84 wrote:
For that we'd have to notice connections between players or try to single out anyone suspicious. For the former, I didn't really notice anything odd, I think the winning strategy for them is to try to be as dead/neutral as possible during the day, because if we don't vote, there's no chance we get them and they will continue to kill us each night.GamlA wrote:
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
As for the latter, I'm voting nominomu. Sorry not sorry, but we have to move forward somehow and you don't seem to be quite "here".
VOTE: nominomu
What you are saying is reasonable, especially the second part. I remember there was a similar pattern in Aireunaeus actions in a previous mafia game where he was a scum. All days were him saying something along the lines of "there's no one suspicious for me, I'll abstain from voting" and that led to scum outnumbering vanillas. Could just be playing style shenanigans rather than a role-dependent behaviour, but honestly it lines up with how the ice planet operates almost too well.nominomu wrote:
ok ok i'll actually do something... i've noticed that the ice planets seem to be knocking out accusatory players that encourage the game to move on (samx and yyottacat), that matches what youre saying (but it does put some suspicion on me though). im a bit suspicious of aireunaeus, he seems to disencourage voting and also he protects the less active players (again, me lmao)Kobold84 wrote:
For that we'd have to notice connections between players or try to single out anyone suspicious. For the former, I didn't really notice anything odd, I think the winning strategy for them is to try to be as dead/neutral as possible during the day, because if we don't vote, there's no chance we get them and they will continue to kill us each night.GamlA wrote:
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
As for the latter, I'm voting nominomu. Sorry not sorry, but we have to move forward somehow and you don't seem to be quite "here".
VOTE: nominomu
Well the reason why i didn’t want to vote anyone out (even the people whom are inactive), is because there is a lack of evidence that they are a scum. I can’t just vote a random guy and they’ll end up as a vanilla type. If someone makes a suspicious move then i actually would vote them of course. I do confirm that just voting out noone is kinda a dumb move but I’ll be more active into finding suspicious and vote anyone. It’s my 3rd time playing an online mafia game.Kobold84 wrote:
What you are saying is reasonable, especially the second part. I remember there was a similar pattern in Aireunaeus actions in a previous mafia game where he was a scum. All days were him saying something along the lines of "there's no one suspicious for me, I'll abstain from voting" and that led to scum outnumbering vanillas. Could just be playing style shenanigans rather than a role-dependent behaviour, but honestly it lines up with how the ice planet operates almost too well.nominomu wrote:
ok ok i'll actually do something... i've noticed that the ice planets seem to be knocking out accusatory players that encourage the game to move on (samx and yyottacat), that matches what youre saying (but it does put some suspicion on me though). im a bit suspicious of aireunaeus, he seems to disencourage voting and also he protects the less active players (again, me lmao)Kobold84 wrote:
For that we'd have to notice connections between players or try to single out anyone suspicious. For the former, I didn't really notice anything odd, I think the winning strategy for them is to try to be as dead/neutral as possible during the day, because if we don't vote, there's no chance we get them and they will continue to kill us each night.GamlA wrote:
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
As for the latter, I'm voting nominomu. Sorry not sorry, but we have to move forward somehow and you don't seem to be quite "here".
VOTE: nominomu
VOTE: Aireunaeus
Just like nominomu pointed out, suspicious moves don't come out of nowhere, you have to use your words and your vote if you want to force people into unfavorable positions. Yes, certainly we don't want to vote out vanillas, but your vote alone doesn't get the target executed on the spot. See how much we got just from this short exchange? And no one died (yet). It's okay to be wrong, just find whoever's looking the most dubious to you.Aireunaeus wrote:
Well the reason why i didn’t want to vote anyone out (even the people whom are inactive), is because there is a lack of evidence that they are a scum. I can’t just vote a random guy and they’ll end up as a vanilla type. If someone makes a suspicious move then i actually would vote them of course. I do confirm that just voting out noone is kinda a dumb move but I’ll be more active into finding suspicious and vote anyone. It’s my 3rd time playing an online mafia game.Kobold84 wrote:
What you are saying is reasonable, especially the second part. I remember there was a similar pattern in Aireunaeus actions in a previous mafia game where he was a scum. All days were him saying something along the lines of "there's no one suspicious for me, I'll abstain from voting" and that led to scum outnumbering vanillas. Could just be playing style shenanigans rather than a role-dependent behaviour, but honestly it lines up with how the ice planet operates almost too well.nominomu wrote:
ok ok i'll actually do something... i've noticed that the ice planets seem to be knocking out accusatory players that encourage the game to move on (samx and yyottacat), that matches what youre saying (but it does put some suspicion on me though). im a bit suspicious of aireunaeus, he seems to disencourage voting and also he protects the less active players (again, me lmao)Kobold84 wrote:
For that we'd have to notice connections between players or try to single out anyone suspicious. For the former, I didn't really notice anything odd, I think the winning strategy for them is to try to be as dead/neutral as possible during the day, because if we don't vote, there's no chance we get them and they will continue to kill us each night.GamlA wrote:
How do you propose we do this?Kobold84 wrote:
Now, as for the strategy for the current day I would propose to single out an ice planet, that way it's possible for double taps to reveal themselves later without much issue, which would massively help us. If you don't understand why, then it's simple: if double-taps reveal themselves with two living ices we won't be able to tell if they are real or if they're ice planets pretending to be them.
As for the latter, I'm voting nominomu. Sorry not sorry, but we have to move forward somehow and you don't seem to be quite "here".
VOTE: nominomu
VOTE: Aireunaeus