forum

Note overflowing with HR, is that rankable?

posted
Total Posts
23
Topic Starter
minhperry
Deppy's gd on new wafer map has a stack at 02:14:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) (view with osu://edit/02:14:514 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) while editing the diff) that is just a normal stack, but with HR it seems to overflow outside the screen like this

I cant find similar threads of this problem with google so I just want to ask if this would be rankable, since it's already ranked. Should a map follow ranking criteria for any mods?
kaedori
there's GYZE - HONESTY [A r M i N's 1-2] +EZ but it's loved
Topic Starter
minhperry

haxyie bf wrote:

there's GYZE - HONESTY [A r M i N's 1-2] +EZ but it's loved
Loved maps like Aspire have overflowing notes so that's normal ig?
[[[[[[
ye it's rankable, unless it's specified otherwise, the ranking criteria only accounts for nomod by default

otherwise it would be absolute pain to fix offscreen objects on mods like easy

(tho map has been disqualified/unranked for being literally unfc-able cuz of completely off-screen objects, it's an unwritten rule tho)
anaxii
wafer needs to stop
BlueChinchompa
Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
anaxii

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
It should but we ain't GMT sooooo
Stomiks

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
It should but we ain't GMT sooooo
Ask them for a request to move it
Topic Starter
minhperry

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
I did post it in discussion and wafer said it's fine as long as it's hittable
beatmapsets/1964790/discussion/4131657/general#/3756466

I just want to see some community option because I couldnt find any similar posts
anaxii

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
It should but we ain't GMT sooooo
Ask them for a request to move it
Laskerf
it's rankable
Stomiks

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
It should but we ain't GMT sooooo
Ask them for a request to move it
Yeah I didn't undestand how you hadn't thought of that
anaxii

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
It should but we ain't GMT sooooo
Ask them for a request to move it
Yeah I didn't undestand how you hadn't thought of that
Nah bro I sended this gif because you just said the most obvious thing on earth LMAOOOOO

What do you think I am???
Stomiks

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

Shouldn't this be in mapping discussion?
It should but we ain't GMT sooooo
Ask them for a request to move it
Yeah I didn't undestand how you hadn't thought of that
Nah bro I sended this gif because you just said the most obvious thing on earth LMAOOOOO

What do you think I am???
idk, a very smart person?
BlueChinchompa
I think its fine for it to be rankable.
anaxii

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
Stomiks

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
What does the times have to do with it?
anaxii

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
What does the times have to do with it?
Because 2023 was not 2007 for example?
Stomiks

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
What does the times have to do with it?
Because 2023 was not 2007 for example?
Was these types of maps not rankable before 2023?
anaxii

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
What does the times have to do with it?
Because 2023 was not 2007 for example?
Was these types of maps not rankable before 2023?
That's not what I said. The editor was very limited compared to now, which means that we can now edit and rank those maps.
Stomiks

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
What does the times have to do with it?
Because 2023 was not 2007 for example?
Was these types of maps not rankable before 2023?

That's not what I said. The editor was very limited compared to now, which means that we can now edit and rank those maps.
That's what I meant?
anaxii

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

Stomiks wrote:

I AM VERY SMART wrote:

BlueChinchompa wrote:

I think its fine for it to be rankable.
We are in 2023 after all
What does the times have to do with it?
Because 2023 was not 2007 for example?
Was these types of maps not rankable before 2023?

That's not what I said. The editor was very limited compared to now, which means that we can now edit and rank those maps.
That's what I meant?
?
kaedori
what has this thread become
Please sign in to reply.

New reply