One of my plays is obviously better(more 300s, less 200s, less misses, more combo), only worse thing are the 50s and smh the worse one was still better and it showed that there are 26k bonus score on the 92% while none on the 94%?
Bonus are dictated based on previous bonus and the judgment
I think you broke combo way more often in one part so that the score become worse even with good accuracy, compared to other one (more consistent combo, lesser misses)