star~
For the hitbursts or?Faust wrote:
Ah yes, the skin could use some texturing. Perhaps consider it having a crystalline/glass look?
Yeah I can see where you're coming at with that. Doesn't need to be necessarily more streams, just more 1/4 rather than 1/2.Glass wrote:
Just thought that stream-spamming might be a bit exhausting on a 178BPM map ):, so I decided to make some parts softer, I'll see what I can do hehe
Thanks for checking
No problem, I'm planning to map a Normal and Hyper anywaysFaust wrote:
Busy with finishing DJ Amuro Remixed by Shounen Radio - Shounen A.
Might take a while before I can get back to my difficulty. My apologies.
Hi ykcarrot~ykcarrot wrote:
Hi Glass ^^/
I have some opinions.
00:47:771 (3,1,2,3) - flip vertically looks better
02:25:692 (3,4) - They should be on 1/3 BSD
02:36:478 (3,4) - ^
02:47:265 (3,4) - ^
02:58:051 (3,4) - ^
Nice map as usual.
Thank you :3La Cataline wrote:
awesome stuff
that's because someone likes violin ;/yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
03:30:242 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - not 1/4 ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
03:41:029 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - ^^^^
you follow violin too much =[ parts like 03:30:917 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - and other 3/4 all over map makes it boring to play and only fun during streams ;A; map more to rhythm/beat!!
Thanks for the starC R E A M wrote:
I like this music. nice music and nice map!
here is the star~~
P.S
I'm sorry for taking your #1.....
Gabi wrote:
I love this song, i would have liked to see some 1/6 streams though :/
Cool map, star
Thanks y'allNeVeR_DiE wrote:
Yet again, another great map and song from you, gj.
yeah this is quite old D:AngelHoney wrote:
Q.Q so old...
+★JesusYamato wrote:
★★★★★★★★★★★★★
★★★★★★★★★★★★★
★★★★★★★★★★★★★
★★★★★★★★★★★★★
★★★★★★★★★★★★★
gosuTKiller wrote:
ffffffffff
I just tried redownloading and it worked fine.LesTrucsRose wrote:
keep getting a download error on this map.
I'm glad you enjoy the map, don't go too crazy on it with FL~Nivalis wrote:
Awesome map, very fun on flashlight mod.
Never in my life I played FL until I bleed my own finger ><
Grats on rank~
\:D/_LRJ_ wrote:
Glass's maps <3<3
So you are here because....?Eclaire wrote:
this is terrible compared to the original made by me, holy fuck.
well, at least that goes well with this shit game and community, lol
LOLEclaire wrote:
this is terrible compared to the original made by me, holy fuck.
well, at least that goes well with this shit game and community, lol
I've read all your posts and read again this. I laughed so much.Eclaire wrote:
shit game and community
Hi Mystearica. What are you doing now?Eclaire wrote:
this is terrible compared to the original made by me, holy fuck.
well, at least that goes well with this shit game and community, lol
yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
UR BAD DECAY
For veteran players of course it easy enough. The aim for 3 star and below was for "beginner"xsrsbsns wrote:
No, normal plays easy enough.
You were wrong in one part: it doesn't need to be below 3 stars, it needs to be at least 3 stars. If you check the actual star rating, it's 3.74 stars, so it's fine.Ayeen wrote:
Just a small protestant here, wasn't suppose to have at least 1 map below 3 star to get ranked?. I do know this map is awesome but tbh, I afraid this map will be example for those who doesn't want to make map under 3 star. As for most, below 3 star is a nuisance to make.
3.74 is higher than 3, but your whole statement is wrong, actually.Firo Prochainezo wrote:
You were wrong in one part: it doesn't need to be below 3 stars, it needs to be at least 3 stars. If you check the actual star rating, it's 3.74 stars, so it's fine.
Shit, guys, this is happening a lot lately. Is it that difficult to include another difficulty?peppy wrote:
Each map set must have at least two difficulties, one of which must be below a 3-star difficulty level. This is so that players of all levels of experience are able to enjoy maps of the songs they love
Glass wrote:
yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
UR BAD DECAY
I am not jealous. I come here only to backup my statement about Decay being bad.Decay wrote:
yeahyeahyeahhh jealous boi
Just map an easier diff and get it ranked separately. iirc correctly, that has been done before.Ephemeral wrote:
pretty clearly violates the 1 3-star < difficulty rule
again
sigh
too late to unrank it now
Don't you know? You mod AFTER maps are ranked.Glass wrote:
Good god this fucking map was in pending since SEPTEMBER LAST YEAR, bubbled since APRIL and yet you only complain when this gets ranked? Fuck off, atleast try to play the difficulty first, I ain't gonna make a boring map full of 1/1 just to get it under 3 stars, Normal plays PERFECTLY FINE as a normal you would know if you actually tested it.
k \:D/Ayeen wrote:
A controversial is a controversial map to be ranked. You map earlier than we new mappers are, you should know the rules more than we new mappers are. It a valid critics to the BAT who rank this, and I pointed this out in #modhelp too. It is more to "learn from your mistake" here for ranking what is against the rules and fair between mappers who struggling to make those "boring" easy you mention then go "unranked this map". And as Ephermal said it is too late for unranked. It up to him to accept (as harsh critic or positive critic) my criticism or not. About pending period, I've seen map that pending more than 1 year still not ranked.
Calm down, sailor; of course the star rating system is going to be completely inaccurate when you place a single object down. That doesn't say anything about its accuracy with complete maps. And really, do you expect relatively new players to be able to beat that Normal difficulty? I don't care what the BPM is, making a difficulty under 3 stars is not difficult. It doesn't have to be full of 1/1 and be completely boring either regardless of what everyone else does with their maps. You're just making excuses for your own damn incompetence.Glass wrote:
Oh look, 4.44 stars with only 1 note, this must means that it's even harder than my normal right?
No. This rating system is fucking retarded, the normal is 3.74 stars just because of the BPM, if you can't play that, you might wanna go back to playing your TVsized anime stuff, 1 minute and half of 1/1 on a 120 BPM shouldn't be too hard I think![]()
![]()
.
Yes they would, I've been to multiplayer with a couple friends of mine WHO ARE NEW TO THIS GAME and they all passed the map, they don't even play this game as often as most of people here so don't give me that "it's too hard for newbies" bullshit.Jarby wrote:
Calm down, sailor; of course the star rating system is going to be completely inaccurate when you place a single object down. That doesn't say anything about its accuracy with complete maps. And really, do you expect relatively new players to be able to beat that Normal difficulty?
That's what I did when I first started the difficulty, full 1/1s and it was still well above 3, so I thought might as well throw in more rhythm than plain 1/1, problem?Jarby wrote:
I don't care what the BPM is, making a difficulty under 3 stars is not difficult. It doesn't have to be full of 1/1 and be completely boring either regardless of what everyone else does with their maps. You're just making excuses for your own damn incompetence.
I don't know who is whining; myself or those of you who're bitching about my map 'slipping by' while all you MATs/BATs were too busy checking your friends' maps to care about anyone else. Oops I might've touched a nerve there, too bad deal with it.Jarby wrote:
Whine all you want, but it's not going to change the fact that your map slipped by and shouldn't have been ranked in its current state.
The main difficulty of this set is [Another], I could've given even less of a fuck and got it approved just by itself, but I decided to throw in some bonus difficulties for those who don't even bother playing approved maps.Jarby wrote:
If you can't make decent difficulties under 3 stars, go get a guest mapper next time.