General
Offset = 606 (may be slightly earlier. Try results from 603-606 and see which one sounds best.)
Lunatic
00:48:301 (5,6,7) - Does this play well to you? I can't tell. The hitsounds are too low in this area.
01:33:470 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - WTF is this? Difficulty spasm right here. All of a sudden notes just spam the screen and you have no time to hit them.
Insane
00:30:783 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - OMG at this spacing. So awkward. >.<
00:32:468 (6) - No reason why this is part of the previous combo
00:42:412 (1,2,3,4) - clean up these spacings somewhat. Don't have to be the same, but make them use nice rounded numbers. You can see the center note isn't completely centered.
00:43:761 (9) - Maybe new combo to make it more readable in the stack. (It's also the start of the next rhythm so it would make sense. Keep it a single note combo. I don't remember what was after as this is an edit.)
00:48:648 (5) - maybe new combo?
01:44:098 (3,4) - ugly There's a reason why no one does this anymore.
02:20:840 (9) - new combo to make it more readable in the stack. (also start of next rhythm)
02:25:727 (5) - New combo?
02:47:637 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - ugh spacing again :/
It's mapped well enough for a star.
Offset = 606 (may be slightly earlier. Try results from 603-606 and see which one sounds best.)
Lunatic
00:48:301 (5,6,7) - Does this play well to you? I can't tell. The hitsounds are too low in this area.
01:33:470 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - WTF is this? Difficulty spasm right here. All of a sudden notes just spam the screen and you have no time to hit them.
Insane
00:30:783 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - OMG at this spacing. So awkward. >.<
00:32:468 (6) - No reason why this is part of the previous combo
00:42:412 (1,2,3,4) - clean up these spacings somewhat. Don't have to be the same, but make them use nice rounded numbers. You can see the center note isn't completely centered.
00:43:761 (9) - Maybe new combo to make it more readable in the stack. (It's also the start of the next rhythm so it would make sense. Keep it a single note combo. I don't remember what was after as this is an edit.)
00:48:648 (5) - maybe new combo?
01:44:098 (3,4) - ugly There's a reason why no one does this anymore.
02:20:840 (9) - new combo to make it more readable in the stack. (also start of next rhythm)
02:25:727 (5) - New combo?
02:47:637 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - ugh spacing again :/
It's mapped well enough for a star.