Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Mapping Discussion

Need help timing an old song from the 1980s

posted
Total Posts
4
Markus-
341 posts
Joined November 2015
Topic Starter
Markus-
Song Title: Jun Togawa - Suki Suki Daisuki (Cut Ver.)

Tried to set timing points as perfectly as I can but still feels a little off

If anyone can, can someone help me out on this cause it's the first time I'm timing/mapping something that constantly changes bpm bit by bit...
owen
8 posts
Joined October 2017
owen
At 00:07:584 I'd change it to 140 and at 00:08:983 i'd change it to 260.5, same with 00:15:807, and 01:27:614. At 01:20:790 you don't need the extra timing point, I'd also change that to 260.5. Personally I think those sound good but idk that's up to you ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Markus-
341 posts
Joined November 2015
Topic Starter
Markus-

owen wrote:

At 00:07:584 I'd change it to 140 and at 00:08:983 i'd change it to 260.5, same with 00:15:807, and 01:27:614. At 01:20:790 you don't need the extra timing point, I'd also change that to 260.5. Personally I think those sound good but idk that's up to you ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Some of those timing points such as 260.5 (or 130.25 since I’d prefer to half that) seems a little too low after playing the song at .25x speed, so I made tweaks and 143.25 sounds about right

00:16:435 should have some tweaks since the very beginning has a tick that plays too late but feels properly timed soon after which feels weird
Last edited by Markus- , edited 1 time in total.
owen
8 posts
Joined October 2017
owen

A3THER_XX wrote:

owen wrote:

At 00:07:584 I'd change it to 140 and at 00:08:983 i'd change it to 260.5, same with 00:15:807, and 01:27:614. At 01:20:790 you don't need the extra timing point, I'd also change that to 260.5. Personally I think those sound good but idk that's up to you ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Some of those timing points such as 260.5 (or 130.25 since I’d prefer to half that) seems a little too low after playing the song at .25x speed, so I made tweaks and 143.25 sounds about right

00:16:435 should have some tweaks since the very beginning has a tick that plays too late but feels properly timed soon after which feels weird
ye timing can be weird like that lol, also I'd agree with you halving the timing, it probably fits the song better
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 4