Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

EastNewSound - Hana wa Gensou no Hate Ni [For Approval]

posted
Total Posts
130
show more
Kurai
osu! Alumni
7,734 posts
Joined March 2009
Kurai
:)

[General]
Like Selee said, Add all mapper's name in the tag ?

[Leo's Flower View]
00:55:576 (5,6,7) - Move them 1 grid down
02:20:267 (2,3) - Move 1/4 earlier, Remove clap on (2) and add clap on (3)
03:09:190 (2) - That would be better if you drive it away from the bottom border
03:50:268 (5) - New combo ?
03:52:114 (1) - Add clap on the first reverse and at the end
04:05:037 (5) - Too much reverses :<
04:27:191 (1) - Move 1/1 earlier and end it at the same spot it was
05:13:575 - Add a warning for 2x part

[Collab Flower View]
02:37:344 (3,4,5,6) - Arg... These jump are bad DD:
03:09:883 (3) - New combo
03:30:421 (3) - Add clap
03:31:344 (6) - Add clap at the beginning
03:33:190 (5) - Add clap
03:33:652 (7) - Add clap at end
03:35:036 (2) - Add clap
03:36:883 (8) - Add clap
03:37:806 (3) - Add clap
03:38:729 (6) - Add clap
03:39:190 (8) - Add clap at end
03:40:575 (2,6) - Add claps
03:42:421 (2) - Add clap
03:42:883 (4) - Add clap at end
03:44:267 (6) - Add clap
03:48:421 (1) - Extand by 1/2
04:10:575 (1,2,3,4) - Add claps

Star :D
Soaprman
1,392 posts
Joined January 2008
Soaprman
Collab Flower View
02:26:036 (7,8,9) - the space between them is equal but the time is not. normally not a big issue but when you're doing it with jumps like this it's a cruel trick. space these properly; it doesn't matter how you do it.

02:37:344 (3,4,5,6) - narrow these jumps a bit. they're such a difficulty spike next to everything around them.

03:13:575 (1...) - kind of hard to read the sliders in this part but it's not a huge deal. you can leave it if you want.

04:43:344 (1) - move this out from underneath the circles before it. mainly beacuse it's covered by the hitbursts and it's not clear at all that it's a repeating slider.

Leo's Flower View

Nothing really to point out here. Good job.

Taiko Collab Flower View

I really need to get good at taiko so I can mod maps like this :(



Nice map here. Sorry I was so slow to mod it. Have a star. Good luck with approval!
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda
Fix some few mod, thx Soap-chan
PEPOTTI
195 posts
Joined May 2010
PEPOTTI
nice map!!
mekadon_old
mekadon_old
Found your request on Twitter. Go ahead, take a star first.
yongtw123
1,028 posts
Joined April 2009
yongtw123
Hi hi~

Btw I am bad at hitsound so if it sounds good to me, then it's good. :D
Spinners at the end are a bit loud though.

[Collab Flower View]
I had great fun with this. Not too hard, but accessible to good osu! players.

00:33:651 (3) - up one grid
00:55:575 (4) - not really aligned with (2,3)

[Leo's Flower View]
Personally I think there are some streams that may be unnecessary. Ex. 03:38:037 (3,4,5,6,7).
I won't point others out because they aren't too bad either.

04:29:037 (1,1) - @@ I can't see the approach circles lol
05:13:576 (1..) - x2 BPM... hmmm. I'd say something like x1.5 but meh. Just caught me off-guard.

[Taiko Collab Flower View]
Sorry can't mod taiko (sad face)


Good mapset!
I played fine through them (except taiko of course lol)
Star~
Aoitenshi
711 posts
Joined February 2009
Aoitenshi

Card N'FoRcE wrote:

04:42:998 (1)(AinO53) - why the new combo?[/list]
I think Leorda Accidentally changed it D:
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

yongtw123 wrote:

Hi hi~

Btw I am bad at hitsound so if it sounds good to me, then it's good. :D
Spinners at the end are a bit loud though. That isn't loud for me

[Collab Flower View]
I had great fun with this. Not too hard, but accessible to good osu! players.

00:33:651 (3) - up one grid OK
00:55:575 (4) - not really aligned with (2,3) NO

[Leo's Flower View]
Personally I think there are some streams that may be unnecessary. Ex. 03:38:037 (3,4,5,6,7). It's not unnecessary. I put the stream to make a hitsound pattern
I won't point others out because they aren't too bad either.

04:29:037 (1,1) - @@ I can't see the approach circles lol Then memorize
05:13:576 (1..) - x2 BPM... hmmm. I'd say something like x1.5 but meh. Just caught me off-guard. *facepalm*

[Taiko Collab Flower View]
Sorry can't mod taiko (sad face)


Good mapset!
I played fine through them (except taiko of course lol)
Star~
Thx yong
narakucrimson
osu! Alumni
1,713 posts
Joined March 2010
narakucrimson
You know... I didn't find any issues at all :D

But why would you want this for ranking? I know you don't want people to ask you to make an easy diff, but I'd this could be a ranked map if it had one. Just saying, though...

Anyway, here's my star for the perfect work!
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

narakucrimson wrote:

You know... I didn't find any issues at all :D

But why would you want this for ranking? I know you don't want people to ask you to make an easy diff, but I'd this could be a ranked map if it had one. Just saying, though...

Anyway, here's my star for the perfect work!
I just want this to approved, not ranking. I don't want ask people to make a easy diff, because this map it's for approval.
rust45
1,085 posts
Joined May 2009
rust45
Christmas Mod!

[SB]
I don't really see why you need that negative image.

[Collab Flower]
00:33:190 (1) - Why does this have a new combo?
00:46:575 (5,6,7,8) - Don't like the anti-jumps, but if you want to keep them, at least put on a new combo.
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Just seems like a clusterfuck that's hard to follow to me.
05:09:652 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^

[Leo's Flower]
04:47:499 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Return of the clusterfuck.
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^
No warning for 2x (The Negative Image strobing doesn't tell you anything), and I don't really think the 2x fits.

[Taiko]
Fine

I'll shoot a star, and don't ask me to come back for a bubble cause I can't bubble approval maps.
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

rust45 wrote:

Christmas Mod!

[SB]
I don't really see why you need that negative image. In collab, negative image is for my second part of collab

[Collab Flower]
00:33:190 (1) - Why does this have a new combo? Opss, sorry
00:46:575 (5,6,7,8) - Don't like the anti-jumps, but if you want to keep them, at least put on a new combo. Ok
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Just seems like a clusterfuck that's hard to follow to me. It's fine for me >.<
05:09:652 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^ It's fine for me >.<

[Leo's Flower]
04:47:499 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Return of the clusterfuck. It's fine for me >.<
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^ It's fine for me >.<
No warning for 2x (The Negative Image strobing doesn't tell you anything), and I don't really think the 2x fits. Added the Speed up!

[Taiko]
Fine

I'll shoot a star, and don't ask me to come back for a bubble cause I can't bubble approval maps. I know that MAT can't bubble the approval map, but It's too hard to find a BAT for that
dNextGen
4,688 posts
Joined May 2010
dNextGen
saran nama diff boleh gak ya :)

Leorda
Collab
Taiko

better imo
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

dNextGen wrote:

saran nama diff boleh gak ya :)

Leorda
Collab
Taiko

better imo
no thx

P.S. I need a BAT to approve this map ;_;
Card N'FoRcE
osu! Alumni
4,058 posts
Here since the beginning
Card N'FoRcE
-Storyboard:
  • Please remove the "Speed up" warning from the Collab Flower View Difficulty.
- Collab Flower View:
  1. .Suggestions: (Fixing this should make gameplay/aesthetics a bit better)
    02:26:036 (7,8,9) - playable, but a really unbalanced jump
- Leo's Flower View:
  1. .Opinions: (Just some thoughts, I'd personally like if you follow them)
    Nothing to say.
- Taiko Collab Flower View:
  1. .Opinions: (Just some thoughts, I'd personally like if you follow them)
    If it's a Collab, where are the mappers' names? :X
Let me know and i'll bubble.
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Card N'FoRcE wrote:

-Storyboard:
  • Please remove the "Speed up" warning from the Collab Flower View Difficulty. Ok
- Collab Flower View:
  1. .Suggestions: (Fixing this should make gameplay/aesthetics a bit better)
    02:26:036 (7,8,9) - playable, but a really unbalanced jump Fixed


- Leo's Flower View:
  1. .Opinions: (Just some thoughts, I'd personally like if you follow them)
    Nothing to say.
- Taiko Collab Flower View:
  1. .Opinions: (Just some thoughts, I'd personally like if you follow them)
    If it's a Collab, where are the mappers' names? :X The problem is, I don't know the part where the mapper fills.... That's why I don't add the mapper names. Only 3UNI is know, but I think he is busy during at school
Let me know and i'll bubble.
Card N'FoRcE
osu! Alumni
4,058 posts
Here since the beginning
Card N'FoRcE
Ok then.

Bubble #1
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Card N'FoRcE wrote:

Ok then.

Bubble #1
thx >.<
Larto
4,128 posts
Joined June 2008
Larto
Leo's Flower View:
04:47:499 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I find that kind of hard to read. I hit it while playing, but had my problems with it. If you really want to keep it, do so, but I just want to note that this is quite hard to play/read, to me anyways.
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^
05:13:344 - Eh, do you really have to use 2.0 sections? Now that we have custom slider speeds you could just use 1.5 or so, that wouldn't be so extreme. Though, as you have a warning, it still works. Keep if you must, change if you can.

Collab Flower View:
02:58:113 (4) - Add new combo? =P
03:17:959 (3,4,5,6,7) - This spacing change looks a bit weird, but iiiiiiiiiit's playable... if you want to keep it.
04:42:883 (1,1,2,3,1) - These new combos are a bit ugly and don't quite make sense
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Again, these overlaps are hard to read.
05:10:806 (1) - Remove New Combo?
05:09:652 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Again, these overlaps are hard to read.

I guess none of this is compulsory, but it'd certainly improve the map quality to look into some of these issues. Nice mapset though.
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Larto wrote:

Leo's Flower View:
04:47:499 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I find that kind of hard to read. I hit it while playing, but had my problems with it. If you really want to keep it, do so, but I just want to note that this is quite hard to play/read, to me anyways. It's easy to read for me~
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^ ^
05:13:344 - Eh, do you really have to use 2.0 sections? Now that we have custom slider speeds you could just use 1.5 or so, that wouldn't be so extreme. Though, as you have a warning, it still works. Keep if you must, change if you can. Change to 1.5x sections

Collab Flower View:
02:58:113 (4) - Add new combo? =P OK
03:17:959 (3,4,5,6,7) - This spacing change looks a bit weird, but iiiiiiiiiit's playable... if you want to keep it. It's easy to read for me~
04:42:883 (1,1,2,3,1) - These new combos are a bit ugly and don't quite make sense Fixed, I think Ain053 is make a combo nonsense :o
04:54:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Again, these overlaps are hard to read. OK
05:10:806 (1) - Remove New Combo? OK
05:09:652 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Again, these overlaps are hard to read. OK

I guess none of this is compulsory, but it'd certainly improve the map quality to look into some of these issues. Nice mapset though.
Thx Larto, bubble please >.<
Dai
1,632 posts
Joined April 2010
Dai
star :)
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

lufi10 wrote:

star :)
thx

Pleaseeeeeeeeeee, CNF and Larto! Bubble my map (。ಥˇωಥ)!!!!
Larto
4,128 posts
Joined June 2008
Larto
Oh, woops. Sorry. Rebubbled. (EDIT: #1 I suppose, sorry)
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Larto wrote:

Oh, woops. Sorry. Rebubbled.
yes! Rebubbled for Bubble #1 or #2? :o
ZLOdeuka-
1,442 posts
Joined June 2009
ZLOdeuka-
o.o
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda
I want this map is approved :(
Aleks719
osu! Alumni
2,437 posts
Joined May 2010
Aleks719
star (:
mekadon_old
mekadon_old
SPOILER
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

mekadon wrote:

SPOILER
D:?

Larto wrote:

(EDIT: #1 I suppose, sorry)
nooooooooooooooooo!!!!! I thought it's bubble #2, ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Patchouli
824 posts
Joined July 2009
Patchouli
Nice map :)
Starrodkirby86
osu! Alumni
3,739 posts
Here since the beginning
Starrodkirby86
Is marvelous work, yes~

However, there's some minor things that I'd like addressed! Let's see.


[Collab Flower View]:
03:17:959 (3,4) - This spacing tripped me utterly. First, you have a (3) - (4) 1/2 jump, then immediately followed by (5) being super close but the same rhythm. I suggest you should either make (3)-(6) the same spacing or repattern this weird thing altogether.

Do we need the inverted BG here? There's no speed-up, after all... In [Taiko Collab Flower View] there isn't an inverted BG.

[Leo's Flower View]:
Delicious.

[Taiko Collab Flower View]:
Is it intentional that you don't have the mappers' names for their respective parts in this collab? oxo
I understand that the names are embedded into BG's for [Collab Flower View], though what's your input on not having names for [Taiko Collab Flower View]?
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Starrodkirby86 wrote:

Is marvelous work, yes~

However, there's some minor things that I'd like addressed! Let's see.


[Collab Flower View]:
03:17:959 (3,4) - This spacing tripped me utterly. First, you have a (3) - (4) 1/2 jump, then immediately followed by (5) being super close but the same rhythm. I suggest you should either make (3)-(6) the same spacing or repattern this weird thing altogether. Fix

Do we need the inverted BG here? There's no speed-up, after all... In [Taiko Collab Flower View] there isn't an inverted BG. ok ok, I remove that

[Leo's Flower View]:
Delicious.

[Taiko Collab Flower View]:
Is it intentional that you don't have the mappers' names for their respective parts in this collab? oxo 3UNI is being AFK
I understand that the names are embedded into BG's for [Collab Flower View], though what's your input on not having names for [Taiko Collab Flower View]? Since 3UNI AFK, I removed this sorry
Starrodkirby86
osu! Alumni
3,739 posts
Here since the beginning
Starrodkirby86

Leorda wrote:

Starrodkirby86 wrote:

[Taiko Collab Flower View]:
Is it intentional that you don't have the mappers' names for their respective parts in this collab? oxo 3UNI is being AFK
I understand that the names are embedded into BG's for [Collab Flower View], though what's your input on not having names for [Taiko Collab Flower View]? Since 3UNI AFK, I removed this sorry
Hmm...So are you saying that, because 3UNI is absent, you were unsure of where the storyboarded names belonged? o.o

If you're online, I'll talk to you there...xD

And what ._.

Why did the first post not update when you removed the Taiko difficulties?

Also, don't worry if the names aren't there. You credited the collab'ers in your first post. You might as well just resubmit that difficulty again. I was just asking a concern I had.

EDIT:

And Leorda...If you're going to fix that part like that...you might as well make it look more like this (Except neater):

The way you fixed it still didn't fix much of anything x[
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Starrodkirby86 wrote:

Hmm...So are you saying that, because 3UNI is absent, you were unsure of where the storyboarded names belonged? o.o

If you're online, I'll talk to you there...xD

And what ._.

Why did the first post not update when you removed the Taiko difficulties?

Also, don't worry if the names aren't there. You credited the collab'ers in your first post. You might as well just resubmit that difficulty again. I was just asking a concern I had.

EDIT:

And Leorda...If you're going to fix that part like that...you might as well make it look more like this (Except neater):

The way you fixed it still didn't fix much of anything x[
Ok then, I will fix this after I full-submited. Also, please give me a bubble #2 because it's hard to find a BAT ._.
Starrodkirby86
osu! Alumni
3,739 posts
Here since the beginning
Starrodkirby86
Leorda, my child ~

About the Taiko difficulty. I suggest you don't need to worry about who's part is who. The names aren't required --- I've seen collabs that don't implement SB names. I was simply asking a concern I had within the map, that's all. Maybe I didn't clarify that having names wasn't required. Anyway, you're free to insert that Taiko difficulty again as long as you credit all the collabers in the beatmap description again.

And don't worry about the bubble stuff. Changing only one pattern and a bit of the storyboard shouldn't reset the process over again.

I just insist that you insert the Taiko difficulty again since there wasn't anything wrong with it.
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Starrodkirby86 wrote:

Leorda, my child ~

About the Taiko difficulty. I suggest you don't need to worry about who's part is who. The names aren't required --- I've seen collabs that don't implement SB names. I was simply asking a concern I had within the map, that's all. Maybe I didn't clarify that having names wasn't required. Anyway, you're free to insert that Taiko difficulty again as long as you credit all the collabers in the beatmap description again.

And don't worry about the bubble stuff. Changing only one pattern and a bit of the storyboard shouldn't reset the process over again.

I just insist that you insert the Taiko difficulty again since there wasn't anything wrong with it.
ok, added. And give me and bubble #2, if you already give me, call my mom to approve this <3
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda
Where are you daddy? It's been 3 days.... and no bubble ;_;
Starrodkirby86
osu! Alumni
3,739 posts
Here since the beginning
Starrodkirby86
I've been a busy daddy, of course. Parents have work too, you know. V:

Anyway, with the recheck and all, everything's fine and dandy.

Here's a note:

It may seem odd that I'll be giving this a Bubble #2, but the only oddity probably comes from the length of time between this. This was not Leorda's fault rather, but mine with my neglect to recheck. I'm not saying this as some pity gift or something, but rather as stating that the map was well-deserved as Bubble #2, and, as it was my original intention to simply continue the bubble combo after the fix on Hakeru's diff (and the SB thing) was done.

So yes. Bubble #2.

If you, the BAT, do not agree with this line of thought, then consider this Bubble #1.
swish
1,194 posts
Joined February 2009
swish
:roll:
Tchim
13 posts
Joined March 2009
Tchim
Fun maps, Star~
tobaku2784
33 posts
Joined May 2009
tobaku2784
yeah!niceBeatmap:->
（　＾ω＾）ノ------------------------☆
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda
thanks for star swish, LeonXIII and tobaku2784

But, I need the BAT to approve this D:
KogumaX
285 posts
Joined October 2010
KogumaX
good song&nice map!☆
Kyonko Hizara
2,855 posts
Joined August 2010
Kyonko Hizara
:)
Takos
678 posts
Joined May 2010
Takos
tsubaki~><
Beuchi
osu! Alumni
2,288 posts
Joined February 2009
Beuchi
This has been so long in here already D:

~General~
- Remove hana wa gensou no ni from tags, it's on the title already so it's unnecessary.

~Leo's Flower View~
01:06:422 (1,1,1,1) - This bugs me a lot. Please make it symmetrycal like the circle pattern before it <w< (You can use http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/77909 as guide and copypaste+flip for the other 2)

That's all~

EDIT: Fine~ After adding the mappers names to tags...

APPROVED!!
Colin Hou
osu! Alumni
4,456 posts
Joined November 2009
Colin Hou
congratz leobaka
KIA
1,754 posts
Joined February 2009
KIA
What's this I don't even :|
approach rate TOO low *facepalm*
ayey
274 posts
Joined August 2009
ayey
yay grats leo
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

KIA wrote:

What's this I don't even :|
approach rate TOO low *facepalm*
|
v

I must to make a not-so-insane diff, because I don't want this map is impossible to approved
inb4 you rate 1 :(

and thx Colinbaka, ayey and my mommy!
Shohei Ohtani
Shohei Ohtani
(full ver.) FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU-
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

CDFA wrote:

(full ver.) FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU-
O_O
Mystica
798 posts
Joined January 2010
Mystica
grats.Finally.
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Mystica wrote:

grats.Finally.
thank you
KIA
1,754 posts
Joined February 2009
KIA

Leorda wrote:

inb4 you rate 1 :(
no, I didn't ;)
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

KIA wrote:

no, I didn't ;)
then why you complain about Approach Rate, stuff? :|

P.S I didn't realized that this is my 1st approved map O.o
Tenshi-nyan
1,482 posts
Joined September 2010
Tenshi-nyan
Oh boy.

Bad hitsounds and overmap.

I don't like this at all.
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Tenshi-nyan wrote:

Oh boy.

Bad hitsounds and overmap.

I don't like this at all.
Just go away and go to hell
Hakeru
2,360 posts
Joined May 2010
Hakeru
Overmap ?___?

nvm ..

DT-able <3
grats leorda
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Hakeru Prismriver wrote:

DT-able <3
grats leorda
thank you
Sallad4ever
2,936 posts
Joined October 2009
Sallad4ever

Leorda wrote:

Tenshi-nyan wrote:

Oh boy.

Bad hitsounds and overmap.

I don't like this at all.
Just go away and go to hell
beberapa tips dariku Leo:
kalau ada yg ga suka dengan mapmu
1. anggap aja hinaan mereka bagaikan angin
2. balas dengan kata2 yg sopan, kenapa? karena g akan ada habisnya kalo masing2 pihak salik menghina

anyway~
yeay finally approved, congratz for your first approved map ;)
Waryas
Waryas
Fun to play... What's the complaining about?
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

JesusYamato wrote:

Fun to play... What's the complaining about?
I think Jigoku-nyan is complaining about the bad hitsound and overmap and KIA was talking about AR..... So yeah, thx for feedback <3
Komeiji Yuki
1,264 posts
Joined March 2010
Komeiji Yuki
GJ Leorda

I like this song extremely ;)

And so glad to see it approved~
mekadon_old
mekadon_old

Hakeru Prismriver wrote:

Overmap ?___?

nvm ..

DT-able <3
grats leorda
Agree. Grats Leorda <3
Leorda
4,416 posts
Joined June 2009
Topic Starter
Leorda

Komeiji Yuki wrote:

GJ Leorda

I like this song extremely ;)

And so glad to see it approved~

mekadon wrote:

Hakeru Prismriver wrote:

Overmap ?___?

nvm ..

DT-able <3
grats leorda
Agree. Grats Leorda <3
thank you guys <33333
damager2090
11 posts
Joined October 2014
damager2090
My favorite map ;)
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
64 / 130