In editor
It's good to change volume with numbers!!!

Good change but needs time to adapt to it :33
It's good to change volume with numbers!!!

Good change but needs time to adapt to it :33
It's not just you. I see that it's tilted too.FruitTingles wrote:
Liking the new tint on the background but something about the main logo makes it looks crooked O_O" Thats probably just me though.
I second that~YGOkid8 wrote:
also, disappointed that all those sort-by stuff on the Extended Chat are gone, since i sorted mine by rank, which was REALLY useful imo
Nice..peppy wrote:
Working on a fix for friends now.
^this, it is a bit odd seeing it so straightUnder9000 wrote:
I vote osu button be rotaded 30 degrees counter clockwise in the main menu
You can solve thiis by using the template skin. Just download it from the Extra tab@osume and copy-paste everything from your skin there, then you'll get your skin + old fashioned stuff.YGOkid8 wrote:
also, is it just me, or are the song names and diff. names etc. dangerously close to the edge now?
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/70424
I think he means by not using the template skin. Positioning is correct using the default skin.Wishy22 wrote:
You can solve thiis by using the template skin. Just download it from the Extra tab@osume and copy-paste everything from your skin there, then you'll get your skin + old fashioned stuff.
Why is your font so big?NatsumeRin wrote:
YES.
H1ko wrote:
no ranking sistem? cant be true....
^ and i'll miss the old star ;-;Wiinter wrote:
that blue on menu made me blind ;_;
I think it should return since even when it wasn't really a perfect tool for knowing how good a player was, it was somehow accurate (high ranked people got to be somewhat good at least, and people ranked under 10k is usually not good for example). As you say it would likely take a while, having SOMETHING meanwhile would be pretty nice.peppy wrote:
Don't get too excited about changing ranking system. It will likely take a while and I have other immediate focuses. Depending on demand, sort by rank *may* return in the meanwhile.
Wishy22 wrote:
Any info we can have about the future ranking system?
I disagree with this statement, holding that I can FC most of my expert songs and are ranked well below 10k. Why? Maybe only because I have ~300 maps, many of which I rarely touch. The idea that Rank determines skill is probably the most ANNOYING assumption made by players.Wishy22 wrote:
I think it should return since even when it wasn't really a perfect tool for knowing how good a player was, it was somehow accurate (high ranked people got to be somewhat good at least, and people ranked under 10k is usually not good for example)
Exceptions may exist, of course..EnPassant wrote:
I disagree with this statement, holding that I can FC most of my expert songs and are ranked well below 10k. Why? Maybe only because I have ~300 maps, many of which I rarely touch. The idea that Rank determines skill is probably the most ANNOYING assumption made by players.Wishy22 wrote:
I think it should return since even when it wasn't really a perfect tool for knowing how good a player was, it was somehow accurate (high ranked people got to be somewhat good at least, and people ranked under 10k is usually not good for example)
It's as accurate as a bullet in the dark.
I do, however, agree with spoilers.
P.S. no offense to the top ranks, you guys are gods. I meant in the general sense
<Uan> T.T (wwwwwwwH1ko wrote:
pls peppy dont change the rank system T____T
Haha I was wondering about this too; would it be possible to return it to the default where new timing sections are inherited?NatsumeRin wrote:
one thing i want to ask about the editor change:
in the last version if i add a timing section it's default inherited, but now every time i add a new timing section it seems i need to change it to inherited manually.
I'll check but I thought the default behaviour was always to create a non-inherited section unless you used ctrl+shift+P. It should create a new section at the current time unless there's already one there? I'll check this too.NatsumeRin wrote:
one thing i want to ask about the editor change:
in the last version if i add a timing section it's default inherited, but now every time i add a new timing section it seems i need to change it to inherited manually.
and if i click "inherited points", it will just show the first inherited point and just add a new point 100ms after it, need to click "use current time" and find it yourself... reminds me of an old version orz.
maybe do something with it? i'm really glad to see the hitsound volume thing in the editor, but it's harder to make plenty of green lines and make them work for you now.
Megurine Luka wrote:
ppy, Ballance asked what about the new achievements..see his user page.
・゚・(ノД`;)・゚・AngelHoney wrote:
<Uan> T.T (wwwwwwwH1ko wrote:
pls peppy dont change the rank system T____T
its will be funny to see new mappers map with full of red lines XDNatsumeRin wrote:
ctrl+shift+p works fine.
there's not so many multi-BPM songs, but there are lots or maps with many inherited timing sections, and this should be taken into account. also plz, i don't think there are more than 100 maps have more red lines than green lines. so the default behavior should be adding an inherirted section?
anyway... i don't want to waste hundreds or even thousands of clicks because of this small thing.
i havent seen it yet, BUT I WILL GODDAMNIT, rly guys: he still is the creator, he brought us this we shouldnt bitch like little kids ALL the time...peppy wrote:
but for now please live without it and have faith.
FurukawaPan wrote:
I really feel like writing an essay or something defending the original ranking system, but for now just a few words since I'm seriously disheartened by the number of people cheering for the old system to be done away with:
Argument 1: The old system forces us to play songs we don't like to get ahead.
Point: Do you really think it's fair to be able to get the top spot ignoring maps you hate? What about the monthly charts? Aren't those only according to someone's taste?
Argument 2: It's meaningless because you can just play easy maps that have more points to pull ahead of more experienced players.
-Is the time investment in this game really worth nothing to you? Most good multiplayer scoring systems both offer ways for super skilled players to jump up quickly AND methods of "grinding" to crawl your way to the top in a slow but steady way. Why shouldn't a player be rewarded with a higher rank for having played a LOT more maps, or having been with the game longer, investing YEARS into their rank. Is it really fair to (us) to just decide one day, ya know, rank isn't accurate, let's just do away with it and find a more creative way to rank the players.
This is just to counter-argue some of the points brought up on this thread, I could write more about why I really agree with the current system for ranking and why it is a very good system, but I'll save that for another day.
FurukawaPan wrote:
I really feel like writing an essay or something defending the original ranking system, but for now just a few words since I'm seriously disheartened by the number of people cheering for the old system to be done away with:
Argument 1: The old system forces us to play songs we don't like to get ahead.
Point: Do you really think it's fair to be able to get the top spot ignoring maps you hate? What about the monthly charts? Aren't those only according to someone's taste?
Argument 2: It's meaningless because you can just play easy maps that have more points to pull ahead of more experienced players.
-Is the time investment in this game really worth nothing to you? Most good multiplayer scoring systems both offer ways for super skilled players to jump up quickly AND methods of "grinding" to crawl your way to the top in a slow but steady way. Why shouldn't a player be rewarded with a higher rank for having played a LOT more maps, or having been with the game longer, investing YEARS into their rank. Is it really fair to (us) to just decide one day, ya know, rank isn't accurate, let's just do away with it and find a more creative way to rank the players.
This is just to counter-argue some of the points brought up on this thread, I could write more about why I really agree with the current system for ranking and why it is a very good system, but I'll save that for another day.
Hardly. I exclusively use ctrl+shift+P because typing in millisecond values makes no sense to me. If anything, the fixed bulk adjustment stuff should SAVE clicks.NatsumeRin wrote:
anyway... i don't want to waste hundreds or even thousands of clicks because of this small thing.
MetalMario201 wrote:
Why is your font so big?NatsumeRin wrote:
YES.
Actually, slanted circle was a old one. I prefer old one, but new design isn't bad.Ishmon16 wrote:
all and all i like it but my custom background is gone D: and yes osu circle is slanted a bit but it give it style
much better now.MetalMario201 wrote:
Hardly. I exclusively use ctrl+shift+P because typing in millisecond values makes no sense to me. If anything, the fixed bulk adjustment stuff should SAVE clicks.NatsumeRin wrote:
anyway... i don't want to waste hundreds or even thousands of clicks because of this small thing.
How come I didn't notice thisykcarrot wrote:
Actually, slanted circle was a old one. I prefer old one, but new design isn't bad.Ishmon16 wrote:
all and all i like it but my custom background is gone D: and yes osu circle is slanted a bit but it give it style
Yep, if you see the new logo to be slanted then your eyes are fooling you. Even as of now I see it skewed sometimes.ykcarrot wrote:
Actually, slanted circle was a old one. I prefer old one, but new design isn't bad.Ishmon16 wrote:
all and all i like it but my custom background is gone D: and yes osu circle is slanted a bit but it give it style
+1kenny012012 wrote:
變LAG了
18:02 <ppy> !faq lag
18:02 <BanchoBot> Lag is a very general term, which can be used to describe just about
anything going wrong with anything.
18:02 <BanchoBot> If you are going to complain about lag, please be specific in
exactly WHERE the lag occurs, and WHAT it involves (internet lag?
graphical freezes? slow framerate? input lag? brain lag?)
18:02 <BanchoBot> Also mention when the "lag" occurs, if there are any special
conditions for it to occur, and if you have any idea what caused it.
Also make sure to check nothing else is running on your PC which
could affect CPU/memory/disk usage.
Well, reinstall was help. Trouble whith updater?peppy wrote:
Working on it
I know it.peppy wrote:
You didn't need to reinstall; just had to wait for the latest patch.
+1Wishy22 wrote:
Some friends getting crashes when doing F2 on the song selection screen, I didn't have this problem yet though.
When you can't connect to Bancho, it says at the bottom that you can press Shift+F1 for Status updates. It basically opens the osustatus-twitter ingamePearlsea wrote:
I don't notice where the bancho status is suppose to be though,