Well'xcuse me. Tad did it while in position too. Will you just overlook this or am I being targeted here?
forum
Katou Megumi: A Danger to OT.
posted
Total Posts
71
Topic Starter
I was unaware of this information, however now that you bring it up, I am inclined to do more research.
However, his wrongdoings do not diminish your own.
However, his wrongdoings do not diminish your own.
I expect of equal punishment of us both then, otherwise I'm inclined on belief that I am being targeted.
Sam also did it, after I did it after Westonini. It's all recorded.
Sam also did it, after I did it after Westonini. It's all recorded.
As far as I know, those impersonations weren't done with malicious intent in mind and the R.O.S abraker's reputation wasn't affected.
As proof to this, abraker has even created an "abraker day" where denizens don the face of the Royal Scientist and imitate him.
As proof to this, abraker has even created an "abraker day" where denizens don the face of the Royal Scientist and imitate him.
Topic Starter
KatouMegumi wrote:
I expect of equal punishment of us both then, otherwise I'm inclined on belief that I am being targeted.
I am not able to punish. It is up to the OT!council; which happens to consist Tad, to decide what is to happen.
I will send an impeachment request to the president at once.
Ashton's turned into a Karen.
Topic Starter
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
As far as I know, those impersonations weren't done with malicious intent in mind and the R.O.S abraker's reputation wasn't affected.
As proof to this, abraker has even created an "abraker day" where denizens don the face of the Royal Scientist and imitate him.
Impersonations \=\ stealing faces!!
abraker has his own face and others use fake ones, however, you as well as Katoumegumi seem to be messing with his DNA!
Your opinions here cannot be unbiased, of course you will say that there is no malicious intent!
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
Ashton's turned into a Karen.
Using derogatory names does not help your case.
Since when did I messed with abraker's DNA?
I would like to state that Tad had not directly messed with abraker's leaked DNA from A-Breaking Laboratories, and abraker should also be held liable for his DNA leaking to the public just like that.
I would also like to state that we only copied his face, not his whole body, as this would allow us to use A-Breaking Laboratories secret mecha robots, that information was also encoded in abraker's DNA leak.
I would also like to state that we only copied his face, not his whole body, as this would allow us to use A-Breaking Laboratories secret mecha robots, that information was also encoded in abraker's DNA leak.
Topic Starter
It appears as an attempt to shift the blame or to take the spotlight off of him, Katoumegumi incriminated you.
With the proof of the image, he has altered and messed around with the DNA of abrakers face without consent. Hence the word ‘steal’. He has done so in the past, and wishes he could again.
Even if he does not get removed from the campaign, a president who chooses to steal another persons face, and a president who somehow knows the exact procedures to do so, is frightening.
Like any other good-hearted person, I decided to share this information with the public, so they are able to make the most informed decision possible.
With the proof of the image, he has altered and messed around with the DNA of abrakers face without consent. Hence the word ‘steal’. He has done so in the past, and wishes he could again.
Even if he does not get removed from the campaign, a president who chooses to steal another persons face, and a president who somehow knows the exact procedures to do so, is frightening.
Like any other good-hearted person, I decided to share this information with the public, so they are able to make the most informed decision possible.
I think you frogot that everyone used abraker's DNA after the Westonini incident, including the cuplrit.
Topic Starter
KatouMegumi wrote:
I think you frogot that everyone used abraker's DNA after the Westonini incident, including the cuplrit.
If you wish to press charges, go ahead. But, the reason I made this post about you is because you are the only one to say they wanted to steal abrakers face.
There's no reason for KatouMegumi to be removed from the campaign.
He has not violated any election rules.
He has not violated any election rules.
Topic Starter
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
There's no reason for KatouMegumi to be removed from the campaign.
He has not violated any election rules.
That is not what I’m saying. Please review my messages.
From what I'm seeing here, you're accusing KatouMegumi of a crime with little to no basis of the crime ever existing in the first place.
And the title of your thread is more of a headline for a clickbait tabloid that attacks individuals than a genuine criticism.
If anyone's breaking any rules it's you
And the title of your thread is more of a headline for a clickbait tabloid that attacks individuals than a genuine criticism.
If anyone's breaking any rules it's you
Topic Starter
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
From what I'm seeing here, you're accusing KatouMegumi of a crime with little to no basis of the crime ever existing in the first place.
And the title of your thread is more of a headline for a clickbait tabloid that attacks individuals than a genuine criticism.
If anyone's breaking any rules it's you
How could you display such a hideous amount of bias when you are supposed to remain absolutely neutral when handling the candidates?
I created a thread with an appropriate headline, and provided evidence of such. I have never once accused him of the crime, only replied to katoumegumi himself.
I critically analyzed katoumegumi by searching for his previous messages, and as a result, found the disturbing message in which I later shared with a few accompanying words to the public. All I said was that he seemed to have said something rather malicious, and then showed two images of katoumegumi and what HE has said. If you are implying the public does not deserve to know about what he has said, then you are encouraging poor treatment and a corrupt government. The public deserves to know!
This is genuine criticism, not an attack. Please rebuke your wild statements!
First, you accuse KatouMegumi of being "A danger to OT" when in reality, he hasn't caused any damage to anyone or anything, nor has he threatened to do so.
Second, your evidence is just a screenshot of KatouMegumi on Discord saying "i want to steal abraker's face again.", which in of itself doesn't prove anything.
You also accused me of being biased, to which I disagree.
Your thread which you claims to be "appropriate" and "critically analyzed" is more of a personal attack to obstructs KatouMegumi's campaign as president.
Second, your evidence is just a screenshot of KatouMegumi on Discord saying "i want to steal abraker's face again.", which in of itself doesn't prove anything.
You also accused me of being biased, to which I disagree.
Your thread which you claims to be "appropriate" and "critically analyzed" is more of a personal attack to obstructs KatouMegumi's campaign as president.
Topic Starter
You are terribly biased. Using derogatory terms and twisting my words is bias, while condoning the disturbing remark a candidate has made.
It doesn’t matter if it proves anything or not, it says a lot about the candidate, and it is not up to YOU to decide what should and should not be shown to the public.
I did not obstruct his campaign, the words were katoumegumi’s and katoumegumi’s alone. Disallowing the ability to share these informations with the public is a sign of corruption and obstructs the entire election, criticizing a persons actions for the better of OT is not a crime and I refuse to be painted out to be a bad guy!
It doesn’t matter if it proves anything or not, it says a lot about the candidate, and it is not up to YOU to decide what should and should not be shown to the public.
I did not obstruct his campaign, the words were katoumegumi’s and katoumegumi’s alone. Disallowing the ability to share these informations with the public is a sign of corruption and obstructs the entire election, criticizing a persons actions for the better of OT is not a crime and I refuse to be painted out to be a bad guy!
Let's all ask abraker if he is truly harmed by my actions and get this over with.
By the way, who is this man? I have never seen him on OT, especially as a denizen and a registered president candidate.
Ashton wrote:
condoning the disturbing remark a candidate has made.
Please provide proof to this statement.
Ashton wrote:
It doesn’t matter if it proves anything or not, it says a lot about the candidate, and it is not up to YOU to decide what should and should not be shown to the public.
It does matter. What do you mean it says a lot about the candidate?
And yes, I do not and cannot decide what should and shouldn't be shown to the public, nor do I want to.
You are accusing me of twisting your words while providing zero evidence whatsoever.
Though you are free to share whatever information you want to the public, you are accusing another candidate of a crime without any sufficient evidence to prove that a crime did took place.
Topic Starter
Please show me where I accuse him. You keep saying that I’m accusing him of a crime but are unable to provide any evidence.
He said something that may damage his image, and I am sharing what he said to the public. You cannot say that he is not malicious, the most you can do is keep him in the campaign.
Surely you aren’t trying to argue that he never said he wanted to steal abrakers face? If not, then it is your responsibility to leave and remain 100% neutral.
All I am doing is sharing a questionable statement a candidate said, not accusing him of any crime.
He said something that may damage his image, and I am sharing what he said to the public. You cannot say that he is not malicious, the most you can do is keep him in the campaign.
Surely you aren’t trying to argue that he never said he wanted to steal abrakers face? If not, then it is your responsibility to leave and remain 100% neutral.
All I am doing is sharing a questionable statement a candidate said, not accusing him of any crime.
Ashton wrote:
abraker has his own face and others use fake ones, however, you as well as Katoumegumi seem to be messing with his DNA!
Ashton wrote:
It appears as an attempt to shift the blame or to take the spotlight off of him, Katoumegumi incriminated you.
With the proof of the image, he has altered and messed around with the DNA of abrakers face without consent. Hence the word ‘steal’. He has done so in the past, and wishes he could again.
Even if he does not get removed from the campaign, a president who chooses to steal another persons face, and a president who somehow knows the exact procedures to do so, is frightening.
Ashton wrote:
Katou Megumi: A danger to OT
Is this enough proof for you?
Topic Starter
It is the truth. And that is not proof of me accusing him of a crime.
I am not saying he is a criminal, I am saying that the images and history that is documented, after thinking critically, that he is a suspicious and scary figure in OT.
If I said I wanted to murder all OT denizens and had a history of doing such activities, it would be fair for another candidate to show my messages and past activities to warn the public; but I have not, and never intend to. Katou, on the other hand, has these messages and the past, and all I am doing is sharing them with the public.
Please lose your bias, it feels like you are targeting me due to past quarrels as an attempt to bosh my campaign, even though I am abiding by all rules. Even if these are not your intentions, you have no right to call me out for a critically thought out criticism of an opposing candidate, something you mentioned was perfectly fine in the rules.
I am not saying he is a criminal, I am saying that the images and history that is documented, after thinking critically, that he is a suspicious and scary figure in OT.
If I said I wanted to murder all OT denizens and had a history of doing such activities, it would be fair for another candidate to show my messages and past activities to warn the public; but I have not, and never intend to. Katou, on the other hand, has these messages and the past, and all I am doing is sharing them with the public.
Please lose your bias, it feels like you are targeting me due to past quarrels as an attempt to bosh my campaign, even though I am abiding by all rules. Even if these are not your intentions, you have no right to call me out for a critically thought out criticism of an opposing candidate, something you mentioned was perfectly fine in the rules.
You literally accused him of "stealing abraker's DNA" lmao.
Do tell me how were you going to send an impeachment request without accusing anyone of a crime?
And the title of your thread is negatively affecting KatouMegumi's reputation, especially now that he's running for president.
Ashton wrote:
I will send an impeachment request to the president at once.
Do tell me how were you going to send an impeachment request without accusing anyone of a crime?
And the title of your thread is negatively affecting KatouMegumi's reputation, especially now that he's running for president.
lol
ily CT
Topic Starter
Because that is what he did, he even shared recorded documents. Why would he want to steal his face *again*?
Of course the title is negatively effecting his reputation, the point isn’t to protect his reputation. Why do you think I should do that when he has sent these disturbing messages?
You would be impeached on the grounds of abusing your power and obstructing the presedential election. That is a desperate matter, of course.
Of course the title is negatively effecting his reputation, the point isn’t to protect his reputation. Why do you think I should do that when he has sent these disturbing messages?
You would be impeached on the grounds of abusing your power and obstructing the presedential election. That is a desperate matter, of course.
Oh so now you're accusing him lol.
I thought it wasn't proof of you accusing him?
Can you even prove that he stole and misused abraker's DNA in the first place?
Is that even considered a crime?
Does anyone other than you think it's "disturbing"?
You say that you made this thread to spread awareness and warn other denizens but what are you even warning them about?
And please do tell when have I abused my power or obstructed the election?
I thought it wasn't proof of you accusing him?
Can you even prove that he stole and misused abraker's DNA in the first place?
Is that even considered a crime?
Does anyone other than you think it's "disturbing"?
You say that you made this thread to spread awareness and warn other denizens but what are you even warning them about?
And please do tell when have I abused my power or obstructed the election?
Topic Starter
Tad, he said he wanted to steal abrakers face again.
I am not accusing him of anything, I am showing people what he did. Crime or not, the fact he wants to steal one of the council members faces is disturbing; do you want your face genetically removed?
You are obstructing the election by trying to disallow a perfectly rule abiding post made to constructively criticize an opposing candidate by showing a clear cut photo of a disturbing remark they have made. You are not viewing this objectively and as such, failing at your job. You do have the right to not remove him from the campaign, but cannot defend his reputation and say that he did not send these messages. Don’t get involved, because you are bringing forth your subjective opinions of the matter. Let the public decide!
I am not accusing him of anything, I am showing people what he did. Crime or not, the fact he wants to steal one of the council members faces is disturbing; do you want your face genetically removed?
You are obstructing the election by trying to disallow a perfectly rule abiding post made to constructively criticize an opposing candidate by showing a clear cut photo of a disturbing remark they have made. You are not viewing this objectively and as such, failing at your job. You do have the right to not remove him from the campaign, but cannot defend his reputation and say that he did not send these messages. Don’t get involved, because you are bringing forth your subjective opinions of the matter. Let the public decide!
Everyone wanted to steal his face, not just me. Candidate SamX500 also stole abraker's face back then. I wonder why you never mention him.
Basically this confirms you intentionally attacking me, being oblivious of who others also "stole" abraker's face.
Basically this confirms you intentionally attacking me, being oblivious of who others also "stole" abraker's face.
One last thing: Copying ≠ stealing.
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
You literally accused him of "stealing abraker's DNA" lmao.
Ashton wrote:
Because that is what he did, he even shared recorded documents. Why would he want to steal his face *again*?
This is literally a confirmation that you accuses him of such.
If this is about abraker's rights then he can complain about this himself.
As far as I know, only abraker's face was ever "stolen", and he seemed fine about it.
This is like if I punched abraker jokingly without hurting him and you use that to accuse me of potentially punching others around me without any reason.
And how is that even proof of me obstructing the election?
I did not "disallow" you making this thread.
I don't have the authority for that nor would I "disallow" you even if I do.
I'm only posting since your actions seems to violate one of the election rules, namely:
"- Be respectful, you are allowed to criticize other denizens/candidates but any personal attack under malicious intent are not acceptable and will be punished accordingly."
Topic Starter
How is this a personal attack under malicious intent?? Do you understand how much you are putting words into my mouth?
I am not violating any rules and you trying to twist what I have done into some malicious vandetta against katoumegumi is obstruction of the election.
Katoumegumi said he would like to steal abrakers face again. Sure, I am accusing him of this, because he DID say it!
Again, you are only sharing your subjective opinions of the matter, displaying your bias against me. It is up to other people to decide whether they want to vote for katoumegumi or not. Stop it, and be professional.
I am not violating any rules and you trying to twist what I have done into some malicious vandetta against katoumegumi is obstruction of the election.
Katoumegumi said he would like to steal abrakers face again. Sure, I am accusing him of this, because he DID say it!
Again, you are only sharing your subjective opinions of the matter, displaying your bias against me. It is up to other people to decide whether they want to vote for katoumegumi or not. Stop it, and be professional.
Wonder who's actually biased and ignorant here.
Anyway. I am not "Katou Megumi", I am "KatouMegumi", you dick. Don't try to "fix" it now. Tad has a copy of your thread.
This can be considered as a personal attack since you accused KatouMegumi of crimes without evidence to show for it and try to paint it in a bad picture.
Especially when both of you are campaigning for president, this can be interpreted as you trying to lower his reputation.
You accuse me of being unprofessional but all I'm doing is showing the contradictions in your posts and telling you that your behavior may in violation of the election rules.
Especially when both of you are campaigning for president, this can be interpreted as you trying to lower his reputation.
You accuse me of being unprofessional but all I'm doing is showing the contradictions in your posts and telling you that your behavior may in violation of the election rules.
Westonini wrote:
Topic Starter
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
This can be considered as a personal attack since you accused KatouMegumi of crimes without evidence to show for it and try to paint it in a bad picture.
That is the point of a presidential campaign, to criticize the opposing candidate.
I never accused him of a crime. Where have I said the word “crime” or “illegal”? Stop saying that. I said he made unsettling remarks, and literally showed a picture of him saying it.
KatouMegumi wrote:
Wonder who's actually biased and ignorant here.
?
This means nothing. You said to keep Role playing in Ot within those messages.
You said he displayed malicious behavior and then provide no proof of it in an atempt to lower his reputation.
That is not criticism.
That is not criticism.
Topic Starter
There is a picture attached to my original post, under the box titled “Graphic Content”.
In that box you will see an image where ketoumegumi says “I want to steal abraker’s face again”. This serves as the so called “proof” and is not disputable.
Stealing faces - I.e people’s own personal skin - is rather malicious.
This is criticism, tad. And yes, it is made to lower his reputation, because he said something so malicious. Any opinions you have don’t matter, and the fact that you have repeatedly (and continue to) shared your own opinions and view on the situation proves you have a bias against me, you fail to remain neutral and as such should be impeached; but that is another issue.
In that box you will see an image where ketoumegumi says “I want to steal abraker’s face again”. This serves as the so called “proof” and is not disputable.
Stealing faces - I.e people’s own personal skin - is rather malicious.
This is criticism, tad. And yes, it is made to lower his reputation, because he said something so malicious. Any opinions you have don’t matter, and the fact that you have repeatedly (and continue to) shared your own opinions and view on the situation proves you have a bias against me, you fail to remain neutral and as such should be impeached; but that is another issue.
I would really love to say "this is ot lol don't take it seriously", but unfortunately it's just a role play in ot. Blocking me is overreactive, though. I explicitly said to leave role play on ot, yet you blocked me as if out of in-character frustration. I think your line between reality and role play is really blurred. Take a break, after all you "resigned". Geez, I really just wanted to get to know you better. Seems like that's not the best ideas, as you had shown your true colours. </outofcharacter>
Well played, Fou du Canada! From now on, I'll just shitpost in this thread like a certain frog.
That picture in of itself doesn't prove anything. And certainly you cannot prove it's of malicious intent.
I've made my point rather clear here so I'll quote myself again.
If abraker had spoken out against such actions but KatouMegumi still continued to do so then I can agree with your reasoning.
But since nothing of such happened this thread is more of a tabloid piece written to attack him opportunistically during a presidential campaign.
I've made my point rather clear here so I'll quote myself again.
Tad Fibonacci wrote:
If this is about abraker's rights then he can complain about this himself.
As far as I know, only abraker's face was ever "stolen", and he seemed fine about it.
This is like if I punched abraker jokingly without hurting him and you use that to accuse me of potentially punching others around me without any reason.
If abraker had spoken out against such actions but KatouMegumi still continued to do so then I can agree with your reasoning.
But since nothing of such happened this thread is more of a tabloid piece written to attack him opportunistically during a presidential campaign.
Topic Starter
If I said “let’s murder all ot denizens” it would be fair to use that against me.
Honestly, what are you even trying to achieve at this point. Stealing someone’s face is pretty malicious, and abraker hasn’t commented at all besides making a national abraker face day - or whatever.
What if he’s too scared to comment, in feat katoumegumi will attack him again? What if he made the holiday so he can endure the harassment for only one day?
It’s all speculation, and you’re speculating that he’s fine, although I messaged him directly about this and he didn’t give an obvious answer. (You can ask me to send you his response).
If the citizens think stealing a face... key word ‘stealing’, the word that katoumegumi used and is photographed, is a trait they want in their presidents, then fine, so be it. But that is not up to you to decide so stop making unnecessary opinions. If you wanted to have an opinion, then leave your job and let someone else run this election.
I’m sorry I blocked you? Role playing or not, you’ve never tried to talk to me before and I couldn’t help but think you were trying to get some sort of info out of me for whatever reason.
Honestly, what are you even trying to achieve at this point. Stealing someone’s face is pretty malicious, and abraker hasn’t commented at all besides making a national abraker face day - or whatever.
What if he’s too scared to comment, in feat katoumegumi will attack him again? What if he made the holiday so he can endure the harassment for only one day?
It’s all speculation, and you’re speculating that he’s fine, although I messaged him directly about this and he didn’t give an obvious answer. (You can ask me to send you his response).
If the citizens think stealing a face... key word ‘stealing’, the word that katoumegumi used and is photographed, is a trait they want in their presidents, then fine, so be it. But that is not up to you to decide so stop making unnecessary opinions. If you wanted to have an opinion, then leave your job and let someone else run this election.
I’m sorry I blocked you? Role playing or not, you’ve never tried to talk to me before and I couldn’t help but think you were trying to get some sort of info out of me for whatever reason.
Guys do you like poppies on a stick? I am taking a shit right now, one poopie on a stick = 0.99c! Limited stock!
Ashton wrote:
If you wanted to have an opinion, then leave your job and let someone else run this election.
Apparently, I cannot have opinions if I have a job lmao.
Ok you're right, abraker is too scared to do anything. Poor abraker cannot defend himself from all of the harassments that he's getting.
It's only up to you to fight back the corrupt system.
It takes a huge amount of courage to be that vulnerable and I'm so proud of you Ashton.
Topic Starter
Your job is to fairly deal with all of the candidates, and since you control the votes, have no bias.
By sharing your opinions of the matter you are admitting that you are even a little biased, which makes me question your legitimacy when you go calculate the votes.
By sharing your opinions of the matter you are admitting that you are even a little biased, which makes me question your legitimacy when you go calculate the votes.
Здравствуй, небо в облаках,
Здравствуй, юность в сапогах,
Пропади, моя тоска, вот он я, привет, войска.
Эх, рельсы-поезда, как я попал сюда.
Здесь не то, что на гражданке,
На какой-нибудь гражданке,
Жизнь снаружи и с изнанки,
Сам попробуй изучи, для печали нет причин.
Непросто быть собой, когда шагает строй,
Только сердце птицей бьётся
И ликует, и смеётся, и ему не удаётся
Под конвоем петь в груди,
Знать бы, что там впереди.
Где-то течёт река,
Где-то дом, где всё ждут нас назад.
Это не грусть слегка,
Просто ветер щекочет глаза.
Где-то течёт река,
Где-то дом, где всё ждут нас назад.
Это не грусть слегка,
Просто ветер щекочет глаза.
Шаг вперёд и два назад,
Кто бы знал чему я рад,
Просто сбросил я печаль,
Словно голову с плеча.
На стыках рельсов путь
В виски вбивает пульс.
Ты поймёшь, как будет нужно,
Где предательство, где дружба,
Где карьера, а где служба
И как сердце безоружно.
Как обманчива наружность,
Сколько звёзд и сколько лычек,
Сколько лиц, личин, отличий
И как мало в нас различий.
Здравствуй, юность в сапогах,
Пропади, моя тоска, вот он я, привет, войска.
Эх, рельсы-поезда, как я попал сюда.
Здесь не то, что на гражданке,
На какой-нибудь гражданке,
Жизнь снаружи и с изнанки,
Сам попробуй изучи, для печали нет причин.
Непросто быть собой, когда шагает строй,
Только сердце птицей бьётся
И ликует, и смеётся, и ему не удаётся
Под конвоем петь в груди,
Знать бы, что там впереди.
Где-то течёт река,
Где-то дом, где всё ждут нас назад.
Это не грусть слегка,
Просто ветер щекочет глаза.
Где-то течёт река,
Где-то дом, где всё ждут нас назад.
Это не грусть слегка,
Просто ветер щекочет глаза.
Шаг вперёд и два назад,
Кто бы знал чему я рад,
Просто сбросил я печаль,
Словно голову с плеча.
На стыках рельсов путь
В виски вбивает пульс.
Ты поймёшь, как будет нужно,
Где предательство, где дружба,
Где карьера, а где служба
И как сердце безоружно.
Как обманчива наружность,
Сколько звёзд и сколько лычек,
Сколько лиц, личин, отличий
И как мало в нас различий.
Ashton wrote:
Your job is to fairly deal with all of the candidates, and since you control the votes, have no bias.
By sharing your opinions of the matter you are admitting that you are even a little biased, which makes me question your legitimacy when you go calculate the votes.
It's impossible for anyone to be absolutely unbiased.
Though believe it or not, I'm not biased against you. I simply find your thread questionable and then pointed them out.
Topic Starter
Oh well perhaps I was wrong. I would like to apologize for my behaviour, and all of my respect goes to katoumegumi.
Hey! My poopie sticks sold out!
Next new flavored batch coming in!
New flavor! Pancaked poopies! Munchy crust of a pancake pan!
Might I add, it may have be difficult to prove KatouMegumi stole Abraker’s face since KatouMegumi’s appearance is currently under the influence of cargirl serum.
I saw a certain denizen whose profile picture displayed evidence of face-stealing yesterday, mighty suspicious times indeed!
I saw a certain denizen whose profile picture displayed evidence of face-stealing yesterday, mighty suspicious times indeed!
this makes me scared for when propaganda against my campaign finally emerges
Ashton messaged me to come here 8 hours ago and I've frankly got no idea what this is about or whether this should be taken seriously.
Can I just peacefully transfer my office over to someone without drama going on here?
Can I just peacefully transfer my office over to someone without drama going on here?
I finally got back and this is some drama. Girls, stop fighting over me, it's embarrassing!
abraker wrote:
I finally got back and this is some drama. Girls, stop fighting over me, it's embarrassing!
B-B-B-B-Baka!
It's not like we're fighting over you or anything. Don't get any ideas!
(>_<)
This thread aged like...wait a second.
ColdTooth wrote:
yawn