abraker wrote:
well those are old-oldfags who are long gone since the Valhalla era of OT
For every OT era you survive, you get to add one old to your fag
abraker wrote:
well those are old-oldfags who are long gone since the Valhalla era of OT
Meah wrote:
Am I an oldfag?
that's toxicRazzy wrote:
glad this place is dead tbh
faggotPrincess Kisses wrote:
that's toxicRazzy wrote:
glad this place is dead tbh
One can never truly stay away from Off-Topic.abraker wrote:
long time no see
TeeArctic1 wrote:
Have you ever seen anything more beautiful than several pages of new threads to reply to?
TeeArctic1 wrote:
abraker wrote:
well those are old-oldfags who are long gone since the Valhalla era of OT
For every OT era you survive, you get to add one old to your fag
noMeah wrote:
4 years, am I old fag now?
Will I become an old fag?silmarilen wrote:
noMeah wrote:
4 years, am I old fag now?
Maybe one day.Meah wrote:
Will I become an old fag?silmarilen wrote:
no
oh my god hey yuu-chii, how long has it been since I last read that nameYuu-Chii wrote:
boi
I'm suprised that silmarilen and BrokenArrow is still around
And silmi you still have that "waifu signature"
abraker wrote:
idk who is yuu-chii
I don't really check the forum much anymore tbh. Back in the old days i would have more posts in a week than i have in a year now.Yuu-Chii wrote:
boi
I'm suprised that silmarilen and BrokenArrow is still around
I don't care enough about my sig to do anything with it lol. Before i had this it was empty anyway.Yuu-Chii wrote:
And silmi you still have that "waifu signature"
Tfw that avatar is considered old now.johnmedina999 wrote:
His old, green-haired avatar was better.
silmarilen wrote:
oh
silmarilen wrote:
who are you?
silmarilen wrote:
please stop doingthis
adrian1309 wrote:
owo
Sucks this!Serraionga wrote:
Meah wrote:
am I old fag now?
Westonini wrote:
Nope, you're still Meah.
BASEDsilmarilen wrote:
i do
First of all, that is completely false. If you think that a 15yo girl births healthier children than a woman in her early to mid 20's, then you need to actually do some research. The reason I think that you actually believe that is because you said: "CHILDREN birth the healthiest babies."Vuelo Eluko wrote:
Speaking strictly in terms of biology here, children birth the healthiest babies. The older the mother, the worse off her spawn are in general. I missed the conversation so I'm not sure what bearing it has but there ya go.
This quote is where most of the original debate stemmed from. I can't even begin to address how ignorant B1rd's statement was. While it is true that being attracted to post-pubescent children over the age of 12-13 isn't Pedophilia, it is still Hebephilia and Ephebophilia, which is still extremely disgusting and illegal for the most part in the US. The only reason I say "for the most part" is because 18 and 19-year-olds are also included in the Ephebophilia category.B1rd wrote:
I'm not trying to justify anything, and being attracted to 15 year olds isn't paedophilia. Pedophilia is concerned with pre-pubescent children, and generally 15 and 16 years olds have their reproductive faculties in order. Reproductive capability is pretty much the main determining factor for attractiveness, because obviously reproduction is the main purpose of human sexuality. So yes it is normal for men, even older men, to be attracted to 15 or 16 year old girls who've gone through puberty.