hey
[General]
adding some soft whistles for the piano at the start would be sweet
00:32:107 - 00:34:866 - use finishes for the slider heads, similar to 00:29:349 - since the snares are on the tick before
[Normal]
ar 5 is a bit high for lowest diff. 4 or 4.5 would be better imo
00:06:762 (3,4,1) - this is really dense, since you dont have an easy. making 00:06:762 (3,4) - a 1/2 reverse would b better
00:15:556 (7) - nc for finish?
01:06:418 (2,3) - u should try avoid single tapping 1/2s, u can try a rhythm that uses a slider end instead
http://puu.sh/txNvj/26cb98403b.jpg or just remove 01:06:418 (2)
patterns look quite cramped, which is probably attributed to your low sv choice
[Hard]
ar 7 or 7.5
00:10:556 (2,3) - dont think the jump is necessary here
00:19:693 (7,8,9) - 00:22:452 (7,8,9) - 00:23:831 (3,4,5,6) - 00:25:211 (7,8,9) - a lot of your patterns are visually inconsistent, try going through with ds again to make these look nicer
00:29:866 (4,5,6,7) - 00:32:969 (5,6,7) - this stuff is more difficult than the patterns in the chorus because of the spacing. consider reducing this so the more intense parts are the most difficult ;;
[Insane]
00:07:280 (1) - implied flow is a little awkward, since 00:06:935 (7,8,9,10) - indicates anti-clockwise motion yet the slider does the opposite. ctrl h'ing would work better imo
00:17:624 - why skip the triplet here?
00:45:383 (2,3,4,5,1) - hm maybe descending spacing would be better since drum pitch lowers (?)
00:50:038 (4,5) - since you seemed to be generally against overmapping stuff 00:50:211 - u could just make this a 1/1 slider
00:50:728 - skipped a drum?
01:01:245 (1,2,3) - 01:02:624 (1,2,3,4) - these sliders seem kinda randomly placed, perhaps you could do more repeating patterns for repeating sounds, like 01:00:211 (2,3,4)
01:09:693 (2,3,4) - since this is linear, all the emphasis is on 01:09:866 (3) - perhaps you could move 01:09:866 (3) - closer to 01:09:693 (2)
gl!