1. The Judgement (5.23 stars, 1120 notes)

ScubDomino wrote:

m4m

00:22:926 (4,5,1,2,3) - the song supported downbeat emphasis through both vocals and kicks but u represented them with a slider that clicks at 00:23:263 (1) - which gives pretty misleading impact rhythm wise (not to mention reverse emphasis appears nowhere else in the map) would do something like this instead as we can all hear the kick throughout the whole song, i didn't follow kick here. lyric dividing and synth sounds are the reason i start a slider with a new combo here: 00:23:263 -
00:32:365 (1,2,1) - tbh the angular and spacing emphasis of this pattern makes it a bit underemphasized and awkward especially impact-wise since it leads to a new section. Would recommend putting 00:32:533 (2) - somewhere (or stack directly) near 00:32:196 (2) - so it gives more movement impact ok
01:14:752 (1) - you should probably end this spinner 1/2 beat before the circle tbh as u did with all other spinners ok
03:23:767 (1) - do this pls thx xd k
05:32:194 (5) - maybe NC here (and not buffer since DS is quite small between the next slider so this is basically completely cheesable) k

also make mp3 192kbps pls thx

dsco wrote:

hello mv1, old friend :`)

00:26:803 (1,2,1,2,3) - maybe nerf this slightly? its odd to have such hard 1/4 pattern here could use something like 01:01:185 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - yes
02:43:817 (1) - 02:54:603 (1) - hmm, odd to not have circle when the synth sound changes like the last two times added
03:22:588 (2,1) - possible to make it so they dont touch? to this part i still haven't came up a good idea. for now i changed it to another pattern.
03:38:767 (2) - if this was higher the slider borders wouldnt clash k
04:01:857 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - feel like this pattern could be slightly more obvious um, i think it's okay now
04:14:329 (3,7) - could make these kicksliders to emphasize the synth sound the kick here is strong enough so i'll keep them as circles

such good patterns
call me back! (and dont forget to fix mp3)

1. Actually 01:36:287 - this redline is placed early by ~20-25ms. So the right offset would be ~96310-96315. And like with current offset I constantly have 15-20 ms earlier hits. Also, I asked my fellow bns, they think too that it goes early.
2. 00:16:239 (3,1) - actually it is better to swap NC because they sound as a complete stanza and it sounds pretty odd having combo 00:15:733 (1,2,3) - and then NC that one 00:16:407 (1) - . Also, unNC that one 00:15:733 (1) - bc as I said earlier 00:15:565 (1,1,2) - this sounds as a complete stanza as well!
3. Maybe bigger spacing to 00:21:464 (1) - because like that whole pattern 00:20:789 (1,1,1,2) - doesn't use stacks. Or the other option is to make spacing to 00:21:801 (2) - smaller bc beat under that isn't really so prominent.
4. 00:47:587 (3) - NC to make that fit with 00:44:891 (1) - , ot remove NC from 00:44:891 (1) - also an option. I prefer removing NC from 00:44:891 (1) - bc music implies that as a whole imo.
5. 03:07:473 (1,2,3,4) - compare to 03:10:170 (1,2,3) - and 03:04:777 (1,2,3) - it seems kinda weird that spacing to 03:07:810 (4) - is thaaat big. Music is calm and no really reason musical-wise to make such a big jump, that will kinda mislead player also harms that part's overall structure. Consider making that smaller. Maybe placing triplet here.
6. Remove NC 04:23:821 (1) - / 04:24:496 (1) - / 04:25:170 (1) - bc u didn't place NC to those sliders (04:07:305 (1,2,3) - and 04:07:979 (1,2,3) - do not have NC).

Namki wrote:

few things!
[The Judgement]

1. Actually 01:36:287 - this redline is placed early by ~20-25ms. So the right offset would be ~96310-96315. And like with current offset I constantly have 15-20 ms earlier hits. Also, I asked my fellow bns, they think too that it goes early. yea, i used 96311 and it sounds much better now
2. 00:16:239 (3,1) - actually it is better to swap NC because they sound as a complete stanza and it sounds pretty odd having combo 00:15:733 (1,2,3) - and then NC that one 00:16:407 (1) - . Also, unNC that one 00:15:733 (1) - bc as I said earlier 00:15:565 (1,1,2) - this sounds as a complete stanza as well! sure
3. Maybe bigger spacing to 00:21:464 (1) - because like that whole pattern 00:20:789 (1,1,1,2) - doesn't use stacks. Or the other option is to make spacing to 00:21:801 (2) - smaller bc beat under that isn't really so prominent. i made the spacing bigger a little
4. 00:47:587 (3) - NC to make that fit with 00:44:891 (1) - , ot remove NC from 00:44:891 (1) - also an option. I prefer removing NC from 00:44:891 (1) - bc music implies that as a whole imo. ok, i removed nc of 44:891
5. 03:07:473 (1,2,3,4) - compare to 03:10:170 (1,2,3) - and 03:04:777 (1,2,3) - it seems kinda weird that spacing to 03:07:810 (4) - is thaaat big. Music is calm and no really reason musical-wise to make such a big jump, that will kinda mislead player also harms that part's overall structure. Consider making that smaller. Maybe placing triplet here. i moved 4 closer, because the triplet is a part of the whole symmetry pattern which starts at 03:05:282 - and ends at 03:07:473 -
6. Remove NC 04:23:821 (1) - / 04:24:496 (1) - / 04:25:170 (1) - bc u didn't place NC to those sliders (04:07:305 (1,2,3) - and 04:07:979 (1,2,3) - do not have NC). sure

call me back when ur ready