Regraz wrote:

Recheck.

I think it is still quite inappropriate to leave so many mappable blanks in the intro. I think the intro should at least be shorter than 20% to show enough commitment toward the song and the map. So I'd like to suggest, as a kind of trade-off for your concerns, starting mapping from 00:23:920 so that the intro will only be 19.9% and you could map the sentence in a whole so as not to make it sounds weird to start in the middle of a sentence. You need to adjust the timing point as well.

What about the diff name change I mentioned in my mod? I decided not to change since I think it makes the spread sound a bit more interesting to the player

About NC scheme in the top diff:
00:26:920 (1,2,1,2) - I think it is better to keep these in one combo as their structure is similar, it is not necessary to NC for hint for players as such spacing variation isn't that hard to that level of players. Same for latter identical patterns.

Trynna wrote:

looks like i tried to post something earlier but forum didn't want to work so my post was never done? oh

regarding the last difficulty of the mapset, there are some auto stacks that are tilting me incredibly, such as 01:07:795 (3,4,1) - 01:10:795 (4,5,1) - 01:07:795 (3,4,1) - . Tail + circle + head stacked are naturally no good, but since you used a low stack leniency it causes an effect that can be even worse (pic that uses sl 5 as an example), making the pattern harder to read than usual and also making your aesthetic really weird. I'd recommend manually stacking those or just increasing the sl (which is not the best option imo but idk) so this thing can be avoided

also the map is pretty cool, gl on ranking it

Trynna wrote:

looks like i tried to post something earlier but forum didn't want to work so my post was never done? oh

regarding the last difficulty of the mapset, there are some auto stacks that are tilting me incredibly, such as 01:07:795 (3,4,1) - 01:10:795 (4,5,1) - 01:07:795 (3,4,1) - . Tail + circle + head stacked are naturally no good, but since you used a low stack leniency it causes an effect that can be even worse (pic that uses sl 5 as an example), making the pattern harder to read than usual and also making your aesthetic really weird. I'd recommend manually stacking those or just increasing the sl (which is not the best option imo but idk) so this thing can be avoided

also the map is pretty cool, gl on ranking it

1. 00:25:045 (2) - Don't you want the ''girl'' vocal to be clickable like here? 00:27:670 (1,2) -
   
2. 00:56:170 (1) - ctrl+g would play a bit smoother i think, thats a pretty huge jump for 1/4 tbh
   
3. 01:09:295 (1) - don't think the nc is needed here?
   
4. 01:11:920 (1) - perhaps a ''distorted'' slider would work well for this effect like shadren did in his diff? example: https://voli.s-ul.eu/Tt3gVbPB.png

Voli wrote:

I agree with the stacking thing above as well, might be wise to address the issue properly. fixed

Insane

1. 00:25:045 (2) - Don't you want the ''girl'' vocal to be clickable like here? 00:27:670 (1,2) - This would break completely the pattern I created, since this rhythm 00:24:670 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - is what I aimed for at the introduction of the song, if I change here just to cover the "girl" it would make it sound a bit inconsistent through the rest of the intro
   
2. 00:56:170 (1) - ctrl+g would play a bit smoother i think, thats a pretty huge jump for 1/4 tbh done
   
3. 01:09:295 (1) - don't think the nc is needed here? lol but there is a nc already
   
4. 01:11:920 (1) - perhaps a ''distorted'' slider would work well for this effect like shadren did in his diff? example: https://voli.s-ul.eu/Tt3gVbPB.png I couldn't open the picture but I tried something myself

Rest of diffs looked good to me. Nice map! Call me for qualify

MaridiuS wrote:

01:13:982 (1,2,3,4,5) - vs 01:16:982 (1,2,3,4,5) - I don't seem to understand the inconsistency here? Same sounds yet first example has random low spaced fifth note which seems more like a mistake than on purpose.
|
top diff