Thanks!Yamicchi wrote:
Hi immediate M4M in case I forgot to do it xd
[General]
• I heard you need higher res BG so here you go (2685x1920). Feel free to crop/resize it your way i mean more high-res bg' not higher res bg but thanks anyway!
• Glaze's diff is the only one with Widescreen support turned on. Consider turning it off. done
• I would prefer having at least 1 spinner for Hard and Challenger diff, in order not to turn the leaderboard into a race with 1 players in top 1 years by years till i found a proper place to add
[Easy]
• 00:49:211 (1) - About this sliderend, I understand that you wanna make consistent pattern with 00:46:134 (1) - but this one deserves a circle on it though. That way it would represent the vocal better i prefer mine, it works fine in my view
• 00:55:365 (1,2) - Meanwhile, also to represent the vocal better, I think these should be a reverse slider. Having 00:56:134 (2,3) - these both circles while there's a huge difference in pitch and intensity of vocal is pretty weird. changed
• 01:00:750 (5) - Minor stuff. It would look better if you adjust the red anchor a bit? http://puu.sh/x8GAE/80b29907e1.jpg k
• 01:27:673 (2) - Well I noticed the vocal ends on red tick but I think it's better to end the slider on 01:28:827 - though would reconsider, keep for now
[Normal]
• 01:00:750 (2,1) - Just asking but having a burst to 1.34x spacing acceptable? :d yes, you can apply different spacing to different time gaps for readability/visual sake
• 01:01:519 (1,2) - 01:13:827 (1,2) - Why do you have to make these inconsistent? Imo having consistent pattern twice wouldn't be a problem though cuz 01:11:519 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - is a long chain of 1/2 rhythms i want a little break
• 01:12:096 (3,4,5) - Minor stuff. Usually you don't make the flow turn so harsh like this, for example 01:02:865 (4,5) - 01:15:173 (4,5) - so if you don't mind, lowering 01:12:673 (4,5) - would do adjusted
[Hard]
• 00:14:788 (4,5) - Why was the spacing raised so high here? for visual, it comes with a stack so i guess the jump isnt too overkill
• 00:19:788 (3,1) - well imo it would be nice to have a bit of spacing emphasis here, I guess it won't be as much as 00:16:519 (5) - but ye 1.6x spacing
• 00:37:096 (2) - The 2 beats here is similar to 00:37:481 (3) - and 00:37:673 (4) - sliderstart instead of just 4, so I think ctrl+g 00:37:481 (3,4) - maybe? following vocal in my rhythm sense
• 01:03:442 (2,3) - Umm I still think even with 156bpm this spacing is a bit too big tbh, also compare with 01:15:750 (2,3) - . Can you decrease it somehow? decreased
• 01:11:711 (2,3,1) - It'd be great if you could breat the flow of 3-1 somehow, like what you did for 01:12:673 (2,1) - to emphasize the strong beat better? yea i agree but i found it pain to adjust everything for this
[Challenger]
• 00:20:750 (1,2,3,4) - Just curious why you choose to have alternative spacing decreasing for these but not for 00:21:134 (1,2,3,4) - these too? spacing is so small that decreasing won't look so impactful
• 00:37:288 - but this beat includes both vocal and drum, why is it unclickable ;w; still, following vocal in my rhythm sense,
if more ppl found it weird i'll make a change
• 00:52:769 (3) - Minor but how about less overlap, to be easier when reading it? i try
• 00:58:442 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Woah impressive <3
Ok that's all I guess. Not much since this is a good set already :3