that difficulty name.
00:06:465 (3) - don't understand why this is here,not really necessary and no important sounds (or sounds at all) are present here.as a technical map,it's a bit weird to include this,but i'm not saying you have to.
00:10:751 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - imo you should've kept the same pattern you had with 00:09:379 (1,2,1,2) ,as the sound continues in the background,but even if you don't,consider changing 00:13:493 (1,2,3) to fit with the patterns set by 00:10:751 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) .
00:14:522 (8,9) - these would look nicer if they were similar to 00:03:551 (8,9) .
00:18:636 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4) - 00:19:322 (1) should stay a stream like 00:18:636 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) before it,and 00:19:493 (2) should be the start of the new combo,not 00:19:665 (1) .
00:23:093 (1,2,3,4) - 00:23:093 (1,2) should be lengthened to a four beat stream rather than a 2 beat stream,remove 00:23:265 (3) and place 00:23:436 (4) at the end of the stream instead,as it follows the music better.this pattern should remain the standard of this section until 00:28:579,where i think it's appropriate to try a new pattern.
00:30:122 (1,2,3) - this little slider thing looks nicer and fits the map better:
00:30:808 (5,6,7,8,9) - should be extended so it ends just before 00:31:322 (1) .
00:33:379 (1,2,3,4) -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRW8EGbdfLA00:56:008 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,1,2,3) - i feel like this section would work a lot nicer and the map would stand out more if you just made this part one big slider art.and another separate slider art at 01:01:493 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) .
01:13:493 (3) - since you aren't stressing this,why put it so far apart from 01:12:979 (2) ?it's kinda jarring.move it a bit closer to the previous slider.
01:17:779 (2) - this would work pretty well if stacked on the end of 01:17:265 (1) .
01:20:351 (1) - stream?
01:23:779 (2) - stacked on top of either the end or start of 01:23:436 (1) it would look a lot nicer.
01:25:151 (2) - put this at the end of 01:24:465 (1) to better lean into 01:25:322 (3) ,unless you're stressing this part for some reason.
01:26:179 (1) - stack this at the end of 01:25:836 (1) rather than at the beginning.
01:26:179 (1,2) - something like this:
01:27:551 (1,2) - and like this:
would work well with the music of the map.
01:28:922 (1,2,3,4) - rearrange this into a diamond shape to fit the rhythm of the map:
01:32:693 (4) - why doesn't this follow the pattern set by 01:31:665 (1,2,3) and instead uses the pattern of 01:33:036 (1,2,3,4) ?especially since this slider isn't a new combo and isn't stressed.
01:35:779 (1,2,3,4,5) - doesn't really make sense to break the slider pattern so early,maybe do another interesting slider thing like this:
01:38:522 (1,2) - start leaning into the pattern set by 01:38:865 (1,2,1,2) .
01:40:236 (1) - ctrl+g?
01:42:293 (3,4) - this is a bit boring.do something like this:
(the timing point is 0.5x btw)
01:42:979 (1,2) - transition this to 01:43:322 (1,2) by using ctrl+g on 01:43:151 (2) .
01:44:608 - this spot feels lonely.
01:50:693 (1,2) - maybe make this a fast moving 1/4 slider
01:51:808 (4) - put this just a bit closer to 01:51:551 (3) because of time-distance equality.
01:53:265 (1,2) - this breaks rule 7 of the
osu!standard ranking criteria.consider changing it to this:
01:54:551 (4) - move this to x:354 y:205 to match with the previous slider's visual circular flow.
01:55:322 (1) - since you already overlapped a slider at 01:53:265 (1) ,why not do the same with this slider?
01:55:665 (2,3) - move these like this to match in symmetry:
01:57:293 (4) - move this to x:456 y:246 to both match with the previous slider's visual circular flow and to match the song's time distance equality.
01:58:065 (2,3) - 1/4 sliders maybe?this is kinda boring on its own.
01:58:922 (9) - stack this on the end of 01:59:093 (1) .
01:59:436 (2) - make this a 1/4 slider that matches the shape of 01:59:093 (1) by changing the slider velocity multiplier.
02:03:036 (6) - maybe put this on top of 02:02:779 (5) ?
02:03:208 (1,2) - switch these two,then move 02:03:379 (2) to x:221 y:116 so it looks like this:
02:03:893 (4,5,6,7) - move this up a bit to lean into 02:04:236 (8) .
02:04:751 (2) - moving this to x:137 y:333 makes it look cool but might be a bit confusing,so i'll leave this to you.
02:05:522 (3) - move this to match the previous slider's time distance equality and it's visual circular flow.
02:05:951 (5) - new combo?
02:09:722 (7) - curve this a bit to match with 02:09:893 (8) .
02:15:722 (1,2) - should these just be 1/2 beats?i mean it makes a pattern that would connect 02:15:551 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) .
02:21:036 (1,2,3) - either merge this with 02:21:379 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) or make 02:21:036 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) be like 02:21:036 (1,2,3) .
02:29:522 (2) - this beat should go on a 1/6 tick,which would be 02:29:493 .
02:29:951 (1,2) - switch these two around and move what is now 02:30:179 (2) to the nearest 1/6 tick like with 02:29:522 (2) .
02:30:636 (1,2,5,6) - like the previous two above.
02:50:522 (7) - add a new combo here.
02:56:008 (7) - take away the reverse arrow and place a beat on 02:56:693 (8) at x:231 y:98.