Bakari wrote:

As requeted

[General]

1. soft-hitfinish44.wav is about 5 seconds long, it overlays with the other hitsounds and feels too spammed. Replace or cut it shorter, perhaps? ✔fixed

[Normal]

1. 00:34:912 (3) - minor - the sudden curve near the end visually stands out from the context. Probably a softer curve would match better. ✔fixed
2. 03:06:262 (4,5) - you can merge them into one slider, (5)'s head does not really follow any significant beats and feels overdone. ✔fixed
   
   I'd consider adding spinners in place of 00:55:312 (1) - these sliders as they feel too slow and they seem to lack intensity. Apart from that it's all good. i want to keep current one for better playing. i dont think newest players play well when they spin. sorrrrrry QQ

[Collab Hard]

• 
  Alarido
  

1. 12 seconds difference in drain time for a collab difficulty is kind of too much, if you ask me. What made you add three additional breaks? seems he didnt want to map that part and i followed him for make consistent.
2. 00:22:312 (2) - the 1/8 sliders clearly should use silenced tails (5% volume) as otherwise there is an unwanted sound played.✔fixed
3. 01:05:812 (5,6,7) - 01:08:512 (5,6,7) - it would be cool to somehow space them differently to increase readability.
   Note: 01:16:312 (3,4,1) - (1) here could also use some larger spacing for readability purposes. sliders play different from circles, since its leniency allow for different movements and also you don't need to click them properly to get 300s, that's why sliders bring such liberty of placement

• 
  Euny

1. 02:37:462 (6) - assuming the slider is following the bass line, the reverse on it is unwanted as the bass sound is only 1/4 beat long.
   Note: same 02:41:812 (5,6,7) - 02:56:662 (6) - here. Basically, you can refer to Alarido's part to be consistent with his and your own rhythm choice.

Just a few things here and there. It is okay, though the drain time could definitely be added.

✔applied all thanks bakaring![CBH's Extra]

1. 00:25:312 (1,2,3,4) - considering that you were jumping to the claps before and kept spacing pretty low, this pattern feels overdone. I would lower the DS while keeping spacing consistent.
2. 00:26:962 (2,3) - again, similar to the comment above, I feel like you should place a jump here to keep patterns consistent.
   Note: 00:32:962 (2,3) - 00:36:562 (2,3) - same here. The idea of jumps works pretty cool, keep it consistent!
3. 00:39:412 (5) - I don't agree with this being a slider, as the sliderslide feels unnecessary for the part and the beat on 00:39:712 - feels stronger. How about something like this as to stress the instruments better?
   Note: you might as well want to 00:38:962 (3,4) - Ctrl+G this pattern. // This suggestion would apply to the whole part.
4. 00:49:612 (3,4) - these look like a jump in a way. Let's try stacking instead as this would give extra emphasis to (4) and look/flow natural.
5. 00:56:212 (6,1) - in comparison with the way every other object around is spaced this is a considerable change. Probably they should have been spaced further.
   Note: 01:56:212 (4,1) - 01:58:612 (4,1) - 02:25:012 (5,1) - 02:32:212 (6,1) - and so on same here, especially when you compare these two with 01:56:212 (4,1,2,3) - unless you intended a sudden slowdown caused by low ds.the spacing is fine, it's readable and better for the playability
6. 01:11:512 (5,1) - minor - looks like they were meant to be parallel, yet they are not.
7. 02:20:962 (4) - unlike every other circle in the combo this one isn't supported by the snares. I would probably remove the circle here for a more natural feel of the rhythm. they are following the vocals
   
   Here and there are a few things I would probably suggest changing. I love the rest of the difficulty, it's polished and consistent.

✔applied all your suggestions without those 2

[MLBB]
I actually had to google what MLBB meant, ask around and see if people understand the difficulty name just to be sure it is good to go
because of you are a boy xD.. to be honest, this is really nice trendy diff name for 2017 in my opinion!

1. 00:47:812 (1,2,3,4) - 00:50:212 (2,3,4,5) - and similar - I have a feeling that using two sliders instead of circles would give a more playable pattern which would also reflect the song in a slightly more accurate way.
   Note: 00:55:012 (6,7,8) - 00:56:812 (3,4,5) - these should probably be mapped the same way. Or, if you really want to keep the circles, add one to 00:55:237 and 00:57:037 - - for consistency.
2. 00:57:112 (1) - I am not sure the shape is 100% readable, an extra opinion here would help. Alternatively, we can try something like this
3. 01:04:612 (2) - actually (2) feels weaker than (1) and (3), hence, I would probably Ctrl+G (2) to give some extra gimmick to the pattern and match the music better. ✔fixed
4. 03:12:112 (1) - ♥ was big work for me❤
   
   Good stuff, I like the way it feels.

✔applied all. thankyu again!

You know, get an extra check for the Easy, look through everything one more time and get back to me.

1. The hitsound is still 5 seconds long.

1. 00:23:512 (3,1) - if you care about blankets, this one can be improved.
2. 00:57:112 - let's remove the reverse and place a circle here to highlight the way music changes?
   Note: 02:33:112 - same.

1. 01:05:812 (5,6,7) - 01:08:512 (5,6,7) -yeah, sliders are different from circles. Yet it doesn't change the fact that the patterns appear nearly identical even though they use different snapping. The idea was to make them differ visually, so that it would be easier to sightread them.

1. 00:39:412 (5) - still remains unchannged without any reply.

Bakari wrote:

[General]

1. The hitsound is still 5 seconds long. ✔OMG xD.. got it i fixed

[Habi]

1. 00:23:512 (3,1) - if you care about blankets, this one can be improved. ✔fixed
2. 00:57:112 - let's remove the reverse and place a circle here to highlight the way music changes?
   Note: 02:33:112 - same.well i agree with you but i think better to keep for my normal diff. normal diff also dont have clickable object and it make more comfortable to play for newest guys in my opinion. i believe you will agree with me too bakaring

[Hard]

1. 01:05:812 (5,6,7) - 01:08:512 (5,6,7) -yeah, sliders are different from circles. Yet it doesn't change the fact that the patterns appear nearly identical even though they use different snapping. The idea was to make them differ visually, so that it would be easier to sightread them. ✔fixed

[CBH]

1. 00:39:412 (5) - still remains unchannged without any reply. 00:39:412 (5) - it's true that it has a strong beat at the end of the tail, but it isn't part of the rhythm I'm following with 00:38:512 (1,2,3,4,5) - so I just decide to leave it as a filler rhythm

the rest looks reasonable

Enon wrote:

축하드려용!

Gero wrote:

~ Qualified ~

Stjpa wrote:

that background looks familiar :thinking:

Natsu wrote:

gratz 바보

Enon wrote:

드디어ㅠ ㅠ 축하드려용!!

My Angel RangE wrote:

:thkinking:

Shmiklak wrote:

cool, grats

Left wrote:

gratz xd

IamKwaN wrote:

please link me a metadata reference regarding the current title and artist, thanks