DavidEd
00:10:145 (2,3,4) -his jump it's kinda.. idk, I doesn't really feel good, maybe stacking 00:10:406 (4) - with 00:09:884 (3) - would play better (less wided angle)
nazi: 01:11:319 (6) - stack sliderend with 01:10:406 (6) -
01:14:319 (5) - stack with 01:13:667 (6) - so this jump 01:14:449 (6,7) - doesnt feel too forced
01:54:493 (1,3) - ctrl+g these 2? its kinda hard to read atm
02:00:754 (2,3,4) - stack just 2 of them or do something like http://prntscr.com/fagofd these 3 stacked doesn't really plays good
nazi: 02:18:623 (2,4) - blanket?
nazi: 01:11:319 (6) - stack sliderend with 01:10:406 (6) -
01:14:319 (5) - stack with 01:13:667 (6) - so this jump 01:14:449 (6,7) - doesnt feel too forced
01:54:493 (1,3) - ctrl+g these 2? its kinda hard to read atm
02:00:754 (2,3,4) - stack just 2 of them or do something like http://prntscr.com/fagofd these 3 stacked doesn't really plays good
nazi: 02:18:623 (2,4) - blanket?
Bergy
02:28:406 (4) - make this slider into 2 circles? that would play better
02:35:971 (6) - ctrl+g? spacing here it's too short 02:35:841 (5,6) -
03:07:276 (2,3) - isnt spacing here too much? maybe make this slider 03:07:667 (4) - a - horizontal slider like the previous ones and make that spacing short
02:35:971 (6) - ctrl+g? spacing here it's too short 02:35:841 (5,6) -
03:07:276 (2,3) - isnt spacing here too much? maybe make this slider 03:07:667 (4) - a - horizontal slider like the previous ones and make that spacing short
I loved your thinking and the map