Thanks for your mod,it helped me to see my mistakes and gave me some idea :3Kazaze wrote:
Hello~
Here modding Zigi's diffZigizigiefe's TatsujinHope I helped!• There's a heavy drum sound on 00:10:164 - ; the same sound 00:09:864 (13,14) - are mapped on, so I would suggest you to start the slider from 00:10:314 - so you have space to put a D on 00:10:164 -
• 00:11:364 (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - Listening to the drums closely (at 25% playback rate ) ; the hitsounds should in my opinion be as such:Your suggestions also work but I represented intense guitar and how drum works,so it should be kept.
○ 00:11:439 (18) - Change to a d
○ 00:11:664 (21) - ^
○ 00:12:039 (26) - ^
• Change the hitsounds of 00:17:514 (84,85,86,87,88,89,90) - to match with 00:12:714 (34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - Applied and did something according to guitar.
• Remove 00:22:839 (139) - I don't think there's too much progression in the instrumentals to justify such a leap in difficulty Unlike the first part of this section,guitar goes totally 1/4 but I don't want to keep it so long because there are enough long streams.
• 00:25:239 (167) - ^ Same reason
• 00:42:114 (251,252) - Ctrl + g and change 00:42:264 (253) - to a d - It's closer to the drums in my opinion Drum sound at 00:42:339 (252) - isn't strong enough to be added kat,so it should be kept for now.
• 00:43:764 (272) - Change to a K? It sound very similar to 00:41:364 (241) - K D would not be good flow imo.I planned it to make here K D when I map but then chose clearer flow.
• 01:13:314 (106) - This k seems very out of place when listening to the instrumentals, change to a d Nice catch.
• 01:29:064 (45,46,47) - These should be ddk since it's the exact same as 01:28:764 (41,42,43) - kkd part is stronger and has higher pitch.I mixed drum + vocal here,so this way looks god imo.
• 01:29:739 - You could add a d here Vocal stops here,so highlighting drum would be weird here.
• There's a very distinct drum sound on 01:35:514 (111) - I think you should highlight it by changing this note to a k I don't need to emphasize snares for everywhere,vocal is probably stronger than drum.
○ Same suggestion with 01:36:714 (127) - ^
• 01:48:489 - add a d here, it's clearly missing Did you not see finisher o:
• 01:55:614 (314) - Change to a k ; see 01:53:664 (293,294,295) - It's ddd due to slight vocal.As I said,don't need to emphasize drum for everywhere :c
• 01:59:364 (353,354) - Ctrl + g ; Since 01:59:514 (354) - is the same type of drum sound as 01:58:314 (343) - Guitar is stronger than drum :/
○ 02:00:114 (360) - k for the same reasons Same above
• 02:00:564 (364,365) - Ctrl + g / Same reasons ^
• 02:03:714 (395) - Change to a k again Same reason
• 02:17:364 (436) - I think you can start your stream from here, remove finish and add a note on 02:17:439 - If you like ; But it works fine with that structure as well - Up to you I was thinking about it,but I've decided that since the sound at 02:17:439 - is too weak,finisher should be kept.
• 02:54:414 (714) - This note doens't correspond to any piano note ; Remove Oops..My bad ;w;
• 02:56:964 (723,724,725,726,727) - Why is that part following the piano cuts at 02:57:714 - and don't continue following the piano? Fixed,I suck at piano lol
• 03:14:364 (802,803) - You can change to a k to highlight the piano ; but it might be inappropriate lol It also works but drum is stronger than piano,it's good .w.
• 03:26:214 (28) - Change to a k to highlight the guitar It would be fine but I want to use different structure by following straight drum sounds for this pattern.
• 03:34:014 (99) - Change to a k ; see 03:32:664 (86,87,88) - Did something else xD
• 03:38:514 (150) - k? Since vocal stops,I should keep it :c
○ 03:41:214 (175) - k ; same reasons as previously -> 03:41:664 (178,179,180) - As I said ;;
• 03:55:989 - You can add a note but lose the Finisher ; I would recommend adding the note and removing the finisher since there's many finishers just after (03:56:364 (298,299) - ) ddddK pattern would not be a problem for me at all,but it also works good.I'll keep it for now,will decide later :U
• 05:35:299 (92) - k~ (just like 05:37:249 (112,113,114) -) and change 05:35:449 (93) - to a d for contrast Did something else
• 05:40:699 (143) - Distinct drum sound on this note / change to k It has lower pitch than previous note.
○ Same with 05:40:999 (147) - & 05:41:599 (155) - ^
• 05:43:549 (175) - You can change this to a k since it sound slightly different from 05:43:699 (176,177,178,179,180) - It would be good according to guitar but since drum is stronger than guitar,it's fine.
• 05:46:399 (204) - Distinct k sound I'm not fan of kdkdk patterns,it would break the flow.
• 05:54:199 (306) - change to a k ; it sounds lighter and stronger than 05:54:274 (307,308) - / Use ctrl+g on 05:54:799 (311,312,313) - if you applied the suggestion Changed the first pattern as kkk but kept the second one since guitar goes low-high.
• 06:00:199 (373) - k for guitar? Good idea
• I'm not sure that I understand perfectly what that 1/6 pattern is for 06:25:399 (658,659,660,661) - When you listen to here with 75% playback,you might hear a sound as if it was 1/6.
• 06:58:699 (997) - change to k -> 06:59:149 (1000,1001,1002) - Vocal..
○ Same with 07:06:799 (1078) - ^
• 07:04:399 (1055,1056) - Ctrl+g since 07:04:549 - should be highlighted as a k for the drum and guitar Actually 07:04:399 (1055) - is higher and stronger than this.
• Change 07:41:599 (154) - to a k -> 07:40:399 (142,143,144,145,146) - As I explained
• 07:53:749 (272,273,274) - ddk for contrast with 07:54:049 (275) - ; same with 07:54:349 (277,278,279) - ^
• I don't know why, but in my opinion these patterns : 08:03:649 (338,339,340,341,342) - would sound great with a d at the end of them :b Not bad idea but kat is the best way to emphasize snare sounds :3
Best of luck!!
I wanna see new BG Atsu (although current bg is gud ;_;) https://zigi.s-ul.eu/CERsEg1h