00:09:117 (1,2,3) - This flow was mean't to be circular, but it isn't a perfect circle (The shape of 3 is too wide)
01:34:192 (3,4,5) - Same here, the way the flow isn't perfectly circular makes it look like if 01:35:087 (4,5) - was part of another different pattern, and it isnt...
00:27:028 (5,6,1) - When you make this pattern like this, it looks like if 6 was part of the next pattern, when it isn't. You should make this two patterns more clearly recognizable, try something like this or similar:
That way, is clear that 1 is part of a different pattern.
00:29:714 (1) - Remove this NC. At this point, the music has already build up enough to not have such small combos. Proof: Just a moment ago you had a 6 notes combo xd
00:44:714 (2) - Why not just make this a rotated version of the previous one (00:44:043 (1) - )? Using simmetry is neat.
Same of above goes to:
00:54:789 (1,2) - 00:58:371 (3,4) - 01:01:953 (1,2) - 01:04:192 (2,3) -
Another cool reason to do it is because (If Im not mistaken) you are using 2 very similar sliders to represent very similar sounds of the song, right? So why not just make them simmetric? :'D
01:12:475 (1,2) - I don't think theres any truly notable sound on 01:12:923 - . It would be better if you extend the slider to 01:13:147 - .
01:14:266 (1,2) - Same here, nothing plays on the red beat, but both the vocal ends and a drum sounds on the white tick (01:14:938 - ), so you should extend that slider to end there.
01:43:819 (2,4) - Ehm idk bout that overlap
01:49:416 (2,3) - Blanket pls :^)
02:12:252 (2,1) - Also blanket
02:10:013 (1) - 02:13:595 (1) - Remove this two NCs, I don't think they are really neccesary
02:17:177 (1) - This pattern could definitely be neater. For a start, you could blanket it with 4 at the top
And with 2 at the bottom
02:18:968 (1) - One is too close to the slider, looks kinda weird, I would place directly in line with 2 (x:493)
02:25:013 (3,1) - Do the blanket
02:29:714 (1,2) - Those are two of the same shape, then, wouldn't it be nice to make that simmetry really clear? e.e
Something like this looks fine ^^^
02:35:759 (3) - Extend it to 02:36:207 - , that would reflect the vocals better
02:36:878 (1,2) - Woh this pattern looks weird, either blanket 1 and 2 (recommended), or just move 2 down.
02:40:013 (4,1) - They are too close, imo it would look better like this, dont you think? c:
02:40:460 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Okey, I think you are missing some pretty important notes here, this notes: 02:41:132 - 02:41:580 - 02:42:699 -
These should be clickable imo (and 02:41:356 - probably shouldnt). There are several ways you can re-arrange that rhytm, I'll just drop one:
Also 02:42:028 (1) - remove that NC
02:43:819 (1,2) - Blanket
02:45:610 (1) - I don't think this NC is neccesary neither
02:46:281 (2,3) - This transition from vocals to drums during a same combo is kinda ¿uh?, but maybe you can get away with it so shhh xd
03:07:326 (3,1) - Make 3 a "V" slider (A slider with a red nod xd) so its more distinguishable from 1
03:08:222 (1,2) - Blanket, or apply simmetry within 03:10:013 (1,2) - and 03:08:222 (1,2) -
03:13:595 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This patterns are basically two of the same, I would recommend you add some variation to one of them (I recommend you change the first one, I liked the second one)
03:14:266 (2,3) - (In case you decide not to change this first pattern, it still requires a little fix:)Move this notes to the left (I would say x:356, y:119) so the pattern looks more like a whole
03:15:386 (1) - NC not neccesary, remove
03:15:386 (1,2,3) - Also, what this pattern is missing is looking more like a circle, let's say something like this:
I rotated "3" 20 degrees clockwise and moved things a little xd
03:23:445 (3,1) - Fix blanket
03:24:341 (1,2) - You could blanket if you want xd
03:31:505 (1,2,3,4,1) - Instead of just a simple "waterfall drop",you could arrange these in a more insteresting way. Something polygonal would be nice. That would also prevent 03:33:296 (1) - from almost going off screen lol