Hi!
(NC - new combo, OC - old combo)
[General]
(NC - new combo, OC - old combo)
[General]
- No kiai?
- AR - For me 9.4AR in combo with 256 bpm is way too high here... It's really hard to read right now. Just try to search in your beatmaps "ar>=9.4 bpm>=200". If you weren't putting anything on blue ticks, ofc it would be fine, but you're putting streams for a reason. So maybe just go 9.3?
- 1/4 saved timeline step doesn't represent all notes, I guess it should be 1/12 instead? (i know that it's hard to look at 1/12 timeline step, but mappers can say from looking at this - "yeah, there are 1/4 and 1/3 notes, okay", and also all notes would be on some timeline positions. So there will be less possible misunderstandings).
- 00:06:128 - // 00:06:246 - There are two strong sounds on these, you are representing them with sliderstart and sliderend. Same sounds after 00:07:066 - // 00:07:183 - you represent with circle and sliderstart. Maybe you should make 00:06:011 (1) - OC, and make circle 00:06:128 - and next slider on 00:06:246 - ?
- 00:06:128 (2,3,4,5) - So, from ^ - all main clicks are half beat away now, sliderstart/end priorities are inverted. Sliders should start at white ticks and end on red ticks. It's really feeling strange when playing.
- 00:10:230 (1) - I'm not sure what this NC is for
- 00:17:319 (1) - Mute spinnerend? Sound doesn't respond to anything in music
- 00:19:839 - Listen carefully, you are missing bump here. Put a note on this place, or maybe even make a slider from this place to 00:20:777 -
- 00:30:151 (5) - NC?
- 00:32:963 (9) - There's no strong sound here, so circle feels awkward.. Maybe just make this space empty?
- 00:33:197 (1) - // 00:33:900 (4) - // 00:36:830 (3) - All of these sliderends are strong sounds, maybe make them clickable? Even if it's some gimmick, I feel it strange
- 00:40:580 (3,4) - Between those two you're missing strong sounds, they are similar to the sounds that you're mapping. So map them too, it's really blank when playing, player wants to click there, make player more happy
- 00:45:853 (5) - NC?
- 00:46:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Wow, those and consecutive same moments are really cooool ) Well done
- 01:06:360 - Strong sound here, it's sliderend. Make two circles from slider 01:06:243 (2) - , first near the previous slider 01:06:009 (1) - and second in a line of next 01:06:477 (3,4,5) - ?
- 01:10:930 (7,8,9,10) - There are 5 equal bumps, so I think you should represent them by 4 circles and sliderstart. You are filling non-bump space with sliderend like 01:10:813 (6) - , here it's different, there are 5 equal bumps. Also same bumps at 01:11:165 (10,11) - sliderends.
- 01:13:743 (2) - Strong sound on the end, same as 01:06:360 -
- 01:17:259 - It's pretty clickable sound here, make note on this place and start spinner right after?
- 01:17:259 (1) - Mute spinnerend?
- 01:21:009 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - Here dominates 1/3, that's ok. Starting from 01:21:946 (1) - and up to the end 01:23:821 (3) - of this small part dominates 1/4 part, so notes don't respond to the main part of the music. Listen carefully. Please fix it.
- 01:26:634 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Wow, those are most cool
- 01:57:569 (8) - NC?
- 01:57:569 (8,9) - Isn't this jump overwhelmengly big?
- 02:00:029 - This is pretty clickable, make 2 notes at the end and finish spinner a bit earlier.
- 00:17:261 (7) - NC? For emphasis
- 00:30:151 (5) - NC?
- 00:32:611 (4,1) - I dunno why, but this stacking feels bad while playing... I guess it's because 00:33:197 (1) - sound is different from what was before. So, maybe, unstack?
- 00:39:525 (7) - Make 1/2 slider instead of note, 00:39:642 - is not empty, so you should fill it
- 00:40:580 (3) - Instead of note make slider to 00:40:580 (3) - . Looks better cause there's continious sound in music.
- 00:42:220 (3) - ^ Same
- 00:56:048 (5) - Mute sliderend, you don't need this sound
- 00:56:634 (1,2) - From these two notes you can make 1/1 sliders; 00:57:337 (3) - this can be 2 times long, up to 00:57:805 - , now it looks cut
- 00:58:509 (4,5,6) - ^ Same
- 01:00:852 (3) - Delete this note and extend 01:00:266 (2) - slider to the notes timeline position. Now this note is questionable, sound is weak so sliderend looks better imho.
- 01:15:149 (7) - Strong sound on the end of this slider, you're missing it hard. Make note there, stack it with ongoing 01:15:501 (1,2) - and put NC on it.
- 01:17:259 - Missing sound here, make slider from 01:17:141 - or just put new note - see what's better
- 01:22:884 (9) - NC?
- 01:23:352 (3) - Make slider from 01:23:587 - to 01:23:704 - and note on 01:23:821 - . Sound on end of slider 01:23:704 (4) - is strong, player should click it.
- 01:30:384 (1) - You can divide this reverse slider into several reverse sliders, not it looks a bit boring
- 01:34:132 (3) - I'm not sure what is main for your mapping this combo. Two 1/2 sliders are ok to play, but this reverse slider after them looks strange, cause nothing changed in sound and reverse slider instead of 1/2 slider appears. Also maybe look carefully on all this combo.
- 01:35:070 (6,1) - Unstack, pls. Yeah, I guess, if something new in music appears, it shouldn't be stack with something else, so position also should signal, that it's something new
- 00:08:121 (7) - NC, for emphasis?
- 00:11:871 (1,2) - This pair of slider and _all_ same pair of sliders of the map don't really respond well to the music. Let's take slider 00:11:871 (1) - strong sounds are 00:11:871 - // 00:11:988 - // 00:12:222 - // 00:12:339 - I'm sure you already know it better than me from MAXIMUM diff. So sliderstart and sliderend are ok, but the middle of the slider ruins the flow.. As a result you're mapping 2 strong sounds and 1 non-sound position + missing 2 strong sounds. I think you need to change that somehow, sorry, I can't give a certain advice. At least I told about this concern.
- 00:16:558 (3) - This one is like ^, but there's even no strong sound on sliderend so that makes it even more strange
- So I won't write about same further sliders, if you will be up for changing those I guess you'll find those by yourself, you should be knowing map better than me
- 00:30:151 (5) - I don't really get why do you need the middle of the slider ( 00:30:737 - ), just make non-reverse slider from 00:30:151 - to 00:31:323 - ?
- 01:13:040 (4) - Don't you miss a sound on 01:13:274 - ? Make this 1/1 slider as previous and map 01:13:509 - with a circle or sliderstart, your choice
- 01:13:977 (6) - ^ Quite same
- 01:16:790 (5) - End this on next big white tick? Feels cut
- 01:21:009 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part feels strange, I can't actually say what sounds am I playing on that... Maybe erase it? Or remap somehow...
- 01:43:039 (5) - NC, you're doing it every 2nd big white tick on this part
- 01:46:789 (5) - ^ NC
- 01:50:070 (4) - End this on next big white tick?
- 00:08:121 (5) - NC, for emphasis?
- 00:15:152 (3) - Make this slider ending on 00:16:909 - , sound ends there. And curve it, long straight slider looks not good)
- 00:30:151 (3) - Why don't you want to end this slider on 00:31:323 - ?
- 00:33:197 (1,2) - How do these two sliders respond to the music?? (especially the 2nd one)
- 00:36:478 (1) - This slider and empty space between it and next slider also look weird
- 00:44:916 (2) - NC, after long gap old combo doesn't look any good
- 00:46:791 (1,2) - I'm not sure, is it appropriate to overlap things in easy?
- 01:00:852 (4) - NC
- 01:12:337 (2) - This slider doesn't respond to the music at all
- 01:16:321 (2) - End this on big white tick?
- 01:21:009 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Well, this part doesn't correlate to music or to previous parts... I think it needs to be remapped somehow (not sure how) or just erased
- 01:28:509 (3) - NC?