somewhere buried. im afraid to pull it up; refer to ot!neus ples.
abraker wrote:
I normally don't even look at ITT2. Where is this political and edgy debate everybody were killing themselves over for?
The last thing this place needs is another half-baked wannabe politics expert. :pabraker wrote:
I normally don't even look at ITT2. Where is this political and edgy debate everybody were killing themselves over for?
B1rd wrote:
>manly thread fine
>girly thread gets shoa'd
s------e------x-------i-------s------m
e
x
i
s
m
Not sure if you're being ironic but that's a top tier political opinion.Choofers wrote:
politics are for deadbrained poofters
everyone on earth deserves to die
now that's just being negativeChoofers wrote:
politics are for deadbrained poofters
everyone on earth deserves to die
me firstChoofers wrote:
politics are for deadbrained poofters
everyone on earth deserves to die
I don't even have to say anything cause you summed it up so well.Railey2 wrote:
having opinions by yourself in your quiet private little chamber isn't the definition of being involved with politics, i'm pretty sure.
if you want to define ''thinking about anything that could even remotely affect other people'' as ''being intrinsically involved with politics'', then ok... but that doesn't seem like a very useful definition.
Way too inclusive.
I'm sorry your feelings are so hurt by the fact that people like to make fun of the pathetic orange you call a leaderYuudachi-kun wrote:
You mean from /r/politicalhumour aka another anti trump subreddit with a disguised name
This I can agree withAurani wrote:
A lot is more like, 95% of them. :p
That doesn't even make any sense..... you've been touching too much pinoy scrotum this month.Hika wrote:
i greentext ur dick
You can't even stand meHika wrote:
Noooo... I've been touching yours.
But I'm a girlAurani wrote:
That doesn't even make any sense..... you've been touching too much pinoy scrotum this month.Hika wrote:
i greentext ur dick
I made thatjohnmedina999 wrote:
Posting this here because I can.
I know, it says "by Yuudachi-kun".Yuudachi-kun wrote:
I made that
when September ends.kai99 wrote:
fukngin tired after doing math
so wake me up whhen exams are over
johnmedina999 wrote:
I know, it says "by Yuudachi-kun".Yuudachi-kun wrote:
I made that
But this circle skin is OP.
Yuudachi-kun wrote:
Think about it
heh it's the exact same with /r/australiaGladiOol wrote:
I most frequently browse /r/thenetherlands (only problem with it is that most of its users are green-left voters and boy-oh-boy do they like to shit on anything remotely right winged. But it does give me a shit ton of insight on more left-leaning ideas, principles and news articles and what not). And like once or twice a week /r/neoliberal for memes.
I dunno, I don't really like the setup 4chan and reddit use. It's too hive-minded. I prefer me good ol' forum setup like this one here.
The poor aren't getting poorer. They are getting rich at a much slower pace. Poverty has almost halved in the last 20 years and global poverty is still reducing to this very day.Railey2 wrote:
Whether or not you think of it as warfare (i don't, personally) doesn't really matter. The core-concern is that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, no matter where you look. This you can't deny.
They absolutely would, though. There's already a massive disparity between the amount of wealth a worker produces and what they're paid for their labor. Corporate types love to say it'd be unprofitable, but they're perfectly happy paying CEOs absurd amounts of cash - they could easily pay workers more.GladiOol wrote:
Companies maximize profit, true. so they'll employ at minimum wage. But blindly raising the minimum wage will (more than likely) result in more problems. (Empirical evidence is pretty short on this subject, though). The problem with raising it is that it will hurt the lowest-skilled workers for they'll no longer ''produce'' enough profit for the companies to be employing them.
Hopefully this is a learning experience for you about how great it is to have a government? The company is too scummy to employ you, and the govt is helping you out big-time. I really hope this helps you change your mindset.B1rd wrote:
So basically, I find it hard to get an entry-level job because the minimum wage is too high for me to be employed, and so there actually needs to be a government program to circumvent the minimum wage laws and mop up the large amount of unemployed youths in my area.
Unionize and fight it, then. That's what unions are for. Corps will do anything to make money, they're not gonna cut wages "just because" they want to equalize cost. If they can scapegoat something, they will, but they'll cut costs everywhere and anywhere. Minimum wage is an easy target because for some reason people want everyone else to suffer as much as they do rather than improve everyone's standard of living.B1rd wrote:
However let's say the labour of the cleaner is only worth $10 an hour. To recoup this cost, among other things, the company will now lower the wage of a worker who's labour is worth $22 an hour, and is being payed $20 an hour, to $15 an hour as well
There's nothing to talk about. This has been a slow week.Tae wrote:
what in the fuck who let this go down to page 2
Hi! How are you doing? Do you have shit that is either funny or interesting that you want to bring up?Tae wrote:
henlo friends!
You don't understand. OT has always been both shitty and inactive at times, but letting ITT drop to page 2 is pure heresy - especially since it has already happened two times this month alone.johnmedina999 wrote:
There's nothing to talk about. This has been a slow week.
B1rd wrote:
page to
Blitzfrog wrote:
Riggedkai99 wrote:
dawnsday my waifu
Mahogany wrote:
So guys, what's the bets on France either going full Dumbfuckistan versus staying a sensible country?
nice ride butComfy Slippers wrote:
Me tooYuudachi-kun wrote:
Mahogany wrote:
So guys, what's the bets on France either going full Dumbfuckistan versus staying a sensible country?
Im laughing so hard at the way you dress up both options
we will continue with Hollande 2.0 and get fucked for 5 more years by EUMahogany wrote:
So guys, what's the bets on France either going full Dumbfuckistan versus staying a sensible country?
hes friend with pretty much every big french medias CEOs, so he get praised everywhere in medias and french people are getting lobotomizedB1rd wrote:
Ah yes, hard not to see why Macron and his "terrorism will be a part of daily life" message combined with neoliberal globalist economics is so popular.
Apparently voting round 1 is the place for protest votes- the large amount for Le Pen partially intended as a wake-up to politicians- "Hey, we exist too, and you'd better acknowledge that instead of just acting like we don't and never changing."Mahogany wrote:
So guys, what's the bets on France either going full Dumbfuckistan versus staying a sensible country?
B-but a 100% tax rate on the rich is a good thing right? They should pay their fair share!GladiOol wrote:
melenchon didn't win. i am a happy man. fillion would've gotten my vote.
Same old same old.FuZ wrote:
hes friend with pretty much every big french medias CEOs, so he get praised everywhere in medias and french people are getting lobotomized
i'm pretty sure most people who voted for him didnt even know he was part of the current government
medias killed Fillon with all these fake job stories, medias killed Le Pen by comparing her to hitler all the time, now their little baby macron have no more competitors and will easily win. thats how you do it on simple minded people
johnmedina999 wrote:
sick
Getting pulled over in 15 secounds - violating driving laws 101Madvillain wrote:
nice ride butComfy Slippers wrote:
kai99 wrote:
kai99 wrote:
I meant the good sick, not the bad one, by the way.johnmedina999 wrote:
sick
no she cant, french people are too stupidDawnsday wrote:
le pen will win
there we go, fixed that for you yoFuZ wrote:
no she cant, french people aren't stupidDawnsday wrote:
le pen will win
it will be 65% macron - 35% le pen
tell me why is it not stupid to vote for macron ?Mahogany wrote:
there we go, fixed that for you yo
Because voting for macron means you're not voting for le penFuZ wrote:
tell me why is it not stupid to vote for macron ?
yeah you're one of these people who think le pen is nazi, racist, because medias said soMahogany wrote:
Because voting for macron means you're not voting for le penFuZ wrote:
tell me why is it not stupid to vote for macron ?
It is the smart decision