m4m from my queue.
[general]
nothing for now atm ;w;.
[easy]
00:13:766(1,2)- would ctrl+g both objects to start with the slider instead with the note so the rhythm would fit the song much better see the higlighted objects.
00:17:054(1)- missing finish on head? there's the cymbal so the finish would give emphasis to that cymbal tbh.
00:31:848(3)- you've missed a clap on slider's head.
00:41:711(3)- shouldn't be drum clap instead of drum finish?
00:58:150(3,4)- would suggest to ctrl+g both objects because i found it confident to start with the slider as you did with the rest of this part where you used mostly 2 pairs of 1/2 sliders and an 1/1 slider but you somehow broke the consistency here so it's like you make a comparison with this second measure with the first measure, both measures of 00:53:218(1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4)- and the second measure looks somehow inconsistent than the first measure. i know that you don't want to do 2 1/2 sliders + 1/1 slider spam but ctrl+g'ing these two objects won't hurt and also would follow the song more better, especially the vocal see these two higlighted objects on timeline.
this diff looks like it was mapped by me o_o
[normal]
00:11:300(3,4,5,6)- perhaps distance snapping issue. just select 00:12:122(4,5,6)- like this and then move them a bit up.
00:13:766(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)- i guess i would nerf this whole pattern because imo, this is the only 'a bit hardish' pattern from this whole part and the rhythm would be like this one. i see that you're following the vocal, but it won't hurt to nerf the whole pattern just because you made the whole pattern a bit hardish imo.
00:54:040(3,4)- mind replacing these 2 notes with a 1/2 slider? the vocal is ongoing on that 1/4 tick too and looks weird to see it ignored imo. i just suggest you to replace these 2 notes with an 1/2 slider because i don't want to make the pattern more harder than before. i just want to keep the pattern nerfed. see the higlighted objects. same goes for 01:06:780(2,3,4)- if i'm not wrong.
i think you can recheck the spacing. just giving you an advice.
[hazu's hard]
00:17:670(3)- the vocal is stronger here and it is clickable but, i don't like how it starts. i would suggest to start with a note better than with a slider to give more effect to the strongest vocal. the rhythm would be like this one so yeah you have to remove that repeat from (3)- =w=).
00:19:520(5,6)- maybe unstack these 2 notes just to give some build-up effect? it is obvious that the vocal is getting intensified gradually as i can see so unstacking them would give more build-up effect and would emphasize the intensifying of the vocal imo.
00:22:396(2)- missing 1/3 repeat because, actually, the vocal stops on 00:22:670- so yeah it is like a 'ghost vocal' let's say. don't forget to adjust the spacing between (2)- and (3)- after!
00:55:273(2,3)- imo, i would change this rhythm just because to make 00:55:684- clickable and tbh, it deserves to be clickable imo so you have to replace the slider (2)- with 2 notes and move (3)- to 00:55:684- which will become (4)- afterwards. the rhythm should be like this one or you can do the same rhythm as the one from 01:08:629(2,3)- for instance.
01:10:889(5,6)- as i said for 00:19:520(5,6)-. would unstack these 2 notes for more build-up effect because the vocal is getting intensified gradually, which is really obvious tbh, and also the instruments are stronger here tho.
[insane]
you can use a custom name for this difficulty like 'KiddinG' or 'Sigma'? i'm not really good at finding custom names ;___;
00:09:040(1,2)- talking about visual stuffs, i'm not a fan of these kind of patterns tbh. if you want to improve the pattern, you can curve (2)- like in this image. it will play more better imo than before.
00:14:383(3,4,5)- the same thing as i said above. you can try this one for instance.
00:19:520(6,7,8)- imo, why don't you space (7)- and (8)- as you did for 00:32:670(6,7,8)-? the vocal is really stronger here and unstacking these notes from (6)-'s tail would give some nice build-up effect if i'm not wrong.
00:29:383(3)- may end this slider on 1/3 instead of end it on 1/4? it is obvious that the vocal is in a kind of extension and ending the slider on 1/3 would follow the vocal until it ends on 1/3 (00:29:657-) and would give more effect to the song itself imo.
00:38:835(3,4)- intentional spacing change? shouldn't the spacing be like from 00:35:547(3,4)-? i think it should be because it looks like an unintentional spacing change imo so it wouldn't hurt to change the spacing from 2.40x to 1.90x here tbh.
00:40:273(2,3,4,5)- is this supposed to be a blanket here? if yes, you may fix it just for the sake of better visual stuff.
00:49:109(4,5,6,7)- talking about build-up stuff, i would like to space them a little more just to give more build-up effect because the vocal is clearly stronger and tbh, some jump would work here rather than some antijumps.
00:55:068(2,3,4)- the current rhythm sounds a bit...strange tbh. starting with the slider feels really weird and it doesn't give enough effect to the song itself imo. to improve the rhythm here, in order to give more effect to the song and follow much better the vocal, i would replace this slider with just a 1/4 note and then i would move 00:55:479(3)- to 00:55:273-. also, i see that you ignore the snare from 00:55:684- after i saw that slider (3)- in extension which quite dissapoints me because there's no any extension tbh so better put a note there after you made the changes to the rhythm just for the sake of emphasizing the snare by making it clickable lol. http://puu.sh/s7LW1/6a8600f39e.jpg
00:58:355(2,3)- i guess i would change (3)-'s slidershape or make it less sharp because it looks like the whole pattern have a bad angle and it doesn't play really great tbh.
01:01:643(2,3)- maybe space them more just for more build-up effect? the vocal is getting gradually stronger and spacing them more would give a nice build-up effect imo.
01:02:259(4,5,6,7)- the same thing as i said on 00:49:109(4,5,6,7)- with build-up stuff.
01:08:424(3,4)- is the same problem as i pointed out on 00:55:068(2,3,4)- but here, i would ctrl+g the both objects and then end (4)- which will become (3)- on 1/4 tick because there's no any extension tbh. having (3)- as circle instead as slider would give more effect to that ignored snare and also it would make it clickable. http://puu.sh/s7MxT/01f417d691.jpg
also, as a last note, can you explain me the reason of the usage of slider changes from 00:09:040- to 00:16:848-? imo, they have no logical, even if the vocal is really stronger. you can emphasize the stronger vocal without using sv changes in the first half of the map tbh *i think 00:29:794(4)- counts tho*. the sv changes from kiai have more logical tbh so they're ok.
that's all for now! not a bad map to say and really fun to play it.
good luck!
[general]
nothing for now atm ;w;.
[easy]
00:13:766(1,2)- would ctrl+g both objects to start with the slider instead with the note so the rhythm would fit the song much better see the higlighted objects.
00:17:054(1)- missing finish on head? there's the cymbal so the finish would give emphasis to that cymbal tbh.
00:31:848(3)- you've missed a clap on slider's head.
00:41:711(3)- shouldn't be drum clap instead of drum finish?
00:58:150(3,4)- would suggest to ctrl+g both objects because i found it confident to start with the slider as you did with the rest of this part where you used mostly 2 pairs of 1/2 sliders and an 1/1 slider but you somehow broke the consistency here so it's like you make a comparison with this second measure with the first measure, both measures of 00:53:218(1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4)- and the second measure looks somehow inconsistent than the first measure. i know that you don't want to do 2 1/2 sliders + 1/1 slider spam but ctrl+g'ing these two objects won't hurt and also would follow the song more better, especially the vocal see these two higlighted objects on timeline.
this diff looks like it was mapped by me o_o
[normal]
00:11:300(3,4,5,6)- perhaps distance snapping issue. just select 00:12:122(4,5,6)- like this and then move them a bit up.
00:13:766(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)- i guess i would nerf this whole pattern because imo, this is the only 'a bit hardish' pattern from this whole part and the rhythm would be like this one. i see that you're following the vocal, but it won't hurt to nerf the whole pattern just because you made the whole pattern a bit hardish imo.
00:54:040(3,4)- mind replacing these 2 notes with a 1/2 slider? the vocal is ongoing on that 1/4 tick too and looks weird to see it ignored imo. i just suggest you to replace these 2 notes with an 1/2 slider because i don't want to make the pattern more harder than before. i just want to keep the pattern nerfed. see the higlighted objects. same goes for 01:06:780(2,3,4)- if i'm not wrong.
i think you can recheck the spacing. just giving you an advice.
[hazu's hard]
00:17:670(3)- the vocal is stronger here and it is clickable but, i don't like how it starts. i would suggest to start with a note better than with a slider to give more effect to the strongest vocal. the rhythm would be like this one so yeah you have to remove that repeat from (3)- =w=).
00:19:520(5,6)- maybe unstack these 2 notes just to give some build-up effect? it is obvious that the vocal is getting intensified gradually as i can see so unstacking them would give more build-up effect and would emphasize the intensifying of the vocal imo.
00:22:396(2)- missing 1/3 repeat because, actually, the vocal stops on 00:22:670- so yeah it is like a 'ghost vocal' let's say. don't forget to adjust the spacing between (2)- and (3)- after!
00:55:273(2,3)- imo, i would change this rhythm just because to make 00:55:684- clickable and tbh, it deserves to be clickable imo so you have to replace the slider (2)- with 2 notes and move (3)- to 00:55:684- which will become (4)- afterwards. the rhythm should be like this one or you can do the same rhythm as the one from 01:08:629(2,3)- for instance.
01:10:889(5,6)- as i said for 00:19:520(5,6)-. would unstack these 2 notes for more build-up effect because the vocal is getting intensified gradually, which is really obvious tbh, and also the instruments are stronger here tho.
[insane]
you can use a custom name for this difficulty like 'KiddinG' or 'Sigma'? i'm not really good at finding custom names ;___;
00:09:040(1,2)- talking about visual stuffs, i'm not a fan of these kind of patterns tbh. if you want to improve the pattern, you can curve (2)- like in this image. it will play more better imo than before.
00:14:383(3,4,5)- the same thing as i said above. you can try this one for instance.
00:19:520(6,7,8)- imo, why don't you space (7)- and (8)- as you did for 00:32:670(6,7,8)-? the vocal is really stronger here and unstacking these notes from (6)-'s tail would give some nice build-up effect if i'm not wrong.
00:29:383(3)- may end this slider on 1/3 instead of end it on 1/4? it is obvious that the vocal is in a kind of extension and ending the slider on 1/3 would follow the vocal until it ends on 1/3 (00:29:657-) and would give more effect to the song itself imo.
00:38:835(3,4)- intentional spacing change? shouldn't the spacing be like from 00:35:547(3,4)-? i think it should be because it looks like an unintentional spacing change imo so it wouldn't hurt to change the spacing from 2.40x to 1.90x here tbh.
00:40:273(2,3,4,5)- is this supposed to be a blanket here? if yes, you may fix it just for the sake of better visual stuff.
00:49:109(4,5,6,7)- talking about build-up stuff, i would like to space them a little more just to give more build-up effect because the vocal is clearly stronger and tbh, some jump would work here rather than some antijumps.
00:55:068(2,3,4)- the current rhythm sounds a bit...strange tbh. starting with the slider feels really weird and it doesn't give enough effect to the song itself imo. to improve the rhythm here, in order to give more effect to the song and follow much better the vocal, i would replace this slider with just a 1/4 note and then i would move 00:55:479(3)- to 00:55:273-. also, i see that you ignore the snare from 00:55:684- after i saw that slider (3)- in extension which quite dissapoints me because there's no any extension tbh so better put a note there after you made the changes to the rhythm just for the sake of emphasizing the snare by making it clickable lol. http://puu.sh/s7LW1/6a8600f39e.jpg
00:58:355(2,3)- i guess i would change (3)-'s slidershape or make it less sharp because it looks like the whole pattern have a bad angle and it doesn't play really great tbh.
01:01:643(2,3)- maybe space them more just for more build-up effect? the vocal is getting gradually stronger and spacing them more would give a nice build-up effect imo.
01:02:259(4,5,6,7)- the same thing as i said on 00:49:109(4,5,6,7)- with build-up stuff.
01:08:424(3,4)- is the same problem as i pointed out on 00:55:068(2,3,4)- but here, i would ctrl+g the both objects and then end (4)- which will become (3)- on 1/4 tick because there's no any extension tbh. having (3)- as circle instead as slider would give more effect to that ignored snare and also it would make it clickable. http://puu.sh/s7MxT/01f417d691.jpg
also, as a last note, can you explain me the reason of the usage of slider changes from 00:09:040- to 00:16:848-? imo, they have no logical, even if the vocal is really stronger. you can emphasize the stronger vocal without using sv changes in the first half of the map tbh *i think 00:29:794(4)- counts tho*. the sv changes from kiai have more logical tbh so they're ok.
that's all for now! not a bad map to say and really fun to play it.
good luck!