[Final Retribution]
- 00:23:889 (1,1,1) - i think you can space them a bit more, current pattern looks like previous 1/2 gaps. although they have a new combo, higher spacing would be easier to read i guess, could also add some consistency to the whole pattern, because 00:23:889 (1,1) - is represented by a overlap while 00:24:204 (1,1) - is not
- 00:45:723 (4,5) - this feels inconsistent with previous spacing concept, 1/2 gaps were represented by stacks (e.g 00:38:346 (1,2,3) - 00:41:297 (1,2,3) - )) so it would be better to do the same thing with this as well
- 00:56:051 (2,3,4) - i don't think using "jumps" like these feel good for this specific phrase, it also looks inconsistent if you consider stuff like 00:50:149 (1,2,3) - which represent the same thing in the music
- 01:00:477 (1,2) - quite weird rhythm, i don't really get why is 01:00:969 - a circle, the beat on 01:00:846 - is way stronger so you could maybe try something like this?
- 01:10:805 (1,2,3) - i think you could increase the spacing a bit here, looks kinda cramped compared to similar stuff
- 01:32:199 (4) - i was expecting something harder to hit here, it's feel way too easy considering how strong this beat is
- 01:43:264 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - uhhh... kinda weird placement for this phrase... this specific combo represents the middle of the chorus (means that the drums are really strong because the music is about to repeat itself once again) yett... the way you mapped this makes it feel like nothing was changing, i think you could do something more interesting by varying angles (just like you did on 01:37:363 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - )
- 02:02:445 (1,2,3,4) - could spam nc to be consistent with previous 00:23:889 (1,1,1) - thing
- 02:25:667 - 02:28:618 - 02:31:568 - 02:34:519 - i don't really get the reason for these NCs, stuff like 02:25:667 (1) - doesn't really have such importance musically speaking... in fact you could even remove these type of beats, by using something like this it feels way more appropriate that way, because the current rhythm outshines the strong beat on 02:25:790 -
- 02:46:077 (1,2,3) - i think you could do something more interesting here, such low object density doesn't really represents the music imo
- 02:47:306 (3,1) - i was expecting the overlapped pattern to represent those strong drums (this 02:48:782 (5,1) - )
- 03:16:323 (1,2,3) - isn't this inconsistent with 03:17:798 (1,2,3) - and 03:19:273 (1,2,3) - ?
- second kiai is kinda the same as previous, there are few places where flow seems a bit random, for example stuff like this 03:26:282 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - is emphasized not only by spacing but also by angles, while in the other hand music changes such as 03:31:077 (4,5,6) - feels way too easy to hit compared to sections in the music that aren't even relevant.
- 03:37:470 (8,1) - could use same curvature for these two, it looks inconsistent as it's now
- 04:05:011 (3,4,5) - looks a bit messy imo, i get your idea of representing the same type of sounds through overlaps, but it seems a bit out of place... maybe you could try something like this?