Because you haven't even attacked my sources, you've just ridiculed them. If you when to have a "evidence-based argument" THEN DISPROVE MY SOURCES WITH EVIDENCE NOT CONJECTURE
If you were to just say something reasonable like "can you prove the integrity of your sources?" then maybe I could go on to find additional evidence. But no, you just say "wahh bias", that is, IN YOUR OPINION, and then completely dismiss everything. I go out of my way to supply sources to statements that aren't even particularly groundbreaking or controversial, and instead of backing up my points you use it as a means to attack my point.
Instead, you're the one who refuses to advance the conversation by even attempting to factually debunk anything, you completely ignore any evidence I provide to back up my sources, and you continue spouting the same nonsense which is nothing but arbitrary reasoning. Like attacking the Youtube channel a video was posted on rather than the contents itself. You're really testing my patience.
If you were to just say something reasonable like "can you prove the integrity of your sources?" then maybe I could go on to find additional evidence. But no, you just say "wahh bias", that is, IN YOUR OPINION, and then completely dismiss everything. I go out of my way to supply sources to statements that aren't even particularly groundbreaking or controversial, and instead of backing up my points you use it as a means to attack my point.
Instead, you're the one who refuses to advance the conversation by even attempting to factually debunk anything, you completely ignore any evidence I provide to back up my sources, and you continue spouting the same nonsense which is nothing but arbitrary reasoning. Like attacking the Youtube channel a video was posted on rather than the contents itself. You're really testing my patience.
Hitler isn't even the root of Nazism, he's just the face of it, completely comparable to the way Stalin and Lenin are the face of Communism but not the root of it.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
As for the Nazism thing, he was the *face* of Nazism, its leader during both its rise and fall. It's like saying "I'm not talking about that crazy Marxist Communism, I mean the moderate Stalinist Communism!"- people generally go to the root of the ideology for these kinds of discussions. The entire talking point is just semantics though, not sure why you're going full retard again with the whole
What? I don't even know what you're talking about. Here I am, debunking your false claims about Nazism and how Nazism is not comparable to communism, and pointing out your irrationality in discrimination between the two ideologies, and yet you just pull out the "retard" card again.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
extrapolation.
