Ryuusei Aika wrote:

from your m4m queue
my map here: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/531385

Down's Insane
01:15:258 - here is no voice so i think 01:15:258 (2) - may change into a 1/4 slider? However, the sound of the guitar sounds stronger than I thought.

good luck xd

Realazy wrote:

m4m from queue

[Down's Insane]

01:12:543 (1) - NC feels out of place I think so too. Fixed!

good luck!

Neoskylove wrote:

포럼피엠 안받는뎁.

[Down's Insane]
00:05:689 - 보컬비트 추가
00:10:862 - ^
00:12:931 - ^ 위 3개 의견처럼 보컬비트가 있긴 합니다만, 음악의 앞부분이라 다 표현하기는 힘들것같네요.
00:18:232 (1) - 앞에 3번 노트를 볼때 조금 어려운 흐름 같습니다. 음.. 어려운지는 잘 모르겠네요. 하지만 음이 강해서 괜찮을거같아요.
00:23:017 - 단순히 슬라이더 꼬리로만 끝내기에는 조금 아쉬운 음 같네요ㅕ. 제가 듣기엔 꽤 강한 음 같은데 ?! 아무음도 없늗..
00:30:646 (1,2) - 00:32:715 (1,2) - 여기 두개는 반스택하신 이유가 뭐죠. 다른곳이랑 똑같이 띄워주시는게 더 좋을것 같아요. 맵을 전체적으로 보시면 3/4슬라이더 뒤에 단노트는 반스택을 시켰습니다. 1/2슬라뒤에 나오는 2연타슬라이더(?) 같은 경우에는 띄워서 만들었구요
00:35:818 (3,4,5) - 어떤 비트를 따라간건지 잘 모르겠습니다. 드럼에서도 이런 음은 잘 안들리는것 같은데. 이것은 드럼보다 기타음을 들어보시면 확인하실 수 있습니다.
00:39:956 (3,4,5) - ^^
01:12:543 (1) - 필요한 뉴콤보는 아니네요. Fixed.
01:21:853 (5) - 조금 이상해 보이는 흐름이네요. 4번이랑 맞대어 볼때. 앞의 슬라이더와 같이 보시면 블랭킷이 있습니다.
01:24:439 (1,2) - 플레이어가 과연 이걸 1/2로 읽을 수 있을지 모르겠습니다. 01:24:181 (5,6,1) - 얘네 거리랑 똑같아 보이네요. 확실히 그렇네요. 좀 띄우겠습니다.

끝

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello M4M

Down's Insane

1. 00:05:301 (5,1,2) - fix blanket Fixed.
2. 01:38:922 (1,2) - ^ Fixed.
3. 01:46:939 (6,7,1) - at the earlier occasion this looked fine, but here it's pretty much unnecessary gameplay-wise and not too good-looking visual-wise I do not know if this is strange. ;w;
4. 01:48:232 (3,4,5) - these patterns you had had mostly the first circle pretty much stacked with the slider. Now that this doesn't have it, it would look better if the latter slider was similarly placed compared to the slider as the first, so it's kinda symmetrical I wanted to give this pattern a moving feel.

Good luck!

HelloSCV wrote:

아형식가져오기도 귀찮네 100만골드에 팔려왔습니다

01:08:405 (4,5,6) - 노트3연타 이후에는 웬만해선 점프를 주셨는데 여기도 점프 넣으시는게 좋아보여요 갑자기 줄어드니 좀 어색하네요 음, 앞까지 강한 분위기여서 스페이싱 이어주다 줄였는데 좀더 고려해볼게요
01:24:181 (1,2) - 앞에껀 뉴콤보빼고 뒤에꺼에 뉴콤보 넣는건 어떨까요? 뒤에 3/4박자패턴이 좀 더 쉽게 강조될거같아요 fix
01:42:413 (3,4) - 개인적인 생각이지만 좀 뭐랄까 과한?느낌인거같은데 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7267975 이런식으로 해보시는건 어떨까요? 01:47:715 (2,3,4) - 이것도 바꾸시면 좋겟지만 지금도 나쁘지않으니 둘다 바꾸시거나 둘다 그대로 두시는게 좋을거같아요 갓매퍼님께서 그렇게 말씀하시니 고쳤습니다 후자는 킵할게요 컨셉이라

전체적으로 히트사운드 음량이 좀 작은느낌인데 특히 노말 샘플셋같은경우엔 거의 들리지 않는수준인거같아요, 제가 귀찮아서 이어폰끼고 안들어보긴했는데 전체적으로 음량을 좀 더 올리시거나 샘플셋을 교체하시는것도 고려해볼만한 것같아요. 나중에 뱃들이 굳이 언급하면 고치는수준? 전반적인 음량 올렸습니다.

그리고 전체적으로 휘슬을 많이넣으셨는데 좀 과한부분은 빼고 필요한부분은 넣는식으로 수정해주시면 좋을거같아요 이건 다운님이 말씀해드릴거임 이거 잘 모르겠

쿠도스 주지마세요

1. 01:01:681 (3,4,5) - You can stack 01:00:646 (2,5) - by moving 01:01:681 (3) - to 63|144, 01:02:198 (4) - to 129|210 and 01:02:715 (5) - to 215|170

1. 00:01:681 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 00:05:818 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i guess you unstacked on second part as for higher vocals but yee keeping consistency still would be great here since it's low diff
2. 01:39:698 (2,3) - this is the only one I saw unstacked circle + 1/1 slider on entire kiai, maybe stack them as well?

1. 00:14:870 (2) - I personally would change this slidershape to the simple one for just a calm section
   
   a

   
2. 00:34:784 (1) - 00:36:853 (1) - sTaCk

1. 00:31:681 (3,4) - idk this may awkward for playing when 00:32:456 (6) - is circle imo, maybe remove reverse on 00:31:681 (3) - and add another 1/4 slider on 00:31:939 - ??
2. 00:51:336 (1,2,3) - 135| 168 for visual thingy?

1. 01:15:905 (4) - at least 1/4 kick would deliver better for some bells on music imo
2. 01:46:939 (6,7,1) - linear triples? since 01:46:681 (5) - is in the bottom and there's nothing rounded flow from that note so yee maybe move 01:47:068 (7) - to 388 | 126

Sotarks wrote:

hello m4m

down's insane
00:49:784 (2,3) - no need to nc those man I put it because of the slider shift.
01:04:266 (1,1) - like^ same but anyway feel free to keep it it's not a big deal imo Same reason as above.

01:07:112 (6,7) - point out that the spacing here is increadibly huge compared to the other 1/4 spacing you use... how about reducing it? It was a little reduced.

01:21:336 (4,5) - how about making those straight slider, 'cause the movment will be more smooth that your actual pattern going reverse you slider flow.. Slider (5) is blanketed and is symmetrical with slider (4).

01:26:508 (1,2,5,6) - check your 1/4 spacing consistence pls Fixed thx xd

01:40:215 (5,6,7) - rythmn here is ... like you skip that clap not so good aa umm.. idk ;w;

gl!

Akitoshi wrote:

Down's Insane

1. 01:15:905 (4) - at least 1/4 kick would deliver better for some bells on music imo It's a good idea, but it's hard to make a pattern.
2. 01:46:939 (6,7,1) - linear triples? since 01:46:681 (5) - is in the bottom and there's nothing rounded flow from that note so yee maybe move 01:47:068 (7) - to 388 | 126 oh nice!

mapset is good enough so i cant point that much lo

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506291 only highest diff cuz fullver and my mod sucks

Sonnyc wrote:

Down.
cs5에 대한 이유를 좀 듣고 싶은데 비록 기준 간격이 가까운 편이어서 작은 서클 크기가 어울릴만하긴 하지만 전반적으로 맵 내에 굵은 점프들이 꽤 있는편이어서 5까지 설정하는 것은 조금 무리가 있지 않았나 싶네요.

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello,
i'm a bit late, sorry about it...

[General]
1st part of song is sound too quiet , mb You can up volume a bit 40->50. And it's kind a underhitsounded. i expected whitles spam. 00:02:198 -
00:03:232 - etc. ok
01:57:543 - stop kiai here , because more hyped moment is ended imo rip i don't want to

[Easy]
Why did You not use whhistles here? I mean why did u make 01:54:439 - normal hit like here? it souds more like soft-whistles... It really noticeable in sliders like 01:49:267 (3) - it feels like zero hitsounded.
maybe You can add some new Hs for it. Something a bit quieter than your current soft whistle. -> planning HS rework
01:50:818 (4,1) - blanket a bit off fixed already lol

rest is fine

[Normal]
00:01:681 (1,2) - hmm, it's 0,9 ds and Ai mod thinks "no one even care" . Honestly, i have no idea about inconsistent spacing because of stacks... is it legit? Who cares it's normal.
00:16:163 (4) - not a big deal, but it strongly enough for NC, and it's end of section and it's a new green line ... like 01:24:439 (1) - ok
00:34:784 (7,1) - swap NC pattern NC
00:57:543 - remove NC lol my mistake
01:00:387 (2) - ctrl-f like here 00:43:060 (1,2,3) - for more consistent rhythm my pattern..
01:40:991 (1) - is NC here really needed? actually needed but I'll off it cuz normal
01:58:060 - 01:58:577 - i suggest to map 2 this beat. You are missing 2 pretty strong beats and start of vocal (01:58:318 - ),after these space hard for player to catch what You wanted to map. (what idea of this?) no reason to cuz map for noobs
01:58:318 - 01:58:577 - map 2 these points will work as well. ^

[Hard]
00:14:094 (1,3) - You can blanket it with same idea like 00:01:681 (1,3) - it's more neat. my pattern..
00:21:336 (3) - why You whistle tail but not head???? there is no sense... like hs weak souds and silence strong for making them equal?(because these sounds equal right now) thats like idk... Even You want to keep it, make whistles clikable, these are too strong. HS will be reworked
00:29:612 (3) - ^
00:33:749 (3,4) - You know, stack works for making objects visible, your slider disagree with it now. i think it's not that unreadable
00:44:353 (3,4) - unstack, stop flow here really unnececary imo. 01:00:387 (2) - You can use same idea like here. It sounds more appropriate. Anyway making sme sounded section with the same rythm does not harm anyone . actually I thought stack also can show it properly, and easier one is better here i think
01:03:491 (5,3) - stack, its like 2 pixel off now xD i tried but I can't find unstack..
01:15:129 - sthis strong beat should be clickable imo smthing like http://puu.sh/tSoaS.jpg will work well. Or 01:15:387 - at least stack this one with sliderend. mapped that symbol, so reverse is more suitable i thought
01:31:681 (3) - 01:48:232 (3) - will be cool if these was ~similar spacing rip my ability
01:52:887 (5,5) - ^

[Insane]
00:10:474 (2,3,4,2,3,4,5) - any reason to change rhytm? i mean repeat sounds really cool here... no sound in first one
00:21:336 (5,1,2,3) - same thing as hard
00:22:629 (1,3) - too spaced imo. They are on weak beats. Especially 00:22:629 (1) - , 00:22:370 (5) - especially(x2) after down beat. visual distance, movement is surely ok here
00:30:646 (5,1) - ^ sound gives, so ok
00:21:594 (1) - okay You NC strong sound, and pettern should be beter readable now, 00:22:370 (5,1) - but why here? pattern NC
00:30:646 (5,1) - ^ ^
00:40:732 (8,1) - this down beat with smaller ds then jumps, i thinks it could be spaced more. don't have to
00:44:870 (7,1) - ^ vocal low so lowered DS
00:41:767 (4,5,6,7) - 1.2 00:37:629 (4,5,6,7) - 1.7 ??? 00:37:370 (3,5,6,7) - stack end of triple with 3 ->ds 1.2 no reason to. sound is different
i firstly thougt You just make patterns with regression principle but here 00:58:836 (5,6,7) - You did 2,2 !!! My brain broken...
00:54:181 (4) - cntrl-g flows a bit better circular flow is better
00:58:318 (4,5,6,7,8) - if You made this as hyped moment with big ds i can't undrstend 01:14:094 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - why here is small-spaced pattern? why i have to compare to that one ;w;
01:08:663 (5,6) - space it more , it looks like 1/4 who thinks???? maybe can be 1/4 if it's priti map
01:42:413 - slider will make flow much more comfortable, everyone hates doubles... doubles with big spacing - just nightmare.
song gave, so
Spacing looks a bit inconsistent 00:34:784 - 01:25:215 - there again why?


[]
That's it.
Goodluck. O/

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello M4M

Easy

1. 01:50:818 (4,1) - fix blanketyeah

Normal

1. Not like it's really wrong currently, but what's your logic in changing between 00:01:681 (1,2,3) - and 00:05:818 (1,2,3) - these 2 kind of spacings you've done for these patterns herevocal is super high, so didn't stack.
2. 00:34:784 (7) - I think this should be the NC instead of 00:35:301 (1) - since it's on white tick and is clearly more important sound. (you are prob going for similar comboing as at 00:24:439 (4,5,6) - for example, but thats different since there the NC is clearly on the important sound that is also at white tick) grouped according to pattern and sound,
3. 00:37:629 (5,6) - this feels random, would imo work better if 00:37:629 (5) - was 1/2 longer mapped where vocal sound should be emphasized, can't map all because note train is too long
4. 00:54:181 (5,6) - same as above
5. 01:00:387 (2,3) - similar case, but here it would work better if you had circle at 01:00:387 - and then these 2 sliders
6. 01:09:956 (4) - perhaps NC this? same with 01:18:232 (4) - You can just not NC them too, it's not like it doesn't work the current way too catually unnecessary
7. 01:29:353 (5,6) - same as at 01:00:387 (2,3)
8. 01:33:491 (5,6) - here on the other hand this patterning feels better since it fits the music better. Still, thinking of how you tap this, it would fit better if same as above
9. 01:36:853 (5) - NC? unnecessary..
10. 01:45:905 (5,6) - here we go once again. For this I would just add circle at 01:46:422 - or smth
11. 01:50:043 (5,6) - lol atleast it's consistent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
12. 01:53:405 (5) - NC here as well? unnecessary
13. 01:57:543 - why not make the important sound here clickable? Perhaps map it simlarly to pattern like this 00:33:749 (5,6,7) - yea fixed

Hard

1. 00:22:370 (1,2,3) - this blanket doesn't look too good due the strong curve of slider 1 or atleast the distance is too high for that curve, lowering the curve is easy fix. It will also smoothen the line between 00:21:853 (4,1) - which will further increase it's visual appeal ah so many issued, just made it to red tick slider ;w;
2. 01:57:543 (1,1,2,3) - similar thing here. Also arrange the stack 01:59:094 (1,2,3) - so that circle 1 is the one blanketing instead of circle 3, since that way it looks correct. You can't really see circle 3 blanketing the slider due it's place rhythmically, but you can clearly see when, like at the moment, circle 1 is not doing it cuz stacking pushes it out of the wayalso just changed pattern ;w;

Insane

1. 00:15:905 (1) - It's cool the way it is too, but I think it would work better if you snapped it with 00:15:128 (4) - only, so that it as if continues it. That way it also flows slightly smoother as the motion is shifting downwards (where 00:16:163 (2) - goes) instead of going back to previous place, where 00:14:870 (2,3,4) - is i couldn't find why now shouldnt so keep
2. 00:21:594 (1) - is this NC made to indicate the string sounds or smth? Otherwise just NC 00:21:336 (5) - instead pattern NC
3. 00:22:370 (5) - NC instead of 00:22:629 (1) - strong sound on white tick lol. Looks like you are consistent with these as well (like those sliders somewhere above lol) so instead of me linkin em all here, if you change one, change em all pattern NC
4. 01:24:439 (2) - NC this the similar way 01:24:827 (1,1) - are both NC, this is also on a white tick. Could just NC 01:23:405 (6) - as well and then remove the NC from 01:24:181 (1) - that way it feels more logical imo will keep it, but consider it cuz you're right
5. 01:42:025 (2,3,4) - you sure bout this? Compared to the previous ones it looks clearly like a 1/2. Granted you are increasing the intensity with slider velocity, but there's no way to except this random huge spacing mapped according to cursor 's speed, it would be much natural.

Good luck!

Sotarks wrote:

hello m4m

easy
00:17:715 - you could probably add a circle here, too follow drum snare ? not necesary in Easy

00:20:301 (3) - maybe a rythmn like this can be appropriate ? just suggestion, if you agree do it 00:28:577 (3) - here aswell.. to make easy easier, and vocal
pretty good easy, good to go.
[]
normal
00:16:163 (4) - you can prob add a nc here to emphasis the downbeat yea

00:34:525 (6,7) - can you maybe replace this with a 1/2 slider to avoid this dense rythmn here ? white tick sound too strong

00:57:543 (1) - remove nc for consistency my NC was wrong, so fixed another one

01:09:698 - you are following vocals but here you skip that important sound pls tru

01:17:974 - ^ aaa
good to go aswell, just a bit worried about the vocals not mapped but shouldn't be a big dead! yea
[]
hard
00:16:163 (1) - maybe try to avoid this overlap dude, it's really not a big deal to change it for the readability of the map! avoided

00:47:198 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - my concern about this patern is 00:47:198 (1,2,3,4) - ok this one follow correctly the vocals, but 00:49:267 (1,2,3,4) - this one doesn't i can suggest you a rythmn like this would be more appropriate tbh. symbol sound was too strong, i felt i shld map it
nice hard here!!
[]
insane
01:23:405 (6) - nc for readability? yea

01:24:439 (1,1,1) - oh please replace that by a reverse slider, it's just so unconfortable to play! not fun tho

01:42:025 (2,3) - hoyl shit spacing!!!1 sorrrrrry...
cool diff
[]

gl!

Akitoshi wrote:

Easy

1. 01:01:681 (3,4,5) - You can stack 01:00:646 (2,5) - by moving 01:01:681 (3) - to 63|144, 01:02:198 (4) - to 129|210 and 01:02:715 (5) - to 215|170 that's nice

Normal

1. 00:01:681 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 00:05:818 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i guess you unstacked on second part as for higher vocals but yee keeping consistency still would be great here since it's low diff vocal high so unstack
2. 01:39:698 (2,3) - this is the only one I saw unstacked circle + 1/1 slider on entire kiai, maybe stack them as well? ok ill fix it

Hard

1. 00:14:870 (2) - I personally would change this slidershape to the simple one for just a calm section
   
   a

   i like my one
2. 00:34:784 (1) - 00:36:853 (1) - sTaCk ah uuuu

Insane

1. 00:31:681 (3,4) - idk this may awkward for playing when 00:32:456 (6) - is circle imo, maybe remove reverse on 00:31:681 (3) - and add another 1/4 slider now one is better to show rhythm of song on 00:31:939 - ??
2. 00:51:336 (1,2,3) - 135| 168 for visual thingy?fixed

mapset is good enough so i cant point that much lo

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/506291 only highest diff cuz fullver and my mod sucks

Venix wrote:

shitty mod

Easy.

• 
  1.05ds LOL

1. 00:45:129 (3) - rip symmetry yea improved
2. I think you can try http://puu.sh/tRoku/4be471a74f.jpg it 01:49:267 (3,4,1) - here, because aesthetics will be better linear movement, now is better i think

Normal

1. Why lower DS than easy? lol no problem if actual spacing is bigger
2. 00:16:163 (4) - You should place nc here, because you've here strong downbeat and it should emphasise music better. The same 01:59:612 (3) - here.kk

Hard

1. perfecto

Xexxar wrote:

lets get this shit going

[insone]
01:15:889 (9) - dis some questionable snapping fam... the real rhythm is 1/4/th with a 1/8th on 01:16:083 - o triplet
01:24:423 (1,2,3) - i really like this xDxD
01:49:251 (1) - this stood out as weird to me, sort of breaks for intensity but doesnt really fit, tbh control g and readjust...fixed

rest are fine easy / normal / hard

偽チノとエッチなことをしたい：＾＾＾＾）

Xexxar wrote:

[Downs]
01:16:018 - u could put a note here T BH Fixed with triple.
01:27:527 (4,5,6) - i dont get this rhythm (i understand u do it alot and u dont have to change it, its just Booty and im trigerd) Well, I do not know if this rhythm is awkward, but it's hard to explain. Xdddd
uncheck widescreen support u cuck ok


偽チノとエッチなことをしたい：＾＾＾＾）

Karen wrote:

omg i wanted to map this too... crying
rip

Karen wrote:

omg i wanted to map this too... crying
rip

Abe Nana wrote:

https://puu.sh/ud8ZS/2123ac113f.flv

1: video 개량판입니다.
2: creator words에 링크된 비디오 버전을 zip으로 해주세요.
3. 알몸이 노출되는 영상이기에 링크에 NSFW 경고를 함께 적을필요가 있습니다

Enon wrote:

ㅊㅊㅊ