lol is LGV894 still a relevant mapper?VINXIS wrote:
Hi relevant person!
asking the real question here
lol is LGV894 still a relevant mapper?VINXIS wrote:
Hi relevant person!
I don't understand how it's complicated.Flower wrote:
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
it's more of a 'unnecessarily complicated' than anything. formatting and all, i can understand where he's coming from. we just lack a proper system to vote for stuff with user verification (which is why we didn't use Google Forms), so this'll have to do.Shiirn wrote:
I don't understand how it's complicated.
You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.
I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
i don't see how that's a reason to remove it. this vote is purely subjective and opinion based, if a user feels that X didn't contribute, he wouldn't vote. yeah sure there's the fact that not everyone who contributes aims to get their name out there for exposure, so the average person won't 'notice' them. but i think it's a fair compromise so that the people who contribute get at least some sort of recognition, rather than none at all in the name of 'fairness'.MrSergio wrote:
Then please remove the oustanding contribution bracket lmao.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
StarrStyx wrote:
tbh you could have set up google forms but require the user to pm for verification (within a set amount of time or w/e, that is) that it is actually them that casted the vote.
You are changing the topic. What I meant is that I spent almost a whole afternoon composing a single PM with given format, not counting time spent checking beatmaps and people. This simply sucks.Shiirn wrote:
I don't understand how it's complicated.Flower wrote:
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.
I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
Flower wrote:
You are changing the topic. What I meant is that I spent almost a whole afternoon composing a single PM with given format, not counting time spent checking beatmaps and people. This simply sucks.
Drumroll plshandsome wrote:
Alright, votes are closed! Results will be out this Friday! (10 Feb)