i am nowhere rip
forum
[osu!std] mapper's choice awards 2016
posted
Total Posts
221
Community don't love us it's ok ;w;ByBy wrote:
i am nowhere rip
It's my nomination,I forgot it,sorryEvilElvis wrote:
Sanae-san not a tuuhea song tbh
ikr ;;ByBy wrote:
i am nowhere rip
Same... (Except for my Image Material)ByBy wrote:
i am nowhere rip
im nowhere too ;_; (except a map)
Probably an error because of that https://osu.ppy.sh/s/423481removed lolExile- wrote:
How is 6th a storyboarder?
You may want to add Irreversible to the list
I still wonder who nominated me for outstanding contribution 
What was the criteria again for outstanding contribution? (Didn't there used to be a write up on each category).
Also suggest sorting user names in alphabetical order.
Topic Starter
there wasn't writeups for every category, and outstanding contribution would basically be anyone who has contributed to the mapping scene in 2016 outstandingly, very big surprise! there are some stretches in nominees but i left them there cuz there wasn't a very strict guideline, and most 'joke' nominees won't be voted in either way.Monstrata wrote:
What was the criteria again for outstanding contribution? (Didn't there used to be a write up on each category).
edit: also a quick update, Grand winners get 6 months of supporter, while Minor winners get 1 month! prizes sponsored by VINXIS and -Mo-!
why i'm not in beginner mapper 
i started december 2015
notice me senpai i'm still a virgin
i started december 2015 notice me senpai i'm still a virgin
not even nominated in the mappers category
...
this is just depressing at this point
...
this is just depressing at this point
i voted for tengaku somewhere in my pile of votes if it makes u feel better
I know that feelShiro wrote:
not even nominated in the mappers category
...
this is just depressing at this point
same
fam dats cuz u did virtuly nothign ths yr XPPpPpPpP hehe >:9
VINXIS wrote:
XPPpPpPpP
Apparently, i ranked one of the only BOFU2015 song in 2016, std and the whole mapset done by meVINXIS wrote:
fam dats cuz u did virtuly nothign ths yr XPPpPpPpP hehe >:9
but it seems people have ignored/forgotten it because it was not outstanding wwww
lo
l
thts y i said virtually Lol Xd
hVINXIS wrote:
thts y i said virtually Lol Xd
oly
me neither, but tengaku and retina are there, so let's celebrate :tada:Shiro wrote:
not even nominated in the mappers category
...
this is just depressing at this point
im not even in rookie hell yea
I'd like some proof as to why people in outstanding contribution are in there.
I obviously don't stalk all of them and I have no idea what they did in the past year, so how can I cast a fair vote about them? =w=
First of all I'm curious as why I'm in there too.
I'm not saying I should or not be in there, but rather the reasons why I'm there. Whatever those reasons may be you should also confirm them with the user in question, since some nominator can just assume things on his own for things that someone may haven't done at all (just trying to bring up an interesting possible scenario).
Maybe someone helped a lot with an osu!booth in their country at some sort of event or maybe they got a lot of stuff done behind the scenes in general, not just modding/mapping activity (which imo is not enough to qualify someone for this). Stuff that only few witnessed and can actually say "yes, this guy worked his ass off for the game"
^ But I'd like to know what those things are, thanks
I obviously don't stalk all of them and I have no idea what they did in the past year, so how can I cast a fair vote about them? =w=
First of all I'm curious as why I'm in there too.
I'm not saying I should or not be in there, but rather the reasons why I'm there. Whatever those reasons may be you should also confirm them with the user in question, since some nominator can just assume things on his own for things that someone may haven't done at all (just trying to bring up an interesting possible scenario).
Maybe someone helped a lot with an osu!booth in their country at some sort of event or maybe they got a lot of stuff done behind the scenes in general, not just modding/mapping activity (which imo is not enough to qualify someone for this). Stuff that only few witnessed and can actually say "yes, this guy worked his ass off for the game"
^ But I'd like to know what those things are, thanks
Wait, so Counter-Attack of the Weak is nominated in the hitsounds category, but Gensou, Yume no Owari isn't?
FeelsBadMan
FeelsBadMan
If you want to bitch about a map not getting nominated, bear in mind you could have nominated it yourself. Even if it was your own map.
@MrSergio - people just nominate. Unless they actually gave reasons for why they nominated people (which wasn't required), no one running the MCA can actually answer your question - unless you'd like an answer like "Cuz someone nominated them/you".
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
Std as always
lol is LGV894 still a relevant mapper?VINXIS wrote:
Hi relevant person!
asking the real question here
I don't understand how it's complicated.Flower wrote:
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.
I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
If I knew I could vote for myself I would've participated huehueueh
Then please remove the oustanding contribution bracket lmao.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
Topic Starter
it's more of a 'unnecessarily complicated' than anything. formatting and all, i can understand where he's coming from. we just lack a proper system to vote for stuff with user verification (which is why we didn't use Google Forms), so this'll have to do.Shiirn wrote:
I don't understand how it's complicated.
You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/users you want to give X amount of points.
I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
i don't see how that's a reason to remove it. this vote is purely subjective and opinion based, if a user feels that X didn't contribute, he wouldn't vote. yeah sure there's the fact that not everyone who contributes aims to get their name out there for exposure, so the average person won't 'notice' them. but i think it's a fair compromise so that the people who contribute get at least some sort of recognition, rather than none at all in the name of 'fairness'.MrSergio wrote:
Then please remove the oustanding contribution bracket lmao.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
tbh you could have set up google forms but require the user to pm for verification (within a set amount of time or w/e, that is) that it is actually them that casted the vote.
Topic Starter
StarrStyx wrote:
tbh you could have set up google forms but require the user to pm for verification (within a set amount of time or w/e, that is) that it is actually them that casted the vote.
very roundabout way of 'verifying', and also unreliable and possibly the same or more complications.
hello