from in-game req

[General]

1. clear ma lady

[sah u ang]

• 
  Hitobjects

1. 00:05:849 - obviously here is the start of new part. and should be clickable I guess. there is some ways.
   1) 00:05:614 - change to a note, 00:05:849 - add a note, 00:05:614 - remove nc and00:05:849 - nc
   2) 00:05:380 - change to 1/2 slider, 00:05:849 - add a note, 00:05:849 - nc
2. 00:09:599 - umm... I think ignore this sound is not good way. put sth here?
3. 02:13:882 (1) - 02:14:427 (1) - need more increase distance imo. probably you already know that reason
4. 03:34:268 - I heard the sound at here. it's quite strong so I'd add a note. (it's 1/8 snap)
5. 03:35:359 - 03:36:450 - same
   
   NC
6. 01:11:474 (6) - 01:11:942 (1) - swap
7. 01:23:661 (3) - 01:27:411 (1) - it's not consistency cycle but yeah, pretty fitting so I think it's up to you.
8. 01:36:786 (1) - if you want to keep this NC, 01:37:724 (6) - make consistent here.
9. 01:48:036 (1) - 01:49:911 (5) - ok I understand your thinking. just pls consider to nc.
10. 02:29:427 (1) - 02:33:791 (4) - nc? too long
    
    04:51:245 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - hi Streliteela how are you doing XD

hitsound seems wip
quite good song.
that's all from me. good luck!

Beomsan wrote:

from in-game req

[General]

1. clear ma lady

[sah u ang]

• 
  Hitobjects

1. 00:05:849 - obviously here is the start of new part. and should be clickable I guess. there is some ways.
   1) 00:05:614 - change to a note, 00:05:849 - add a note, 00:05:614 - remove nc and00:05:849 - nc
   2) 00:05:380 - change to 1/2 slider, 00:05:849 - add a note, 00:05:849 - nc
   it will break the ds and pattern here,which i dont want to
2. 00:09:599 - umm... I think ignore this sound is not good way. put sth here?
   00:09:364 (1) - following piano
3. 02:13:882 (1) - 02:14:427 (1) - need more increase distance imo. probably you already know that reason k
4. 03:34:268 - I heard the sound at here. it's quite strong so I'd add a note. (it's 1/8 snap)
5. 03:35:359 - 03:36:450 - same ikr,but 1/8 snap note here is way too hard for 4*...so i decided not to add
   
   NC
6. 01:11:474 (6) - 01:11:942 (1) - swap 01:11:942 (1,2,3,4,5) - emphasise pentagon
7. 01:23:661 (3) - 01:27:411 (1) - it's not consistency cycle but yeah, pretty fitting so I think it's up to you. still fine now imo,but maybe ill change
8. 01:36:786 (1) - if you want to keep this NC, 01:37:724 (6) - make consistent here. yes
9. 01:48:036 (1) - 01:49:911 (5) - ok I understand your thinking. just pls consider to nc. should be fine?
10. 02:29:427 (1) - 02:33:791 (4) - nc? too long 6 is not long imo..
    
    04:51:245 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - hi Streliteela how are you doing XD
    nice

hitsound seems wip
quite good song.
that's all from me. good luck!

thx xd

Good Luck

Frey wrote:

• Heaven of Miracles

1. 00:09:364 (1) - Sliderslide和slidertick不能同时消音 至少在没有更新RC的情况下，这一条规则是依然适用的。这里很明显sliderslide和slidertick都被消音了（尽管slidertick是5%的音量，但是基本上等于没有）。为了给玩家更好的反馈，建议把音量稍微提高一点点。ok
   
2. 00:40:536 (1,2) - 这里做成单点完全没有问题。 试了下，太涨星，dt也很难，还是折返吧
   
3. 00:42:763 (5) - 这里可以改成一个1/4 横着的 短滑条，就可以不丢失00:42:880 - 这个节奏，打起来也很顺手。ok
   
4. 01:33:270 (4,6) - 如果是我的话我会选择删除他们，然后复制01:33:036 (3,5) - ，在粘贴到4和6的时间轴和直观位置。 试试看
   
5. 01:48:974 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 他们的起始处应该是01:50:614 (8) - ，这里很明显应该做一个小一点的跳跃，而不是接上之前的间隔。
   都改了下
6. 01:54:599 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 同理，这里的起始处可以是01:56:239 (8) - ，或者是把01:56:474 (1) - 叠到原来01:54:833 (2) - 的位置
   
7. 02:57:245 (7) - ctrl+g无论是从他们所说的emphasis还是flow都是大概不错的吧
   恩
8. 02:59:427 (7) - 同理，不过接到下一个部件的效果没有上一个好
   后面稍微改了下顺序
9. 03:25:609 (5) - 滑条头在下边，斜着竖起来，然后放到x212 y308，使得03:24:791 (2,3) - 和03:25:336 (4,5) - 他们分别的间隔一致。
   03:25:063 (3,5) - 考虑到这两个音调是一样的所以说不准备改了，stack没什么问题
10. 04:41:427 (3,4,5,6) - 既然前边都是前后前后（back and forth - 类似04:35:972 (1,2,3,4) - 04:38:154 (1,2,3,4) - ），为何这里要多一个看起来像是放错位置的note？改了下一个位置

Good Luck

thx for mod~~

From my queue.~


Nice song, really calming and a pleasure to listen to whilst modding. Take what I said as only suggestions. This map is quite slow and stuff so there wasn't TOO much to say.

Good luck.~

Miryle wrote:

From my queue.~

Heaven of Miracles

Insane

1. 00:05:614 (1) – Could you put a circle on this downbeat rather than a slider end? I feel it fits the music better. Or you could just Ctrl+G 00:05:614 (1,2) together.
   Ye someone mentioned, but as ive said i really wanna keep the aesthetics and pattern here so i have no idea how to change for now. slider end downbeat is somehow fine here cuz it's just the intro of music.
2. 00:09:364 (1) – This slider would be cooler if it started at 00:09:599 instead, since the low bass starts there. Add a circle where it currently starts so you have the piano covered too though.
   there's also a downbeat 00:09:364 - so prefer current way. tbh changing slider will also break my pattern so yeah..
3. 00:11:474 (1,2,3) – Try to make these more symmetrical?
   ok
4. 00:47:099 (1,2) – Blanket maybe?
   no need
5. 00:53:427 (2,3,4,5,6) – Star looks super weird. Try this: https://puu.sh/rVE0k/d6b6010e14.png
   00:53:427 (2,3) - 00:53:895 (4,6) - pretty much flip stuff. But i use another shape for slider.
6. 00:56:474 (1,3) – Ew overlap.
   ok
7. 01:21:786 (3,4,5,6) – Why not make this a square instead of a 4/5ths pentagon? Same with 01:25:536 (3,4,5,6).
   both are ok,just personal preference i should say
   
8. 01:27:411 (1,2,3,4,1) – Another weird-looking star that could look nicer. I get that it might ruin the pattern you have going with this, so think twice before applying.
   6 sides so fine..not star
9. 02:26:427 (3) – Could maybe put something in this space so it doesn’t feel so empty? When I played this part it was… well, boring.
   lemme consider
10. 02:54:245 (2,3) – Blanket is off if you look really closely. Not a huge deal, but just pointing it out.
    well...
11. 02:56:973 (6) – Move this to the center of these two: 02:57:791 (1,2)?
    no cuz 02:55:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - keep pattern
12. 03:13:063 (1,3) – Ew overlap. 03:19:609 (1,3) and 03:21:245 (4,1) too.
    intentional,should be fine.
13. 03:34:245 – Could add a beat here to go with what should be 1/6 rhythm (if I hear correctly) which you have still on ¼ blue ticks. In fact, do that with all sliders that start with a du-dun du-dun du-dun (idk how to explain it better… basically 03:35:336 and 03:36:427 if you use 1/6 snapping). I’d check that this area is timed right. Namely from 03:34:336 – 03:37:063.
    i think it's 1/8,and if i start circle from 1/8 it will be hard. so i can't.
14. 03:40:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) – I get the pattern, just personally I don’t like how this flows. Curves too sharply for the music, which seems to be quite loose and flowy.
    yes it's sharp and tricky, but interesting imo. This map has quite some challenging patterns.
    
15. 04:39:245 (1,2,3,4) – Maybe try doing something different here since you already did the square pattern twice? Up to you. I just feel to drag it out this long for sounds that aren’t specifically meant to be repeated three times (you just mapped it to the melody) could get repetitive.
    this is repetitive on purpose, same as 01:27:411 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -

Nice song, really calming and a pleasure to listen to whilst modding. Take what I said as only suggestions. This map is quite slow and stuff so there wasn't TOO much to say.

Good luck.~

thx,didn't fix much cuz many are just personal view.

Q

[1]
00:28:114 (6) - why don't you make better flow like this?
00:46:981 - Add a beat? I think This part has a piano sound.
00:48:505 (5,1) - I think people could be confused about reading because 00:48:036 (3,4,5) - this looks triangle, So DS looks similar.
01:05:849 (1,2,1) - If I were you, I mapped like this.
01:09:130 (3,4) - make sure 01:08:895 (2,3) - is jump.
01:41:239 - This should be clickable because It have strong piano.
01:50:380 (7,8) - Could be hard to read.
02:03:791 (1,2) - ctrl G fore flow with 02:03:927 (2,3) - .
03:32:700 (1,3) - How about make symmetry like 00:20:849 (1,2,3) - ?
03:34:245 - 03:35:336 - 03:36:427 - add a beat, It has strong sound.
03:47:154 (4,5) - Do you have any reason for stacking? I think Unstack could be better, 03:46:609 (2,3,4) - You didn't stack and you stacked 4,5 suddenly, It feels awkward for playing.
03:57:791 (1,2,3,4) - because of this antijumps, 03:58:882 (1,2,3) - this stream pattern could be hard to read.
04:34:882 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Just copy&paste pattern? ISn't It boring to play? I think you just copied 04:33:791 (1,2,3,4) - 04:34:882 (1,2,3,4) - 04:37:063 (1,2,3,4) - 04:39:245 (1,2,3,4) - .
05:02:154 (1) - This circle could be hard to read Because of DS and It's In 04:57:791 (1) - this slider's body, make Easier reading.

Good luck!

Hi

00:03:505 (5) - can stack this with 00:05:380 (2) - and u will get what i mean if u accept u can fix ds here 00:03:036 (3,4,5) -
00:05:614 (1) - this doesnt feel right ending on strong down beat where it should be clickable maybe try do same pattern and in start here 00:02:099 (1,2) -
they sound the same starting from here 00:05:849 -
00:26:005 (4,5) - ctrl g these 2 so the tail direction get more comfortable movement to the next object
00:29:989 (5,2) - this touching triggers me xD
00:36:200 - i dont hear anything here to place a note seemed overmaped
00:39:950 - ^
00:42:645 (4,5,6) - try some like this
for the sake of that 00:42:880 - strong drum also the pattern doesnt arrenge the sounds correctly imo
00:43:349 (1,2) - can improve blanket
00:50:145 - this feels should be clickable with these same sounds 00:50:380 (4,5) - try this 00:57:645 (2,3,4) - oh my point like u did here
01:06:669 (2,1) - the 1/4 stack confuses me also can be confused with the other 1/2 stacks maybe try this it will playes fine
01:19:911 (1) - i hear u should add 1 repeat to 1/8 slider or maybe just me
01:56:708 (2) - nc sv change
04:55:609 (2) - nc u did nc on each downbeat
05:04:336 (2) - ^
05:06:518 (1) - <3__<3

good luck nice. >w<

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[1]
00:28:114 (6) - why don't you make better flow like this?
it's just a bit fun to have this kind of left-right shift shape for 00:27:880 (4,5,6,7,1) -
00:46:981 - Add a beat? I think This part has a piano sound.
you are right,there is a piano sound, but it's 1/8 so if i add note it will be hard to hit accurately.
00:48:505 (5,1) - I think people could be confused about reading because 00:48:036 (3,4,5) - this looks triangle, So DS looks similar.
maybe,but it's very fine here.
01:05:849 (1,2,1) - If I were you, I mapped like this. ok
01:09:130 (3,4) - make sure 01:08:895 (2,3) - is jump. well what do u mean?
01:41:239 - This should be clickable because It have strong piano. 01:41:005 (5) - 1/6 reverse slider is good here
01:50:380 (7,8) - Could be hard to read. no
02:03:791 (1,2) - ctrl G fore flow with 02:03:927 (2,3) - . yes
03:32:700 (1,3) - How about make symmetry like 00:20:849 (1,2,3) - ? o
03:34:245 - 03:35:336 - 03:36:427 - add a beat, It has strong sound. true has strong beat,but as i said 1/8 circle start is so hard for 4*
03:47:154 (4,5) - Do you have any reason for stacking? I think Unstack could be better, 03:46:609 (2,3,4) - You didn't stack and you stacked 4,5 suddenly, It feels awkward for playing. alright then.
03:57:791 (1,2,3,4) - because of this antijumps, 03:58:882 (1,2,3) - this stream pattern could be hard to read. not jump...and different ds
04:34:882 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Just copy&paste pattern? ISn't It boring to play? I think you just copied 04:33:791 (1,2,3,4) - 04:34:882 (1,2,3,4) - 04:37:063 (1,2,3,4) - 04:39:245 (1,2,3,4) - .
yes,cuz music is similar here. i did the same for 01:27:411 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
05:02:154 (1) - This circle could be hard to read Because of DS and It's In 04:57:791 (1) - this slider's body, make Easier reading.
it's on purpose ofc so looks neat.
Good luck!

thanks a lot!!

Lilyanna wrote:

Hi

00:03:505 (5) - can stack this with 00:05:380 (2) - and u will get what i mean if u accept u can fix ds here 00:03:036 (3,4,5) -
cuz 00:03:974 (2,2,2,2) - aesthetics
00:05:614 (1) - this doesnt feel right ending on strong down beat where it should be clickable maybe try do same pattern and in start here 00:02:099 (1,2) -
they sound the same starting from here 00:05:849 - ikr but for keeping patterns i wanna keep. rhythm is fine imo..i stated this b4
00:26:005 (4,5) - ctrl g these 2 so the tail direction get more comfortable movement to the next object
wut...tbh 00:25:536 (3,4,5) - the sharp angle plays much better than blunt ones, and better flow for 00:26:239 (5,1) -
00:29:989 (5,2) - this touching triggers me xD ok
00:36:200 - i dont hear anything here to place a note seemed overmaped
00:39:950 - ^ listen with 25%,there's a beat 00:36:200 -
00:42:645 (4,5,6) - try some like this
well then
for the sake of that 00:42:880 - strong drum also the pattern doesnt arrenge the sounds correctly imo
00:43:349 (1,2) - can improve blanket kk
00:50:145 - this feels should be clickable with these same sounds 00:50:380 (4,5) - try this
00:48:974 (1,2,3) - want this shape xd
00:57:645 (2,3,4) - oh my point like u did here
01:06:669 (2,1) - the 1/4 stack confuses me also can be confused with the other 1/2 stacks maybe try this it will playes fine
changed sth
01:19:911 (1) - i hear u should add 1 repeat to 1/8 slider or maybe just me it's just 1/8 lol
01:56:708 (2) - nc sv change no need
04:55:609 (2) - nc u did nc on each downbeat
05:04:336 (2) - ^ wtf no need
05:06:518 (1) - <3__<3 ♪♪

good luck nice. >w<

thanks very much!

水摸小天使owo


撒谎大神飞图如喝水，害怕.jpg
GL~

太神了。。。。。。看了遍都改了，没什么好说的
多谢~~

Hi.
From m4m~
General
Heaven of Miracles
nice map gl

[Heaven of Miracles]

• 
  stack leniency 4 makes everything cute

1. 00:05:614 (1) - wouldnt be better if the tail is clickable? the beat there is much stronger than the one on its head
2. 00:09:364 (1,2) - id unstack these cuz theres a lack of emphasis on 2
3. 01:48:036 (5) - 01:48:974 (1) - 01:49:911 (5) - 01:55:536 (5) - in this section you use a higher spacing for the note on the 1st and 3rd beat of the measure except for those i pointed out. I know you did it for the structures and thats ok too but id like to see some consistency here :3
4. 02:22:882 - the timing sections here have a different volume
5. 02:43:472 (4,1) - the stack kills the emphasis that 1 deserves
6. 02:49:882 (2,1) - ^
7. 03:32:154 (5,6) - im sure 6 is strong enough to have its own place on the playfield
8. 03:34:245 - 03:35:336 - 03:36:427 - add circles?
9. 03:44:154 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - i dont really see a reason behind that high spacing increase. the music isnt different from the next sections yet you used less spacing on these
10. 03:53:427 (1,2,3,4) - piano is high pitched here so increasing the spacing would be cool, at least around the same spacing as 03:49:063 (1,2,3,4) -
11. 04:06:382 (3,1) - piano is really strong on 1. id space these as much as 04:07:472 (4,1) -
12. 04:15:927 (4) - 3 circles does the job better imo. the piano has the same pitch as 04:15:109 (1,2,3) - yet you used a slider
13. 05:02:154 (1) - i dont really like covering stuff with slider bodies but if u want to keep it move it 1 pixel down so it maches the coordinates of the red node of the slider

nice map

kunka wrote:

Hi.
From m4m~
General

1. BG: The aspect ratio is 15:9. I recommend 16:9 as much as possible.
   original size is 4:3 so i have to use this resolution.

Heaven of Miracles

1. 00:07:255 - add whistle
2. 00:44:052 (2,1) - stack miss?
3. 00:46:981 - I hear 1/8 rhythm. You pick up similar 1/8 in 01:19:911 (1) - . You recommend that I add it if you can permit 1/8. http://puu.sh/rYqIY.jpg
   The difference is that one starts from yellow tick and the other one from white tick. I want to keep simple and 1/8 from yellow tick is too hard.
4. 02:43:063 (3,4,1) - There is not the problem with rhythm. However, I think that I am hard to play by stack. However, it's unnatural when I remove the stack. Therefore I think that I should change it in the same way as 02:44:154 (5,6) - http://puu.sh/rYrol.jpg
   nothing 02:43:200 - so i don't think two 1/2 sliders work well here.
5. 02:50:700 - You continue picking up the sound of the snare. And it's artificiality that don't pick up this points. I recommend the addition of the circle to 02:50:700 -
6. 03:28:336 (1) - Hit sound is weak. I recommend setting same as 03:27:245 (1) -
7. 04:05:700 (2,3,1) - It's suggestion same as the above (Problem of the stack). I think that rhythm like until now is better 04:03:245 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/rYsOd.jpg Stack is canceled if I change it in this way, too. same thing xd
8. 04:21:518 (2) - Hit sound is weak. I recommend setting same as 04:30:245 (2) -
9. 04:45:791 (1) - whistle
10. 04:46:882 (6) - nc
11. 04:55:609 (2) - I think that nc is necessary for the mercy of the drain.
12. 05:04:336 (2) - ^ unnecessary imo
13. 05:04:336 (2,1) - stack miss no

nice map gl

no reply=fixed, thx!

pkhg wrote:

[Heaven of Miracles]

• 
  stack leniency 4 makes everything cute
  let's try

1. 00:05:614 (1) - wouldnt be better if the tail is clickable? the beat there is much stronger than the one on its head would be but i wanna keep pattern as explained before
2. 00:09:364 (1,2) - id unstack these cuz theres a lack of emphasis on 2
3. 01:48:036 (5) - 01:48:974 (1) - 01:49:911 (5) - 01:55:536 (5) - in this section you use a higher spacing for the note on the 1st and 3rd beat of the measure except for those i pointed out. I know you did it for the structures and thats ok too but id like to see some consistency here :3 www shape is cool
4. 02:22:882 - the timing sections here have a different volume
5. 02:43:472 (4,1) - the stack kills the emphasis that 1 deserves
6. 02:49:882 (2,1) - ^
7. 03:32:154 (5,6) - im sure 6 is strong enough to have its own place on the playfield same pitch so yeah
8. 03:34:245 - 03:35:336 - 03:36:427 - add circles? no 1/8 start
9. 03:44:154 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - i dont really see a reason behind that high spacing increase. the music isnt different from the next sections yet you used less spacing on these
10. 03:53:427 (1,2,3,4) - piano is high pitched here so increasing the spacing would be cool, at least around the same spacing as 03:49:063 (1,2,3,4) -
11. 04:06:382 (3,1) - piano is really strong on 1. id space these as much as 04:07:472 (4,1) -
12. 04:15:927 (4) - 3 circles does the job better imo. the piano has the same pitch as 04:15:109 (1,2,3) - yet you used a slider
13. 05:02:154 (1) - i dont really like covering stuff with slider bodies but if u want to keep it move it 1 pixel down so it maches the coordinates of the red node of the slider

nice map

thx,no reply=fixed

theyre 1/3 not 1/8 lol

pkhg wrote:

theyre 1/3 not 1/8 lol

listened carefully and i believe sound is on 03:34:268 - 03:35:359 - 03:36:450 -

M4M reply~


So I honestly couldn't say much about this, since I agreed with almost everything you did in this map. So have a star to compensate x.x

Good Luck o/

Kaitjuh wrote:

M4M reply~

oh god

Heaven of Miracles

1. 00:42:645 (4,5,6) - This might be hard to play, since the first two are mapped on the high notes but the slider is mapped on the drums, so I did not expect this to 1. be a triple and 2. be a triple spaced that far. I would suggest nerfing be pattern.
2. 01:24:364 (4) - Maybe place this somewhere else, since the distance to the next object could be emphasized better.
3. 01:24:716 (1,2) - also spacing wise this seems relatively a little lower than the rest? Any reason for this? hmm it's fine imo,hard to adjust spacing here
4. 02:50:154 (1) - The higher spacing here is not really supported by anything imo 02:49:882 (2,1) - 1 actually has higher tune than 2
5. 03:25:336 (4) - This also feels off since it's not spaced like the previous objects, even though it's just as strong. same ds as 03:23:972 (1,2) -
6. 05:06:518 (1) - Silence/mute the sliderend instead, since there's no sound.it's already 5%

So I honestly couldn't say much about this, since I agreed with almost everything you did in this map. So have a star to compensate x.x

Good Luck o/

no reply=fixed thx

哇，好感谢mod，我来回摸了。
恩，这个mod的地方很多都比较主观的建议，还请见谅

GenesisR wrote:

哇，好感谢mod，我来回摸了。
恩，这个mod的地方很多都比较主观的建议，还请见谅

SPOILER

00:05:380 (2,1) - 感觉这里前面的一个note用滑条，然后后面的小节用circle起更符合重音 这边还是保留下形状..
00:42:645 (4,5) - 感觉这个稍微高一点会好读一些
00:44:052 (2) - 好像没太包好，似乎再往上一点
00:47:099 (1) - 这个地方前面感觉还是放个1/8滑条更好些？太难了
01:06:786 (1,2,3,4) - 恩，做成1, 4, 3, 2好像更好看些 只有01:07:020 (2,3) - 有重音区别需要跳
01:29:286 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 感觉这一组间距比前面大一点表现力更强些，然后后面那个也再稍微更大一点
01:58:609 (2,3,4,5) - 感觉把3, 4的间距稍微放大一些更好读
02:17:427 (2,3) - 感觉这两个note和前面间距大一些更好读
02:34:882 (6) - 感觉这个滑条稍微顺时针转一点更正一些好看 不用
02:37:609 (4,5,6) - 感觉这个变成折返条对节奏表现更强，后面同理 在考虑下
03:34:336 (1,2,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) - 这里感觉好像还是把前面那个音加上更好些？好像挺明显的 是啊。。就是太难
04:23:700 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这里鼓点听起来似乎挺弱的，强度相近的钢琴音比较明显，要不要考虑考虑1/4滑条 不用，有鼓
04:41:427 (3,4,5,6) - 感觉这里的1/4节奏用高速滑条下下去更能表现和前面几小节情感上更强 滑条就算了，，不做

no reply=fixed thx

[general]

1. do you have metadata ? ( i searched for it and found youtube link but the title is all uppercase so idk lol)

[diff]

1. 00:03:739 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - why is the spacing here so different o: i think all the beat here have similiar intensity so spacing shouldn't be different much like this , try to make spacing more consistent ?
2. 00:07:489 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - same
3. 00:27:880 (4,5,6,7,1) - a bit awkward to see the stream shape here really different from the others a lots like this is the only one that shape weird lol the others are all curved stream shape , maybe it would be better to try to make thing more consistent to improve the aesthetic consistency
4. 00:31:630 (4,5,6,7,1) - try to start using 1.0x from here instead of 00:35:380 (7) - ?, the intensity kinda same imo
5. 00:42:645 (4,5,6) - is this intentional ? , the 1/4 spacing here play really awkward somehow lol regular 1/4 spacing would be enough now , this thing kinda appear unexpected tho which make me believe it's 1/2 instead of 1/4
6. 00:53:427 (2) - i think move this to around x352 y52 can improve the pattern aesthetic a bit
7. 01:56:708 (2,1) - stack?
8. 02:55:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 02:57:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the concept of patterning there is inconsistent to each other lol cus 02:55:882 (2,3) - low spacing but
9. 02:58:064 (2,3) - high spacing , and that make thing inconsisntent and play weird imo , maybe you can try to do something with it to fix it and make it consistent to each other ?
10. 03:12:518 (5) - is the slider end at slidertail here intentional o: ? i think make the flow go directly to 03:13:063 (1) - might make thing play more smooth
11. 03:14:154 (3,4) - mmm would be better to give this more spacing for emphasis the snare at 4 , you did it right here 03:18:518 (3,4) - 03:20:700 (3,4) -
12. 03:32:154 (5,6) - stack doesn't fit the beat here imo , the piano here support for the movement more , try to move 6 to around x328 y372 ?
13. 03:33:245 (2) - can move to x260 y208 to improve aesthetic equality here 03:32:700 (1,2,3) -
14. 04:06:927 (4,1) - 04:07:472 (4,1) - mm looks like the only 1/4 jumps in the map here and they appear really unexpected eventhough you got the nc cus maybe i think the beat there doesn't need to be that emphasized that much imo the beat there just sound more like a regular beat with nothing so special about them so it would be good to just using the regular 1/4 spacing instead to express the beat here better

call me back when ready

CelsiusLK wrote:

[general]

1. do you have metadata ? ( i searched for it and found youtube link but the title is all uppercase so idk lol)
   Yeah, I agree, on youtube page it's capitals

[diff]

1. 00:03:739 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - why is the spacing here so different o: i think all the beat here have similiar intensity so spacing shouldn't be different much like this , try to make spacing more consistent ?
   00:03:739 (1,1,1,1) - i clearly hear that the pitch is going down here...from high tune to lower one,so i choose to reduce spacing gradually here to emphasise it.
2. 00:07:489 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - same
3. 00:27:880 (4,5,6,7,1) - a bit awkward to see the stream shape here really different from the others a lots like this is the only one that shape weird lol the others are all curved stream shape , maybe it would be better to try to make thing more consistent to improve the aesthetic consistency ok changed
4. 00:31:630 (4,5,6,7,1) - try to start using 1.0x from here instead of 00:35:380 (7) - ?, the intensity kinda same imo
   music is more intense from 00:33:974 - imo and i used more spacing later, so 0.8x is ok...not a big deal difference
5. 00:42:645 (4,5,6) - is this intentional ? , the 1/4 spacing here play really awkward somehow lol regular 1/4 spacing would be enough now , this thing kinda appear unexpected tho which make me believe it's 1/2 instead of 1/4
   a very strong drum 00:42:880 - so i want to emphasise the beat. Actually original place of 00:42:645 (4,5) - lie exactly in the middle of 00:42:411 (3,6) - .In order to reduce reading difficulties i move them up so that more spacing in 00:42:411 (3,4,5) - . 00:42:763 (5,6) - only 2.0x so imo it's fine.
6. 00:53:427 (2) - i think move this to around x352 y52 can improve the pattern aesthetic a bit ok
7. 01:56:708 (2,1) - stack? ye
8. 02:55:609 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 02:57:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the concept of patterning there is inconsistent to each other lol cus 02:55:882 (2,3) - low spacing but 02:58:064 (2,3) - high spacing , and that make thing inconsisntent and play weird imo , maybe you can try to do something with it to fix it and make it consistent to each other ? ok
9. 03:12:518 (5) - is the slider end at slidertail here intentional o: ? i think make the flow go directly to 03:13:063 (1) - might make thing play more smooth
   03:13:063 (1) - from here a new instrument is introduced and the reverse slider ends 03:12:927 - is very ok imo.
10. 03:14:154 (3,4) - mmm would be better to give this more spacing for emphasis the snare at 4 , you did it right here 03:18:518 (3,4) - 03:20:700 (3,4) - ok
11. 03:32:154 (5,6) - stack doesn't fit the beat here imo , the piano here support for the movement more , try to move 6 to around x328 y372 ?
    i dont wanna change for now cuz for me 03:32:154 (5,6) - clearly have same piano pitch here..they have same music so stack is ok
12. 03:33:245 (2) - can move to x260 y208 to improve aesthetic equality here 03:32:700 (1,2,3) - sure
13. 04:06:927 (4,1) - 04:07:472 (4,1) - mm looks like the only 1/4 jumps in the map here and they appear really unexpected eventhough you got the nc cus maybe i think the beat there doesn't need to be that emphasized that much imo the beat there just sound more like a regular beat with nothing so special about them so it would be good to just using the regular 1/4 spacing instead to express the beat here better
    ok,spent some time to change patterns around here.

call me back when ready

thanks!

b

00:05:614 (1,5) - sliders end on pretty important beats, make them clickable

00:42:763 (5,6) - are you sure about this, it's rather unexpected 1/4 jump, visually it looks like 1/2

03:44:427 (3,4,5,6,7) - scale this down a bit, it's insanely high spaced when there's nothing special here compared to this whole section

wtf so quick
I will fix after I get home xd

Strategas wrote:

00:05:614 (1,5) - sliders end on pretty important beats, make them clickable
00:05:849 - fixed, but 00:06:786 (5) - wanna keep becuz i like reverse slider here+i emphasised 00:07:489 (1) - and it's more important than 00:07:255 - imo
00:42:763 (5,6) - are you sure about this, it's rather unexpected 1/4 jump, visually it looks like 1/2
ok
03:44:427 (3,4,5,6,7) - scale this down a bit, it's insanely high spaced when there's nothing special here compared to this whole section
k

2

awesome work :3

Thank you!!

gratz! i like preview

这个人怎么用了我的主菜单背景图作bg
这上面是miku诶>.<

gratz!

Pretty good song and map but just this circle isn't follow the main piano 02:09:110 (7) -

edit: yukiyo have finded this xd

Gratz


but,
02:09:110 (7) - Is there even a relevant sound you are mapping to be map. You map the piano right? There is no piano sound here, none of the melody or am I stupid? Even in the original video of BHG Music there is no melody sound there ;_;
This really threw me off while playing ... thrice. It just doesn't make any sense to me. At least explain please.

Zero__wind wrote:

这个人怎么用了我的主菜单背景图作bg
这上面是miku诶>.<

S酱给的BG qwq

Yukiyo wrote:

Gratz
but,
02:09:110 (7) - Is there even a relevant sound you are mapping to be map. You map the piano right? There is no piano sound here, none of the melody or am I stupid? Even in the original video of BHG Music there is no melody sound there ;_;
This really threw me off while playing ... thrice. It just doesn't make any sense to me. At least explain please.

Thanks for your concern, actually i clearly heard a beat 02:09:110 (7) - ...it is same as the music for sliderends on 02:08:154 (3,4,5) - etc. It is not main piano music like 02:08:973 (6) - . Actually same sound occurs on 02:09:246 - and 02:09:382 - ,but it will be too hard for DT if i put note on every 1/2,so i just use 2 circles here. I also want to keep consistency with 02:05:700 (6,7) - 02:12:246 (3,4) - so yeah... It doesn't seem to be an overmap here imo xd

Edit: 220BPM part is a pain to DT... At first I used notes on every 1/2 cuz there are sounds there, but after test played I decided to reduce difficulty level so here it is. I hope it still plays nice now

太可怕了

Adding Klaus Badelt to the tags for Pirates of the Carribean but not John Williams for Star Wars? *starts a war about favourite film score composers* (ง ͠° ͟ل͜ ͡°)ง

On a more serious note, I too find the note at 02:09:110 (7) to be out of place - ofc it's technically not an overmap since there are constant 1/6-notes in the background, but that's the point: They play constantly and you leave them unmapped all the time in order to focus on the more dominant layers - Stuff like 02:04:882 (3,4,5) doesn't really feel like you're mapping them because it's simply emphasizing the more dominant notes on the sliderheads more, but it doesn't really bring attention to those background-notes at all.
Your argument about keeping it consistent with 02:05:837 (7) and 02:12:382 (4) etc is faulted because the song itself isn't consistent in that way, there are strong melody-notes on these notes but there is none at 02:09:110 (7) - You are enforcing consistency onto a part of the song that is inconsistent itself. As someone who knows the original song, as most people probably do, I don't pay much attention to reading the map here because I know that even in the original song there is no strong note at that place, hence I don't expect it to be mapped either - You putting it under a stack makes this even more of an issue as it's easily being overlooked.

Another point: 01:58:609 (2,3,4,5,2,3,4,5,2) - Are you aware that all of these sliders are basically off-beat? The notes on the slidertails are all stronger than the ones on the heads, because at this point the song is still built like a 2/4-song with 1/3-snaps - To visualize what I mean, try changing the timing section to 146,666bpm and 2/4-signature, that's how the beat priorization should be. You even emphasized those slidertails with your hitsounding, so it seems like you felt those to be stronger too, but the slider-placement is going against that completely. The single sliders aren't that much of an issue bc they represent the pairs of notes kinda well, but at 01:59:427 (4,5) and 02:01:063 (4,5) it just feels completely wrong as it's representing a triplet of notes with an additional note before it as two pairs.. I hope you get what I mean, but if not, just emphasize the beats like you did with your hitsounding ^^

Yet some more points: I strongly lack differentiation at 02:04:882 (3,4,5) - 02:08:155 (3,4,5) - 02:15:518 (1,2,3) -, the last one of those three sliders always has an additional strong melody-note on its tail, as opposed to the previous two sliders which only have strong notes on their heads, but this isn't represented in the map at all. (At the first combo it's even a bit worse since there's also the layer of the piano which only plays the fundamental notes of the harmonies which plays at 02:03:246 and 02:04:064 and both at 02:04:882 and 02:05:155 but not at 02:05:427 if you listen closely, but that's just a sidenote)

Also it took me several runs to realize that there actually are hitsounds on notes like 02:37:882 (6) because those are barely audible, they sound like what would usually be a slidertick to me and I don't think they provide sufficient feedback for the player when they are surrounded by much noisier hitsounds overshadowing this quiet one, but I'm more sensitive about that than other people so idk, would be nice to hear some more opinions on that though.

Bonsai wrote:

Adding Klaus Badelt to the tags for Pirates of the Carribean but not John Williams for Star Wars? *starts a war about favourite film score composers* (ง ͠° ͟ل͜ ͡°)ง
Tags are all from track list that the composer provided, but i can add Klaus Badelt tho

On a more serious note, I too find the note at 02:09:110 (7) to be out of place - ofc it's technically not an overmap since there are constant 1/6-notes in the background, but that's the point: They play constantly and you leave them unmapped all the time in order to focus on the more dominant layers - Stuff like 02:04:882 (3,4,5) doesn't really feel like you're mapping them because it's simply emphasizing the more dominant notes on the sliderheads more, but it doesn't really bring attention to those background-notes at all.
Your argument about keeping it consistent with 02:05:837 (7) and 02:12:382 (4) etc is faulted because the song itself isn't consistent in that way, there are strong melody-notes on these notes but there is none at 02:09:110 (7) - You are enforcing consistency onto a part of the song that is inconsistent itself. As someone who knows the original song, as most people probably do, I don't pay much attention to reading the map here because I know that even in the original song there is no strong note at that place, hence I don't expect it to be mapped either - You putting it under a stack makes this even more of an issue as it's easily being overlooked.
ok all fixed

Another point: 01:58:609 (2,3,4,5,2,3,4,5,2) - Are you aware that all of these sliders are basically off-beat? The notes on the slidertails are all stronger than the ones on the heads, because at this point the song is still built like a 2/4-song with 1/3-snaps - To visualize what I mean, try changing the timing section to 146,666bpm and 2/4-signature, that's how the beat priorization should be. You even emphasized those slidertails with your hitsounding, so it seems like you felt those to be stronger too, but the slider-placement is going against that completely. The single sliders aren't that much of an issue bc they represent the pairs of notes kinda well, but at 01:59:427 (4,5) and 02:01:063 (4,5) it just feels completely wrong as it's representing a triplet of notes with an additional note before it as two pairs.. I hope you get what I mean, but if not, just emphasize the beats like you did with your hitsounding ^^
no,i did this intentionally,sliers dont necessarily have to be downbeat on head and soft beat on end, i feel like it plays really fun with a lot of sliders like these here,if i apply all downbeat on sliderhead or use circles, it will be very hard to map the rhythm here. At least it will be much harder. The sliders are fun and good here to process to the kiai.

Yet some more points: I strongly lack differentiation at 02:04:882 (3,4,5) - 02:08:155 (3,4,5) - 02:15:518 (1,2,3) -, the last one of those three sliders always has an additional strong melody-note on its tail, as opposed to the previous two sliders which only have strong notes on their heads, but this isn't represented in the map at all. (At the first combo it's even a bit worse since there's also the layer of the piano which only plays the fundamental notes of the harmonies which plays at 02:03:246 and 02:04:064 and both at 02:04:882 and 02:05:155 but not at 02:05:427 if you listen closely, but that's just a sidenote)
The kiai i remapped...02:15:518 (1,2,3) - i want to keep due to the nice shape it brings. the triangle is good imo, it also follows rhythm.Wanna keep emphasis on overall structure here.

Also it took me several runs to realize that there actually are hitsounds on notes like 02:37:882 (6) because those are barely audible, they sound like what would usually be a slidertick to me and I don't think they provide sufficient feedback for the player when they are surrounded by much noisier hitsounds overshadowing this quiet one, but I'm more sensitive about that than other people so idk, would be nice to hear some more opinions on that though.
did sth here,thx

Thx for mod,hope i explained clearly.

ok as requested

Thx Bonsai & Okorin, updated with the revised version.
Any more suggestions feel free to post xd

things got settled so we're back to #1

Heaven of Miracles is a bit of an odd diff name (What's the connotation of it? Also Heaven of Miracles is a bit odd in english). Maybe you could try doing something different? "Land of Miracles" sounds a bit better, but that's just one suggestion. Awesome map btw <3

Ascendance wrote:

Heaven of Miracles is a bit of an odd diff name (What's the connotation of it? Also Heaven of Miracles is a bit odd in english). Maybe you could try doing something different? "Land of Miracles" sounds a bit better, but that's just one suggestion. Awesome map btw <3

Wee actually I'd like to include Heaven in diff name cuz that's my first feeling of this song. The remix of those piano music feels like this. And I think tho it might be a bit strange in English it's still understandable...

Land is a bit...common and not divine?(how to describe in English lol) I really like current diff name it creates such atmosphere xd

Hope the reason is fine cuz I find it hard to explain

hope everything's fine now
#2

Discussed with the mapper about change tag "of" and fix unused timing line on 02:22:882.

Everything looks good!

Reapproved!

nice one
gratz!

谁能告诉我，2:35处的音乐名字QAQ

sunyiwei wrote:

谁能告诉我，2:35处的音乐名字QAQ

哎，我也不是很清楚啊xd
建议看下track list或者截一下那边音乐发论坛之类的地方问下？

OMG 这个怎么回复啊0.0 还有，你是chinese？为什么是澳大利亚的旗子 还有什么是track list论坛又在哪里，你是指的这个网站的论坛还是其他网站的XD，啥都不懂，今天才下osu！

sunyiwei wrote:

OMG 这个怎么回复啊0.0 还有，你是chinese？为什么是澳大利亚的旗子 还有什么是track list论坛又在哪里，你是指的这个网站的论坛还是其他网站的XD，啥都不懂，今天才下osu！

是啊。。只是在澳洲长居而已，track list在主页面的描述部分 https://osu.ppy.sh/s/522872 下面的框框里，点开就有了。
这游戏刚下的话建议去看教程，tutorial，可以去osu百度贴吧或者去国外的论坛。

(⊙o⊙)哦 好方便啊。 一语点醒梦中人，谢谢谢谢，thank you~

good