Lexis wrote:

Hi, from my queue, M4M

[Easy]

00:05:228 (2,3) - Fix blanket // Fixed, thanks

00:34:588 (1,2) - Ctrl J H & G on 1 and replace it. After that, try to do a blanket with 2. Looks better ? :3 // I didn't manage to do something better without fucking up the DS

01:30:119 (1) - This slider looks quite ugly. Why not try to move it a bit to the left and remake the blanket with the other slider ? // Reworked the slider

01:32:192 (1,2) - Fix blanket (end of slider 1) // Fixed

[Normal]

00:39:056 (2,3) - Fix blanket // Fixed

00:46:078 (1,2) - Make a blanket ? // No, not necessary here

01:06:503 (3,5) - Tiny overlap // Fixed

01:29:482 (3,1) - Uh.... I know you followed the beats here... But that's not better to keep consistency here ? And just change (3) into a 1/2 slider ? That's not really bad in 1/2 and it sounds good (there is a small beat at the end of the slider in 1/2, so it's good). // There is no actual note for a 1/2 slider, and I don't want this part to be consistent because the song is different here. The overlap at this one place actually prevent the player for a special rythm and add a bit of "challenge"

Most of the players who are playing Normals are Newbies/Beginners. (Without the pp farmers :p) // A lot of them are actually people looking for top 50 rank by doing fullmod SS

__So I think It's not really good to break the consistency at one moment, that is really disappointing and I think it's better to change it into a 1/2 slider.

01:43:681 (1,2) - Weird placing // Improved

02:27:958 (1) - Doesn't fits with rythm O.o // I think it does, I just didn't add a reverse 1/8 slider like in my Shrine diff because this element is not appropriate for a Normal, anyway, the timing may be sligthly off, I will check that EDIT: Improved timing a bit

-----------------------------------------------------------
End of my mod ! |-| Fin de mon mod !
I hope my mod is helpful to you |-| J'espère que ca t'as aidé_i_i_i_i_
iiBecause it was fkin' long to translate |-| Parce que c'était super long à traduire
lol

1. 00:23:739 (2,3,4) - create a triangle shape for visual
2. 00:32:673 (1) - it would be nice to NC this ( and the same patterns at the back)
   this is because 00:30:759 (1,2,3) - has another sound (piano + idk what the instrument is called :c) ;00:32:673 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - (piano only)
3. 01:14:641 (1) - best tonot start on a blue line + it doesn't have a sounds at the reverse there? best to just put one or two circles down imo :/
4. 01:17:992 (3,3) - it's best to stack these on the heads of 01:18:631 (1,1) - cause it's gives the feeling of stopped movement there, but, just my opinions flying through xD
5. 01:21:822 (3) - i think this should be pointing upwards as the song goes to a higher note

1. I'm pretty sure overlaps / stacks aren't allowed in this diff.
2. 00:20:547 (2,1) - overlap
3. 00:44:163 (3,1) - ^
4. 01:05:226 (1,1) - i think distancing this a little more would be more better.
5. 01:43:681 (1,1) - not sure about this almost overlap sliders
6. 02:08:574 (1) - maybe alittle downwards cause it's touching the hp bar, buut not sure whether it matters tho.
   

_IxApplePie_ wrote:

m4m~

Shrine

1. 00:23:739 (2,3,4) - create a triangle shape for visual // Reworked this pattern
2. 00:32:673 (1) - it would be nice to NC this ( and the same patterns at the back)
   this is because 00:30:759 (1,2,3) - has another sound (piano + idk what the instrument is called :c) ;00:32:673 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - (piano only) // You're right, fixed
3. 01:14:641 (1) - best tonot start on a blue line + it doesn't have a sounds at the reverse there? best to just put one or two circles down imo :/ // I don't really understand what you are telling me, this slider is fine for me and there is a note on the reverse (but the timing of the song is a bit weird for this part), no changes
4. 01:17:992 (3,3) - it's best to stack these on the heads of 01:18:631 (1,1) - cause it's gives the feeling of stopped movement there, but, just my opinions flying through xD // Maybe, but I would have to change this whole part of the song and there would be too many stopped movements, I prefer how it actually is, no changes
5. 01:21:822 (3) - i think this should be pointing upwards as the song goes to a higher note // Changed

Easy

1. I'm pretty sure overlaps / stacks aren't allowed in this diff. // The overlaps in my diff are totally fine imo since these are readable for a beginner and appear to be overlapped for such a short time
2. 00:20:547 (2,1) - overlap
3. 00:44:163 (3,1) - ^
4. 01:05:226 (1,1) - i think distancing this a little more would be more better. // Improved this slider
5. 01:43:681 (1,1) - not sure about this almost overlap sliders // Fine for me
6. 02:08:574 (1) - maybe alittle downwards cause it's touching the hp bar, buut not sure whether it matters tho. // Changed
   

That's all! GL~
Can't seem to find anything in Normal so @_@

Worminators wrote:

Thanks for the mod, translating it in both languages was not necessary but thanks anyway

Hobbes2 wrote:

Hi

[Easy]

00:23:100 (1) - You want this guy's head to be fully covered by 00:20:547 (2) - , to do this you can move 00:23:100 (1) - to x:139 y:151 // Fixed

00:37:780 (4,1) - This blanket is not quite perfect. // Fixed

00:40:333 (2) - I'd say better flow if you ctrl+j the shape - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6399982 // Okay

00:44:163 (3,1) - Properly stack // Can't stack better now

01:14:801 (1,1) - Improvable blanket. // Improved

01:28:205 (1,1) - I know it's not super visible or noticeable in game, but the aesthetics have been very clean up until this point so I think it would be best to go ahead and avoid this slight overlap altogether. // Okay, rotated this 10° so it don't overlap anymore

01:43:043 (2,1) - Fix blanket // Fixed

01:51:340 (1,1) - Stack these // Okay

02:10:489 (1) - As earlier in the map this guy's head needs to be covered fully by 02:08:574 (1) - body. Move 02:10:489 (1) - to x:206 y:181 (this also doesn't break DS) // Fixed

[Shrine]

00:14:803 (5,2,3) - Get the distance between these 3 the same visually? Makes this whole pattern neater. // Changed this pattern a bit

00:25:654 (5,6) - Just from the piano notes I feel like these should be spaced instead of stacked. Contrast it with 00:21:824 (5,6) - and compare it with 00:14:164 (4,5) - // Spaced but not that much because there is not much sound difference

00:34:269 (6) - Most intense of the notes, deserves some spacing imo. Stack with 00:32:993 (2) - perhaps? // No, I prefer having this pattern
00:38:099 (6) - ^, the placement is less obvious however.
00:41:929 (6) - ^, You get the idea, won't mention these any more.

00:46:716 (2,3) - I'm not really a fan of this flow, it doesn't play too bad but it doesn't look good visually. // Don't wanna change

00:57:248 (6,2) - You can go ahead and stack these tbh // It was supposed to be stacked but got unstacked for some reason

01:29:482 (3,1) - Improve blanket // I guess its better now

01:59:638 (3) - For this set of triangles the third note is the most intense of each set of three, making feel like using more spacing for it instead of making a perfect triangle would be more appropriate. // I want to keep this pattern

I really like the song, very pleasant to listen to. Good luck! // Thanks!

• [Easy]

1. AR should be 3 because it's a slow music
2. 01:10:971 (1,2) - Imperfect blanket and here too 01:10:971 (1,1)

• [Normal]

1. 01:03:950 (2,2) - Try a overlap this
2. 01:16:716 (1,2,3) - The placing is weird, we have no blanket and no flow (sad) so I suggest to try this
3. 02:18:787 (2,1) - Fix a overlap
   
   
   
   • [Shrine]
   1. 01:25:652 (3) - Why You don't make a little jump?
   2. 01:27:567 (3) - ^
   3. 01:46:872 (3) - ^^

ShogunMoon wrote:

Hi!
NM from my Queue~

You prefer English so you have a English mod, yay!

• [Easy]

1. AR should be 3 because it's a slow music // I think AR2 is good enough, slow song, slow AR
2. 01:10:971 (1,2) - Imperfect blanket and here too 01:10:971 (1,1) // Fixed

• [Normal]

1. 01:03:950 (2,2) - Try a overlap this // Done
2. 01:16:716 (1,2,3) - The placing is weird, we have no blanket and no flow (sad) so I suggest to try this // You're right, this pattern is better
3. 02:18:787 (2,1) - Fix a overlap // Fixed
   
   
   
   • [Shrine]
   1. 01:25:652 (3) - Why You don't make a little jump? // No I prefer to be consistant with my patterns
   2. 01:27:567 (3) - ^
   3. 01:46:872 (3) - ^^

Good luck with this. Don’t kudos if it wasn’t helpful.

1. 00:20:547 (2,1) - 02:08:574 (1,1) - This kind of overlap should be avoided as it can be too confusing for players in this level.
2. 00:34:588 (1,2,3) - Uh doesn't looks really aesthetically appealing imo, feels like you could've come up with a better design on this if you didn't run out of space so yeah would be nice if you can adjust some stuff around on this.
3. 01:43:681 (1,1) - Not sure if 01:46:872l are meant to be stacked under 01:43:681 but I wouldn't recommend doing this anyway with the same reasoning as 00:20:547 .

1. 00:56:290 (5,1) - A minor overlap which can be avoided for neatness.
2. 01:46:872 (3) - Add whistle like what you did in Shrine?
3. 02:00:915 (1,2) - 02:02:830 (1,2) - Can be changed to a 1/2 repeat slider since you already did so with 01:59:000 (1) . Also it's the idea of your placements with 02:00:915 (1,2,1,2) - 02:14:319 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 02:21:979 (1,2,1,2) is a bit repetitive imo so changing 02:00:915 (1,2) - 02:02:830 (1,2) for more variety won't hurt I guess.

1. 00:28:845 (1) - Optional but you might wanna add a silent soft-sliderslide2 on this.
2. 01:45:596 - Add whistle? Apply this to other diffs too if you apply this.

Electoz wrote:

I'm not certain if the current timing and time signatures are correct, can you gather more opinions on those?

[Easy]

1. 00:20:547 (2,1) - 02:08:574 (1,1) - This kind of overlap should be avoided as it can be too confusing for players in this level. // Fixed
2. 00:34:588 (1,2,3) - Uh doesn't looks really aesthetically appealing imo, feels like you could've come up with a better design on this if you didn't run out of space so yeah would be nice if you can adjust some stuff around on this. // I could not find another design, this one seems fine for me anyway
3. 01:43:681 (1,1) - Not sure if 01:46:872l are meant to be stacked under 01:43:681 but I wouldn't recommend doing this anyway with the same reasoning as 00:20:547 . // Fixed, they were meant to be stacked but it got unstacked for some obscure reason

[Normal]

1. 00:56:290 (5,1) - A minor overlap which can be avoided for neatness. // Fixed
2. 01:46:872 (3) - Add whistle like what you did in Shrine? // Removed whistle on Shrine instead, I want no whistle on 01:43:681 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - except for 01:43:681 (1) - which is the continuation of the piano from 01:43:043 (3,4,1) -
3. 02:00:915 (1,2) - 02:02:830 (1,2) - Can be changed to a 1/2 repeat slider since you already did so with 01:59:000 (1) . Also it's the idea of your placements with 02:00:915 (1,2,1,2) - 02:14:319 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 02:21:979 (1,2,1,2) is a bit repetitive imo so changing 02:00:915 (1,2) - 02:02:830 (1,2) for more variety won't hurt I guess. // Changed

[Shrine]

1. 00:28:845 (1) - Optional but you might wanna add a silent soft-sliderslide2 on this. // Oh I didn't noticed that, fixed
2. 01:45:596 - Add whistle? Apply this to other diffs too if you apply this. // No, see above

Nothing much to say I guess, call me once you gathered more opinions on timing and time signatures and have them confirmed and I'll see whether I'll bubble this.

M-O-P-S-I wrote:

Advanced timing check as requested!

Timing is fine until the end, changed some offsets.

02:25:809 (1) - at this point i changed offsets and bpm

yee

BPM: 88,25 Offset: 145809
BPM: 83,00 Offset: 146488
BPM: 79,00 Offset: 147213
BPM: 94,00 Offset: 147964
BPM: 63,00 Offset: 150228
BPM: 59,00 Offset: 150696
BPM: 56,00 Offset: 151214
BPM: 50,00 Offset: 151739
BPM: 50,00 Offset: 152339

1. 01:00:120 - 01:00:758 - 01:07:141 - 01:43:680 - Add whistle? Since there's whistle on these places in other diffs.

Zero__wind wrote:

General
clear

Easy
01:30:120 (1) - 1ms off, should start from 01:30:119 -
02:25:808 (1) - ^ should start from 02:25:807 -

Normal
01:30:120 (1) - same as Easy

Shrine
01:31:478 (1) - 1ms off, snap to 01:31:477 -
02:01:552 (3,4) - I don't really feel like a stack here since 4's key is different from 02:01:552 (3) - , naturally spreading it out like 00:06:503 (4,5) - should be a better choice. I really like how there's difference between 00:02:673 (4,5) - 00:06:503 (4,5) - 00:10:332 (4,5) - 00:14:162 (4,5) -
02:03:467 (3,4) - ^
02:11:127 (3,4) - ^
02:25:808 (1) - 1ms off, snap to 02:25:807 -

nothing else
call me back