1. Yoyo kagirinaku (5,84 stars, 1552 notes)

1. If you do have a bigger version of the BG consider adding it, you have a bit of room to work with Audio wise be carerful, the ranking criteria say you shouldn't exceed 192 kbps, yours is 320. But eh 320 is best anyways. But considering you wanted to keysound this, your map will likely exceed the 30 MB cap.
2. Combo colors are good

1. 03:15:789 - rotate all of the pairs by like 5-10 degrees counter-clockwise it looks a little better ^^
2. 01:28:746 (3,4,5,6) - so cruel I love it
3. 03:21:361 (1) - you should make this a repeat slider since seeing this rhythm change coming without knowing the song is pretty much impossible :p
4. 03:51:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - <3 the way you stacked 03:51:884 (7,1,1) - so good haha
5. 05:28:473 (4) - soft sampleset randomly lol

lazyboy007 wrote:

This map's so bad. I think you really need my help. It's like almost garbage tier. psch. git gud. Wooosh

JK nice map imma mod this thoroughly. :3 Good, or else...!!!

[General]

1. If you do have a bigger version of the BG consider adding it, you have a bit of room to work with Hm, I'll see what I can do.Audio wise be carerful, the ranking criteria say you shouldn't exceed 192 kbps, yours is 320. But eh 320 is best anyways. But considering you wanted to keysound this, your map will likely exceed the 30 MB cap. I'll probably change the quality when the time comes.
2. Combo colors are good

Thanks, gonna increase the saturation tho, since they are not perfect with the bg. Havn't done it yet bcs I'm lazy, not you.

[Mapping]

1. 03:15:789 - rotate all of the pairs by like 5-10 degrees counter-clockwise it looks a little better ^^ Kinda ruins the angle I tried to get 03:14:745 (4,1) - here. So I won't change.
2. 01:28:746 (3,4,5,6) - so cruel I love it I love it too, didnt see another way of doing it to fit the music as good as this.
3. 03:21:361 (1) - you should make this a repeat slider since seeing this rhythm change coming without knowing the song is pretty much impossible :p Fixed.
4. 03:51:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - <3 the way you stacked 03:51:884 (7,1,1) - so good haha Best pattern I ever made.
5. 05:28:473 (4) - soft sampleset randomly lol LOL FIXED.

Great map tbh, it's too polished for me to find anything worth correcting. Best of them luckzzz :3 Thankzzzz

_Yiiiii wrote:

Hi, from my queue

Yoyo kagirinaku
Stack Leniency=6 so this looks much better 01:33:361 (1,2) - Fixed

00:01:054 (1,2) - Make the distance smaller, no need to have a jump here.It's already small? and since it's sliders, and a very slow rythm, the spacing doesn't really matter too much at all.

00:11:669 (1) - Make it 1/2 earlier. Accomplishes nothing, it doesn't change the pattern for the better nor does it bring out the music any way. Starting the slider on the noteshift, or one beat before the noteshift are both accepted options. Which as stated above, are so similar that a change won't make any difference.

01:07:515 (1,2,3) - Use same DS Fixed

01:26:900 (1,3) - Blanket shouldn't touch. Fixed

01:28:951 (4,5,6) - This fast burst isn't detectable, in other word, it isn't friendly for playing, replace it with a repeating slider could make it better. Only need to do that for this burst, you can keep the others. I'll keep it as it is for now, but what you're saying is something I agree with. If I get more mods pointing out those 1/6's I'll change them into the way you suggested.

01:34:284 (1) - Try another slider shape, it should be different from these two 01:33:361 (1,2) - since the vocal changed. Redid the whole pattern, noticed that I had skipped a bass beat on the 2nd slider.

02:02:900 (1,2,3) - No overlap plz. Means I would have to remap a big chunk of that entire section just for the sake of the overlaps. When the end result is just that pattern being a bit more aestethically pleasing. For now I wont change it, but I'll keep it in mind.

02:44:438 (1,2,3) - ^ Remapped the entire section bcs the sliders looked fugly anyways.

02:05:054 (2,1) - So close. Fixed

03:38:576 (2,3,4,5,6) - You can try NC them all, cuz this shape it used for 1/6 stream but it isn't here. Fixed

Nothing else, good map!

Sharo- wrote:

m4m thing from ur queue

i like this map it plays really good so this is gonna be a kinda short mod because i couldnt see much wrong w it

first off, that dark brown combo color is hard to see with 100 bg dim, just a heads up Up'd the saturation and the luminosity.

00:05:669 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is hard to read/time right since theyre seemingly the same distance apart but it goes from 1/3 to 1/2 The spacing is fine since it basically doubles from 1-2-3 compared to 4-5-6. NC'd it for extra clarity though.

im not gonna point out every single one but the sliderends on these parts 00:17:669 (1,2,3) - 00:25:054 (1,2,3) - ect. , they should be lower volume, not silenced but a lower volume imo. dont have to change but a suggestion I'll do that when I eventually hitsound it, or force someone else to hitsound it for me

00:46:438 - starting here to 01:01:054 - lower volume since its quieter here, like make the first section 45, then next 55 then,,
01:15:823 - go back to 65 here Fixed some of it, but as stated above, will fix everything hitsound related when I have actually hitsounded the map to begin with.

01:28:746 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this is hard to read with the 3rd note of the triples being a slider, just do a triple after They are a 5 hit drumroll in 1/6 xd so if i only map a triple afterwards then i skip out on one beat akak undermapping.

02:22:284 - 02:37:054 - 02:49:515 - same thing as before with the volume I'll fix laters

03:51:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - cool stream Ty

04:10:739 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - slider ends need lower volume here Laters


sry if u dont wanna change anything, i rly only pick out stuff that bothers me as a player. but maybe youll find this somewhat helpful! It's fine, you reminded me that I seriously need to be less lazy when it comes to hitsounding rofl, I hate doing it.

RevengeZ wrote:

You can actually end the beatmap here 06:12:011 - or here 06:12:473 - , adding a spinner at the end, but if you keep mapping after that it sounds pretty weird, like the intensity of the song isnt the same as the map. I contemplated doing this when I reached this exact spot when mapping. However I decided that instead of ending early and having a longers spinner, I'd rather map longer and have a shorter spinner. Everyone uses different amount of volumes too which means where a song should end when it fades is really subjective. I'll keep it in mind though if more people point it out.

1. 00:21:361 (1,2,3) - try to approach the two stacks near the slidertail, because it can be easier to the player to read + the spacing you use don't follow with the next note you use, for exemple, this note 00:21:592 (2) - has the same distance as this one and this one: 00:21:977 (5) - 00:22:131 (6) - but there is not the same rhythm lap. so at least move the 2, to keep consistancy with timing.
2. 00:23:977 (5,1) - those two notes are pretty close to the bottom of the grid, so move them a bit higher
3. 00:28:977 (2) - same as previously, but for this one, i think that it can lead to misunderstanding due to the number of objects, so change it if you want only.
4. 00:32:131 (3,4,1) - the jump between this note is a bit hard in my opinion, the sound doesn't allow so much big jumps, you can do a jump, but reduce the distance a bit i think, i see that on each 1/1 beats you got higher with the distance, i think that's a real creative thing, but in my opinion, this should get a bit reduce, because the part is not a kiai or also a very fast/intense part (for exemple you can use the same distance as you did on this part 00:38:900 (1,2,3,4,1) - in my opinion, it feels very good!)
5. 02:02:900 (1,2,3) - why not putting those notes in the middle of the grid so it can give a good symmetry?
6. 02:05:361 (3,1) - for me, there is a lack of flow here
7. 02:13:515 (3,4) - this part is also pretty close to the bottom of the grid, more specifically the number 4; because there is accuracy bar here
8. 02:13:977 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - here, you did a triangular thing, and you reduced the distance between them, that's a great idea, but why not doing the other thing and increase distance between them on each 3 beats, i mean you can try to change the distance between them here 02:14:437 (4,5,6) - and make it higher than the spacing you use here 02:13:977 (1,2,3) - it will show the power of the intensification of the song here. (hope you will understand!)
9. 03:45:730 (3,1) - distance problem here? i mean why there is difference with distance here? one is x0.60 and the other on x1.30
10. 05:40:627 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - for this part, i would suggest you something that could be interesting as my point of view. i saw that you stacked notes here on some beats, and it's a very nice idea, but why not doing higher spacing between the note you stacked? i mean, you can try to up the distance between those notes: 05:40:319 (4,5) - / 05:40:781 (2,3) - / 05:41:242 (5,6) - /
11. okay, so that's all for me, all i said was just suggestion, because this map was really really really nice, i really liked it, and good luck for ranking, i'm sure you can do it, because this map have potential!

Pachiru wrote:

1. 00:21:361 (1,2,3) - try to approach the two stacks near the slidertail, because it can be easier to the player to read + the spacing you use don't follow with the next note you use, for exemple, this note 00:21:592 (2) - has the same distance as this one and this one: 00:21:977 (5) - It's consistently done like this troughout the entirety of the map so I don't find it to be a problem.00:22:131 (6) - but there is not the same rhythm lap. so at least move the 2, to keep consistancy with timing.It is the same rythm tho? Plain ol' 1/2's
2. 00:23:977 (5,1) - those two notes are pretty close to the bottom of the grid, so move them a bit higher Not outside the grid so it is fine.
3. 00:28:977 (2) - same as previously, but for this one, i think that it can lead to misunderstanding due to the number of objects, so change it if you want only. Still the consistency with the pattern and similar spacing. Only reason these are 1/6 kcik sliders is bcs the drums it now are very different from those before. So yes it's overmapping, but it was the only way to differentiate it from the rest
4. 00:32:131 (3,4,1) - the jump between this note is a bit hard in my opinion, the sound doesn't allow so much big jumps, you can do a jump, but reduce the distance a bit i think, i see that on each 1/1 beats you got higher with the distance, i think that's a real creative thing, but in my opinion, this should get a bit reduce, because the part is not a kiai or also a very fast/intense part (for exemple you can use the same distance as you did on this part 00:38:900 ](1,2,3,4,1) - in my opinion, it feels very good!) Fixed by remapping a bit.
5. 02:02:900 (1,2,3) - why not putting those notes in the middle of the grid so it can give a good symmetry? They are stacked ontop of previous notes :p
6. 02:05:361 (3,1) - for me, there is a lack of flow here All to themselves. But really though it is meant to break flow there due to the change in vocals.
7. 02:13:515 (3,4) - this part is also pretty close to the bottom of the grid, more specifically the number 4; because there is accuracy bar here Still inside the grid so should be fine.
8. 02:13:977 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - here, you did a triangular thing, and you reduced the distance between them, that's a great idea, but why not doing the other thing and increase distance between them on each 3 beats, i mean you can try to change the distance between them here 02:14:437 (4,5,6) - and make it higher than the spacing you use here 02:13:977 (1,2,3) - it will show the power of the intensification of the song here. (hope you will understand!) Because the drums are going down and down and down. Sure, the first hit of every downshift is more intense than the rest, but I dont value that as much as showing the decrease in overall intensity.
9. 03:45:730 (3,1) - distance problem here? i mean why there is difference with distance here? one is x0.60 and the other on x1.30 Fixed
10. 05:40:627 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - for this part, i would suggest you something that could be interesting as my point of view. i saw that you stacked notes here on some beats, and it's a very nice idea, but why not doing higher spacing between the note you stacked? i mean, you can try to up the distance between those notes: 05:40:319 (4,5) - / 05:40:781 (2,3) - / 05:41:242 (5,6) - / Changed around some notes, but kept the stacks. The pattern got too compex and confusing with non stacked notes.
11. okay, so that's all for me, all i said was just suggestion, because this map was really really really nice, i really liked it, and good luck for ranking, i'm sure you can do it, because this map have potential!Thanks a lot! I'm doing my best to get the attention of BN's and modders so that I can finaly get it bubbled.

hope this mod will help you,It did!

GoldenWolf wrote:

irc modding on timing, mainly for these 03:21:361 - 03:37:500 - parts, also fixed the bpm and offset on 04:08:884 - this red line (wtf hystie?)

1. 05:37:704 (5,1) - i wonder why (5) has the huge jump than (1), while (1) has a downbeat there
2. 05:37:704 (5,1) - this kinda touches the hp bar
3. 04:58:165 - till the end - wow no hitsounds

lit120 wrote:

[babymetal]

1. 05:37:704 (5,1) - i wonder why (5) has the huge jump than (1), while (1) has a downbeat there the singles throughout the song mostly try to imitate how the guitar goes but i agree somewhat the spacing is a tad too big.
2. 05:37:704 (5,1) - this kinda touches the hp bar should be fine since skins customization is a thing so it's quite subjective.
3. 04:58:165 - till the end - wow no hitsounds havn't done them yet xd

not a lot, but oh well that's to be expected tho, thanks for what you pointed out!

from ur q btw I'll start on your mod soon

happy30 wrote:

00:07:102 (1,2,3) - I would remove the (2) and make a jump pattern here into the next slider. Fixed
00:42:025 (3,4,5,6) - this spacing would confuse me, I would stack or overlap the beats after the slider ends I personally feel like it plays fine and that the spacing/pattern is really reflective to the song itself. That kind of kickslider has already been introduced earlier in the map too. However, I'll keep it in mind and if I get more mods pointing out that this is an issue then I'll apply your recommendation as a solution.
00:52:640 (2) - I don't like how this is stacked, how about this? I don't really agree with how large the spacing is on your example, mainly due to the section focusing heavily on the vocals and there not being any vocal start on just that beat. The previous held note ends on it however, and to reflect it ending I want it to be close to the slider-end. I personally feel that it justifes a lower spacing, so fixed by a compromise meaning that it's not stacked anymore. Fixed

I feel the same for this one. 01:10:948 (2) - ^
01:19:255 (3) - I would stack this on (2) instead! Completely agree!
01:29:973 (3,1) - Pretty slider-breaking jump here Agree and dissagree at the same time. The spacing should be fine due to the pattern repeating the same rythm three times. So since 01:29:050 (3,1) - and 01:29:512 (3,1) - comes beforehand it should negate the sliderbreaking, hopefully. But if the jump you pointed out came out of nowhere then yes sliderbreaking would definitely be an issue.
01:51:871 (1,2,3) - no 0.25 spacing here? Wanted the chorus to be slightly more spaced than the previous parts regarding triples(this is consistent theme throughout all 3 of them). If this is a bigger issue than I take it as, then I'll fix it.It wasn't consistent, so fixed several places to keep it like it should be!
02:06:640 (1,2,3) - ^ ^


good goodddd!! thanks thaankssss!!

• [Yoyo kagirinaku]

1. 00:05:717 (1,2,1) - spacing shuldnt be the same here, since one is 3/4 gap and others are 1/2, use a different spacing to separate them would make player easily to read
2. 00:02:948 - i suggest to make the part the same as 00:08:486 - , since the sliderend idnt express anything rn
3. 00:30:948 (2,3) - slider shape is not rly good here
4. 01:15:794 - end the slider at here to have more impact at 01:15:871 (1) - since is a strong sound
5. 02:50:255 - make the spacing bigger, the spacing rn cant express the sound well
6. 03:13:717 (5) - inconsistent structure
7. 03:51:413 - this is rly too complex fr a calm part, using reverse slider or low spacing stream is just enough
8. 04:10:806 - lo mute the sliderend
9. 05:03:750 (1,3,1) - overlap look pretty bad here
10. 05:41:134 (4,7) - NC for emphasis
11. 06:04:673 - u should make the structure less and less complex to express the fading music, like start from 06:12:057 - u can just use a spinner to 06:19:442 -

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

ill just gives suggestin that u might want to consider :>

• [Yoyo kagirinaku]

1. 00:05:717 (1,2,1) - spacing shuldnt be the same here, since one is 3/4 gap and others are 1/2, use a different spacing to separate them would make player easily to read The 3/4 gap is bigger than the 1/2 gaps but NC'd for increased readability.
2. 00:02:948 - i suggest to make the part the same as 00:08:486 - , since the sliderend idnt express anything rn There's flams right there which is the most prominent sounds as of that place. They also prepare the player for what's to come since the map uses a lot of single 1/4 & 1/6 kicksliders. And to top it all of the intro of the song is an honor/tribute to GoldenWolf's style of mapping.
3. 00:30:948 (2,3) - slider shape is not rly good here Fixed by making the red anchors curve more
4. 01:15:794 - end the slider at here to have more impact at 01:15:871 (1) - since is a strong sound fixed
5. 02:50:255 - make the spacing bigger, the spacing rn cant express the sound well Don't think an increase in spacing will fix that due to the song not being that intense to being with at that moment. The pattern is revolved around the double and the triple with them being the focus of everything there. It's not by any means too easy to play due to the finger control required.
6. 03:13:717 (5) - inconsistent structure The change from a straight slider to a curved one is firstly to finish the rotational pattern, there is one spot left in it which the slider end of the straight slider fills. Secondly since the curved slider is starting on 03:14:025 - which is a downbeat, i wanted to break the flow and change the slider shape to emphasise that.
7. 03:51:413 - this is rly too complex fr a calm part, using reverse slider or low spacing stream is just enough Dissagree due to the complexity of the drumroll itself in the song, it stands out a lot. A big part of the map is also structured around rotational patterns, and I made this with that in mind.
8. 04:10:806 - lo mute the sliderend fixed
9. 05:03:750 (1,3,1) - overlap look pretty bad here fixed
10. 05:41:134 (4,7) - NC for emphasis fixed
11. 06:04:673 - u should make the structure less and less complex to express the fading music, like start from 06:12:057 - u can just use a spinner to 06:19:442 - I agree to some degree and that's why the kicksliders are stacked in the final moments of the song and the angles are easier and more repetetive. However I don't personally think that dumbing down the mapping due to the volume getting lower is a 100% good option. If i get more people pointing out that the outro could be done better then i'll change it to what you suggested

gl Thanks!

Kencho wrote:

Sorry for delay.

[General]

1. "BABYMETAL THE ONE" in tags is not necessary because Artist and Title have it already. So you can removed them. Fixed
   
2. Do you have any provided for metadata? Added "Meta data box in description.

[Yoyo kagirinaku]

1. Timing lines with the inconsistent setting (custom set number):
   00:00:187
   03:21:417
   03:25:574
   03:27:431
   03:31:561
   03:33:424
   03:37:585
   04:08:959
   04:10:814
   04:11:459
   04:12:087
   04:13:912 All fixed
   
   
2. 00:08:494 (1,2,3,1) - Avoid using too hugh spacing on 1/4 empty beat. Especially in the lower SV part. It would cause player miss their slider tail and hit a 100 on sliders. In other part like 00:17:725 (1,2,3) - 00:38:033 (1,2,3) - is fine. But 00:33:110 (3,1) - 00:39:879 (1,2,3,1) - is too far away. I suggest you make it closer and it would be better for playability. The reasoning behind the overly big spacing on 3/4 sliders in a section that is argueably pretty calm is that I want the player to know what will come later in the song. I don't want the extreme 3/4 slider spacing to be a punch to the face, so that's why they are there early. So that if they aren't satisfied with getting 100's or missing, they can restart without having to play for 4 minutes before getting back to the same spot.
   
3. 01:47:879 (4,5) - This jumps seems too far away, so make it closer? Fixed by moving around the order of the combo.
   
4. 02:11:571 (2,3,4,5,1) - This pattern not really well in flow. You may try to ctrl+G 02:11:725 (3,4) - or change another pattern. Fixed by ctrl+g
   
5. 02:57:263 (5) - I recommend you to stack this one on 02:57:110 (4) - because the previous pattern also stacked(02:56:187 (4,5) - ). Also 02:57:263 (5,1) - seems too far away, so stack 4,5 to make it consistent. The stacks are there to put emphasis on the two bass kicks that are on a 1/2 snap. Like 02:56:187 (4,5) - and 02:58:033 (3,4) - For the one you suggested there are only 1 bass kick 02:56:956 (3) - therefore I didn't stack.
   
6. 03:22:804 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern seems not necessary. So, I suggest you delete these circles and extend the slider to 2/3 beat. Also move them closer. It's there to overly emphasise the guitar and how complex the section is rythm-wise. However I did reduce the spacing.
   
7. 03:28:812 (1,2,3,4) - ^ ^
   
8. 05:17:604 (1) - Ctrl+G this may better for flow. Fixed
   
9. 05:24:988 (1) - ^ ^
   
10. 05:24:527 (3,4) - The spacing seems not really fit the song. Fixed
    
11. 05:32:065 (4,5,1) - 05:39:296 (3,4,5,1) - ^ Fixed
    
12. 06:12:065 - 06:19:758 - Just a suggestion, these objects can be deleted since the volume of the song was decreased at 06:12:065 - . So on you may start a spinner at 06:12:065 - I've got this suggestion before but I still personally think that continuing on at that point is perfectly fine. The song is still going on, so why not continue mapping it until the volume is so low it's barely hearable? All the hitsounds are also lowered according to the song, so it should be fine.

Looks clean structural map. Call me back when you are ready. Alright!