ok i reviewed it
Katyusha wrote:
CanadianBaka wrote:
Neko-san da!
[Neko Means Cat]
00:01:137 (3,4) - why is this not a slider, you did make 00:02:675 (3) - this one so it's inconsistent Because I don't feel like it's needed for the entire pattern to be similar, besides, I want a flow change direction to the next pattern, so there's a meaning to those 2 notes, also, it plays well. actually, it makes your map inconsistent becuase there is no real change in the music, so there's no need for circles. If you wanted a variety then change the second one into circles so it's consistent and also varies well.
>>I think there's totally no need to keep consistency for 00:01:137 (3,4) - . Tho the song is quite similar at the beginning there still allows some variety here. Especially for this case, 2 circles work well imo.
00:04:021 (2) - there's no sound here, why is there a note here? You don't hear the clear Cymbal here? no I don't, also it gives the next notes more emphasis if you don't map it at all
>>yes i agree. 00:04:021 (2) - delete.
00:04:406 (4,5,6,7,8) - this is very intense spacing for sounds that aren't even that intense in the first place Regardless of intensity, a 1.0x stream is very tame, there's nothing intense about it, also, with the direction, is a curved one, really easy to play, it actually wouldn't make sense for this to be low spacing when the rest of the song is high spaced. I understand your point, but curving it with 1.0x spacing isn't really a good idea, it makes the player move + tap so much that it's really hard for such a slow song
>>should be fine, but might decrease ds 00:04:406 (4,5,6,7,8) - to around 0.8x cuz it's not the intense part of map.
00:05:752 (1,2,3,4) - here the vocalist doesn't get more "excited" so there's no need for you to raise the spacing, 00:05:175 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - all these notes should be spaced EXACTLY the same, also instead of using circles using sliders would be better seeing the vocalist likes to hang out her wrods Nope, there are 2 clear sections here, with different pitch voice that I'm clearly using for intensity, one, the "lalala" here 00:04:694 (7,1,2,3) - then, the "watashi wa" here 00:05:752 (1,2,3) - , if anything, I would agree that 00:06:329 (4) - is a bit overdone, but the rest is in no way out of shape. so your actually telling me, that your going to space notes futher because of the vocals? NO. The "lalala" has the same excitement as the "watashi wa" so there's no need to space the "watashi wa" more then the "lalala", change of flow? Yes, big change in spacing? no
>>i think you can increase spacing for 00:05:175 (1,2,3) - a bit? they seem too small. This part can have a more 'fair' and equal jump tbh
00:17:291 (1,2,3) - I see what you were trying to do here, but it looks really messy, I would take out the curve of each slider and just space each of them equally, if you want more exageration on 00:18:060 (3) - this note then extend it to 00:18:444 (4) - here AND make it slower then the other sliders, but the spacing should still be consistent >Making an slider slower, Just no, when did I used slow slider in the entire map ? doing this is really inconsistent, also, the different spacing CLEARLY comes from the voice pitch going higher.
sigh, you CLEARLY said this because you are too lazy to change it, It wouldn't be inconsistent, yes I know you haven't changed the SV before in your map, but it would not only add more emphasis if you did this it would also flow better, if you look at my set of the map you see hydrocannon13's diff (HC's advanced) do the same thing, you will notice it's a lot better then what you have. Also "just no" is not a proper response.
>>00:16:521 (3,6) - stack pls, it's a bit messy here but lol maybe fine