00:03:273 (2,3) - maybe increase spacing just so it doesnt read like 1/2
00:06:721 (3) - if this is supposed to blanket its quite
off. if not its fine
00:13:790 (1) - angle directly towards 00:14:307 (2) - so that its a perfect back and forth
00:25:342 (4,5) - this spacing is weird, because its almost 1.0x but just slightly more. i think either using 1.0x again or using something bigger like 1.5x to separate it more would look nicer
01:04:652 (1,1,1) - i think following vocals here would be better since the piano is pretty quiet and you follow the vocals in the last few measures.
01:07:928 (1,1,1) - i think flipping this vertically would make it flow better, both from 01:07:411 (3,1) and 01:08:618 (1,1)
01:11:549 (8,1) - bigger spacing? the vocal on 1 is pretty emphasized
01:22:583 (3) - ending this on blue tick is confusing since you don't do it beforehand. the synths on 01:19:824 (2) and 01:23:273 (4) end the same way, but the slider ends on 1/2 those times. or maybe just decrease the spacing to make it more clear.
01:27:928 (1,1,1) - it is quite hard to read this rhythm. its hard to see a way to fix though. maybe separate 01:27:583 (1) into two sliders so that you tap each 1/2? that way the next rhythm is a natural progression.
01:29:307 (2,3) - put 3 under 2? it would read better and create more emphasis on this rhythm: 01:29:652 (3,1) which you use a few more times.
01:38:273 (1,2,3,1) - this jump flows really awkwardly, if 01:38:618 (1,2,3) was moved more to the left it would read / play better.
01:45:169 (3,4,1) - this is quite an unnatural movement because of how high 4,1 is
01:57:066 (7,1,2) - this rhythm doesnt play that well imo. i think a
rhythm like this plays better and follows the melody nicer.
01:59:135 (4,5,6) - moving 5 to the left side of 4 and 6 would make this pattern flow better imo.
02:06:721 (2,3) - a 1/2 slider on 2 follows the music better i think
02:20:342 (1,2) - this rhythm doesnt really seem to follow anything to me. i think circle, 1/2 slider, circle would play better
02:31:549 (2,3) - i think you accidentally messed up the spacing here. otherwise, it doesnt make sense for this to not have the same spacing as the rest of the stream (or the triple, since 3,4 is 0.78x and 2,3 is 0.58x)
02:31:721 (4) - NC to match the streams in the next kiai?
02:42:583 (7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - i just wanna say i really like the flow here
02:34:307 (7,1) - this doesnt emphasize the vocals well, imo.
02:56:893 (3,4,1) - space this more? it would emphasize it better like here 02:56:204 (1,2,1)
02:58:445 (3,4,5) - why not use 0.6x like 02:57:066 (4,1,2) ? i think consistent spacing is important to clarify the rhythms more intensely.
03:01:376 (1,2,3) - maybe not necessary but althought 1.75x is more consistent here, it might be too dramatic, since there is a danger of reading these sliders like 1/2 sliders. 1.5x would work better i think.
03:01:893 (4,5) - why not 0.2x like these 03:02:756 (2,3,4,5) ?
03:01:980 (5,6) - why not 0.6x like 03:03:531 (1,2) ? both of these (^) would make this section look nicer imo
03:07:152 (4,1) - maybe increase this spacing like you did here: 02:56:118 (4,1) ? it would be cool to use again
03:14:135 (5) - ending the stream like this is really anticlimactic, especially with how emphasized the melody is right there
03:18:962 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - imo these are way too spaced for how calm this section is, they are almost as big as the jumps in the kiais.
03:21:204 (5,6,7,1) - ^
03:25:514 (1,2,3,4) - why not make this a perfect parallelogram?
http://imgur.com/a/zfa6F looks nicer (top is my suggestion, bottom is map)
03:41:376 (1,2,1) - this looks a little weird to me. maybe just add a slight curve or subtle red tick to the final slider so the angles dont clash
03:43:273 (1,1,1) - same as before. this one is better though, the spacing emphasizes it nicely.
03:51:721 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - maybe just a little too big
03:53:100 (1,2,3) - i think following the whispered vocals is better here, since they are so emphasized
03:56:031 (1,2,1) - i think stacking these would display the rhythm better
03:58:618 (3,4,5) - i dont like the circle being under the last slider tail, but this is probably ok. just seems unnecessary.
04:03:962 (1,2,3,1) - ^. this one is worse imo, since 04:03:962 (1,2) is grouped more because of the rhythm. putting the final circle under 2 plays and looks much better i think
04:08:445 (2,3) - 04:11:204 (4,5) - i really dislike these stacks, especially with parts like 04:11:807 (7,1) existing. it is very confusing. i would use the small spacing you used in the intro (00:21:031 (2,3) - 00:23:790 (2,3) - etc) to make this read better. if you do this, i would stack 04:19:911 (1,2) to continue these trends.
04:31:549 (4) - making this 1/2 instead of 04:31:721 (1) - would emphasize the rhythm that the kicksliders follow better, imo. (and then a circle on the red tick)
04:35:859 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i think these could be spaced more, they are much more emphasized than the jumps before. its a little anticlimactic.
04:37:239 (1,2,3,4) - this small spacing is quite odd, its not used for this part of the song anywhere else, i think a bigger spacing would end this section more nicely
04:39:135 (4,1) - stacking these on 1 would follow the piano better i think
04:50:859 (6) - you could find something cooler / nicer than this i think.