Secretpipe :OSecretpipe wrote:
I'm not really good at Taiko but I liked it :3
I love your map and I decided create this <3
Thanks for the support
Secretpipe :OSecretpipe wrote:
I'm not really good at Taiko but I liked it :3
Thanks very much for the modCeryuia wrote:
Hihi~ From my Queue
I love this song <3 Me too
[Game Oni]
Change 00:43:892 (24,25) and 00:45:263 (26,27) to kats with finishers, these suit the music better Changed
01:05:492 (142) - Add a finisher to this so that it's easier for players to read and see This becomes a very loud sound. In my opinion, a couple of tries and passed
Consider changing the stream from 01:26:406 - 01:27:777 to something like this to fit the loud background music: Changed to kkddkdkdddkdkkddk
Same goes for the stream starting 02:10:292 - 02:11:320 as well kkddkdkkddkdk
02:51:606 (3) - Move this don to 02:51:777 as this fits more with the soft music Moved
Same goes for 02:54:349 (5) + 03:14:920 (20) + 03:19:035 (22) (5) Moved, (20) Not moved, for me this is ok and (22) moved
03:17:663 (22) - Delete this, there is no sound here Removed, I do not hear well lol
There wasn't a lot I could find, this map is so nice to play ~
Good Luck ~!
Thank you very much for modRemus wrote:
Hello from my queue o/Game End
- 01:44:320 (416) - as you already did(on wooooooob made kk), i recommend you to map this sound as double kats cause of their volume. Maybe i lost some places, but i hope you understand me. I understand, I will consider this
- 01:57:520 (36) - imo to follow the rhytm you should move it at 01:57:692 - Moved
- 02:09:435 (93,96) - what do you think about kats? They emphasize some loud sounds. I hear same intesity
- 04:04:463 (223) - you break your overall thytm of this part in that place. Try to delete or just change this place. For example 04:04:635 - Moved to 04:04:635 -
- 04:31:120 (166) - i think that no need in that note. (cause your map concept is majority of triples and 5-stream notes+some stream moments. To not break that concept better to keep it that way. I think this ok removing the note
- 05:39:349 (197) - better if you move it at 05:39:520 - , imo Ok
- 05:59:320 (160,164,167,171,174,178,180,184,188,191,195,198,201,204,207,211,214,217) - don't you think about making this parts with big Kats and triples between them? Your choice is good, but i just notice that.Nice idea, applied!
Map is good, already consistent(except some streams, but they give variety to the map.
So, hope you'll rank this map one day.
Good luck !
Gracias por tu modding <3JessiChan wrote:
Hola Gaston, petición de NM de mi Queue. :3
d
k
D (Finisher)
K (Finisher)
Nota: Son sólo consejos, puedes tomarlos o rechazarlos libremente.
GENERAL
º En el Source del map, coloca Monstercat de allí viene. Agregado en tags, veo que todos los beatmaps rankeados lo agregan en los tags, así que por las dudas lo coloco ahíGame Oni00:43:892 (24,25,26,27) - Lo mejor sería que esas notas no tuviesen Finisher, suena demasiado suave esa parte y eso lo... ¿Satura? No sabría decirte. Removido
00:52:463 (60,61) - ^ Igual con estos dos. (60) Removido, el (61) presiento que va Finisher, igual veo mas adelante.
00:52:463 (60,61) - Coloca nota, todo esto va junto. No tengas miedo ya que es una marathon, que sea difícil lo hace divertido. No esucho un sonido como para seguir
01:05:492 - Lamentablemente este tipo de SV no es rankeable, lo mejor sería que lo colocaras normal o le bajaras la velocidad, la velocidad máxima para los SV's es de x1.20 Ahora que lo pienso, es verdad. No vi mapas rankeando con esa velocidad. Igual me parece raro que el Ranking Criteria de Taiko no lo diga.
01:14:063 - Quita ese sv, que siga en velocidad normal. Es muy brusco el cambio, al menos para nosotros los HD players es casi imposible de ver, tendríamos que memorizarlo lol. Es verdad, SV bajo + HD no es buena idea ahora que lo pienso xD
01:28:120 - El Sv anterior está fenomenal, pero a partir de aca busca la manera de que no haga ese cambio brusco, no se... que vaya descendiendo de a poco o colocar un sv aca 01:27:949 - Para que frene la velocidad antes.Bajé la velocidad en el stream anterior y agregué un SV's para que baje la velocidad en esa sección
01:36:177 (363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373) - Todas estas notas hasta aca, tienen bien el SV y termina perfecto. Algo asi quiero que hagas con los demás que te marqué como "Errores"Ok, lo tendré como referencia
02:49:035 - No se qué decirte... No se si sea rankeable que bajes el volúmen a taaaal manera, puedes dejarlo asi por ahora pero creo que eso no está permitido. Es que si lo pongo en normal sonaría mur fuerte. Le pregunto a un BN por las dudas
03:46:292 (129,130) - Quita los finishers. Mmm, no sé... por ahora los saco
04:01:035 (210,211,212,213) - Esos espacios, agregales nota, aún se oye música de sobra. Notas agregadas
04:36:006 (202) - k Ok
04:40:120 (233) - ^ Igual ^
04:43:549 (259,260) - estas dos k y este 04:43:892 (262) - d Listo
04:44:920 (269) - k
04:45:263 (271) - Podría ser un D d
04:46:292 (278,279,280) - k k d < Que sean así esas tres que te marqué. Ok
04:47:663 (287) - k ^
Eso es todo, recuerda acomodar esos SV's no es porque se vean mal, se ven fantásticos, pero si realmente quieres rankear este map lo mejor sería que los cambies o que sea todo plano, ya que estos SV's bruscos no son permitidos. ¡Buena suerte! Creo que dejaré un link para descargar el mapa con los sv's
Thanks for modding and stars <3Raediaufar wrote:
wow.. I love this, this is a really good stuff Thanks!
Don't much to mod since this map is nearly-perfect imo[Game Oni] open01:03:177 - why not adding note here? I don't feel break here is fit the song, add k, it's still readable I based in the map from STD mode. I added d
01:11:149 (185) - I think this one should be k For now i add k
01:17:749 (223) - delete this, more fit to the rhythm (being only 5 notes on this part, reduce it 3 is better) and if you want you might want to make it 01:17:835 (223,224,225) - kdd Applied
04:46:292 (271,272) - d Ok
04:53:492 - now let's move to sv, 0.5 is indeed to slow for this part, I'll stick with 0.7, then just add 0.05 on every other sv timing on the next except on 05:23:663 - which just make it jump from 0.9 to 1.0 coz this has the feel Applied
well that's all mod I can do, I love when you can make the pattern consistent but also vary as well. And this map give me the FEEL of the song sooo much. Really enjoy playing it I try to vary patterns, I'm happy for you like
Thanks very much!IControl wrote:
iControl's M4M from QueContinue?
01:04:635 - add sppiner from here 01:04:635 - ,remove, k to here 01:05:492 - matches the wub better Added only spinner.
01:14:235 - add d I don't like
01:15:606 - add d to match the guitars better Added
01:16:120 - add d? to match the sound here I don't listen a loud sound
01:16:377 - d^ Added
01:17:749 - d to be more constant with 01:07:463 (14) - Ok
01:18:435 - d Ok
01:19:120 - d This a long pattern from here
01:21:177 - d Ok
01:22:549 - d Ok
01:23:406 - d No, this is better
01:23:920 - d Ok
01:24:777 - k I felt this section was a bit undermapped Added
01:26:835 (160,161) - ctrl g No, this is better
01:27:606 (169,170,171) - ctrl g i think this stream sounds better Ctrl + g? this is same
02:10:720 (98,99) - ctrl g again No, this is better
02:12:777 (115) - k? sounds higher Ok
02:49:035 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - no sound with finishers plays weirdly. I would remove all finishers Fixed
03:28:635 (26) - d Ok
03:29:320 (30) - d No, i like as its
03:30:006 (34) - k No, i like as its
03:31:206 (41) - d Ok
03:32:063 (46) - d Ok
03:32:749 (50) - d Ok
03:32:920 (51) - d No
03:33:606 (55) - d No
03:34:292 (59,60) - cltr g No, i like as its
03:34:806 (62) - d These suggestions were to follow the keyboard better Added d. I'm not added all suggestions, sorry.
04:21:349 (85) - change the kkd to kdd? Ok
03:30:349 (36) - d Ok
04:26:063 - you might want to start mapping some parts to the keyboard a bit here. Because it sounds very repetitive and change is nice It is the only pattern that occurs to me, not much to do around here
04:26:577 (124) - k No, I'll see soon this
04:27:949 (134) - k ↑
04:31:892 (163) - d I listen a kat here
04:33:263 (173,174,175) - the kdk's feel really forced here try changing to ddk
I would suggest to countiune remapping this section a bit to the things mentinoned above ddk is not cool, i'll see later
05:28:635 (142) - d Ok
05:31:377 (164) - d ↑
05:34:120 (187) - d re map all parts if you agree ↑
06:01:720 (182,183,184) - change all to k k k so the beat won't be to repetitive Sorry, i don't like as is
Those are my suggestions good luck
Oui wrote:
modCONTINUE?
00:46:292 - k I don't listen a loud sound
00:46:463 - d ^
00:46:977 (29) - k Ok
00:47:835 (34) - d For my, is better k
00:48:349 (37) - d ^
00:48:520 (38) - k Is better d
00:51:606 (56) - d Ok
00:51:777 (57) - k Ok
01:16:635 (75) - k Ok
01:18:949 (93) - k d for now
01:19:463 - k I don't like
01:20:320 - d ^
01:20:492 - d Ok
01:20:663 (109) - delete No, i like this
01:21:692 (116) - k No
01:22:206 - k I don't like
01:52:377 - k No
01:57:863 - k No
01:59:835 - d I don't listen a loud sound
you can start increasing the notes volume from here: 02:50:577 - I'll see later this
03:30:349 (36) - k Before this was k
03:31:206 (41) - k ^
03:57:435 - d I don't like
03:57:606 (195) - k Ok
04:12:177 - dkd (1/4) No
04:14:920 - dkd (1/4) No
04:23:149 (100,101) - ctrl + g I don't like
04:25:892 (120,121) - ctrl + g ^
04:25:892 (120,121) - ddd (1/4) ? ^
05:34:292 - kddkd (1/4) ^
05:38:235 (226) - k Ok
06:10:292 (23) - D K is better
06:10:635 (24) - D^
Thanks for help. His mod is ready for tomorrowfrukoyurdakul wrote:
Hi, here are my opinions about this map :3
00:51:949 (58,59) - Maybe ctrl + g to these two because of the note patterns (high to low should be k d shortly) Applied
00:56:406 - 00:57:777 - 00:59:149 - why skipped these notes? There are sounds here, maybe fill them. I've thought about it, added notes
01:15:606 - If you don't follow the electro sound there is no drum note here. Ok
01:27:520 (162,163,164,165) - Again, no drum sounds but maybe putting 01:27:606 - k and 01:27:777 - k here will be just fine. Applied
01:38:577 - k but this one is optional :3 Added
02:11:577 - this note is extra, there is no sound here again I think this is better
02:12:777 - ^ I follow the electro sound, and is better for my :/
02:40:635 - you can delete breaks just dragging it to left or right if you want I didn't know Thanks!
03:32:063 (46) - k Ok
05:17:835 (63,64) - change them to k or 05:17:835 - add a inherited point here and make the audio soft because of the noticeable snare sounds I listen the same, i might be don't change this
05:59:835 (168,178) - Maybe changing this kind of finishers (middle finishers at the 1/3 of the measures) to D will be good, cuz much K is much Ok, changed to d
Hope this helps
Thanks for modDarkVortex wrote:
Heyho o/
[Continue?]
00:55:720 (70,71) - ctrl+g these to match the drums Ok
00:56:920 (77,78,79,80) - It would make more sense changing these to a k d k d pattern and change 00:58:292 (85,86,87,88) - to a k d k k pattern. This way you still have your variation and you match the drums more. Applied
01:17:920 (85) - This should be a k as well for that electronic voice Changed
01:55:035 - A ddd pattern would fit well for the distorted electronic noise here Added ddd
01:54:520 - ^ Here as well but then you'd need to add it at 01:57:263 - as well imo (if you want though) Ok, added
03:24:349 - Starting there you could make a gradual SV increase like you did with volume Nice suggestion, but i'll think later if is good
05:59:835 (168,178,188) - etc. Why are these not K like the other finishers? There are strong snares behind them as well (and i personally think ddd D ddd patterns are horrible lol) I tried variation, but meh
Great map, good luck with it!
Thanks for mod AlodaAloda wrote:
Hi.Continue?How about removing 00:37:720 (6) and 00:39:092 (17), then adding a note at 00:38:406. I feel like it has the strongest sound here of the three and it also makes sense to have the more dense pattern at the (slightly) louder part of the song. Compare it to 00:37:720. Changed
You could remove 01:04:463 (145) , then change the spinner (01:04:635 (1)) so it starts here instead. The sound you're mapping it to seems to start here, and using a spinner at the end of a 1/4 stream like this is fine. Applied
What is 02:44:577 (1) mapped to? Remove it? I listen a low sound
A number of the notes between 03:29:835 and 03:32:577 feel a little off. Maybe you could try changing some colours around here to match the song a little more closely. Changed some notes
04:09:606 - 04:50:749 feels quite strange to me. I think you've used a little too much 1/4 throughout the section. I think the gradually increasing density is really nice, but yeah, I think it's a bit too much. Maybe try starting from like 1 triplet per bar then gradually increasing up to something like what you have at 04:31:549. I think that remap this maybe
Your map is pretty good already, so my mod ended up being pretty short ahaha gl No matter, all count
Thanks for modVoyage wrote:
For M4M queue.[General]
HP5.5 can be bumped up to HP6, I believe with how the song is very consistent with its rhythm, making the HP drain harder is sufficient for more challenge. Fixed
For tags, add "016 - expedition" to the end of Monstercat in tags for the album origins. Added
For tags, add electronic for genre. Added[Continue?]
00:39:692 (21) - Change to k, if you're gonna emphasize the drums using kats for similar sounds like earlier on for 00:39:435 (19) and 00:38:749 (14). Changed
01:13:463 (60) - Change to k, the growl sound starting at 01:13:377 still continues and plus it would be consistent if it was the same like this earlier pattern at 01:10:635 (38,39,40,41,42) for the same sound.
01:16:635 (74) - Change to k, you emphasized the same sound using kats earlier for this note at 01:16:463 (73) and it would play well and rhythmically wise leading up to the loud don for the drums at 01:16:806 (75). Changed
01:25:463 - Add a d, the drums and the synthetic sound starting at 01:25:377 still continues and plus it makes this section of kats more fun to play leading up to the streamy section compared to just 1/4th kats leading up to the streamy section. The sv's don't fit well. I changed some notes to d for follow your suggestion.
01:25:977 - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to add this in. ^
01:33:349 (206) - Change to k, the drums and the growling sound still continues starting from 01:33:263 - and it would be emphasized better as a kat like you did previously for the same sound at 01:30:520 (182,183,184). Changed
01:44:320 (282) - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to change this. Ok
02:00:520 (48) - Change to k, the same sound starting at 02:00:349 still continues and would play rhythmically well leading up to the triple (d,d,d) pattern that's mapped to the drum. Changed
02:09:349 - Add a d, the synthetic sound and drums starting at 02:09:263 still continues and would make the string of 1/4th kats more rhythmically fun to play leading up to the streamy part. Same reason of 01:25:463 -
02:09:863 - ^, same reason as above applies if you choose to change this. ^
04:14:835 (43) - Change to d, I hear nothing of significance that can be emphasized using a kat here and it would be better to keep this section consistent like earlier for the same sound at 04:13:377 (31,32,33). Changed
05:17:835 (63) - Change to k, if you're gonna emphasize the higher vocals like you did earlier on at 05:06:520 and 05:12:349. I don't follow the vocal. I follow just the drum
Best of endeavors with going for Approval for this marathon.
Thanks for mod!NlHIL wrote:
[Continue?]
01:36:692 (230,231) - 03:08:063 (14,15) - 03:19:206 (22,23) - swap Changed
03:01:206 - add d? I don't listen a loud sound
03:12:177 - add k? ^
Thanks very much for modJaye wrote:
[General]
- d = don & k = kat, Caps on either for a Finisher (standard layout really).
- This was really hard to mod tbh.
[ Continue?]
- 01:27:606 (162) - Change to d, the different in tone between this note and that of (160) is something that should be highlighted (red ticks are important).
- A lot of this is pretty good tbh. Changed
- 03:09:435 (16) - Change to k as sound is almost identical to 03:08:064 (14). Changed
- 04:02:749 (217) - Change to k, high toned noise. Although there is a deep held noise (that sounds like a noisy beehive) I wouldn't recommend mapping to it (mapping to held notes is weird). Changed
- 04:53:492 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Invert the colours of this whole section, the higher vocal parts you have mapped as d and surrounded with k, though it should be the other way around to emphasise "hah". Also you mostly do this in the later patterns so I'm not sure why this one is completely different. I try to vary in patterns. But i changed some notes
- I really like this stream at 05:23:663. Thanks
Apologies for the extremely short mod, but it's already looking pretty good. Best of luck getting this approved! All mod count, thanks!
Thanks for check the mapsnowball112 wrote:
Heya, follow up mod on irc suggestions.I still have a few concerns about the final kiai, but we can discuss that in IRC.
- Move down bg further, looks better. Change to 0,0,"2d97d91603.jpg",0,120 or so. Fixed
- It's a bit annoying that you don't keep 00:45:263 (25,26) - these sounds consistent as k later in this section when the sound is similar, at least until 00:51:949. For 00:52:120 (58,59) - you can use kd, because the sound is lower, but before that I think it's better if you keep it as k. Try something like this, cursor on 00:49:377. I don't think it fits well if you switch the note colour for that sound. I applied your suggestion with a similar pattern
- 01:08:320 - move to 01:08:149 for better fit. Similar at 01:18:863 - etc.Notes moved
- 01:14:063 - this part could use a few more notes, density is too low otherwise I think. Try something like this, cursor on 01:15:435.)I added more notes, but i delete note in 01:16:120 -
- 01:10:635 - this should not be kkddk. The sound is similar to 01:07:892 - , not to 01:13:377. Maybe try 01:10:720 - d and 01:13:635 - k, just make these two different. Changed only kdddk, kddkk i don't like the sound
- 01:15:435 - add a note here for consistency Ok
- Similar to what we discussed in IRC for the previous section: I am not convinced that it is good to start a triple from sounds like 01:29:492 - when sounds like 01:30:520 - are better for that. Also, you have clearer sounds that can be used for 1/4 between 01:29:149 - and 01:29:492 - (low background sound). And 01:29:063 - should be removed. And 01:31:120 - does not fit well I think. Try something like this,cursor on 01:30:177. Also applies to later sections until 01:46:806. I don't follow your suggestion. I try to follow the electro background sound that is added in this section 01:28:120 - . But i changed some kkd for kkk
- 01:49:206 - section from here until 02:08:920 - could use a few more notes. Example, cursor on 01:51:949. Added notes and suggestion followed
- 03:50:577 - this should be k according to the other patterns you have used here.
- 04:53:835 - kdkd? and 05:12:692 (48,49,50,51) - ddkd for more consistent structure in this part. Changed
- The section from 04:09:606 - is a bit questionable, I don't think the song is not so intense. Maybe try patterns like this, cursor on 04:10:463. Or something like this, cursor on 04:11:835 - . Or add some breaks to what you currently have, because I think these patterns are questionable, especially the 5-note 1/4 in this part. The song does not really do a build up here. I followed your suggestion, nice idea!
Edit: some more things you may want to consider:Applied all and discussed on irc
- 01:15:435 - try this, so that the spacing follows the high instrument sounds in the background, feels more natural to play.
- 01:24:435 - missing note for consistency.
- 01:53:149 - add d, better for following background sounds here.
- 01:54:777 - add d for consistency
- 01:55:035 - kkd? The instrument is strong here.
- 01:57:263 - ddkkk? Similar reason to ^
- Try 02:00:692 - D and remove 02:00:863 (66,67) - for similar structure to 01:49:720 (3,4,5). You can also signal the beginning of the increasing song intensity like this.
- 02:01:806 and 02:04:549 - should be k I think.
- 02:06:863 - maybe add d here for the background instruments.
- 02:08:235 - ^
Thanks!snowball112 wrote:
Recheck, no kd.You may call me back~
- 01:01:549 (110,112) - ctrl+g? If you're following the same base kdkkd structure as before you should swap these to have kd here. Ok, fixed
- I think there should be a k on 01:03:177 - , because if you compare 01:01:720 (112,113,114,115,116) - and 01:03:092 (128,129,130,131,132) - , these should be similar from base structure, but the second one is more intense. Since the first is dkddk after the change ^, you could make the second one kkddk as the intensity increases. Changed
- 01:11:235 - I think you can add a k for the instrument sound here. Added
- Some k in the 5-note at 01:13:377 - would be nice, maybe try dkkdk. And 01:21:606 - can be k for a similar reason, so you have your 5-note patterns for this kind of sound start with d-k-d in the first two kiai sections. I left it as it was, but in the last 5 notes of each kiai I changed it to kkdkk
- 01:16:806 - finish? Similar to 01:05:835 - , would make a nice accent here. I want to highlight the beginning of kiai
- You can try filling out 01:35:406 - and 01:35:577 - with notes for emphasis of the sound here, maybe try making a kdddkkd pattern here. I did not add a note on 01:35:406 - I think the pace is better. Added note in 01:35:577 -
- 02:00:692 - finish, would be nice for emphasis and marking the new part. Finish added
- I think you can add a d on 02:04:120 - . I don't hear something that stands out
- 04:19:549 - try this, better for consistent structure. Applied
- 04:20:920 - try this, and repeat at 04:22:292 - as well.
- 04:23:663 - you can try something like this if you want for more consistency.
- I think 04:26:406 - can be d kkd as well. Similar at 04:27:777 - , I think it sounds nicer for the instrument sounds, and also not bad for variety. I did not apply the changes you suggested, but it gave me an idea to tweak current patterns
- 04:46:635 - I think this should look like this for better overall structure with 04:49:377 - imo, to get a 1-2-1-2 pattern. Ok, changed
- I think 06:10:635 - could be D, just because the pitch decreases very slightly here. Oh well, changed
- I think it might play out better if you ctrl+g notes like 05:30:349 (156,158) - to make dkddk patterns instead of kdddk, but this is up to you. I just find that the kdddk don't flow as nicely. Applies to the rest of the final kiai. I applied your suggestion with dkddk
22:26 gaston_2199: Hey! I applied the changes you sent me on the forum. When you can check it
22:28 snowball112: i'll check now I think
22:34 snowball112: alright, 02:44:577 - this could be a k
22:34 snowball112: mono is fine for the piano I think
22:35 gaston_2199: 02:45:949 (2) - d?
22:35 snowball112: no, just leave as k
22:35 snowball112: it's better if you just mono k for piano
22:36 snowball112: and then start using d and k for long instruments later
22:36 gaston_2199: Ok
22:36 snowball112: just make 02:44:577 - k, rest is fine here
22:36 gaston_2199: Well, fixed
22:40 snowball112: ok, 04:42:520 - the part starting here
22:41 snowball112: I think 04:48:006 - this one should be the same as 04:45:263 (232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239) -
22:42 snowball112: 04:48:006 - http://puu.sh/sFsdR/5bd99b3154.jpg
22:42 snowball112: just looks neater that way
22:46 snowball112: i'm still a bit unhappy about 04:20:920 (74,75) - 04:22:292 (82,83) - 04:23:663 (90,91) - that these are not dk :< because the pitch is different to 04:25:035 (98,99) - for example
22:48 snowball112: 04:26:406 (107,108) - dk and 04:27:777 (115,116) - dk too, so you transition better
22:48 snowball112: it would make dk_dk_dk_kd and dk_dk_kd_kd, could be nice for transition in this part
22:50 gaston_2199: Mmm, sounds good
22:51 snowball112: 04:37:377 (175,176) - and 04:38:749 (184,185) - would be dk too, indicator to transition
22:51 snowball112: so there you would have dk_dk_kk_kk
22:54 gaston_2199: I try to follow on the drums throughout the song and i think that d is not sound good
22:55 gaston_2199: Since here 04:32:235 (141) - for example, is k
22:55 gaston_2199: And I want to constantly follow that
22:55 snowball112: then you can leave these
22:55 snowball112: the ones I mentioned first are the more important ones
22:58 snowball112: can you update? that should be everything
22:59 gaston_2199: Ok
23:00 gaston_2199: done
23:00 snowball112: alright, last recheck
23:02 gaston_2199: I thins change this 04:37:892 (176,185) - for k
23:02 gaston_2199: think*
23:04 snowball112: you also forgot a finish on 01:05:835 -
23:04 snowball112: 01:16:806 - maybe too, but that one is optional
23:05 snowball112: and 03:50:577 - should be a d
23:05 gaston_2199: I forgot lol
23:05 gaston_2199: Ok
23:06 snowball112: maybe 03:57:435 - d as well, for better structure
23:06 gaston_2199: 03:57:263 (193) - Remove finish?
23:07 snowball112: probably, other sounds like this don't have finish either
23:08 gaston_2199: Ok, it's better to remove it
23:10 snowball112: I'm thinking that you could maybe change 04:40:292 - to d
23:10 snowball112: maybe 04:41:663 - as well
23:10 snowball112: to buildup more closely to the ddk_d_kdk from previous parts
23:12 gaston_2199: r Ok
23:12 gaston_2199: Ok*
23:13 snowball112: how about 04:44:149 - and 04:45:092 - d as well? very optional, but so much k is a bit loud
23:14 gaston_2199: You're right, it sounds better as you said it
23:15 snowball112: ok, last thing
23:15 snowball112: maybe 05:30:520 - and 05:36:006 - k
23:17 snowball112: because you used ddkkd before at 05:29:663 - for example, and 05:30:349 (156,157,158) - is stronger, so maybe dkk here
23:17 gaston_2199: I had thought about it
23:18 snowball112: i think it would work well :P
23:18 gaston_2199: The same in 05:41:492 - and 05:46:977 (54) - ¿
23:18 gaston_2199: ?*
23:19 snowball112: yes
23:19 gaston_2199: Beatmap updated
Me alegro de que le haya gustado.RuinedChicken wrote:
Took me a while, huh?
The issues I saw at a first glace are no longer there. I've played your map a gooooood amount of times. No inconsistencies within your own style that I can see. Even the one part I didn't like is still mapped consistently.
To sum up, it's pretty good. I'm shooting a star here and wish you good luck. Hope to see it ranked : D
Secretpipe wrote:
Awesome!
Gracias por tu mod!Vulkin wrote:
wtf am i doing modding a bubbled map
also im sorry for modding at the last minute , been busy with so many exams and stuffs.
-Continue?-
im not sure if the HP is ok, since its a marathon and they tend to have a much lower HP for their length, might need to recheck this Para mi está bien ya que no tiene patrones complicados, se puede reponer rápido el HP en algunos momentos. De igual manera lo pensaré
01:37:206 (233,234) - Ctrl+G? Cambiado, es el mismo sonido nada más que con volumen más fuerte.
02:07:292 (108) - k for consistency? Me gusta, cambiado.
02:12:777 (150) - dont feel like this is needed Sigo el electro sound
im really sorry for modding this thing at the last minute of being ranked ;A; No importa, todo cuenta aunque sea en el último momento
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOgaston_2199 wrote:
Beatmap updated~ (bubble popped)