Nuolong wrote:

Mod

00:03:259 (1) - I think you should start this spinner at 00:02:015 (1) instead :3 because it is where I hear the sound start I think its ok here, I don't like having too much spinner anyways
00:10:099 (1) - Nitpick - make this slider a little neater, like more symmetrical Blanketed with the spinner, and I like having asymmetrical feel

SPOILER

00:11:031 (4) - Make this slider neater - because right now it seems slanted and doesn't look that good imo ;w; This slider is good 00:14:140 (6) - but this current one is slanted Fix
00:11:497 (5) - I do not think this is needed, because there are no sounds in the music that exist for the blue tick here
00:14:140 (6,7) - Flow between these two are lacking, move 00:14:606 (7) - to x36,y44 or somewhere near
00:17:249 (6) - Not necessary to change, but is there a reason that this is dragged to end on the blue tick? Because I think the sound continues all the way to the next beat
00:16:782 (4,5,6) - Flow here is really nice :3
00:21:446 (5) - Same here, no beat is on the blue tick.
00:24:088 (6) - Fix this slider just a lil bit by making it curvier
00:27:197 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think this whole stream needs to be changed; it's not needed. It seems way overmapped in this part~ I think that there was a stream that was supposed to be here, also Milan's map has it so i think its ok
00:40:720 (5) - I don't think this is a good slider shape -- it promotes good flow to the upcoming notes, but this part of the music seems dramatically smooth and calmer than the previous part, so I think it should consist of rounder sliders, or at least sliders that aren't as sharp, like these 00:37:767 (1) - Agreed
00:47:560 (3) - Incorrectly emphasized - sliders, most of the time, shouldn't end on white ticks, which this does.
00:49:891 (1,2) - Abstract flow, it doesn't seem to play out that well (IMO)
00:52:067 (5) - Might not be a big deal, but overlaps 00:52:378 (1) - just a lil.
00:53:777 (2) - Maybe it'd be more appropriate to stack this on top of 00:53:933 (1) -
01:05:435 (5) - Same as mentioned earlier. I just might have something against this certain slider. I just don't think it looks as nice as the other sliders you've been using, so I think you should change it :3 I kinda changed it.. i guess?
01:40:565 (4,5,6,7) - I do not hear anything in the music that calls for a need of this lil stream :3 The kiai has so much going on that I can't tell what to put anyways, so I mapped to what I felt was ok
01:50:513 (4,5,6,7) - Same as ^
01:52:067 (1) - Red anchor is not tied to any beat in the music at all, so it should be smooth
01:55:176 (3) - I'll stop pointing these sliders out from now~ it's up to you if you agree with me and think you can make 'em look better :3
01:58:285 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Pretty sure it's an overmap, song doesn't have anything that tells me a stream is necessary
02:02:016 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same, stream is not needed at all ? there is a stream, its pretty faint but there is one to me
02:05:902 (5) - Same as mentioned earlier, blue tick has no note
02:14:762 (5,6) - Remove these two, the stream is supposed to end that 02:14:684 (4) - Used these for flow and similar sound
02:15:694 (3) - same
02:21:601 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - if anything a mini stream should start 02:22:223 (5) - here and here 02:22:689 (11) - . Rest of the notes are overmapping
02:25:176 (4) - Although hitsounds sorta fix this problem, I don't think these are necessary; circles would be fine.
02:27:818 (3,4) - overmapped I used these sliders since they share the same sound as 02:24:710 (2) -
02:30:072 (5) - this note is unnecessary. it should just be a triple! I initially mapped to the bells in the background
02:56:420 (9,10) - If you apply the same hitsound to these two, then if anything, these should be the ones stacked and not these pairs 02:55:953 (6,7,8,9) -
03:42:119 (3) - Drag to blue is unnecessary here, I think it'd be better to just end it on the white tick Her voice carries to the white tick, and I like the flow that it gives like this
03:47:404 (2) - Fix blanket, even if it is intended to look like this, I highly suggest you to change it (it looks really ugly ;w;) Fixed!
03:49:580 (2) - overlaps 03:48:959 (5) - Thank you, fixed.
03:57:352 (2) - Fix blanket I think i fixed... ?
03:59:529 (2) - make this slider more elegant, based on the anchors, etc. it looks like you made it in 10 sec (no offense!!) yep, it is ugly, I tried making it look like そ but I fixed it now
04:00:461 (4) - bad placement and overlapping with previous slider Blankets http://puu.sh/rScGf/827144f332.jpg
04:01:394 (5) - This follows absolutely nothing in the music o whoops, fixed
04:14:762 (4,5,6,7) - overmap, or if these do actually follow a really faint part of the music, I recommend you not do follow them as often. I think it ruins the song a bit and when you use it a lot the map feels super repetitive. If you get rid of these streams you can definitely add some spicy jumps or something like that. Since it is such a faint part of the music, it cannot be argued that the sound does exist, because I can't hear it; therefore I feel like it shouldn't be as emphasized as it is in the map ;w;
04:37:456 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - overmap (I'll stop pointing it out because I think you understand my point)
04:44:762 (1) - Stack this properly (nitpick) nice, fixed
04:45:539 (3) - Overlaps in a bad fashion, move a little bit Fixedd
04:45:928 (5) - similarly, this note is an overmap as the note doesn't exist in music I made this for playability and fun but I'll fix it proably because it is an overmap
04:53:466 (1) - holy ass this is beautiful, but I wish you made other sliders as nice as this (like with as much effort), you can maybe change some sliders to look better in this section 03:39:010 (1) -
04:59:917 (1) - end slider 05:04:814 (1) - instead

Ends on white tick.. ?

Good map as this didn't get any mods yet :3 Good luck~! Hope I helped.

-Vanilla wrote:

Nuolong wrote:

Ends on white tick.. ?

Good map as this didn't get any mods yet :3 Good luck~! Hope I helped.

My colors dont mean anything but if I didn't say anything assume it wasn't changed. Thanks for the mod! I understand it seems pretty overmapped but I promise you there is a reason those streams are there GL with your mapset!

Also star b/c double kd

Xelasto wrote:

Herro. M4M here.

Rose-Colored Glasses

00:13:518 (4) - This shape is not so good looking. I see what you were going for but the curve doesn't looks so hot. Perhaps make it straight like 3?
00:15:383 (1) - No NC (New combo) If a player is playing a song that's almost 6 stars, this pattern should be no trouble for them.
00:23:155 (3,4) - Too close. It kinda kills the flow.
00:25:332 (1) - No NC (as above)
00:25:953 (2,1) - Not parallel. Go to a tiny grid (G) and move 1 a bit to the left.
00:26:264 (1) - No NC
00:28:129 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Since the last stream was a half circle, why not make this one as well?
00:29:684 (1) - No NC
00:37:767 (1) - Switch the NC to 00:37:456 (7)
00:38:389 (1) - Switch the NC to 00:38:700 (2)
00:49:580 (4) - I feel like this should be faster and be more of a complete circle.
00:47:093 (1) - Switch the NC to 00:47:404 (2)
00:47:871 (1) - No NC
00:50:513 (1) - No NC (You get the idea; I think there are a lot of really short combos that are unnecessary.)
00:56:109 (4) - I suggest rotating this by around -60 degrees to make a better box with 5
01:02:326 (1,2) - This isn't really big. I'm just bothered by the fact that the angle almost touches 1.
01:04:192 (1,2) - My gut tells me this isn't parallel. Continue on if you're sure it is.
01:09:788 (1) - I feel like the first "ripple" is too close to the beginning
01:11:031 (1,3) - Are these purposefully not stacked?
01:11:964 (7) - This blanket is uneven. Pull the middle point in a bit
01:20:358 (3,4) - The fact that these are stacked even though 4 is not immediately after 3 makes this really easy to mess up on on your first try.
01:22:534 (2,3) - ^
01:24:710 (1,2) - ^
01:34:347 (2) - Move this so it blankets 1?
01:34:658 (1,1) - Make these parallel?
01:41:497 (3,1) - These two ends are not stacked.
01:43:363 (6) - NC
01:50:824 (1) - This quick upwards jolt after the stream. Maybe make it look sorta like ")" so it flows into 2 better?
02:20:358 (2,1,2) - Although I know what you went for here, the two sliders look like they're just a crazily-off double blanket.
02:24:710 (2) - Why have this slider have a noise at the end but not the others?
02:33:103 (2,3,4) - The flow in this feels awkward. What about tilting it sideways?
02:34:658 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Too many double notes. Feels really weird to play.
02:42:119 (14) - This slider has such a slight bend at the end it almost looks like the end is just displaced. I suggest you emphasis the bend a bit more.
02:41:964 (13) - NC
02:43:052 (1) - No NC
02:43:985 (4,1) - The blanket almost stabs 4 in the side. It bothers me ;-;
03:39:477 (2,3) - Stack?
03:46:472 (2,3) - The straight up and down motion of this pattern just doesn't feel as good as something like 00:25:021 (1,2,1,2)
03:47:404 (2) - Fix this blanket, please.
03:52:689 (3,4) - Why not make this mirror eachother?
04:01:083 (5) - This blanket swings out too wide.
04:32:171 (1,4) - Easy opportunity for a stack.
04:44:762 (1,2) - Blanket?
04:53:466 (1) - The hole at the top left should be shaped a bit more like a tear drop.

Overall, nice map. I definitely think that the biggest problem (which I stopped mentioning) is the imbalanced combo changes. Some combos are as long as 16 notes, but there are some as low as 2 or even 1. It makes the map too forgiving. However, other than that I think the flow was very nice. Great job!

Splaszor wrote:

M4M o/

Rose-Colored Glasses

00:26:264 (3) - Sounds a bit awkward, put end of slider at 00:26:420 instead?
02:50:513 (6) - ^ Put slider end at 02:50:668 maybe?
01:38:700 (2) - ^ Put slider end at 01:39:010 maybe?
04:02:948 (2) - ^ Put slider end at 04:03:259 maybe?

00:58:440 (2) - Mute slider end?
02:28:129 (1) - ^
02:29:062 (5) - ^
02:30:616 (3) - ^
02:31:860 (1) - ^
04:03:570 (3) - ^ uhhh whoops... good catch! D:

03:45:694 (1) - Move to x:148 y:152 fixed

02:41:187 (8) - NC
02:26:730 (2) - Says object end isn't snapped in AiMod idk why

Lama Poluna wrote:

Rose-Colored Glasses

• 
  - General -

1. Romanised title must be - ワールド・ランプシェード FIXED
2. This has in tags - Warrudo Ranpusheedo Added
3. I think bg should be taken from the video - I will find a new BG soon, thanks!this
   - Diff -
4. 00:03:259 (1) - Spiner must end in 00:09:942 - , otherwise very difficult to click on 00:10:099 (1) - . The player can always stop spinning
5. 00:10:565 (2) - x448 y168, very difficult to read.
6. 01:37:767 - In such part necessary to reduce the sound from 50-30~ Fixed!

alma199912 wrote:

Yo, m4m for your queue.

Rose-Colored Glasses

00:22:223 (8) - move the slider start to slider end of 00:22:534 (1).
01:29:062 (2,3,4) - create a stream here, don't stack. I find it to flow better when jumping to this stream 01:29:373 (1,2,3,4,1) i just unstacked
01:48:959 (1,2,3,4) - move the stream a bit to the left, like this. In this case, twisting it like you do after in here 01:58:907 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) and here
02:02:016 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6), seems weird to me. used the first part of the stream to blanket, and i think the flow still is similar so I'll keep it
02:50:979 (8) - Add NC.
02:55:953 (6) - Add NC.
02:58:440 (7) - Add NC.
03:00:928 (7) - Add NC.Ill keep these consistent
03:39:477 (2,3) - Snap note (2) to slider end ok
03:45:694 (1,2) - ^ (this one idk, the editor lets me snap it so i'll just indicate it) doing it for consistency

And now, for some really minor aesthetic things, that could or could not be necessary (do what ever you want).
00:37:456 (7,1) - This blanket could be perfected
01:46:161 (6,8,1) - ^ fixed
00:39:010 (3) - Move slider closer to 00:38:700 (2) like in 00:36:212 (1,2). fixed
01:12:586 (2) - slider close to 01:12:275 (1) slider start

Oh, and have a star, for the good work

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

hi im modder xd

this one lol

wombo handstand

00:11:497 (5,6) - your varying distances in blankets throws off the aesthetic a bit, consider spacing these out at atleast 1/4... i personally like 00:12:586 (1,2) - this distance the best. which btw vvvv

00:12:586 (1,2) - fix your blanket lol wut

00:17:249 (6,1) - cluttered again, if you dont want to ruin the spacing of 00:18:492 (5) - and how it stacks both ends then you can just have it start in the middle of the slider track rather than the end circle

00:20:047 (1,3) - yeah this distance is nice

00:42:430 (1,2) - these are parallel but the way 00:42:741 (2) - is placed it doesn't look like it, place a bit further lower left RIGHT, IM RETARDED (POST MOD EDIT) ye

00:51:757 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - FXI UR KFCUIGN BLNKAET ya

00:57:508 (2,3,2,3) - anti flow, i suggest having them stack in the opposite direction

00:58:751 (1) - fix the starting end of this, as it is now 00:59:062 (2) - favors 00:58:440 (2) - better. this combo shouldn't be ctrl h ctrl j, this should be a bit more manual. ?

01:42:119 (1) - using combo colors this way is patently unrankable they fukd

01:44:606 (1) - colors

01:47:249 (3,1) - wtf that STACK tho ye

01:48:026 (1) - colors

01:49:269 (1) - colors

01:50:824 (1) - colors

01:53:622 (1) - colors brochgil aonec the combo colors i fix all

01:57:042 (2,3) - why not use this spacing at the start of the map? this looks much nicer than having the slider edges line up, and its a lot easier to do also

01:58:285 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - hi clockwise y change when flow is good into the hardest parts of the map

02:03:259 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - oo that was nice

02:04:503 (1,3) - BUT I DONT GET WHY IT HAS TO BE SO CLOSE :C makes lining stuff up easier and noobs that play it will be like "dam they paralel niga"

02:05:902 (5,6) - PLZ THIS INSTEAD LOLLL (also fix blanket h e h) wot blanket? it fix gooooood?>?

02:15:073 (1,2) - fix curvature of either is ok

02:28:440 (2) - oooh maybe instead of stack, place this down the same distance as 02:27:663 (2,4) - away from the slider end? it would make the whole section feel way more unified like that, this goes for all the stacks yessesesesesesesesssssssssss~!

03:47:404 (2,3) - niiiiiggaaa.... make mopre spaciged

04:49:657 (6,1) - unnatural flow

04:53:466 (1) - sex me daddey ye

Silynn wrote:

Hiya! M4M here from your queue

First thing's first, the BG. Filename of "sex" is actually not rankable (just kidding i don't know if this is true or not). Really though, your BG is hella squished. I made you a non-squished version from the source file and I think you should use it. Here ya go: http://puu.sh/rVkgq.jpg LUL

Next, this map is actually really really well structured. I think 95% of the issues in this map are sloppy blankets that feel really squished. I don't know if that's just my personal preference, but it stands out to me a lot when playing, and I would recommend doing a self-check on these. Hopefully I'll have more suggestions than just "fix blanket lol" though ;w;

Examples of squished blankets:

00:37:456 (7,1) -
Current: http://puu.sh/rVtiS.png
Suggested Fix: http://puu.sh/rVtll.png

00:58:440 (2,1,2) -
Current: http://puu.sh/rVtox.png
Suggested Fix: http://puu.sh/rVtC2.png

01:11:964 (7,1,2) -
Current: http://puu.sh/rVtFL.png
Suggested Fix: http://puu.sh/rVtMd.png

Agreed with these, ill go through to fix all of them

Anyways, there's a lot of these through the map and I don't really feel like pointing every single one out. But if you want me to feel free to message me in game and I can over IRC. If you think I'm crazy feel free to ignore

Alright, on to the real mod lol

mod

1. 00:11:497 (5) - Consider replacing this with a note. I'd place around 84,316. Also NC. If you keep the 1/4 slider, you should move it further up so the blanket doesn't feel so cramped. changed blanket spacing
2. 00:21:446 (5,6) - ^same thing ^
3. 00:27:586 (2,3) - these two notes aren't in the music, I'd make (1) a slider that ends where (4) is instead I hear some bg rustling in the music, i know its not enough to justify a full stream but it continues through the stream, so I'll keep it for now
4. 00:48:026 (4) - try moving this slider so it lines up with (3)? i like it, fixed
5. 01:23:466 (2) - don't know how much it matters to you but this slider is pretty easy to misread IMO. if you don't care then keep it! I used to do this pattern with the slider starts stacked, i think its ok how it is now
6. 01:41:342 (2,3) - line these up more, try moving (2) to 431,202 or so agreed
7. 01:47:093 (2,3,4) - this flow is a bit awkward. consider changing. something like this might feel better: http://puu.sh/rVBOq.png (3 is stack on the start of 1) I like your pattern, it does feel good but the whole map I tried rather completely linear flow or circular flow for any combo, so I'll keep it as is, i might change it later if someone else points it out
8. 01:48:959 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - cool !! uhh i just noticed that these are the same combo color... wot
9. 01:51:446 (3) - could flow better if the start was lined up with 2 and the end is lined up with 4, hard to explain but try it out i guess? sorta feels off to the side for no real reason right now (i know it's supposed to be stacked on the stream) I agree with the flow but I'll keep it how it is just for distance snap consistency sake
10. 02:24:088 (1,2,3,4,1) - something about how this stream is placed bothers me but i can't figure out what it is so why am i even mentioning it.. lol
11. 02:56:575 (10) - maybe move to 264,109? I moved it, but instead I made the DS equivalent (1.18x)
12. 03:11:964 (4) - possibly move this further away, try 495,45 and see if you like it or not song is too calm to increase DS
13. 03:25:487 (6,1) - this jump is awkward
14. 03:57:042 (1) - I don't really think there's enough space inside of the slider to throw a note in the center, the overlapping looks bad. that's just my preference though agreed, I made the slider more open
15. 04:53:466 (1) - I would shift the end of the slider up slightly so it's not so close to itself ficksd

Anyways that's it. Sorry for the lame mod. Super solid map, it deserves to be ranked. Feel free call me back for a re-check if you get further with it and need a bit more feedback. Sent you a star /o/ TY :O

Kami-senpai wrote:

M4M from thine queue

Rose-Colored Glasses

00:19:580 (3) - Since this is such a big change, you should NC it
00:23:155 (3) - ctrl + g this because you want 4 to be going the opposite direction, flow wise, which is what the change in music direction (idk if im making sense) calls for
00:26:264 (3) - Why is this SV so slow? I don't really hear any part of the music that could account for that
00:30:772 (4,5,6) - These hitsounds are nice ^.^
00:37:767 (1,2,3,4,1) - Maybe evenly space these because there's no special emphasis that should make it uneven ficksdd
00:43:985 (2,3,4,5) - I think you should put one of those bell hitsounded triplets here I did something and I like the sound sooo ye fixed
00:48:026 (4) - Based off your hitsounds, this would make a lot more sense as two single note jumps instead of a slider
00:52:378 (1) - Tilt this a little to the left so that it doesn't overlap with 00:52:067 (5) - yay
00:59:839 (1) - There's a whistle hitsound for the middle portion of the slider that I'm not sure if you intended or not wo0w nice catch
01:17:249 (1,2,1,2) - I almost feel that this would be better as single note jumps, since the song is pretty emphasized here with the drum. Since the sounds are different (i.e. snare and kicks) make the first two notes in each combo have high distance and the third one lower, like so: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6426114 I can see why I should change the pattern but I think its ok anyways since the snare lands on the slider start
01:18:181 (1) - Normally when you do this the flow is alright, but this slider seems to be too high up and too curved upwards for a nice flow. If you were to rotate around -26 degrees that would make it much better
01:19:425 (3,4) - These should get NC and higher distance because of emphasized sound
01:20:824 (4,1) - Very hard to predict based on distance and timing. Either space them out more or add a note between them made distance higher
01:22:534 (2,3) - Same with this. Your other stacks are pretty inconsistent as well, sometimes, they are extended sliders and sometimes they have 1/2 space between them. Be more consistent with those for predictability
01:25:798 (2) - I'm not a big fan of ending sliders on the big white ticks because thats supposed to be a downbeat in the music. Maybe exchange this slider for two circles
01:27:663 (2,3,1,2) - If you're gonna use the same pattern, they should be mapped to the same sounds. Here the sounds are completely different, yet you use the same pattern, without even hitsounding them the same way.
01:33:725 (1) - NC off? No reason for NC ye
01:34:658 (1,2,1,2) - Idk, just everywhere you use this pattern, it just doesn't seem to fit the music because they're not the same sounds and they're not hitsounded the same way. If you hitsounded them the same, maybe it would work better it might be different in terms of sound each time but when you listen to the vocals it has emphasis on the start of the sliders, so I used the same pattern for consistency sake
01:38:700 (2) - There is clearly a note of the vocals at 1:39:010 that you just extended the slider over. Please don't do that. It makes me sad ;-; I did a bunch of different things for this part but I'll change it so it fits the white ticks
02:00:772 (5,6) - This style of stack is kinda hard to read, but if other people think its fine then its okay with me as well
02:13:985 (3) - NC
02:15:073 (1,2) - Maybe make it so the blanket looks more even, like so: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6426154 ok
02:19:425 (1,2,1,2) - The distances here are much higher than the ones where you did this previously Ill keep these just because you come out of a kiai doing this and i like increasing difficulty as song goes along (slightly)
02:21:912 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I didn't mention this earlier, but your streams seem to lacking a lot of potential hitsounds I hitsounded the streams to the bg music completely, I would add extra hitsounds, but id have to experiment, I think theyre ok right now
02:41:497 (12) - Yea definitely don't end this slider on the down beat. Put a single circle on the big white tick fixed
02:42:430 (3,4) - For the intensity of the music, this distance seems a bit high
02:50:513 (6) - NC oki
02:55:953 (6,7,8,9,10) - why is this so cramped??! ;-; it makes me cri. Spread them out plz oki
03:05:824 (11,1) - Hitsound these with clap too plz
03:25:953 (2) - Maybe move this more to the left so its not quite so overlapped
03:43:985 (1) - I feel that starting here, the SV should be slower because the music is kinda droned out, but you speed it up. Your call, but I think a slower SV would fit much much better
03:45:694 (1,2,1) - weird weird weird weird stack ;-; dun do dis.
03:46:316 (1) - NC off 03:46:472 (2) - NC on
03:48:959 (5) - NC on
03:56:264 (1) - NC off I messed with the NCs in this section
04:02:016 (1) - Lower volume starting here ye
04:11:031 (1,2) - Wow such small distance .-. spread it out more oops
04:23:155 (5,6,7) - This is a good example of fitting hitsound + pattern
04:29:684 (4) - I feel that if you ctrl +g this it would flow better
04:49:657 (6,1) - Normally your stream flow is nice, but this one is just super odd. Please place the slider more inline Quote from my other mod - the guitar is going owooowowwowwwowwwooo so i make slider go woowowowowowowoooo
04:53:311 (3,1) - Cool slider, bad flow from the note before it. I feel like this would be better: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6426195

Overall, really nice map. Flow is generally on point, but I would suggest trying out different patterns to see which ones fit the music more. A general rule of thumb is, if the sound isn't the same, don't use the same pattern. You could twist this rule by making the hitsounds the same to trick the players into thinking its the same sound. Yea ill mess around with it, I do agree with you here, but I just tried to map towards whats intense in the pattern and whats not and it usually ended up as a circle slider circle slider, so I decided to use similar patterns

Also, please hitsound some more. In some places, especially streams, it is lacking and in others, it is just really weird, like it has no distinct pattern to them.

Great blankets, great slider aesthetic.

I look forward to seeing this baby ranked Same to you!

1. turn the volume on your first redtick to 5%, having two timing points with different volume %'s is unrankable

1. 00:10:099 (1,3) - blanket
2. 00:10:565 (2) - bring this up a bit away from your 1/1 slider
3. 00:32:171 (5) - pretty bad to ignore the triple sound here that you mapped just before it
4. 00:42:430 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - why did you start ignoring the triple here? i think it's very helpful for accenting the vocals
5. 00:48:026 (4) - i would make this two circles or even a triple tbh
6. 00:53:000 (1,1) - maybe try to avoid this overlap?
7. 01:02:016 (6) - ignoring sound here again :<
8. 01:06:990 (6) -
9. 01:44:295 (7,1) - avoid this overlap?
10. 01:45:073 (2,5) - think this overlap is pretty ew
11. 01:46:472 (8) - imo this shouldn't be 3/4
12. 01:58:907 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - cool stream ^^
13. 02:44:295 (1) - honestly from here to 03:24:088 (1) here the song is very calm, however your spacing doesn't reflect that as it's bascially the same spacing as the beginning of the map. outside of some outleirs such as streams or intensity spikes, i don't see why the spacing here would be as large as it is
14. 03:28:440 (2,1) - stack?
15. 03:30:306 (5,8,1) - thinks looks kinda messy to me, try to stack some things?
16. 03:32:016 (3,5) - maybe make them overlap more or get rid of the overlap?

Logic Agent wrote:

hi m4m stuff. sorry this took forever lmao

[General]

1. turn the volume on your first redtick to 5%, having two timing points with different volume %'s is unrankable oki

[Rose-Colored Glasses]

1. 00:10:099 (1,3) - blanket oops
2. 00:10:565 (2) - bring this up a bit away from your 1/1 slider
3. 00:32:171 (5) - pretty bad to ignore the triple sound here that you mapped just before it ?
4. 00:42:430 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - why did you start ignoring the triple here? i think it's very helpful for accenting the vocals ?
5. 00:48:026 (4) - i would make this two circles or even a triple tbh
6. 00:53:000 (1,1) - maybe try to avoid this overlap?ye
7. 01:02:016 (6) - ignoring sound here again :<
8. 01:06:990 (6) -
9. 01:44:295 (7,1) - avoid this overlap?ye
10. 01:45:073 (2,5) - think this overlap is pretty ewye
11. 01:46:472 (8) - imo this shouldn't be 3/4
12. 01:58:907 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - cool stream ^^
13. 02:44:295 (1) - honestly from here to 03:24:088 (1) here the song is very calm, however your spacing doesn't reflect that as it's bascially the same spacing as the beginning of the map. outside of some outleirs such as streams or intensity spikes, i don't see why the spacing here would be as large as it is i mapped to drums for the whole song and there were more frequent snares so I kept spacing consistent
14. 03:28:440 (2,1) - stack?
15. 03:30:306 (5,8,1) - thinks looks kinda messy to me, try to stack some things?
16. 03:32:016 (3,5) - maybe make them overlap more or get rid of the overlap?

map overall is playable and decent, but there's a lot of aesthetic choices and spacing issues that I think should be cleaned up. this is a great song and the wip sb looks nice

Vell wrote:

mod

00:20:513 (2) - stack with the sliderend of 00:20:979 (4) - might flow better consistent with first one, felt good to me so ill keep it

00:27:274 (3) - the spacing is oddly high probably because you want to emphasize the kick on 00:27:197 (2) - but I think replacing 00:27:197 (2,3) - with a 1/4 slider would do the job as well

01:05:280 - why does a triple start here when the tingling sound you emphasized previously many times starts here 01:05:435 - ? delete 01:05:358 - and turn 01:05:435 (4) - into a triple Good catch

01:23:466 (2) - let it end on the kick and guitar note like you did with 01:22:534 (2,3) - ? ?

02:21:601 (1,2) - same issue as 00:27:197 (2,3)

02:43:674 - maybe put a 1/2 slider here instead of the repeat to follow the guitar? to me the guitar goes owowoeoeoeeowww so i did the repeat slider.. I don't use enough of those anyways so lol

02:53:000 (5) - 02:55:643 (5) - 02:57:974 (5) - 03:00:461 (5) - NC on these to stay consistent with the NCs on 02:48:026 - 02:50:513 -

sorry a bit short, very interesting map though. The overmapping does feel natural when playing but some streams seemed to be too overspaced and felt kinda forced instead of being supported by the song. It might just be me but when I map i try to follow the personality of the map as close as possible and I end up making the difference between low impact and high impact parts of the map super big in terms of spacing.

PajWoj wrote:

m4m

map

00:10:099 (1,4) - that overlaps a bit Fixed
00:15:073 (1,2,1,2) - i would keep this as one combo not split it
00:17:871 (2,3) - sudden change of ds might disract some players
00:25:021 (1,2,1,2) - same as above above
00:34:347 (3,4,5,1) - you could move the notes a bit further to the front of the slider so it kind of blankets Fixed!
00:41:497 (2,4,5,6) - i would stack this tbh
00:43:363 (4,3) - stack maybe
01:23:000 (3,2) - maybe stack this
there are lots of weird (to me) stacks like those above, i'll stop mentioning them (do whatever you want, but i guess this was intentional)
01:48:959 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this looks really weird, probably plays well (even though it's hard) but i would change it so it's easier
01:50:590 (5,3) - stack
01:52:067 (1,3) - you might want to stack the end and the circle too
02:24:399 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i like things like this overall but it doesn't fit imo, change the small sliders to circles I'll avoid the meta for now, I think it fits so I'll keep it for now.
02:34:658 (2,3) - 02:35:435 (1,2) - another sudden ds change
03:16:005 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - why is this not spaced equally Hype buildup, its a pretty small change too so I'll keep this here
03:30:306 (5,8) - stack
03:58:285 (5,1) - stack
04:18:492 (7,1) - overlap Fixed!

i love the song the map the sb aaaaaaaaaa gl gl gl gl TY

My stacks were made the way they are because I initially mapped this with a stack leniency of 2, so I wanted to avoid perfect stacking (kinda dumb on my part but its too much work to change now.)

Blue Dragon wrote:

im not really going to mod but this is really well done lol

Halfslashed wrote:

M4M

Fixed
Fixed but in a different way
Commentary, not fixed

[Rose-Colored Glasses]

SPOILER

00:18:492 (5) - Your other sliders like this usually have the ends overlapping, and they all represent the same sound.

00:21:446 (5,6) - These map the same sounds as 00:11:497 (5,6) - but have completely different shapes, so i'm curious as to why. Throughout this first intro section you clearly associate most of your shapes with certain sounds from what I can see. I went for more of a similar rhythm instead of shape, just for some variety, I'll change this though cuz i think it looks gross

00:27:197 (2,3,4,1) - If you're into this sort of thing, you can make a blanket here.

00:27:974 (7,1) - In context, this emphasis doesn't make much sense since right before you have 00:27:352 (4,1) - which is mapping the 1/4 slider to the guitar, while here the 1/4 slider is before the guitar. Either are valid, you should pick one though.

00:30:928 (6) - Another instance of this. The meaning of this slider is ambiguous since it is repeated here 00:32:482 (1) - for a different sound. This is repeated throughout so it may be intentional, but I can't tell what sound it's supposed to represent. I remapped this part

00:34:503 (5,6,7) - Not liking your emphasis here. 00:34:503 (5,6) - to me sounds like it should be bigger than 00:34:658 (6,7). Be mindful that you don't disrupt the jump on 00:34:814 (7,1). Remapped

00:51:757 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Blanket is off. c00l

01:08:233 (1,2,3,4) - I get the feeling that visual distance could be more consistent here. Also check your slider angles 01:08:233 (1,4).

01:09:477 (5,1) - Looks like an unintentional overlap. o0ps

01:13:207 (4,5) - Which visual concept are you using in this section? This type of overlap, 01:09:632 (6,2) -, 01:10:720 (6,2) - , 01:11:964 (7,2)- ? You should be consistent with them. remapped

01:16:005 (1,2) - Not sure if I understand the reason for the flow break here.

01:35:591 (1,3) - Unintentional overlap. fuk

01:37:767 (1,2,3) - Can't say i feel the impact of the vocals with the way you have it mapped. I feel like 01:38:389 should be clickable at the least.

01:38:700 (2,3) - Could also be changed to having 01:39:010 - mapped as well and all of them with extended sliders. That's my interpretation though, so feel free to ignore this.

01:39:321 (3) - Make sure the end is silenced here. :ok_hand:

01:48:959 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Nope, nothing wrong here. I just wanted to point it out because it's cool.

01:58:907 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Yeah, this plays fine, but compared to what you did above it provides a different emphasis concept than you used before, so i highly recommend you change it.

02:53:000 (5) - Looks like you forgot an NC.

03:08:544 (1,2,1,2) - For a song with no previous 1/3, this isn't the greatest idea. It's passable, but it'd be nice if you had a repeat for 03:08:544 (1,2) - and then your current pattern. To me this also makes sense intensity wise, since the second set is stronger. http://puu.sh/sPzMq/e992c81e61.jpg If it were less than 5.5* then maybe, it is a rhythm game so instead of giving an odd rhythm an easy hit, I made it at least a little harder, you can still spam it and hit it so its ok :3

03:13:518 (4,5,6,7,1) - No spacing increase? These drums sound more audible. I increased spacing on snares, not kicks

03:15:694 (1,2) - Can't say i understand your emphasis here.

03:16:005 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Overdone compared to previous spacings in this section without substantial enough changes in the song to me. people interpret maps differently, I increased spacing because the song is getting more hyped

03:47:404 (2,3) - Blanket is off.

04:37:456 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Can't say I understand the difference in visuals compared to what you're mapping. changed i think?

04:43:674 (1) - I'm not entirely sure on the rankability of this slider. RC states: "Additionally, the slider borders must never be covered up from the slider being packed in too tightly." under the clause " Every slider must have a clear and visible path to follow from start to end". Here is a rankable alternative (No, it's not polished, i'm just trying to give you an idea of what you can do to fix your current slider): http://puu.sh/sPAyt/a7bc133f19.jpg Fixed. thanks

04:49:269 (1,3,5) - I recommend having 1/4 sliders start on these sounds to give better emphasis, since your current rhythm ignores these. I think ill keep it for now, but I see your point..

04:53:466 (1) - Here's how you can improve this slider: Make sure the loop has a teardrop shape, and align the two red nodes of the heart better. Example of what I mean: http://puu.sh/sPBi8/12c0048e74.jpg Notice how I have a straight slider on the top red node that should bisect the heart. Then from there, you should get the bottom red node to align as closely as possible with the slider tail. Note, I'm just giving you a rough idea, these aren't polished measurements and in my illustration i messed up your shape, but it's possible to implement this and get the same shape you have. maybe.. seems like a lot of work xd

Overall, the main issue I saw was your visual concepts. It's fine to use overlaps, but you should be consistent on which ones you're using in a given section. Same goes for your slider shapes, it should be clear what each shape means. Map isn't bad though.

Good luck!

Dashyy- wrote:

hi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! m4m

Changed
Changed in a different way

rose:

00:30:617 (3,4,5,6) - imo this doesn't fit the music that well. there's nothing in the song that signifies such a jump and it feels way to intense. 00:31:860 fixed intensnsisty(2,3,4,5) - this pattern plays and sound a lot better imo.
00:36:834 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,1) - switching concepts like that makes the map messy imo. if u have a reasong could u explain If you played the map before I remapped this whole section it was just triplets so I tried to have the same audio rhythm in the hitsounding while introducing different ways to map those sounds to add variety
00:44:140 (3,4,5,6) - i kinda get why you didn't map the quieter triangle sounds, but this one is pretty obvious. mapping this would improve the general flow of the changed flow
map.

01:07:611 (2) - don't get why there's a reverse overlapping slider. if the song repeats itself it would work but it just doesn't look right here. ye i changed it somehow
01:18:648 (3) - put this on top of 01:19:269 (2) - ye
02:26:575 - to 02:43:985 - is my biggest concern with the map. you never keep with a certain concept of the map and it just looks messy. at least with
the previous section, you tried to keep with the concepts. but now you're all over the place with this one. the song changes so does my mapping
03:08:544 (1,2,1,2) - this 1/3 section is really sudden. i would suggest using reverse sliders for better readability kinda changed
03:18:491 (1,2,1,2) - fukcing notepad won't let me do carrots so just see above
04:33:104 (5) - maybe make this slider straight? blanketed lol
04:53:466 (1) - what is wrong with that heart ?

nice blanketing

vekt0r wrote:

Hi, m4m:

rose colored glasses

(Lul I can barely pass this bc 30k scrub who can’t stream)
00:44:295 (4,5,6) - The other places that you didn’t map the jingling sound with 1/4 I can understand, but you should here I'm really not sure what I wan't to do here, I added the jumps initially because of the hype building going into the next section, but I feel like there could be something to add jinglinging
03:54:554 (2,3,4,5) - 2 is below the others, also offset these too turn off stacking, they are all overlapped, the 2 is below because stack leniency moves it away from the sliderend of 1

In general, also with notes after 3/4 sliders, most of them are spaced, so be more intentional with the ones that aren't
Also i think 01:23:000 (3,2) - are the only ones in the map that directly overlap, while all other parallel sliders partially overlap. Fixed some of these, I checked for section consistency and fixed the ones that were inconsistent

Good luck, this map is fun to play