honestly these finishes dont fit at all imo :S
00:11:882 - 00:11:882 - 00:21:482 - etc
00:11:882 - 00:11:882 - 00:21:482 - etc
forum
Atsuko Asahi & Manaka Kataoka - Gozen 9-ji
posted
Total Posts
157
really? I think they fit personallyKibbleru wrote:
honestly these finishes dont fit at all imo :S
00:11:882 - 00:11:882 - 00:21:482 - etc
Topic Starter
If you mean by fit the song, then I agree.Kibbleru wrote:
honestly these finishes dont fit at all imo :S
00:11:882 - 00:11:882 - 00:21:482 - etc
They are meant to be different from the song because without them, the map felt a little bland. I put them in there to add to the audio appeal.
fair enough :dPolkaMocha wrote:
If you mean by fit the song, then I agree.Kibbleru wrote:
honestly these finishes dont fit at all imo :S
00:11:882 - 00:11:882 - 00:21:482 - etc
They are meant to be different from the song because without them, the map felt a little bland. I put them in there to add to the audio appeal.
I'll check this soon.
Ayyri
I know, but if I made this 1/6 it would be the only 1/6 in the diff. I simplified the rhythm to 1/4 to make it more playable. I can change it if I have to but I don't really want to. It's almost impossible for the player to read this as 1/6 or predict that it'll be 1/6.Ayyri wrote:
hobbbbbbbbbbbbb
- 00:21:932 - The sound for this is at 00:21:882 - . (1/6, not 1/4.) I remember that the timing for the map is kinda messed up, since it had to either follow the piano or the drums. Buuuuut yeah, the sound is still there. :p
Ayyri
That's literally the same thing I told Polka. But I don't know if I would want to let that slide. :/Hobbes2 wrote:
I know, but if I made this 1/6 it would be the only 1/6 in the diff. I simplified the rhythm to 1/4 to make it more playable. I can change it if I have to but I don't really want to. It's almost impossible for the player to read this as 1/6 or predict that it'll be 1/6.
00:21:932 (4) - isn't even 1/6 though, it's offset completely from the rest of the map (The sound that is)Ayyri wrote:
That's literally the same thing I told Polka. But I don't know if I would want to let that slide. :/Hobbes2 wrote:
I know, but if I made this 1/6 it would be the only 1/6 in the diff. I simplified the rhythm to 1/4 to make it more playable. I can change it if I have to but I don't really want to. It's almost impossible for the player to read this as 1/6 or predict that it'll be 1/6.It's barely noticeable though..;w;
EDIT - Like I said in irc, those drum sounds are offset from the rest of the song a bit, best approximation is 1/16 before but nobody really wants to play that lol. If we were to strictly map those drum bits to the correct rhythm it'd be poo, so it's simplified to 1/4 ticks. If this is bad I suppose I could change it but the map wouldn't be as fun.
EDIT2 so im not a buster - I get your point on 1/6 being more accurate while still retaining playability now, I was a bit confused on that earlier. But yeah sticking to 1/4 is the best solution imo.
Ayyri
gratz on rank
Any special meanings for those times?
Especially for 9:31 A.M. and 9:30 A.M., I can see time is going by as diff becomes harder, but 9:30 is actually harder than 9:31 so idk
Especially for 9:31 A.M. and 9:30 A.M., I can see time is going by as diff becomes harder, but 9:30 is actually harder than 9:31 so idk
lol, i think 9:31 used to be harder but after a few changes it got switched, but the diff names never got fixed. thats probably worth dqing over to fix, polka can confirm thosahuang wrote:
Any special meanings for those times?
Especially for 9:31 A.M. and 9:30 A.M., I can see time is going by as diff becomes harder, but 9:30 is actually harder than 9:31 so idk
doesn't really need to dq tbh cuz technically diff name can be anything, but i feel that if you want the map to be more flawless it would be a good idea to do a quick fix on it xD
Tbh 9:31 being placed lower than 9:30 didn't felt rational enough but since I didn't look the actual map, I can't say more.
Topic Starter
Thanks.Nao Tomori wrote:
gratz on rank
9:00 easysahuang wrote:
Any special meanings for those times?
Especially for 9:31 A.M. and 9:30 A.M., I can see time is going by as diff becomes harder, but 9:30 is actually harder than 9:31 so idk
9:15 normal
9:30 hard
9:45 insane
Advanced and hypers are kind of in between like 9:20 and 9:40.
To clear this up, star rating doesnt matter in terms of the times associated with the difficulty name.Sonnyc wrote:
Tbh 9:31 being placed lower than 9:30 didn't felt rational enough but since I didn't look the actual map, I can't say more.
"Well, how I went about naming these was I first named them easy normal hard based on their star difficulty, and then I put the times based on what I named them.
So the other 9:30 gained an extra minute because it was an extra difficulty.
star rating influenced difficulty name
difficulty name influenced time
star rating did not influence time
...if that makes any sense"
Sorry for the confusion people ouo;
I didnt give times based on difficulty, but when all was said and done, 9:30 used to be easier than 9:31, so everything did flow at one point yeah.Hobbes2 wrote:
lol, i think 9:31 used to be harder but after a few changes it got switched, but the diff names never got fixed. thats probably worth dqing over to fix, polka can confirm tho
That was unexpected, I was going to check it and then I realized this got Qualified, congratulations.
Topic Starter
Sorry.Gero wrote:
That was unexpected, I was going to check it and then I realized this got Qualified, congratulations.
Thanks tho
Gero wrote:
That was unexpected, I was going to check it and then I realized this got Qualified, congratulations.
Congratulations! :3 See? It's not that hard to get BNs now. \w/
Even though you have the "harder" one named 9:31 and the easier one named 9:30, I still think they should be changed. If these were the two hardest diffs and the "easier" one in your mind had higher SR but the "harder one" was lower SR but had custom diff name, it wouldn't be allowed. They should definitely be changed to accurately represent spread
Topic Starter
hhhhh cab someone dq this so I can fix o- o ?Ascendance wrote:
Even though you have the "harder" one named 9:31 and the easier one named 9:30, I still think they should be changed. If these were the two hardest diffs and the "easier" one in your mind had higher SR but the "harder one" was lower SR but had custom diff name, it wouldn't be allowed. They should definitely be changed to accurately represent spread
Topic Starter
It never was. Just finding time was the hard part lelHappyRocket88 wrote:
Congratulations! :3 See? It's not that hard to get BNs now. \w/
Disqualified upon mapper's request.
Topic Starter
K I fixed the diffs.
any reason why the romanised title's 9 A.M. instead of Gozen 9-ji?
probably delete spaces between the unicode artist names too, i.e. 朝日温子＆片岡真央
probably delete spaces between the unicode artist names too, i.e. 朝日温子＆片岡真央
Topic Starter
Kind of splitting hairs at this point but okay changedIamKwaN wrote:
any reason why the romanised title's 9 A.M. instead of Gozen 9-ji?
probably delete spaces between the unicode artist names too, i.e. 朝日温子＆片岡真央
just enjoy life bruhPolkaMocha wrote:
Kind of splitting hairs at this point but okay changed
And I thought we're all clear with metadata
wew
wew
Topic Starter
ikr @- @Electoz wrote:
And I thought we're all clear with metadata
wew
Send me a forum pm if you need to push this mapset forward.
it was just metadata change, nothing else, so I guess a QAT can qualify directly, or isn't that way?
The difficulty naming also changed, so it will need to go through the requalification process completelyezek wrote:
it was just metadata change, nothing else, so I guess a QAT can qualify directly, or isn't that way?
Rechecked and everything seems fine, also Ascendance can you give me the reason why the difficulty name change is the cause for the whole thing lol, is that stated somewhere? Anyways I talked with the mapper and decides to rebubble to avoid any further fuss so we should be good now.
Rebubbled!
Rebubbled!
Ayyri
@Electoz: The difficulty name change would count as a metadata change. Moreover, the artist and romanised title changed. So that would be another reason for it to go through the whole qualification process again. (Since metadata changes require a rebubble.)Ascendance wrote:
difficulty naming also changed, so it will need to go through the requalification process completely
Basically there was a difficulty with lower SR named 9:31, and the higher SR with 9:30. His justification was that in his opinion, the lower SR diff was "harder", which isn't reason enough for that (there's rules for custom difficulty naming, especially particular to the hardest diff in reference), so he changed them to avoid confusion.
re:gratz
don't you need 24 hour between bubble and qualify if you have to do the whole process again?
Since you go through the whole process (Nomination/Qualify) you have to wait the 24h
Reverted to bubble
Reverted to bubble
My bad, I'll Qualify it tomorrow.
Topic Starter
. -. Thanks nao
so wait do we need to wait 4 more hours because of electoz's bubble or do we have to wait another 19??
so wait do we need to wait 4 more hours because of electoz's bubble or do we have to wait another 19??
Ayyri
Talking about time in a map about time ~
No, because Feerum reverted to the original bubble. Which means its 24 hours from the original bubble, not Feerums. At least, that's what happened here t/508884/start=135Ayyri wrote:
Start the 24 hour clock from Feerum's bubble.PolkaMocha wrote:
. -. Thanks nao
so wait do we need to wait 4 more hours because of electoz's bubble or do we have to wait another 19??
Topic Starter
THANKS A LOT NAOAyyri wrote:
Start the 24 hour clock from Feerum's bubble.PolkaMocha wrote:
. -. Thanks nao
so wait do we need to wait 4 more hours because of electoz's bubble or do we have to wait another 19??
Yes, but the rules needed clarifying. It reverts the bubble but resets the timer. At least that is my current understanding.Hobbes2 wrote:
No, because Feerum reverted to the original bubble. Which means its 24 hours from the original bubble, not Feerums. At least, that's what happened here t/508884/start=135
i told you about the diff name thing too man ._.PolkaMocha wrote:
THANKS A LOT NAOAyyri wrote:
so wait do we need to wait 4 more hours because of electoz's bubble or do we have to wait another 19??
Start the 24 hour clock from Feerum's bubble.
Ayyri
It's better to be safe than sorry.Cryptic wrote:
Yes, but the rules needed clarifying. It reverts the bubble but resets the timer. At least that is my current understanding.Hobbes2 wrote:
No, because Feerum reverted to the original bubble. Which means its 24 hours from the original bubble, not Feerums. At least, that's what happened here t/508884/start=135
Again, congratulations.
Topic Starter
THATS NOT THE PROBLEMNao Tomori wrote:
i told you about the diff name thing too man ._.
Also thanks Ayyri luv u