too late..
JUDYDANNY wrote:
Hello Midnait :3/ requested to check the bubbled map via PM , and sorry to late
There are mostly my opinions.Symbol meaning
- >> Normal suggestion.
Big text >> Strong suggestion.
>> Questionable imo.
>>> Needs to improve some. (Rhythm is not good , plays or sounds weird)
No comment >>simple (you can notice easily: just hits on drums or simple beats) , or already explained on the other place. OR JUST MY OPINON.
[Madnaait]Maybe seems ok. call me back after fixed them.
- 00:51:550 - change k? pitch is up to up from here. Seems good
- 01:02:042 - same. ^
- 01:08:599 - add d? to follow the backvocal ww. I'll keep, just to emphasize the melody more
- 01:23:681 - d? Okay
- 01:31:222 - k? same as 01:36:468 - . okay
- 01:40:813 - add d to follow the accompaniment sound same as 01:38:190 - . Doesn't sound okay for me lol
- 01:48:272 (652,653) - change kk or dk ? to express the next song and for a variation from before ddd~~k stream flow. it plays better imo w. Changed to dddkk
- 02:36:140 (1,2,3,4) - kdkd? to make a more consistent and for making a gap on only 02:37:616 - , to sounds up (to 02:37:616 - )or not (to 02:36:304 - ). I changed 02:36:796 (967,968) - to k d
- 02:41:386 (1,2,3,4) - same. ^
- 02:44:337 (1,2) - prefer to dk imo with plays ww Firetruck, I've never noticed that lol
- 02:58:354 - , 03:08:845 - k ? ddkd- ddkd- ddkk- ddkk? (kdkd-kdkd-kdkk-kdkk?) Okay
- 03:50:239 - change k , to express the sounds up. Seems okay
- 04:00:075 - k? Oh man sounds much better like that
- 04:01:796 (1,2) - kd? Following voice here, so no change
how about change to k on 03:57:944 - , 04:02:206 - , 04:03:190 - ,04:04:173 - (and 04:04:255 - too if you like)? Its not bad to variate on purpose for expression the less bass sound part. It's okay as it is imo, but I see where are you coming from- 04:10:075 - k too? It's the same as 04:07:452
- 04:26:960 - change d? 04:24:173 (21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29) - less d sound imo.. Sounds good
- 05:34:747 (303,304) - either change to k to follow the more main. Changed to k
- 05:42:452 - add k and 05:43:681 - remove instead? its really short pattern… ;_; 05:41:878 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Instrumental needs more power imo. I removed the note, but didn't add the k at 05:43:681
- 05:45:894 - , 05:45:976 - add k too? Okay
- 05:52:944 - same , add? , 05:54:829 - remove? idk about this one, 05:54:829 has melody in it ;_;
- 05:56:468 - add k ? lol Added a don there, and 05:56:632 - Changing this to k seems more appropiate imo
- 06:05:813 (1,2,3) - consider change to kkd same as 02:36:140 - theory. I'll keep, to make a difference between the rest of the patterns of that song
- 06:06:632 (1,2) - dk? Lol changed
- 06:11:058 (1,2,3) - , 06:17:124 (1,2) - , 06:16:304 (1,2,3) - same. Same as the other
- 06:47:124 (1,2,3) - ddd? Uh, sounds weird imo
- 06:56:058 - remove….? idk why its longer only just here. Because in the next part there isn't that "extra voice" that sounds right there lol
- 07:25:157 (1,2,3,4,5) - ddddk? Seems weird, but I'll change it to emphasize a bit more the melody
- 07:26:140 - prefer to d imo www I'll keep
- 07:48:927 - d? same sounds with next 07:49:009 - on drums. Why did I change that to k? wwww
- 07:50:813 - d,07:50:976 (1,2) - dk instead? kkdkkk flow seems not the best way to hear and it plays better too imo. I'll keep as it is, there's a big amount of voice in that pattern so I decided to make it with a bit more k's lol
- 07:49:993 (1,2,3) - dkd? same reason. ^
- 08:08:763 (1,2,3) - dkd? pitch is lower than 08:06:140 (711) - . Yeah, I wanted to do that but always forgot :^)
- 09:11:878 - k? same as 09:10:567 - 09:11:222 - vocal tone theory? Okay
Midnaait wrote:
JUDYDANNY wrote:
rech
| 00:40:403 - , 00:40:485 - , 00:41:058 - , 00:41:140 - remove all? It plays a bit not well to lead the next D-D-D~~. Okay
|00:42:534 - remove the finisher? Placed finisher there to emphasize next song better
|07:29:665 (2717,2718,2721,2722) - move to 1/4 left? inconsistency with before07:28:927 - . Uhh, I'll keep because that wouldn't follow the melody imo
HYPE #2JUDYDANNY wrote:
It's easy to understand the theory and relatively cleaned.
Looks fine, good Luck(¦3[___]
#2
Fixed alltasuke912 wrote:
Hi I'm a long song-hater.Noob
My first play. It's DTable
[ General][ Inner Oni]
- 02:31:714 - Green line should be moved to 1/4 left since it doesn't work if player tap key before 02:31:714 -. Also volume seems bit too loud. Try to make lower and add green line at 02:32:944 -
- 04:18:435 - Lower volume please.
- 09:56:468 - Move green line to left
Volume setting isn't perfect, but it's easy to fix. Patterns are good.
- 02:14:009 (798,799,800,801,802,803,804,805) - Maybe ddkddkkd to follow the melody? 02:14:173 (800,801) - 02:14:419 (803,805) - Each second sounds are lower pitch than first.
- 11:22:862 - Spinner endpoint should be here
You may call me back when you are done