As said in the previous post, 呢兩項對呢張圖無作用, 剔走佢啦=_=

• [Inner Oni]

1. 00:17:928 (72,74,75,77) - If you listen to the pitch of these notes, you will find that 00:17:928 (72,74,77) - have the same pitch. Therefore, it would be even better to swap 00:18:655 (75,77) - to d k to match the piano.
2. 00:26:109 (110,111) - The vocal pitch of the first note is in fact higher than the second note, so I would recommend changing these notes to k d. Furthermore, the piano at 00:26:655 (112) - could be emphasized more in this way.
3. 01:17:928 (373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382) - How about rearranging the pattern into d d k d k k d k k d ? I would say d at 01:17:928 (373) - would sound better owing to the high-pitched vocal at 01:17:564 -
4. 01:37:382 (448,449,450,451) - d k d K would express the vocal nicely since the pitch is increasing across 01:37:382 (448,449,450) -
5. 02:40:291 (899,900) - I would still recommend changing this note to d as vocal only appears at 02:40:291 - . More importantly, this could help emphasize the high-pitched notes at 02:40:837 (901,902,903,904) - which are all mapped as k.
6. From 02:51:018 to 02:53:200 - It seems that the flow of the new pattern is not good enough. Maybe try this pattern instead to follow the high-pitched vocal accordingly ? (cursor at 02:52:109 - )
7. 04:22:655 (1729,1730,1731,1732,1733,1734,1735,1736,1737,1738) - same as 01:17:928 (373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382) -
8. 04:45:018 (1816,1817) - d k would work well since the pitch is increasing across the two notes. In fact, 04:45:018 (1816,1818) - have the same lower pitch, but you can keep 04:45:382 (1818) - as k because of the next D.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

A quick recheck here. (no kd)

[General]

As said in the previous post, 呢兩項對呢張圖無作用, 剔走佢啦=_=

唔記得改 sorry :O)

• [Inner Oni]

1. 00:17:928 (72,74,75,77) - If you listen to the pitch of these notes, you will find that 00:17:928 (72,74,77) - have the same pitch. Therefore, it would be even better to swap 00:18:655 (75,77) - to d k to match the piano. Changed into d d k
2. 00:26:109 (110,111) - The vocal pitch of the first note is in fact higher than the second note, so I would recommend changing these notes to k d. Furthermore, the piano at 00:26:655 (112) - could be emphasized more in this way. 00:26:109 (110) - I really want put a d note here. But as you say, the vocal pitch of the first note is in fact higher than the second note. Therefore i would change 00:26:473 (111) - into d too.
3. 01:17:928 (373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382) - How about rearranging the pattern into d d k d k k d k k d ? I would say d at 01:17:928 (373) - would sound better owing to the high-pitched vocal at 01:17:564 - Changed into d d k d k k d d k d , 01:19:200 (380) - sounds put d is better for me
4. 01:37:382 (448,449,450,451) - d k d K would express the vocal nicely since the pitch is increasing across 01:37:382 (448,449,450) - 聽多次又好似唔錯:D accepted
5. 02:40:291 (899,900) - I would still recommend changing this note to d as vocal only appears at 02:40:291 - . More importantly, this could help emphasize the high-pitched notes at 02:40:837 (901,902,903,904) - which are all mapped as k. How about kkddd d from 02:39:928 (895) - ?
6. From 02:51:018 to 02:53:200 - It seems that the flow of the new pattern is not good enough. Maybe try this pattern instead to follow the high-pitched vocal accordingly ? (cursor at 02:52:109 - ) Made some changes
7. 04:22:655 (1729,1730,1731,1732,1733,1734,1735,1736,1737,1738) - same as 01:17:928 (373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382) - accepted
8. 04:45:018 (1816,1817) - d k would work well since the pitch is increasing across the two notes. In fact, 04:45:018 (1816,1818) - have the same lower pitch, but you can keep 04:45:382 (1818) - as k because of the next D. I would keep this two notes as k d since i really think k d is better. (呢度我聽左好耐下都係覺得04:45:018 (1816) - 同04:45:382 (1818) - 都係high pitch lol. 不過轉左04:44:837 (1815) - 做d. 你睇下會唔會感覺好少少

1. 00:13:564 - I don't think this line is needed, 55% still sounds a little loud imo.
2. 00:24:473 - Green line should be moved to 1/4 left, because it sounds soft if player hits key before the line.
   
   
3. It's a no issue, but I want you to use New Color so that we can use timestamps smoothly. You know combo count of stamp doesn't work if you remove or add notes before the timestamp.
   

1. 00:18:655 (76,77) - Why not dk?
2. 00:46:291 - missing a d note? It fits to the kicks well. If you apply it, consider to change previous note to don.
3. 00:47:928 - I believe 1/6 works good here, since kick sounds 1/8. it's not hard for playing
   
   
4. 00:54:291 - 00:58:655 - Try to make one or two triplets to avoid noticeable difficulty gap from kiai part.
5. 01:17:564 - 60% seems a little small, I recommend using 70%
6. 01:24:837 (377,378,379,380,381) - Personally i think dkkdd fits to the melody well.
7. 01:41:200 (445,446,447) - I feel too empty for the kiai beginning. Make a note between k and d?
8. 01:50:291 - Try to make a ddd triplet from here, it fits to the kick well, and it works to keep suitable density of notes imo.
9. 01:52:200 - add kat here?
   01:53:200 (514,515) - Same as kiai beginning, consider adding a note.
   
   
10. 03:14:655 (1091,1092) -, 03:26:291 (1168,1169) -, etc. see above.
11. 03:25:382 (1164,1165) - same as 1st kiai.
12. 03:58:655 (1449,1450,1451,1452,1453) - How about making simply ddkkk here?
13. 04:29:746 (1721,1722,1723,1724) - same as 1:24
14. 05:36:473 - Outro part seems overmapped. You should kill a lot of notes. Please keep calm difficulty if it's calm part.

tasuke912 wrote:

Hi.
[ General]

1. 00:13:564 - I don't think this line is needed, 55% still sounds a little loud imo. 55% is relative louder than 40%
2. 00:24:473 - Green line should be moved to 1/4 left, because it sounds soft if player hits key before the line. Accepted
   
   
3. It's a no issue, but I want you to use New Color so that we can use timestamps smoothly. You know combo count of stamp doesn't work if you remove or add notes before the timestamp.
   

[ Inner Oni]

1. 00:18:655 (76,77) - Why not dk? Accepted
2. 00:46:291 - missing a d note? It fits to the kicks well. If you apply it, consider to change previous note to don. Changed into k dkd k
3. 00:47:928 - I believe 1/6 works good here, since kick sounds 1/8. it's not hard for playing Using of 1/6 seems will increase the density too sudden here
   
   
4. 00:54:291 - 00:58:655 - Try to make one or two triplets to avoid noticeable difficulty gap from kiai part. Accpeted
5. 01:17:564 - 60% seems a little small, I recommend using 70% 65% is better for me
6. 01:24:837 (377,378,379,380,381) - Personally i think dkkdd fits to the melody well. 01:25:200 (407) - is relative higher pitch than 01:25:018 (406) - . Thus, ddkkd seems better
7. 01:41:200 (445,446,447) - I feel too empty for the kiai beginning. Make a note between k and d? made some changes
8. 01:50:291 - Try to make a ddd triplet from here, it fits to the kick well, and it works to keep suitable density of notes imo. How about ddkkd?? =w=
9. 01:52:200 - add kat here? used ddkdk
   01:53:200 (514,515) - Same as kiai beginning, consider adding a note. same as 01:41:200 (445,446,447) -
   
   
10. 03:14:655 (1091,1092) -, 03:26:291 (1168,1169) -, etc. see above. same as 01:41:200 (445,446,447) - =w=''
11. 03:25:382 (1164,1165) - same as 1st kiai. same as 01:41:200 (445,446,447) - ;w;//
12. 03:58:655 (1449,1450,1451,1452,1453) - How about making simply ddkkk here? dkddk can perform a better hit sound for me here.
13. 04:29:746 (1721,1722,1723,1724) - same as 1:24 same as 01:24:837 (377,378,379,380,381) -
14. 05:36:473 - Outro part seems overmapped. You should kill a lot of notes. Please keep calm difficulty if it's calm part.

This part is relative much less denser than the last kiai part already and I feel that the difficulty is calm enough. However, I may try to make some changes to reduce the difficulty if I have another new ideas for this part in the future. But for now, I think I might keep no changes here Sorry ;_;
You may call me back when you are done!

Volta wrote:

hello~

[General]
00:01:928 - , 01:17:655 - , 04:22:382 - , 05:36:473 - i'd say using normal sampleset sounds better than soft, even if the song is calm in these sections. Yeah

[Inner Oni]
00:09:928 - change to d? since its pitch is lower than 00:08:473 - it will sounds good imo Accept!
00:16:109 (63,64) - swap this to make a variety considering the difference in piano? Accept!
00:26:109 (112,113) - you might want to swap these notes since (112) is higher in pitch Accept!

01:13:200 - or 01:13:018 - consider to change to d to emphasis the vocal better Accept!
01:37:382 (462,463) - swap? 01:37:382 (462,463) - d k seems better for me
02:41:200 - you can try change this to d to have reversed pattern with 02:43:928 (303,304,305,306,307,308) - Changed
02:45:746 (315,316,317,318,319) - change to kkkdd? flows better imo 02:46:291 (320) - is changed into d. Thus, I may keep kkkdk.

02:58:473 (406,407,408,409,410) - how about change to kkd-d-k and 02:57:564 (399,400) - swap this note? i think it fits vocal better 02:58:655 (408) - is a little bit high pitch than 02:58:473 (406) - , so I would keep ddk here. But i would swap 02:59:018 (410) -
03:21:928 (570,571,572,573,574) - change to kdddk? complements better with next dkk Accept!
03:34:200 - change to d? good variety How about change this into kdd 03:32:655 (651,652,653) - ?? )

05:42:473 - is this timing point needed? Deleted ;w;


very good and polished map!

Volta wrote:

recheck, no kd.

03:56:018 - just realized currently this green line is redundant. probably you want to make this with volume 80% and add another green line at 03:56:291 - with 60% volume (refer to 03:54:564 - and 03:54:837 - too)


that's it and we're ready to go

Volta wrote:

i understand, but what i see now is the green line at 03:56:018 is 60% and unnecessary because previous green line is also at same volume

now

my suggestion