lit120 wrote:

[extra]

1. 00:00:560 (1) - try to use normal finish for the downbeat if u want to ok!
2. 00:04:042 (3) - why not clap? setting a drum hitsound here doesn't make any sense to the song rhythm here follow the music
3. 00:16:631 (1) - remove whistle since there's nothing u can hear but a vocal only instead like 00:17:167 (2) - ok
4. 00:24:399 (1) - i think u might wanna set a hitsound here (dunno what i wanted to say to set a hitsound here xd) oh ok
5. 00:34:310 (2) - why not finish like 00:31:095 (4) - from the same sound beat nothing finish sound
6. 00:59:756 (1,2) - try to mute the slider end only ok
7. 02:00:560 - hmm... how about a note here for an execution b4 a break? i don't want to
8. 02:08:327 (2,3) - yeah u know, the same reason ok!

FoxyGrandpa wrote:

• [General]

1. Widescreen is checked for Nayasa's Insane, Dailycares Extra and Hard. ok!

• [Alacats Extra]

1. Seems odd to me that the diff above this has a lower AR. lower OD, and lower HP that's fine
   
2. 02:00:292 (3) - having the break start before the downbeat feels off. How about adding 2 notes before the downbeat to follow the little bit of vocals, gives off more of a natural lead off. only take background sound here
   
3. 02:08:060 (1,2) - I think another NC could get the emphasis on the wub and the vocal. ok
   
4. 02:48:774 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The diff jumps from 6.25 to 6.05 stars without this jump, seems like kind of a big spike for one part IMO. so what?
   
5. 02:58:685 (1,2,3) - I would delete the NC here just to keep it consistant with similar parts that sound like this. ok!

CaffeAmericano wrote:

Extra

• 00:39:667 (3,4,1,2) - I think that the wide angle in the jumps ( http://puu.sh/qvJXj/33f28b7d44.jpg ) plays little awkwardly compared to other similar parts (e.g. 00:35:381 (3,4,1,2) - 00:35:381 (3,4,1,2) - 00:48:238 (3,4,1,2) - etc) no problem to me
  
  
  I think variations like 01:28:417 (1) - 01:36:988 (1) - give really nice emphasis to the downbeat/vocal. How about making 00:19:845 (1) - 00:28:417 (1) - 02:54:131 (1) - 03:02:702 (1) - stand out too? prefer to use that shape
  
  02:08:327 (2,3,4) - Perhaps it would be better to move 02:08:327 (2,3) - little to the right to make it more consistent with 00:59:756 (1,2,3) - ? ok