forum

Dancing Dolls - monochrome(Asterisk Makina Remix) [CatchTheB

posted
Total Posts
99
show more
Topic Starter
koliron

Nelly wrote:

Its been a 10 months when I modded this map. So ill try to be very serious and yes its a random mod

General

It's so quiet that I can't literally hear the hitsounds. LOL i forgot to update again, done xD

Combo 4 its kinda unrecongnizable because the BG that it has focused on dark theme... I mean look closer to the BG. Id select this color like I did. sure fixed

I'm kinda surprised that it don't have a hitsounding, maybe it have but I can't listen to then. It need a hitsounding (claps and finishes are fine, but if you have a hitsounds then I apologize for that).

Destiny

Explain to me why is this kiai part less than 15 seconds when AiBot said more than 15 seconds but this kiai does it. I understand if it like 2 inherited will be very near together, i'll understand but this kiai dosen't because it goes vocals again. a 15 or less sec kiai it's fine if there is no way to increase it, and i cant do it here, the difference about patterns and the song is too much

00:38:920 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Holy cow this one needs a random luck to pass this, might be a bit closer. random luck? lol well after some suggestions about this i reduced it few grids
02:09:434 - 02:13:548 - Don't understand these parts it have some but they're, for me, really, really confusing me. huh.. maybe because is a stream? idk to me it is pretty easy to read
04:46:805 (3) - Maybe x:248 y:144 would be better. sorry no :c that would plays weird, i prefer to keep this pattern for the consistency with patterns like 00:39:605 - :3
05:05:662 (3,4,5,6) - Spotted this dash-mash trick, make a little bit closer something like this. reduced a little, now they are the same as 03:57:091 (1,2,3) -
05:12:520 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This one is great because you're confusing players for the first time playing on this map. well, any map is not supposed to be ssed in the first try, right? XD i made these distances to be easier to read, so this pattrn wouldnt be a problem for overdose players, even in the first try

It's kinda short one still but that's my type of skill of modding ;w; don't worry it was helpful n_n
If you're so kind to support me you can mod this map. I am aiming to rank it but im preety sure I can't rank it, ever but still thanks. Thats my best :c aww sure i will
thank you! ^^
xi-False
MOD


-These 00:23:148 (6) - Woosh sounds can use more movement I feel like, you should make it into this type of slider Image

-Same with this Woosh sound 00:25:891 (5) - but if you to make it like the slider above i showed, you should also move 00:26:233 (1) - to x:120 and
00:26:319 (2) - to x:184

-same with this lonely slider 00:34:120 (8) - make it like this

-All these woosh sliders are the same 00:36:862 (4,1,3) - since in the music, each woosh sound becomes more and more high pitch i feel like the length of the sliders should also increase to match the music more.
what I did was. I added an inherited point here 00:36:862 - and change the slider Velocity to 0.75x same with this 00:37:720 (1) - bu tinstead of it being 0.75x I left it as it was 1.00x and as for the last slider 00:38:234 (3) - i made the slider velocity into 1.25x like so Image

-This section feels a bit weird 02:12:177 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think its because you have Anti-Flow back to back which is fine but just kinda hard for example this pattern 02:12:691 (7,1,2,3) - the H-Dash make it hard to land this combo you can move these notes 02:12:862 (1,2,3) - too x:160 to smooth out that section but still keep the zigzaggy feel to it

-I shit miss every now and then when I try to land these patterns 02:53:320 (1,2,3) - 02:54:005 (5,6,7) - maybe make it into one straight stream, it's ok how it is but i would recommend that

- I would also recommend to move this note 02:55:291 (5) - to x:256 and same with this 02:55:977 (5) -
its a really small change but I feel like it helps a lot

-I Love these patterns 05:11:919 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -

Marathon maps!!
the none-Kiai Sections are made really well
:)
Topic Starter
koliron

xi-False wrote:

MOD


-These 00:23:148 (6) - Woosh sounds can use more movement I feel like, you should make it into this type of slider Image

-Same with this Woosh sound 00:25:891 (5) - but if you to make it like the slider above i showed, you should also move 00:26:233 (1) - to x:120 and
00:26:319 (2) - to x:184

-same with this lonely slider 00:34:120 (8) - make it like this changed all of them, now those curves are too ez for an overdose but its fine c_c

-All these woosh sliders are the same 00:36:862 (4,1,3) - since in the music, each woosh sound becomes more and more high pitch i feel like the length of the sliders should also increase to match the music more.
what I did was. I added an inherited point here 00:36:862 - and change the slider Velocity to 0.75x same with this 00:37:720 (1) - bu tinstead of it being 0.75x I left it as it was 1.00x and as for the last slider 00:38:234 (3) - i made the slider velocity into 1.25x like so Image mmh no sorry, walk here would be too weird, i prefer to keep those dash

-This section feels a bit weird 02:12:177 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think its because you have Anti-Flow back to back which is fine but just kinda hard for example this pattern 02:12:691 (7,1,2,3) - the H-Dash make it hard to land this combo you can move these notes 02:12:862 (1,2,3) - too x:160 to smooth out that section but still keep the zigzaggy feel to it i dont want to be repetitive, so i added a harder movement for the strongest sound, and tbh is pretty easy imo

-I shit miss every now and then when I try to land these patterns 02:53:320 (1,2,3) - 02:54:005 (5,6,7) - maybe make it into one straight stream, it's ok how it is but i would recommend that ok, now is not necessary to dash here

- I would also recommend to move this note 02:55:291 (5) - to x:256 and same with this 02:55:977 (5) -
its a really small change but I feel like it helps a lot sure nice idea

-I Love these patterns 05:11:919 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - aww thanks <3

Marathon maps!!
the none-Kiai Sections are made really well
:)
thank you! ^^
CelegaS
I really like this map you did a great job. Almost all pattern fit well with the song so it's so enjoyable, i have the feeling i'm really playing the song and not trying to catch some fruits in rythm. Voice part are not boring and nice job for that.

Destiny
Destiny
  1. 02:52:120 (1,3) - I already missed because I was fulldashing, idk if it's normal.
  2. 02:58:805 to 03:08:405 - I have a feeling that doesn't fit with the song, not like the rest of the map. It's strange for me.
I actually love how the map is.
Topic Starter
koliron

CelegaS wrote:

I really like this map you did a great job. Almost all pattern fit well with the song so it's so enjoyable, i have the feeling i'm really playing the song and not trying to catch some fruits in rythm. Voice part are not boring and nice job for that.

Destiny
Destiny
  1. 02:52:120 (1,3) - I already missed because I was fulldashing, idk if it's normal. sure i changed all of them, now you can dash there
  2. 02:58:805 to 03:08:405 - I have a feeling that doesn't fit with the song, not like the rest of the map. It's strange for me. mmh yeah probably for the vocal, all of this is 1/2 so i changed a little the rhythm, now sounds much better
I actually love how the map is.
thank you for the mod and your suggestions in discord ^^
Topic Starter
koliron
XdDxDDDdd bub pLZ xdddddddddddddD thx lmAo xdXdxx
NachOx

koliron wrote:

XdDxDDDdd bub pLZ xdddddddddddddD thx lmAo xdXdxx
¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿
Ascendance
[u]w[/u ]
Topic Starter
koliron
bubbled!
Ascendance

koliron wrote:

bubbled!
logs
2016-07-21 01:01 Ascendance: 00:08:920 (2,3) - wanna tilt these to the left instead of to the right, since the catcher is meant to move in that direction?
2016-07-21 01:02 koliron: mh sure
2016-07-21 01:02 koliron: done
2016-07-21 01:02 Ascendance: 00:16:977 - Is there a reason you didn't start the stream from here? It feels odd to start it halfway through at 00:18:348 -
2016-07-21 01:03 koliron: mh yeah i think those sounds are easier to notice since 00:18:348 -
2016-07-21 01:04 koliron: also i dont like to spam too much streams
2016-07-21 01:04 koliron: =.=
2016-07-21 01:04 Ascendance: hm alright
2016-07-21 01:05 Ascendance: 00:19:034 (1,2,3,4) - maybe a curve or a pattern like 00:20:405 (1,2,3,4) - would be better here, since the horizontal flow seems quite sharp here
2016-07-21 01:05 Ascendance: since it's not the kiai, i think a curve would be more natural to do
2016-07-21 01:06 koliron: mh ok wait
2016-07-21 01:08 koliron: done
2016-07-21 01:08 Ascendance: could you screenshot? o:
2016-07-21 01:09 koliron: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5655484
2016-07-21 01:09 Ascendance: alright, nice
2016-07-21 01:10 Ascendance: 00:22:034 - missing a note here? I can distinctly hear something on the blue tick, so maybe you can use it as a connector note between 00:21:777 (1,2) -
2016-07-21 01:12 koliron: huh well maybe if i listen in 25% there is a sound there, but maybe that would sounds pretty weird, i prefer to keep those notes to only emphasize the strongest sounds, like in 02:47:148 (1,2,3) -
2016-07-21 01:12 Ascendance: hm alright
2016-07-21 01:12 Ascendance: well at least try to add a bit of space between 1,2 since the catcher has to wait a bit for 2 to fall
2016-07-21 01:13 Ascendance: so a bit more movement could be good
2016-07-21 01:13 koliron: sure
2016-07-21 01:14 Ascendance: 00:36:862 (4,1,3) - Curving these a bit more would be nice, since it's really easy to overshoot/undershoot right now, so a bit more curve could have some safety for the player
2016-07-21 01:15 koliron: what do you mean with a curve?
2016-07-21 01:15 koliron: more vertical?
2016-07-21 01:15 Ascendance: just move the red point up a bit
2016-07-21 01:15 Ascendance: (or down for the lower slider)
2016-07-21 01:15 koliron: oh celegas said that is weird to walk there so i added more SV but if you think i can reduce it again
2016-07-21 01:16 Ascendance: I think just need to increase the angle of the red point so it's not so easy to miss the big droplet
2016-07-21 01:16 koliron: sure wait
2016-07-21 01:16 koliron: there are some of these in the next kiai too
2016-07-21 01:16 Ascendance: alright
2016-07-21 01:16 Ascendance: take your time
2016-07-21 01:17 koliron: done
2016-07-21 01:17 koliron: fdskjlh
2016-07-21 01:17 Ascendance: 00:38:920 (1,2,3) - this pattern makes me so sad
2016-07-21 01:18 Ascendance: such harsh wiggle :(
2016-07-21 01:18 Ascendance: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5655511 this is so much better imo
2016-07-21 01:18 koliron: mmh
2016-07-21 01:18 Ascendance: you can do the same to the other side
2016-07-21 01:18 Ascendance: the current pattern is just way too choppy and harsh for me tbh
2016-07-21 01:18 koliron: wait i will try to find something easier and keep the aesthetic
2016-07-21 01:21 Ascendance: some sort of left-right pattern would be nice
2016-07-21 01:21 koliron: done
2016-07-21 01:22 Ascendance: did you do to the other side too?
2016-07-21 01:22 koliron: ya
2016-07-21 01:22 koliron: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5655525
2016-07-21 01:22 Ascendance: 00:44:062 (1,2,3,4) - maybe lower these to 1.3 or 1.2x instead?
2016-07-21 01:23 koliron: do you mean until no-dash?
2016-07-21 01:24 Ascendance: just lower the distance between them so that way people don't leave 4 early
2016-07-21 01:24 koliron: ok reduced anyways
2016-07-21 01:24 koliron: reduced in 02:58:462 - too
2016-07-21 01:25 Ascendance: 01:28:977 (1) - could you cut this into 2 sliders so that way the fruits aren't so high?
2016-07-21 01:25 koliron: wew im noob
2016-07-21 01:25 koliron: sure
2016-07-21 01:26 koliron: done in 03:43:377 - too
2016-07-21 01:27 Ascendance: 02:58:462 (1,2,3,4) -
2016-07-21 01:27 Ascendance: lower :D
2016-07-21 01:27 koliron: 02:24 koliron: reduced in 02:58:462 - too
2016-07-21 01:27 koliron: ewe
2016-07-21 01:27 Ascendance: oh
2016-07-21 01:27 Ascendance: im noob.
2016-07-21 01:28 koliron: hoho
2016-07-21 01:28 Ascendance: 03:42:691 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - this is a really harsh stream because of the angle of approach with 03:42:520 (4,1) -
2016-07-21 01:28 Ascendance: it's really sharp antiflow into a stream that can kill you
2016-07-21 01:29 Ascendance: I'd make the stream more S-shaped and remove the antiflow
2016-07-21 01:29 koliron: mmmh did you test? because i dont think is hard
2016-07-21 01:29 koliron: but i will change it anyway
2016-07-21 01:30 Ascendance: It's not hard, it could just be potentially uncomfortable
2016-07-21 01:31 Ascendance: why not try this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5655548 ?
2016-07-21 01:31 koliron: nuuu
2016-07-21 01:31 koliron: aesthetic
2016-07-21 01:31 Ascendance: ;w;
2016-07-21 01:31 Ascendance: but that pattern;;
2016-07-21 01:32 koliron: shhh people like them
2016-07-21 01:32 koliron: u noob
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: ;w;...
2016-07-21 01:32 koliron: anyway changed xD
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: i dont like
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: eeeeeee
2016-07-21 01:32 koliron: wait
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: ok
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: 03:43:377 (1) - split this?
2016-07-21 01:32 koliron: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5655561
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: oh you did already
2016-07-21 01:32 Ascendance: w
2016-07-21 01:32 koliron: yap
2016-07-21 01:34 Ascendance: 04:28:634 (4,5,6) - horizontal and more spaced please :< vertical hold makes flow breaker
2016-07-21 01:35 koliron: :C
2016-07-21 01:35 koliron: ok wait
2016-07-21 01:36 Ascendance: 05:12:777 (5,6,7,8) - wtf
2016-07-21 01:36 koliron: B)
2016-07-21 01:36 Ascendance: nonono
2016-07-21 01:36 koliron: yeyey
2016-07-21 01:37 Ascendance: change :(((
2016-07-21 01:37 Ascendance: 05:12:862 (6,7) - ctrlg;;
2016-07-21 01:37 koliron: can i just reduce the distance?
2016-07-21 01:38 Ascendance: e... the pattern itself is really harsh
2016-07-21 01:38 Ascendance: starting from 05:12:520 -
2016-07-21 01:39 koliron: pls this is supposed to be an overdose -_- i nerfed all the hard patterns
2016-07-21 01:39 koliron: but ok
2016-07-21 01:39 koliron: wait
2016-07-21 01:39 Ascendance: 05:12:520 (1,2,3) - should be horizontal again so its not flowbreaker
2016-07-21 01:40 Ascendance: the rest is fine i guess
2016-07-21 01:40 koliron: duuu
2016-07-21 01:41 koliron: at least let me keep that xC
2016-07-21 01:41 Ascendance: 05:12:520 (1,2,3) -
2016-07-21 01:41 Ascendance: 05:12:520 (1,2,3) -
2016-07-21 01:41 Ascendance: :((((((((
2016-07-21 01:41 koliron: jmmm
2016-07-21 01:41 koliron: ok
2016-07-21 01:43 koliron: gimme a moment because
2016-07-21 01:43 koliron: 04:27:948 - this is too repetitive now
2016-07-21 01:46 koliron: done
2016-07-21 01:46 Ascendance: ok upd
2016-07-21 01:47 koliron: updated
2016-07-21 01:47 koliron: ldjkfl
Xinely

koliron wrote:

XdDxDDDdd bub pLZ xdddddddddddddD thx lmAo xdXdxx
lol sure if you want xd
Topic Starter
koliron

Xinely wrote:

koliron wrote:

XdDxDDDdd bub pLZ xdddddddddddddD thx lmAo xdXdxx
lol sure if you want xd
o yaaaaaaaa <3
Xinely
finally have time

Destiny :
- 00:05:320 (4) - how about slider's tail move to left so it becomes horizontal sliders? drums for 00:05:320 (4) - are strong that imo feel a bit weird if its same with 00:05:148 (3) - which has lower drums
- 00:08:062 (7) - can try 1/4 slider and circle here, i think you need a jump for 00:08:234 - this vocal
- 00:12:177 (1,2,3,4) - feels overmap since no sound for 1/4
- 00:21:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i think you can give some jump for the stream, current music all have strong drums
- 00:21:777 (1) - feels like 1/12 instead of 1/8
- 00:50:234 (2) - reduce spacing a bit i guess, got miss here. x:264
- 01:09:091 - until 01:18:691 - i think you can add jumps for each stanza since the music (a bit similar with whistle) can emphasised here
- 01:18:177 (5,1) - if you map for vocal then ignore this, i feel a bit weird that 01:18:691 - stanza mapped with low spacing, i think that this slider and circle can be combined to 1/2 slider repeat instead
- 01:23:491 (3) - i think hdash will be great for this, due vocal and you always do 2 hdash each stanza here. if agree then 01:24:862 (3) - too
- 01:28:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1,1) - thats why i hate snapping, i cant even confirm the snap, also mind to reduce jump to 01:28:977 (1) - , its so hard (for me) ;_;
- 01:42:262 - feel weird if you ignore this when you mapped 01:36:520 (1,1) - before, as player i think that i should follow trumpet. 01:42:005 (1,2,3,4) - is still trumpet part so imo better to keep follow trumpet before you move to follow drum in next
- 01:47:834 (1) - i guess remove nc here for consistency
- 01:52:320 (2) - feels like 1/12 instead of 1/8
- 02:00:005 (3) - 01:54:520 (3) - 02:08:234 (4) - 01:56:920 (3) - 02:02:405 (3) - imo you can add hdash for catch them. their trumpet voice at pitch ><
- 02:13:548 (1,2,3) - i would keep suggest you map with 1/4 streams, it feels weird to feel 3/2 because trumpet. you can try keep 1/4 streams but jump for 02:13:805 - 02:14:062 - to emphasis trumpet imo
- 02:45:605 (3) - according to 02:42:348 (1,2,3,4) - so this slider should be a circle because nothing for 02:45:691 -
- 02:47:148 (3) - if this, i think more fit in 1/6 (if follow drum) ;_;
- 02:50:577 (4) - finish, i hear cymbal
- 02:52:120 (1,2,3) - maybe change slider shape or reduce spacing for (2), i feel catching (3) is very sharp flow
- 03:22:805 (1) - same as 01:52:320 (2) -
- 03:43:377 (1,1) - same as 01:28:977 (1,1) -
- 03:47:834 - 03:52:977 - i would like to see a jump or hdash for them.. its melody on the song ;w;
- 04:06:734 (2) - same as 01:52:320 (2) -
- 04:07:034 (3) - if you follow drum then no sound for 04:07:205 - (actually a weak vocal) but 04:07:291 - strong drum appears here
- 04:08:920 - and similar stuff basically same as 02:00:005 (3) - 01:54:520 (3) - 02:08:234 (4) - 01:56:920 (3) - 02:02:405 (3) - , i know our beloved BN can figure out all w/o my mention 8)
- 04:27:948 (1,2,3) - same as 02:13:548 (1,2,3) - (basically repetitive song ;-;)

i surrender if should mod streams xd
autofanboy
ing
Topic Starter
koliron

Xinely wrote:

finally have time

Destiny :
- 00:05:320 (4) - how about slider's tail move to left so it becomes horizontal sliders? drums for 00:05:320 (4) - are strong that imo feel a bit weird if its same with 00:05:148 (3) - which has lower drums the strong sound is only in 00:05:320 - thats why i add more distance there, but in 1/4 is not imo
- 00:08:062 (7) - can try 1/4 slider and circle here, i think you need a jump for 00:08:234 - this vocal same as above ;w;
- 00:12:177 (1,2,3,4) - feels overmap since no sound for 1/4 ay but the vocal is there D: like in 03:57:091 (1,2,3,4) -
- 00:21:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i think you can give some jump for the stream, current music all have strong drums mmmh but it wouldnt follow the music imo
- 00:21:777 (1) - feels like 1/12 instead of 1/8 *
- 00:50:234 (2) - reduce spacing a bit i guess, got miss here. x:264 ok reduced
- 01:09:091 - until 01:18:691 - i think you can add jumps for each stanza since the music (a bit similar with whistle) can emphasised here mhh ok i added a little more distance in all new stanzas to emphasize them, but i dont want to add hypers until 01:20:062 - because this section is pretty calm imo
- 01:18:177 (5,1) - if you map for vocal then ignore this, i feel a bit weird that 01:18:691 - stanza mapped with low spacing, i think that this slider and circle can be combined to 1/2 slider repeat instead mmh ya i followed the vocal :C
- 01:23:491 (3) - i think hdash will be great for this, due vocal and you always do 2 hdash each stanza here. if agree then 01:24:862 (3) - too lol 01:23:491 (3) -wasnt even a dash, a increased the distance but hyper would break the consistency
- 01:28:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1,1) - thats why i hate snapping, i cant even confirm the snap, also mind to reduce jump to 01:28:977 (1) - , its so hard (for me) ;_; *, and sure ds reduced to (1)
- 01:42:262 - feel weird if you ignore this when you mapped 01:36:520 (1,1) - before, as player i think that i should follow trumpet. 01:42:005 (1,2,3,4) - is still trumpet part so imo better to keep follow trumpet before you move to follow drum in next yap following the drum since 01:42:005 -
- 01:47:834 (1) - i guess remove nc here for consistency aaaa
- 01:52:320 (2) - feels like 1/12 instead of 1/8 *
- 02:00:005 (3) - 01:54:520 (3) - 02:08:234 (4) - 01:56:920 (3) - 02:02:405 (3) - imo you can add hdash for catch them. their trumpet voice at pitch >< aaaa sure added in some of them
- 02:13:548 (1,2,3) - i would keep suggest you map with 1/4 streams, it feels weird to feel 3/2 because trumpet. you can try keep 1/4 streams but jump for 02:13:805 - 02:14:062 - to emphasis trumpet imo mmh i dont think si recommendable follow the drum here, is almost impossible to listen :c
- 02:45:605 (3) - according to 02:42:348 (1,2,3,4) - so this slider should be a circle because nothing for 02:45:691 - sureee
- 02:47:148 (3) - if this, i think more fit in 1/6 (if follow drum) ;_; *
- 02:50:577 (4) - finish, i hear cymbal added
- 02:52:120 (1,2,3) - maybe change slider shape or reduce spacing for (2), i feel catching (3) is very sharp flow ok now those short slider are a little more vertical, so is easier to catch
- 03:22:805 (1) - same as 01:52:320 (2) - *
- 03:43:377 (1,1) - same as 01:28:977 (1,1) - yap reduced too
- 03:47:834 - 03:52:977 - i would like to see a jump or hdash for them.. its melody on the song ;w; ok now is a little more vertical like in 01:33:091 (4) -
- 04:06:734 (2) - same as 01:52:320 (2) - *
- 04:07:034 (3) - if you follow drum then no sound for 04:07:205 - (actually a weak vocal) but 04:07:291 - strong drum appears here removed hitsound from 1/2 now is easier to notice the vocal
- 04:08:920 - and similar stuff basically same as 02:00:005 (3) - 01:54:520 (3) - 02:08:234 (4) - 01:56:920 (3) - 02:02:405 (3) - , i know our beloved BN can figure out all w/o my mention 8) added distance to the same sounds for consistency
- 04:27:948 (1,2,3) - same as 02:13:548 (1,2,3) - (basically repetitive song ;-;) same aaaa

*: i dont think that 1/12 would fit in them, i mean all of the song is 1/2 1/4 or 1/8, so i think vary only in them with 1/12 would be weird, btw maybe in 03:43:377 - 01:28:977 - is hard to notice but if you listen in 25% without hitsounds, sounds like 02:47:148 - are obviously 1/8 imo
thank you!
Xinely
teach me how to map ctb kolisama

#2
Topic Starter
koliron
aaaaa hype

Thanks! >w<
autofanboy
placeholdering

it is at below u dummy
autofanboy
hi

█ Optional to change --- █ Suggested to change --- █ Unrankable

[ General]

  • Combo Colors
  1. Keeping them blue is absolutely fine, yet I think Combo Color 2 and Combo Color 3 are similar, so what about changing one of them to a lighter one, as I see there is a stark contrast between Combo Color 3 and Combo Color 4.

[ Destiny]

  • Gameplay
  1. 00:07:891 (5,6,7) - It looks so strange in gameplay, basically because of the movement at (7), what about Ctrl+H'ing (7) and put at original place? In addition, the jump at 00:08:062 (7,8,9) - is also harder if you put an inward-curved triplet here, i.e. (7), so it would be nicer if you flip it for easier flow, considering that it is just the intro, so difficult jumps are still too early.
  2. 00:10:634 (2,3,4,5) - This part is supposed to be slightly harder as it is the end of the intro, while I see that the movement of 00:10:634 (2,3,4) - is still too easy and plain, it is also FC'able without dashing there. Maybe you can add some dashes here to emphasize at least the clap at 00:10:634 (2,3) - , and 00:10:977 (4,5) - for the vocal emphasis?
  3. 00:16:977 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is actually very weird because the one after this is with streams, while this is also one of the stanza involving the later streams. I know you are trying to emphasize 00:19:720 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - as it is the most intense part here so to create a gradient. However, I would suggest changing this part to a stream like the later parts of the stanza you did, yet you may use the dashing density as the emphasis. For instance, for the part at 00:16:977 - 00:18:262 - , you put a stream that only contains dashes, and then at 00:18:348 - 00:19:634 - , there are starting to have HDashes and more dashes, then it continues. It is also be a nice build-up so I suggested it. Additionally, maybe you can remove some of the HDashes for 00:18:348 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - because it is a bit much and nearly equivalent to the next part at 00:20:405 - 00:21:005 - .
  4. 00:21:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - The stream is good. I would suggest if you want to make the shape of the stream look like this instead: *screenshot. It has more movements and I think the curve is better here because the end part should be sounding more stronger than the start, so the bending is much bigger at the near end of the curved stream. Also there will be a dash at 00:21:691 (8,1) - yet it is just a mild one so I think it is good to go.
  5. 00:33:605 (3,4) - Omit the HDash as there are no other HDashes can be found in the stanza at the exact rhythm position, you may refer to 00:22:633 (3,4) - , 00:25:205 (2,3) - ... or the next one of this part: 00:36:177 (1,2) - .
  6. 02:13:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - It is a bit hard to catch especially at 02:14:062 (3,4,5,6,7) - , since the sliders and streams are near to straight, and there are a lot of HDashes going on here. What about inclining all the sliders and streams here a bit more?
  7. 02:14:749 (3,1) - Woah, would this part be way too hard? The HDash is already edge-jumping quality and then there is a slider with high slider velocity, so players must dash in order to make a sharp turn here. What about making this easier? Maybe you need to change the stream pattern, or the slider pattern in vice versa.
  8. 02:16:977 (5,6,1) - This is not a big problem but I would suggest having (5,6) in shorter distance comparing to (6,1). It is really easy to miss at (5,6) because most of the players will think of turning after the HDash at (5,6), yet the jump is much bigger, so in that way players may miss (6).
  9. 02:25:720 (4,1,2) - Same as 02:14:749 (3,1) - .
  10. 02:35:320 (4,1,2,3,4) - The strength of the HDash at 02:35:320 (4,1) - is very intense, however the curvature of (1,2,3,4) is with small degree, which is really easy for players to overshoot here. Also I see that it is possible to stand and catch (1,2,3,4), so maybe you can curve the stream, that it bends more to the left. Just as long as it is not that inclined as 02:35:833 (5,6,7,8) - , then it is good.
  11. 02:47:834 (1,2) - There should be no HDashes with the reason as 00:33:605 (3,4) - .
  12. 03:04:634 (2,3) - So you put a dash at 03:03:433 (4,5) - , so how about doing the same here for consistency? You can just move 03:04:291 (1,2) - to the left if you don't know how to fix it in short period.
  13. 03:13:205 (3,4,1) - The pattern of HDash usage is not matching to the song at this point, in my opinion. I would rather add a HDash at 03:13:720 (4,1) - instead for a better emphasis of the triplets.
  14. 03:42:520 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - This is also really easy to overshoot, because of the movement at 03:42:520 (4,1,2,3,4) - , the HDash can push players to the edges and thus missing the first bit. What about rotating the stream for 180 degree and place back to original position?
  15. 04:03:091 (6,1,2,3,4) - ^
  16. 04:29:148 (3,1,2) - Same thing related to the first chorus.
  17. 04:37:548 (1,2,3,4) - The HDash at (2,3) is a bit much in my opinion, the beat at (3) is not prominent in the song so I think you can remove the HDash at (2,3). Maybe a slider like 04:40:291 (1) - can be used to replace (2,3)? You need to change the pattern too if you decided to apply my suggestion.
  18. 04:45:263 (9,10) - Where is the HDash like what you did for 02:30:862 (9,10) - ?
  19. 04:56:062 (3,4,5,6,7) - Gah, it is just not looking too artistic during the gameplay... Make it shape like *this.
  20. 04:56:577 (8,1) - Maybe add a HDash here? The stanza 04:51:262 - 05:02:062 - is too empty with no HDashes. Additionally, there are HDashes every 4 white ticks after 05:02:234 - so I think you can add HDashes at 04:51:262 - 05:02:062 - for every 8 or 16 white ticks to create a great build-up.
  21. 05:05:662 (3,4,5,6) - It was going so well with no dashes in streams, very clean. But somehow there is one here and it requires sudden dashes in middle of the stream. Why not remove those dashes?
  22. 05:10:462 (1,2,3,4,5) - This can be more intense in my opinion, right now it requires a few movements, but I think this one would be better: *screenshot. The movement at 05:10:719 (4,5) - (of the original stream) should be more intense, or equivalent to the distance of 05:09:949 (3,4) - , otherwise it is way too hard to catch the HDash at 05:10:805 (5,6) - .

    New Combos
    Please check the NC once again, I will take a look at that later. I have found some of them, such as:
  23. 00:12:862 (5) -
  24. 00:15:434 (4) -
  25. 00:23:491 - 00:25:034 -

    etc.

Tell me when you updated.
Good luck!

AFB
LigerZero
No Kudosu

tags added "works 3" for name in album asterisk networks
Topic Starter
koliron

alienflybot wrote:

hi hiii

█ Optional to change --- █ Suggested to change --- █ Unrankable

[ General]

  • Combo Colors
  1. Keeping them blue is absolutely fine, yet I think Combo Color 2 and Combo Color 3 are similar, so what about changing one of them to a lighter one, as I see there is a stark contrast between Combo Color 3 and Combo Color 4. done! changed all of them a little (1- 2+ 3++ 4-)

[ Destiny]

  • Gameplay
  1. 00:07:891 (5,6,7) - It looks so strange in gameplay, basically because of the movement at (7), what about Ctrl+H'ing (7) and put at original place? In addition, the jump at 00:08:062 (7,8,9) - is also harder if you put an inward-curved triplet here, i.e. (7), so it would be nicer if you flip it for easier flow, considering that it is just the intro, so difficult jumps are still too early. mmh i think no, tbh it is like this pattern but with more aesthetic, and even little easier imo x:
  2. 00:10:634 (2,3,4,5) - This part is supposed to be slightly harder as it is the end of the intro, while I see that the movement of 00:10:634 (2,3,4) - is still too easy and plain, it is also FC'able without dashing there. Maybe you can add some dashes here to emphasize at least the clap at 00:10:634 (2,3) - , and 00:10:977 (4,5) - for the vocal emphasis? ok added dash to 2,3,5
  3. 00:16:977 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is actually very weird because the one after this is with streams, while this is also one of the stanza involving the later streams. I know you are trying to emphasize 00:19:720 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - as it is the most intense part here so to create a gradient. However, I would suggest changing this part to a stream like the later parts of the stanza you did, yet you may use the dashing density as the emphasis. For instance, for the part at 00:16:977 - 00:18:262 - , you put a stream that only contains dashes, and then at 00:18:348 - 00:19:634 - , there are starting to have HDashes and more dashes, then it continues. It is also be a nice build-up so I suggested it. Additionally, maybe you can remove some of the HDashes for 00:18:348 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - because it is a bit much and nearly equivalent to the next part at 00:20:405 - 00:21:005 - . mmh ok, i added some note here, but not in every 1/4, (xxxo 4 times) without hyper to make a buildup as you said >u<
  4. 00:21:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - The stream is good. I would suggest if you want to make the shape of the stream look like this instead: *screenshot. It has more movements and I think the curve is better here because the end part should be sounding more stronger than the start, so the bending is much bigger at the near end of the curved stream. Also there will be a dash at 00:21:691 (8,1) - yet it is just a mild one so I think it is good to go. woooo i also made a nice pattern around there, thank you so much!
  5. 00:33:605 (3,4) - Omit the HDash as there are no other HDashes can be found in the stanza at the exact rhythm position, you may refer to 00:22:633 (3,4) - , 00:25:205 (2,3) - ... or the next one of this part: 00:36:177 (1,2) - . mmmh no sry :C i added in the beginning (00:22:462 (1,2,3,4) - ) and here 00:33:434 (1,2,3,4,5) - to emphasize the start of the kiai (actually the kiai would start again in 00:33:434 - but there is not place too add a no-kiai time, if you look closely, the kiai in 02:47:834 - in 1/2 of this one because is only 1 kiai huahuahuahua) but added in 02:47:834 (1,2) -
  6. 02:13:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - It is a bit hard to catch especially at 02:14:062 (3,4,5,6,7) - , since the sliders and streams are near to straight, and there are a lot of HDashes going on here. What about inclining all the sliders and streams here a bit more? mh tbh i dont think it is hard at all, but ok now 02:14:062 (3) - is horizontal, so i guess it is easier now
  7. 02:14:749 (3,1) - Woah, would this part be way too hard? The HDash is already edge-jumping quality and then there is a slider with high slider velocity, so players must dash in order to make a sharp turn here. What about making this easier? Maybe you need to change the stream pattern, or the slider pattern in vice versa. this is supposed to be hard because is the most intense section of the song, and the sliders are not edge jumping o.o in 175 bpm the dash distance is 2.61, thats why i used x1.45 (1.80 vel slider x 1.45 = 2.61~) aaaaa just in case i asked for some testplays and noone suggested about this, so i dont think it is hard
  8. 02:16:977 (5,6,1) - This is not a big problem but I would suggest having (5,6) in shorter distance comparing to (6,1). It is really easy to miss at (5,6) because most of the players will think of turning after the HDash at (5,6), yet the jump is much bigger, so in that way players may miss (6). ok moved 5 a little to the right and 6 to the left
  9. 02:25:720 (4,1,2) - Same as 02:14:749 (3,1) - . same > <
  10. 02:35:320 (4,1,2,3,4) - The strength of the HDash at 02:35:320 (4,1) - is very intense, however the curvature of (1,2,3,4) is with small degree, which is really easy for players to overshoot here. Also I see that it is possible to stand and catch (1,2,3,4), so maybe you can curve the stream, that it bends more to the left. Just as long as it is not that inclined as 02:35:833 (5,6,7,8) - , then it is good. oh LOL i didnt notice that ds, thank you!
  11. 02:47:834 (1,2) - There should be no HDashes with the reason as 00:33:605 (3,4) - . kek actually it used to not have hyper, but now i added with your previous suggestion ofr consistency
  12. 03:04:634 (2,3) - So you put a dash at 03:03:433 (4,5) - , so how about doing the same here for consistency? You can just move 03:04:291 (1,2) - to the left if you don't know how to fix it in short period. aaaa i forgot, done! also moved 03:05:662 (1,2) - to the right for aesthetic
  13. 03:13:205 (3,4,1) - The pattern of HDash usage is not matching to the song at this point, in my opinion. I would rather add a HDash at 03:13:720 (4,1) - instead for a better emphasis of the triplets. mh i think 4 deserves hyper too, but you are right, added to 1!
  14. 03:42:520 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - This is also really easy to overshoot, because of the movement at 03:42:520 (4,1,2,3,4) - , the HDash can push players to the edges and thus missing the first bit. What about rotating the stream for 180 degree and place back to original position? also i made new stream <3
  15. 04:03:091 (6,1,2,3,4) - ^ oh actually this one is 1/4 so i dont think it is hard x:
  16. 04:29:148 (3,1,2) - Same thing related to the first chorus. same answer :c
  17. 04:37:548 (1,2,3,4) - The HDash at (2,3) is a bit much in my opinion, the beat at (3) is not prominent in the song so I think you can remove the HDash at (2,3). Maybe a slider like 04:40:291 (1) - can be used to replace (2,3)? You need to change the pattern too if you decided to apply my suggestion. mh yeah maybe the sound in 3 is not too strong, but still has vocal and hitsound so i reduced those distance a lot, now they are almost dash
  18. 04:45:263 (9,10) - Where is the HDash like what you did for 02:30:862 (9,10) - ? ayyyy added
  19. 04:56:062 (3,4,5,6,7) - Gah, it is just not looking too artistic during the gameplay... Make it shape like *this. true, made a new stream instead~
  20. 04:56:577 (8,1) - Maybe add a HDash here? The stanza 04:51:262 - 05:02:062 - is too empty with no HDashes. Additionally, there are HDashes every 4 white ticks after 05:02:234 - so I think you can add HDashes at 04:51:262 - 05:02:062 - for every 8 or 16 white ticks to create a great build-up. mmh yeah, i didnt add hypers in 04:51:262 - this section because i think it is the most calm part in whole the song
  21. 05:05:662 (3,4,5,6) - It was going so well with no dashes in streams, very clean. But somehow there is one here and it requires sudden dashes in middle of the stream. Why not remove those dashes? mmh, i think a overdose player will dash anyways XD but sure! removed
  22. 05:10:462 (1,2,3,4,5) - This can be more intense in my opinion, right now it requires a few movements, but I think this one would be better: *screenshot. The movement at 05:10:719 (4,5) - (of the original stream) should be more intense, or equivalent to the distance of 05:09:949 (3,4) - , otherwise it is way too hard to catch the HDash at 05:10:805 (5,6) - . done! nice idea

    New Combos
    Please check the NC once again, I will take a look at that later. I have found some of them, such as:
  23. 00:12:862 (5) -
  24. 00:15:434 (4) -
  25. 00:23:491 - 00:25:034 -

    etc. mmh ok, i understand that you do the ncs in a different way (my ncs are following pattern + instrument stanzas except 01:04:120 - this one which follows the vocal, or it would be a nc spam huehue), but i agree there were some combos with too much fruits, so i added (and removed) some ncs, hope now is better ^^

Tell me when you updated.
Good luck!

AFB
updated! also do not forget to check 00:38:920 (1,2,3,4) - this pattern again, i changed it a little to not be so repetitive (it used to be like 03:44:920 (2,3,4) - )

also tag added, thanks LigerZero x3

thank you! aaaa
autofanboy
recheck

█ Optional to change --- █ Suggested to change --- █ Unrankable

[ General]

  • AIMod
  1. Unsnapped object: 00:39:947 (3) -

[ Destiny]

  • Gameplay
  1. 00:38:920 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Since it is just the start of the stream, what about moving them closer to the middle? The HDashes at 00:39:434 (4,1) - and 00:40:119 (4,1) - are quite big, and even larger than the gaps like 00:40:805 (4,1) - .
  2. 03:10:121 (2,3,4) - The distance of (3,4) is a bit big in my opinion. Could you minimize them slightly?
  3. 04:40:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - There are one more HDash in the previous pattern 04:40:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - at 04:40:977 (3,4,5,6) - but there are none for 04:42:348 (3,4,5,6) - in the next pattern. Maybe you want to swap them? I think there should be more HDashes in the latter pattern comparing to the former one, so it sounds more intense and difficulty gradually ramping up.
  4. 05:03:434 (8,1) - Because of what you said in the mod I posted yesterday, what about removing this HDash as well, to emphasize the loud sound at 05:04:977 (1) - ? It is also with the same stanza as the previous one but with some cymbals, so adding HDashes on cymbals instead would be a better option.
  5. 05:06:177 (6,1) - Remove this with the same reason above.

    New Combos
  6. 00:08:062 (1) - Remove the NC?
  7. 00:23:148 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1) - For this part, try this NC pattern: *screenshot For 00:23:491 (1,2,3,4) - , you may also assort them into one combo.
  8. 00:27:262 (4) - NC since you did the same for 00:26:748 (1) - .
  9. 00:28:634 (4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - You may change to the one I suggested above if you applied the changes.
  10. 00:34:120 (8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - ^
  11. 00:36:862 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - Why not they are in same combo?
  12. 00:38:234 (3) - NC?
  13. 00:56:748 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - In a combo?
  14. 00:59:320 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^
  15. 01:17:320 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe you want to make good use of the vocal changes, try adding NC at 01:17:834 (4) - and 01:19:377 (6) - .
  16. 02:02:748 (4,1) - Maybe remove the NC - OR - you change the NC, that it starts at 02:02:748 (4) - instead?
  17. 02:47:834 - 02:53:234 - Exactly the same as the first part that is after intro. Make sure you double check the NC here.
  18. 03:31:719 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - You can NC as how the vocal goes, like what I suggested above.
  19. 04:17:148 (5,1) - Same as above that I have mentioned.
  20. 04:32:748 (1) - Remove the NC.
  21. 05:01:548 (3) - You may want to add a NC here, because there are numerous claps so you can emphasize them.

Call me after the fix.
Good luck!

AFB
Topic Starter
koliron

alienflybot wrote:

recheck

█ Optional to change --- █ Suggested to change --- █ Unrankable

[ General]

  • AIMod
  1. Unsnapped object: 00:39:947 (3) - aysh

[ Destiny]

  • Gameplay
  1. 00:38:920 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Since it is just the start of the stream, what about moving them closer to the middle? The HDashes at 00:39:434 (4,1) - and 00:40:119 (4,1) - are quite big, and even larger than the gaps like 00:40:805 (4,1) - . o sure reduced
  2. 03:10:121 (2,3,4) - The distance of (3,4) is a bit big in my opinion. Could you minimize them slightly? oko~ done in 03:10:977 (8) - too
  3. 04:40:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - There are one more HDash in the previous pattern 04:40:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - at 04:40:977 (3,4,5,6) - but there are none for 04:42:348 (3,4,5,6) - in the next pattern. Maybe you want to swap them? I think there should be more HDashes in the latter pattern comparing to the former one, so it sounds more intense and difficulty gradually ramping up. nice idea done
  4. 05:03:434 (8,1) - Because of what you said in the mod I posted yesterday, what about removing this HDash as well, to emphasize the loud sound at 05:04:977 (1) - ? It is also with the same stanza as the previous one but with some cymbals, so adding HDashes on cymbals instead would be a better option. mmh no sorry it would break the consistency :c as you said in the previous nod, there is hyper in every 4/1 since 05:02:234 -
  5. 05:06:177 (6,1) - Remove this with the same reason above. same > <

    New Combos
  6. 00:08:062 (1) - Remove the NC?
  7. 00:23:148 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1) - For this part, try this NC pattern: *screenshot For 00:23:491 (1,2,3,4) - , you may also assort them into one combo.
  8. 00:27:262 (4) - NC since you did the same for 00:26:748 (1) - .
  9. 00:28:634 (4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - You may change to the one I suggested above if you applied the changes.
  10. 00:34:120 (8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - ^
  11. 00:36:862 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - Why not they are in same combo?
  12. 00:38:234 (3) - NC?
  13. 00:56:748 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - In a combo?
  14. 00:59:320 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^ no because it would be a long combo
  15. 01:17:320 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe you want to make good use of the vocal changes, try adding NC at 01:17:834 (4) - and 01:19:377 (6) - . as i said in the previous reply, i usually prefer to nc the intrument, not the vocal aaaa also i think the current one is easier to notice
  16. 02:02:748 (4,1) - Maybe remove the NC - OR - you change the NC, that it starts at 02:02:748 (4) - instead?
  17. 02:47:834 - 02:53:234 - Exactly the same as the first part that is after intro. Make sure you double check the NC here.
  18. 03:31:719 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - You can NC as how the vocal goes, like what I suggested above. same reason
  19. 04:17:148 (5,1) - Same as above that I have mentioned.
  20. 04:32:748 (1) - Remove the NC.
  21. 05:01:548 (3) - You may want to add a NC here, because there are numerous claps so you can emphasize them.

    agreed with the rest1

Call me after the fix.
Good luck!

AFB
flkdsfjlkdsjkl thanks!
Xinely
#1
autofanboy
Discussed a bit about the map and made some changes related to new combos and patterns.

Bubble #2
6.66 meme

Good luck!
Ascendance
circlejerk
Yuii-
that message is literally the ultimate way of triggering people ascendance are you mad
Ascendance

Yuii- wrote:

that message is literally the ultimate way of triggering people ascendance are you mad
can't be as bad as what i got from image material so lets see the creative new insults they have this time
Riari

Ascendance wrote:

Yuii- wrote:

that message is literally the ultimate way of triggering people ascendance are you mad
can't be as bad as what i got from image material so lets see the creative new insults they have this time

cuck
A r M i N
time to vote 10 Stars
Topic Starter
koliron

A r M i N wrote:

time to vote 10 Stars
Aesthetic haters (^:
Sotarks

Ascendance wrote:

circlejerk
CelegaS
Congrat koliron!
Depths
I love memes
Underforest
gratz :)
-Sh1n1-
Gratz Koli
JBHyperion
Some concerns:

Destiny
  1. 00:19:291 (4,5,6) - 00:19:977 (4,5,6) - Why are these chained 1/4 hypers? The only strong sounds here are the following snare+cymbals at 00:19:720 (1) and 00:20:405 (1) - by hypering these additional weak sounds you take emphasis away from the strong sounds and are left with an exaggerated pattern with unfitting flow
  2. 00:24:691 (2,1,2) - Short antiflow pattern after rapid flow reversal is awkward to play, would be better to have (2) to the left of (1) or else remove a direction change element by mapping three circles in a line instead of a repeat slider
  3. 00:30:348 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
  4. 00:33:091 (1,2,3,4) - The strongest sounds in this section and you map a single 4plet when all previous weaker sounds were pairs of 1/4 hdash? Doesn't make sense to me, the emphasis is reversed here in and I don't understand why
  5. 01:10:120 (6,1) - 01:11:662 (8,1) - 01:14:234 (6,1) - etc. Any reason why you decided not to hyper here? There are strong vocal and synth sounds to justify them, and it feels weird that you mapped the exact same sounds from 01:20:062 (1) onwards with frequent hdash... Some sections feel really underemphasized at present, notably 01:17:834 (4,5,1) -
  6. 01:53:234 (2,3,1) - Why no hyper to (1) when you have one to (3) which is far weaker? Artificially carrying on this pattern at the expense of proper emphasis is unfitting and lazy. Same can be seen at 01:58:720 (2,3,1) - etc.
  7. 02:03:948 (1,2,3) - and similar play really awkwardly due to requiring delicate antiflow dash after a strong 1/4 hyper. I get what you were trying to do here but it doesn't really work, since you end up emphasizing the tail of (2) way more than necessary with that normal dash. A more normal flow where dash isn't required e.g. 02:01:205 (1,2,3) - plays so much better
  8. 02:09:434 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Your hdash patterns follow the synth for this combo, but for the rest of the stream follows the drums - why when the synth is still really strong here? I was expecting 02:10:462 (4,5,1) - 02:11:662 (3,4,5) - to have the emphasis for some interesting flow but you just switched right back to the drums randomly when the synth is prominent making the patterns hard to follow. I'd prefer to follow synth until 02:12:177 (1) and then switch to the drums once the 1/4 rhythm really kicks in there
  9. 02:14:920 - Ok so most of the vocal patterns in the kiai are all horizontal sliders with hdash that can be caught by just holding dash, which is really lacking in variety for the part of the song you seem to want to emphasize the most (the kiai). There are a lot of great vocal rhythms you could have layered in here to make this more interesting along with some variation in slidershape
  10. 03:16:634 (1,2,3,4,1) - Jump parity makes little sense to me here, why emphasize 03:17:148 (4) with a hdash when the strong vocal and cymbal sound 03:17:320 (1) gets a lacklustre (and uncomfortable) walking pattern? Same thing happens at 03:17:662 (3,4,1) - your hdash is much stronger to an average-strength vocal sound than it is to the intense 03:18:005 (1) - such that following the rhythm is very confusing here
  11. 03:23:491 (1) - Same concerns about missing hypers as in the previous verse 01:10:120 (6,1) etc.
  12. 04:04:891 (4,5) - 04:05:577 (4,5) - Care to explain your decision behind these direction changes, and also why (5) is forced up against the screen border? This movement is really unexpected and results in a harsh flowstop as the catcher is forced against the wall
  13. 04:07:891 (3,1) - 04:13:377 (3,1) - etc. Same as 01:53:234 (2,3,1) previously since this is copypaste and suffers from the same issues
  14. 04:13:120 (2,3) - 04:15:862 (2,3) - etc. Same as 02:03:948 (1,2,3) except issue displaced to (2,3) instead of (1,2)
  15. 04:24:520 (1,2) - Your synth emphasis is better here than in the previous pre-kiai stream, but you're missing a hdash between these two to follow the music since (3,4) are comparably strong with hypers. 04:25:977 (9,1,2) - Could also support a hyper pattern if you wished for consistency
  16. 04:29:320 - Same concerns as in the previous kiai 02:14:920
  17. 04:39:262 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - There are no 1/4 beats in the music, nor vocal effects to support the inclusion of these extra beats
  18. 04:53:320 (3,4,5,6,7) - What are the 1/4 beats following here? Aside from 05:01:548 (1) - I don't hear any 1/4 sounds in this section at all until 05:07:034 (2) leaving this feeling very forced
As a whole I just feel like the map is really overdone. The song doesn't call for such strong hypers and harsh flow throughout, and some overmapping is extremely obvious. I'd like to see some more opinions on this before ranking.
Ascendance
its k
Riari

Ascendance wrote:

its k
cuck
worst fl player
LUL
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply