FCL wrote:

you sent the request to perkele mapping association

• [w]

1. Другого мп3 я так понимаю не нашлось? аплодисменты звучат как-то странно в начале украдено из ранкнутого мапсета
2. 00:04:607 (1) - тут точно нужен какой-нить хс, вистл отлично подходит да
3. 00:08:931 (2) - та же история ла
4. 00:32:715 (1) - по идее этот слайдер будет плохо (хорошо) читаться, я бы посоветовал повернуть его на -90 градусов ну хз, все, кто тестил, говорили, что норм
5. 00:32:174 (1) - вообще сама идея не очень, но почему я тебе не скажу а
6. 00:36:634 (8) - мне мама говорила, что овермапать это плохо да тут одна карта сплошной овермап, а тут это не так уж и заметно
7. 00:40:012 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - мне не нравится тот факт, что ты вообще почти не добавил к этим нотам какие либо хсы, такое вступление должно быть как-то подчеркнуто я думаю. Попробуй добавить драм клапы на все незахээшеные ноты, вроде по кайфу звучит. Ну или что-то другое, софт свистки там нормал клапы, хз доабвил
8. 00:45:688 (1,3) - алло админ, где хсы (вистлы) ааа
9. 00:47:579 (8) - тоже вистл пожалуйста спосибо
10. 00:47:850 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - понятное дело, пп джампы для пидоров (дтшников) это дело святое, но тут я бы такого не делал. По ритму ну очень сильно ощущаются 1/4 ноты, так что я бы добавил 1-2 трипла между нотами а мне нравятся, прикольно выглядят
11. 00:48:390 (3) - клап пожалуйста да
12. 00:55:958 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - чо-то похожее как и выше, пускай это и субъективная точка зрения сейм
13. 00:58:661 (1) - 2к16 джампы подъехали (четыреголова). В общем я бы просто такой большой джамп не делал, дт уроды могут миссануть случайно, просто подвить его ближе (например на 476,288) ну ладно (рип 4*)
14. 01:02:985 (1) - вистл на хеад ы
15. 01:06:228 (3) - сильный вокал, тоже бы добавил вистл на хеад ааа
16. 01:17:579 (1,1) - тоже мне не нравится такой гап, но не буду говорить почему тут св меняется, так что лучше оставить
17. 01:52:174 (1,2,3,4,1) - а тут я бы побольше спейсинга сделал потому что я хз http://puu.sh/px9sK/2f1b4fb03e.jpgн у ок
18. 01:52:309 (2) - и да, макели говорил мне, что овермапать не хорошо а
19. 02:25:147 (1) - сюда надо аплодисменты как форта в его мапах для песни с евровидения? и да, они уже есть в начале))
20. 02:32:174 (1) - клап может быть? к
21. 02:59:471 (6,7,1) - не очень же флоу, как нить вот вот хотя бы http://puu.sh/px9Ex/89517e6bf0.jpg

сначала там был x332 спейсинг .. поменяю потом мб

Как эксперт могу сказать что неплохо для начинающего маппера, но думаю вам стоит обратить больше внимания на hitсаундинг спасибо професиАНАЛьный маппер

Deppyforce wrote:

i forgot LOL

[General]
id make the break thing goes like this in all diffs http://puu.sh/pyhL7/f49d592af8.jpg d no reasons, since there are no changis in da musik

[Normal]
00:31:363 - u should map this 1/2 too so its a bit more constant with other stanzas! na, wan t to mak it more lik ez so thats why i missed som notz
00:38:120 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - yo this might be 3 long maybe consider change 00:42:985 (3) - to just circle to simplify rhythm wil ask fr mor pinins
01:25:417 - same as before sam

also dat too long thing also applies to other part with same rhythm im just lazy to point them all!

[Hard]
00:17:309 (4,1) - fix blanket plz http://puu.sh/pyhAz/8232682b98.jpg aa
00:55:552 - ju can add a ds'd triple here t b h cuz random pause in kiai feels empty will ask somebody, followed the vocalz ther
01:48:390 (1) - kinda same ye

fuk last diff i cant farm it so i wont mod it gg

gl!!

CookieKivi wrote:

oн тнιѕ мαp ιѕ reαlly ɴιce! eѕѕpeαcιαlly тнe eαѕιer dιғғѕ! ɢood joв. c:

Kalibe wrote:

Let's go doroppu.

Normal ~

*I If you have only Normal diff, especially with 1.44 stars, you should decrease AR then, bcs BN bla bla bla. Just decrease to 4 and good. ar4 in normal = rip readability, but ill ask somebody, thx
*II To be honest, can you make this diff harder a bit, idk with more spacing or more on SV to reach 1.7 - 1.8 stars? Because idk if spread 1.44 -> 2.7 isn't a tragic spike diff :E aa, thought about that, prolly ill have to do that
*III 01:31:093 (1) - Ctrl H works better for flow on this slider duh! i like how it is now ;p
*IV Well, that's all. Cool

Hard ~

*V 01:50:282 (3,4,1) - Plays better imo if those nodes are on 168|92 ok
Idk, this is too pro for me to mod xd

:c ;w; :C ~ <3

*X 00:41:363 (1) - Also prefer to add curve on this just to boost flow after stream ( if you want see ) okay
*XI 00:53:796 (3,4,1) - I think flow between 4 and 1 looks awkward a bit, so it'll be good if you move (3 and 4) to down. actually i did it on purpose and i like it, so :c
* XII 02:50:552 (1,2,1) - Hmm. This pattern is okay, but it can be better for my eyes. Just have a pic what i mean, feel free to throw this, if you don't like it. changed the whole pattern, thanks!
*XIII 02:58:661 (3) - Little curve fits better with transision to next stream // aka make this curve more curvy lol. okay

Ok, that's all. Lovely song and diffs. Have a star dude :3~ thanks <3

ncuh wrote:

Реквест из очереди
[Insane]
00:28:390 (1) - сделай вместо 1/1 слайдера 1/2 реверс. Потому что не очень приятно, когда на середине слайдера начинается вокал http://i.imgur.com/jUlpEaG.png да ну, инструменты же
00:49:471 (6,7,8) - выглядит как-то не очень согласен
00:53:255 (5) - пододвинуть бы влево, чтобы было в 1 линию мне так нравится

Lecia wrote:

irc

19:05 Lecia: gg
19:10 Lecia: мб я тебе напишу то что я думаю а ты скажешь я дебил или не
19:11 Atamare: даваи
19:11 Lecia: короче
19:11 Lecia: 02:04:607 (3,4)
19:11 Lecia: адвансед
19:11 Lecia: мб там чета поменять чтобы типа флоу
19:13 Lecia: инс
19:13 Lecia: 00:49:742 (8,1)
19:13 Lecia: я бы понерфил эту хуйню
19:13 Lecia: 02:07:850 (1)
19:13 Lecia: а это вообще че блядь
19:14 Atamare: в одваснеде коечто сделол
19:14 Lecia: 00:35:147 (2,3,4)
19:14 Lecia: так
19:14 Lecia: э
19:14 Lecia: слезы слейд
19:15 Lecia: мб там сделать один кружочек под другим
19:15 Lecia: 00:58:661 (1)
19:15 Lecia: аааа бля что это
19:15 Lecia: 01:26:228 (6)
19:15 Lecia: почему он медленный
19:15 Lecia: 02:59:607 (8,1)
19:15 Atamare: в инсе сделл 1
19:16 Atamare: второе ни
19:16 Atamare: в слезах все норм
19:16 Lecia: ну вот последнее
19:16 Lecia: это же пиздецй
19:16 Atamare: почему
19:16 Atamare: конец же
19:16 Atamare: и звук
19:16 Atamare: такой
19:16 Atamare: уууууууууууууууууууу
19:16 Lecia: ну
19:16 Atamare: барбара стрезенд DDDDddddddddddddd
19:17 Lecia: такое себе
19:17 Lecia: короче
19:17 Lecia: вот если бы я играл на высоких рангах
19:17 Lecia: и вот эту хуйню играл с дт
19:17 Lecia: я бы брейкнул там пару раз
19:18 Atamare: пасмотрем
19:18 Atamare: пока оставлю
19:18 Atamare: я не брекалс
19:18 Lecia: бля надо научится мапать наверное сначала а потом модить
19:18 Lecia: ъъъъ

ProfessionalBox wrote:

M4M from my que. I'm deeply sorry for the delay.

Advanced

1. 00:40:823 (5,6,1) - Minor DS issues its not an issue, there is different spacing because of sv changes
2. 01:34:877 (5,6,1) - The flow here is a bit bad since it becomes a really sharp turn. I don't really have a quick solution but maybe you can come up with one yourself? ya, tried smth
3. Couldn't really find any crucial issues here

Hard

1. Slidertickrate of 2 is not needed here either, I highly recommend removing it ok
2. 00:13:255 (1) - I think this would look better if you removed one of the red sliderpoints and tried something like this nah, i like it
   
   Quick Example

   
3. 02:24:607 (6,7,8,9,1) - This might be a bit overkill since it's 5x 110bpm singletaps in a hard diff. That's challenging even in an insane so you might want to nerf this idk, will ask for more opinions
4. Again not much to be modded here

The set is ready for BN mods so you should start to look for them instead of normal mods / m4ms

I hope this mod helped even a tiny bit since there isn't much to be modded anymore. Good luck with the set!

1. Could add 'folk' and 'world beat' to tags as well

1. Don't make usage of SV changes in the easiest difficulty of the map. It might be apparent for most players, but having two sliders with nearly same visual length than beatlength (e.g. 00:22:715 (2,1) - ) is deceiving for beginners.
   Just set it regular 1.0x, 0.9x is borderline and everything below should be unrankable.
2. 00:35:958 (4,5,6) - This isn't a great solution, setting up two sliders here instead would be easier to read than the current clustered pattern.

1. 01:33:255 (1,3) - No overlap pls, this one's annoying compared to the rest existing in this map. Just rearrange the upcoming oval flow a bit.

1. /

1. Hitsounds seem to be the same so I just post here. Applies to all diffs:
   
   1. 00:19:742 - Whistle
   2. 00:29:471 (3) - drumfinish. Same for:
      00:33:796 (4) - head 01:27:850 (4) - head 01:30:012 (4) - head 01:32:174 (4) - head
      It's really apparent on the lower diffs (Normal), so please have a look at this again.
   3. 01:07:850 - to 01:13:796 - seems like you were missing quite some drumclaps
   4. 02:00:823 (4) - softclap would fit better here
   5. 02:20:823 (1) - softclap on tail.
2. 01:01:634 (3,4,5) - overmapped. and not the good kind
3. 02:22:444 (7) - For readability purposes i recommend setting a NC at this point. Overlap is strong here.

1. 00:32:174 (6) - These slow-mo sliders should really have a NC on them to indicate the SV drop. Could set it on the whole triple as well.
   Same for: 01:26:093 (5,6) -
2. 00:38:120 - Don't leave this beat out, it's good to keep the pace going on as the pace of the music is still going on. A gap at this point doesn't feel fitting:
   
   SPOILER

   
   The same goes for 01:31:093 (1) -
3. 01:06:498 - 02:15:688 - I don't know for what purpose you extended the breaks here (not even snapped), but it doesn't seem to work with the music. Drop them.
4. 00:41:228 (10,1) - 01:35:282 (10,1) - 02:25:012 (11,1) - Fix these spacings, these look odd due to SV change
5. Your usage of repeat sliders is somewhat confusing. Usually they're used to simplify gameplay while adding variety to the map, but it feels more like you arbitrarily set them in this map. So just in case you didn't, please explain these:
   00:41:634 (2) -
   01:44:877 (4) -
   02:05:147 (6) -
   02:41:904 (8) -

1. isn't there any other background image you could use? Besides this one being very poorly edited, I think there are a lot of better matching backgrounds out there.. if all else is unavailable even an image of the artist would fit better, imo. D:
2. 00:24:066 - to 00:41:363 - in all diffs - I don't think 25% hitsound volume is okay here. s: The hitsounds are barely audible (with 100/100), consider pushing them a bit higher (to around ~40%, should work well)?
3. last object in all diffs - consider reducing hitsound volume gradually, would match nicely with the song? o:

1. 00:40:012 (5,6) - the sound stops before the sliderend and another starts there, so I think it would fit better to shorten (5) by 1/2 and add another 1/2 slider on the white tick instead of mapping this with a circle. (like 01:34:066 (4,5) - )
2. 00:42:985 (3) - and 00:45:147 (3) - if no Easy will be added, consider replacing these sliders with circles, so players have at least half a beat more time to 'rest' (If an Easy gets added, please keep them to have a nice spread from N to Adv)
   same for 00:51:634 (3) - 00:53:796 (3) - ofc; and 01:37:039 (4) - 01:39:201 (4) - etc, I think you know which ones you could remove/replace
3. 02:18:661 (4) - 02:22:985 (3) - 02:27:309 (4) - 02:31:634 (4) - 02:35:958 (4) - 02:40:282 (4) - missing NCs
4. 02:59:877 (1) - consider snapping the spinner to 1/2 to avoid problems in converted game modes o:

1. 00:11:363 (2) - 00:15:688 (2) - 00:20:012 (2) - add NCs for consistency with the following NC pattern
2. 00:24:607 (2,3) - please make sure that there are no slider borders that touch each other, looks untidy and sometimes can be confusing :c
   same for 01:22:985 (2,3) - 01:43:525 (3,1) - 02:39:201 (4,5) - 02:51:093 (1,2) -
3. 00:32:174 (5,1) - similar here, but they could even be mistaken for 1/4 :/ Make the path players have to follow more obvious, please.
   same here 01:25:688 (4,5) - 02:04:607 (3,4) -
4. 01:07:309 (1,2) - and 01:11:634 (1,2) - are a bit too simplified, imo.. doesn't match with the rest of the diff, consider changing this up a little, maybe like this: http://puu.sh/qv8ya.jpg ?
5. 01:16:769 (2) - how about ending the slider on the white tick instead of the red one to match better with the vocals?
6. 01:48:390 (1) - move to 300|332 to make sure the reverse arrow is clearly visible

1. 00:11:363 (3) - 00:15:688 (2) - 00:20:012 (2) - NCs, as in Adv (also applies to higher diffs)
   Also, 00:04:607 (1,2) - 00:13:255 (1) - 00:17:579 (1) - don't really match with the rest of the diff.. in prev diffs it worked fine, but here it seems weird if you take a look at the whole diff to have such a calm intro when the sliders could be very well split up. (same for the higher diffs)
2. 00:28:255 (7) - 00:30:417 (6) - 00:32:039 (4) - 00:34:201 (6) - 00:34:742 (8) - examples for 1/4s that could very well be removed, imo. And there are a looot more. Especially in calmer parts they feel extremely unnecessary, because there is this very clear beautiful voice, which you don't follow but instead you emphasize each tiny background sound that's barely noticeable. >: Might be just me, tho.. (In Kiai the 1/4 match well, tho, because the beats there are well audible and the song becomes a lot more intense)
3. 00:40:012 (2,3,4) - please make sure that reverse arrows aren't covered by the previous circles! Just manually stack them to avoid this o:
   same for 00:58:120 (4,5,6) - 01:34:066 (2,3,4) - and several others, please check this yourself in the whole diff!
4. 00:53:120 (3) - no beat here but on 00:53:390 - instead so consider moving it there?
5. 01:52:174 (3) - after all the previous 1-reverse sliders this one is really unexpected and migth be confusing, should be changed, imo.. How about replacing it with two 1/4 sliders?
   similar for 02:17:309 (4,5) - 02:19:471 (5,6) - you could split them up as well. I don't recommend replacing them with streams as that's a little to tough for Hard and doesn't work well with the current spread. >:
   02:24:607 (6,7,8,9) - would also like to see this as two 1/4 sliders, basically because of the same reasons
   and 02:28:931 (4) - 02:41:363 (3,4,5,6,7,8) -

Sieg wrote:

почему оно умерло?

Squichu wrote:

Apologies for the long wait! ;_;
But finally~~

General

1. isn't there any other background image you could use? Besides this one being very poorly edited, I think there are a lot of better matching backgrounds out there.. if all else is unavailable even an image of the artist would fit better, imo. D: i like this bg and it actually fits, so why not? :s
2. 00:24:066 - to 00:41:363 - in all diffs - I don't think 25% hitsound volume is okay here. s: The hitsounds are barely audible (with 100/100), consider pushing them a bit higher (to around ~40%, should work well)? um, but they are pretty audible lol i can easily hear them because the music is pretty quiet there
3. last object in all diffs - consider reducing hitsound volume gradually, would match nicely with the song? o: last object in all diffs except last diff is a spinner so is this really neccessary? :a

Normal
Neat diff, but it doesn't work as the easiest difficulty, because of very long 1/2 patterns (examples: 00:38:120 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 00:49:471 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - 01:33:255 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ) that are way to complicated for beginner players regardless of low bpm and especially considering the amount of stacked objects.. :/
You could change the diff up to make it better readable and playable for beginners, but then the gap between Normal and Advanced might be a problem, so I highly recommend adding an Easy instead. added an easy
[/list]

Advanced
01:07:309 (1,2) - and 01:11:634 (1,2) - are a bit too simplified, imo.. doesn't match with the rest of the diff, consider changing this up a little, maybe like this: http://puu.sh/qv8ya.jpg ? they are not simplified, im just mapping the vocals and thats why these are like that[/list]
- imo, you should also reconsider the 1/4 usage in Hard (at least in the beginning), because there's not a single 1/4 mapped in this Diff (except for the spinner at the end), and it's a huge step from 1/2 rhythms-only to 1/4 rhythms-mostly.. :/ You could also add some 1/4 repeats to this diff, they're not too complicated to play and you could keep the 1/4 in Hard, _however_ you shouldn't make any difficulty-changing changes to Normal than and definitely add an Easy, because the gap between N and Adv becomes to huge then. as i told before, ive added an easy, but im not going to change hard / advanced because 1/4s in hard are all stacked and they are really easy to play. also bpm isnt that high to worry about them. gap is also okay, because hard is litterally advanced with some 1/4s (even spacings are the same)

Hard

• 
  Also, 00:04:607 (1,2) - 00:13:255 (1) - 00:17:579 (1) - don't really match with the rest of the diff.. in prev diffs it worked fine, but here it seems weird if you take a look at the whole diff to have such a calm intro when the sliders could be very well split up. (same for the higher diffs) its the beginning and it perfectly fits with the music, so why not? >:

1. 00:28:255 (7) - 00:30:417 (6) - 00:32:039 (4) - 00:34:201 (6) - 00:34:742 (8) - examples for 1/4s that could very well be removed, imo. And there are a looot more. Especially in calmer parts they feel extremely unnecessary, because there is this very clear beautiful voice, which you don't follow but instead you emphasize each tiny background sound that's barely noticeable. >: Might be just me, tho.. (In Kiai the 1/4 match well, tho, because the beats there are well audible and the song becomes a lot more intense) sorry but i will feel to bad becuz i just cant undermap them.. probably it will work, but not for me. it will just ruin the entire thing of the song, cmon :c
2. 00:40:012 (2,3,4) - please make sure that reverse arrows aren't covered by the previous circles! Just manually stack them to avoid this o:
   same for 00:58:120 (4,5,6) - 01:34:066 (2,3,4) - and several others, please check this yourself in the whole diff! dont really understand u because they are already manually stacked..
3. 00:53:120 (3) - no beat here but on 00:53:390 - instead so consider moving it there? i dont really like that idea because i think my way works better with the music.
4. 01:52:174 (3) - after all the previous 1-reverse sliders this one is really unexpected and migth be confusing, should be changed, imo.. How about replacing it with two 1/4 sliders?
   similar for 02:17:309 (4,5) - 02:19:471 (5,6) - you could split them up as well. I don't recommend replacing them with streams as that's a little to tough for Hard and doesn't work well with the current spread. >: they are there to simplify the gameplay, so this Hard wont look like a light Insane.. so i guess ill keep them
   02:24:607 (6,7,8,9) - would also like to see this as two 1/4 sliders, basically because of the same reasons
   and 02:28:931 (4) - 02:41:363 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - it feels okay for me because the part of the song is pretty intense, so why not to make it a bit harder? :a

Insane
looks pretty much fine, but the overlap of streams here 02:21:634 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - should be avoided, imo. Looks and plays kinda weird o.o idkm i didnt find any problems with that.. nobody was complaining about it while testplaying so i guess ill keep it?..

Sorry that I took so long. :c
And good luck!