forum

Chitose Haru & Kumagai Eri - Perfect Free

posted
Total Posts
197
show more
VINXIS
01:33:342 (1,2) - jump playz even shittier lo
03:53:566 (3) - wot no it deosnt -_ - 03:42:780 (3) -
04:34:858 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i wanted 2 treat this all as 1 section lmao Xd also listen to 04:35:533 (2,3) - the 3 has ltiaerly no sound emphasis ocmplared to the rest of the notes IMo lik it has no kick or snare and its as weak as 04:35:195 (3) - witht heguitar sound lo


K
Topic Starter
RLC

jonathanlfj wrote:

AN modding crew incoming

[Concert]
05:26:937 (2) - based on the previous spacing intensity, this actually is underspaced, see if you can give it a bigger jump the back and forth 1/4 sliders were supported by the guitar but that note isn't so I think it's ok

[Omar Kamal]
00:16:431 (3,4) - ctrl+g flows better yehaj the 1/3 jump that makes from (4) to (1) feels a bit overkill even if (1) has that strong effect on it
00:27:106 (3,4) - should be faster due to higher musical intensity seems like it would needlessly look confusing compared to (1,2)
01:48:341 (4,5,6,7) - flow feels a bit unnatural here, could have the 1/4 jump land on 01:48:847 (7) and then form a zig-zag it goes down because of the faint descending melody in the background; the flow looks sharp enough to me tbh
01:53:061 (1) - why so undermapped the part at 01:50:364 (1,2) - is exiting a more intense section, but i want this part to reach minimal intensity around 01:53:061 (1) - before increasing again (because of the building noise effect in the music)
04:11:600 (1) - remove NC alright
04:54:746 (3) - the vocals holy should use hyper speed slider here that would only make a visual difference tbh; the rotational flow created by 04:54:325 (4,1,2,3) - already gives it plenty of energy in play. i wanna use a straight slider but a longer straight slider looks weird 2 me
t h a n k
Nathan

jonathanlfj wrote:

AN modding crew incoming

[Concert]
01:06:207 (2,3) - that's a pretty awkward angle I really don't see how it's awkward, just seems like a very straightforward movement to me
02:21:038 (7,8,9,10,1) - OCD pls fix ok
02:23:229 (1) - feels like you are skipping a lot here, the later half of the repeat could use a more interesting rhythm changed
02:28:622 (3) - why is this not part of the spacing decrease 3 is an increase in pitch, while the decrease in pitch starts at 4
02:34:521 (1,2,3,4) - hmm heavy hitsound with compact spacing...doesn't really fit well imo I didn't want to space it too much so it wouldn't surprise the player after a calm part
03:05:533 (6,7,1,2) - this doesn't really flow well, the need to go up to do the 1/4 and then down to 1/2 is a bit awkward the 1/4 jump is only a little bit faster since it's slider to circle, which I want since there's a finish on 03:05:870 (1), plus the stack resets movement a bit anyways
03:10:504 (2,3) - was this intentional? played really weird and difficult to read huh I don't see how this is weird in this map's context at all after repeatedly using patterns like 01:21:628 (4,5) and 01:22:049 (1,2,3)
03:31:319 (1) - blanket d
03:32:162 (2,3,4,5) - this should use a higher spacing for the build up to carry on buffed
04:00:139 (3) - spacing feels a bit far here nerfed

those: should just remap
Giralda: no title
captin: nop
apaffy: raise your yehajs
Blissfulyoshi: need faster sliders
Topic Starter
RLC
all updated
jonathanlfj
oko dad
Nathan
se no
Topic Starter
RLC
hey yo
Depths
!
Topic Starter
RLC
CelsiusLK checked over irc:

- removed unused hs
- removed an unsnapped useless line
- an NC change
- turned on letterboxing during break, toggled off widescreen support
Iceskulls
bub2
Secretpipe
Good stuff inc!

Gogogo
Rizia
everything looks very good
qualified
Topic Starter
RLC
thank you!

note to any passerby QAT: we are aware that the snapping of the guitar in the solo is very bizarre, thus we consciously chose to map to the support of the background 1/4 track in more questionable parts rather than trying to force strange rhythms
IamKwaN
Please give me metadata proof for the song, I am too lazy to search for it.

Also, what type of work is 音楽少女 ? Seems to be anime.

EDIT:

Alright, this is what I found.

Do you have any other sources for the current Artist and the 'first name, surname' format?
Topic Starter
RLC
yes, it is an anime, hence the CV artist formatting and source field / anime in tags--i'll try to find the sources and edit this post

also don't understand why celsius's kd was revoked; i listed the things he suggested--that's pretty much what a mod would have looked like if he posted it...

EDIT: here's one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb9Nmgwj55U

♬♪♫ ミ Vocal: Haru Chitose (cv. Manami Numakura) & Eri Kumagai (cv. Asami Seto)
♬♪♫ ミ 「千歳ハル(cv,沼倉愛美)&熊谷絵里(cv,瀬戸麻沙美)」
♬♪♫ ミ Lyrics: Haru Chitose & Eri Kumagai
♬♪♫ ミ Composition: Taishi (Electro.Muster)
and another, but the video seems to have been removed
https://mai88eternalscarlet.wordpress.c ... fect-free/

EDIT 2:
http://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm24817971

千歳ハル(cv 沼倉愛美) 熊谷絵里(cv 瀬戸麻沙美)
IamKwaN

xlni wrote:

yes, it is an anime, hence the CV artist formatting and source field / anime in tags--i'll try to find the sources and edit this post

also don't understand why celsius's kd was revoked; i listed the things he suggested--that's pretty much what a mod would have looked like if he posted it... don't know, he denied himself.

EDIT: here's one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb9Nmgwj55U this isn't official, let's have a look at the other you provide.

♬♪♫ ミ Vocal: Haru Chitose (cv. Manami Numakura) & Eri Kumagai (cv. Asami Seto)
♬♪♫ ミ 「千歳ハル(cv,沼倉愛美)&熊谷絵里(cv,瀬戸麻沙美)」
♬♪♫ ミ Lyrics: Haru Chitose & Eri Kumagai
♬♪♫ ミ Composition: Taishi (Electro.Muster)
and another, but the video seems to have been removed
https://mai88eternalscarlet.wordpress.c ... fect-free/

EDIT 2:
http://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm24817971

千歳ハル(cv 沼倉愛美) 熊谷絵里(cv 瀬戸麻沙美)
they are different from what you use lol , also no supporting for the first name, surname format? I mean why not Chitose Haru.
Iceskulls

xlni wrote:

also don't understand why celsius's kd was revoked; i listed the things he suggested--that's pretty much what a mod would have looked like if he posted it...
[/quote]

p/5146940 lol u already kds me
i just do recheck there
Topic Starter
RLC
@kwan idk because the first thing i linked did that (for name order) but i guess that's wrong?

what artist do you think is right then, given the variation in spacing, punctuation, etc. between the sources

next time i'll just ask you for metadata at the start

@celsius OH okay; totally forgot
IamKwaN
First one is not considered as a valid source. Pick any one from the official information here or here.
Unicode Artist: 千歳ハル&熊谷絵里
Romanised Artist: Chitose Haru & Kumagai Eri
Unicode Artist: 千歳ハル(cv 沼倉愛美) 熊谷絵里(cv 瀬戸麻沙美)
Romanised Artist: Chitose Haru(cv Numakura Manami) Kumagai Eri(cv Seto Asami)
Second one is weird without comma, the final decision lies on your side though.

Quick fix, and then go ahead again~ I love the voice actresses. lol
Astar
I just pressed F5 and suddenly I can't see the rankings rofl
Topic Starter
RLC
if it's either-or, i'll use the second; because having only (anime character) - (song) just doesn't sit right with me lol

will update

EDIT: actually the second one looks kinda sloppy in-game; i may just use the first and put actual VAs in tags--will ask for some opinions between the two
Iceskulls
1st one looks a lots better

ok
re 1st
jonathanlfj
#2
Rizia
my website lag
ac8129464363
K
VINXIS
smth is broke n

Rizia

VINXIS wrote:

smth is broke n

yes X_X
meii18
seems like it's a bug or something :c
FriendoFox
I noticed myself, I already FC'd with HD hoping to get #1 but what is this? D:

Bancho is being slow to me tho, so maybe it's because of that?

Edit*: Try re-ranking if it's possible to do it quickly lol
meii18

FriendoFox wrote:

I noticed myself, I already FC'd with HD hoping to get #1 but what is this? D:

Bancho is being slow to me tho, so maybe it's because of that?
Not because of Bancho.It's because Rizia had website lag and the mapset is in ranked/approved thread but it appears to be 'Latest Pending Version'.It must be fixed quickly
Irreversible
let's try to dq it and rerank lool

uhmm, I can press the qualify button... but it's not qualified, so i can't disqualify it? . . .
ProfessionalBox
ryza
Is there any reason the artist shouldn't just be 音楽少女? I'm actually really confused on this. I don't know if you guys need album scans or what but that makes the most sense to me.
VINXIS
thts the anime
ryza

VINXIS wrote:

thts the anime
idk if you guys are joking, but the anime short should be completely disregarded when determining the metadata
Satellite
VINXIS
so is this gunna get fixed or d
uzzi

VINXIS wrote:

so is this gunna get fixed or d
probably d
Topic Starter
RLC

Silynn wrote:

I don't know if you guys need album scans or what
if you have them, they'd be appreciated

Silynn wrote:

but that makes the most sense to me.
but why

Silynn wrote:

idk if you guys are joking, but the anime short should be completely disregarded when determining the metadata
no one is joking here. you still haven't given any proof that Ongaku Shoujo should be the artist?
VINXIS
is it ok to get this ranked now or is it still rip
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply