On my comp, offset sounds better at 1,120
[Extra]
[Extra]
- 00:10:442 - with the new offset as mentioned above, it becomes clearer that this belongs a 1/4 beat earlier.
- 00:16:733 and 00:17:946 - neither of these triples are represented in the music. I don't see a need for them.
- 00:34:470 (1) - the closeness of this to the previous note would be very confusing, compared to its timing. Unless you want to be intentionally difficult to read here, consider moving it away from the previous (5).
- 00:37:200 - same here, to lesser degree, if you wanted it to be easier to read move it further from the (3). Or you could and/or move it to the next combo, which should also serve to indicate it's supposed to be played closer to that group.
- 00:43:491 - I would move that spinner back 1, or 3 1/4 beats, give some time for players to get to the first slider. At a just a 1/4 beat apart it's too brutal atm.
- 00:44:477 (6) - slider lasting 3 beats here is wrong, should last only two
- 00:49:328 (10, 11) - there is no reason in the music for these double time sliders, I would consider changing them, they will be very surprising and unintuitive
- 01:17:524 (6) - This slider is just itching to be moved earlier two 1/4 beats to line up with the guitar. Dunno how you want to arrange other notes around it to fit.
- 01:19:494 - I think a stack circle here would work well, the singer saying "de" at that exact point and there is no circle to accompany him
- 01:21:920 - Same as above
- 01:23:890 and 01:24:345 - Same