Gaia wrote:

Yo from Queue hellow! :3
you only want me to do hard? okie less work for me

[hard]
00:15:813 (1) - flow can be better if u curve it down more sure
00:17:764 (1,2,3,4) - blanket isnt perfect changed up with previous pattern, should look better now
00:18:740 (3,5) - overlap doesnt look good it's not visible while playing tho :3
00:22:886 (4,5,6) - back and forth thing is hard to read changed overlap from 1 + 4 so it should be easier to read now. the back-forth stacking isn't that hard, imo
00:52:643 (2) - dont recommend stacking a 3rd one, but if u do shift it down more fixed, similar patterns also
00:57:764 (2,4) - not sure how i feel about this cuz this is hard to read keeping it, it's not that hard.
01:08:496 (1) - bleh just stack it :> I don't want to stack everything, that looks boring. :n in easier diffs I stack cause it gets to hard otherwise but here it's fine >w<
01:16:545 (2,3) - flow can be better if u shift to the top left more changed slightly
01:19:716 (5) - um flow. u can blanket with 01:18:740 (3,4) - and the little jump to 6 would be fun changed, but the jump wouldn't make any sense so I just went with a different pattern
01:47:277 (2) - push up moreyup
01:52:399 (2,4) - omg lol wat to say about this basically the same as 00:57:764 (2,4) ? owo
02:57:033 (1) - no nc 02:57:764 (3) - nc here changed this previously for consistency with previous choruses, so no need anymore
02:55:325 (1,2,1,2) - uhm rhythm sounds so wrong here. http://puu.sh/b3PsO/176b9e3785.jpg FIXED!! >-<
03:10:447 (5,1) - dat overlap not visible while playing. :3
03:11:423 (1) - whistle intentional? yes. there's a whislte on almost every downbeat.

gl hf

Kazuya wrote:

Hello. It's only ideas! Hi! owo

Uncheck: Widescrren support & Letterbox During Breaks!
uncheked widescreen support but keeping letterboxed, cause it's easier to spot short breaks then! >w<

[Hard]

00:04:594 (3) - Hmmhmm... Move circle here: x: 110 y: 85 the forth-back movement is intentional tho. ;-;
00:05:082 (4) - = x: 114 y: 276 ^
00:15:569 (5) - Hmm.Move here x: 142 y: 375 moved to 246|373 instead, cause of balanced dstance to prev/next object
00:38:496 (3) - Remove circle, move 00:37:764 (2) - slider here: 00:38:008 - , and put circle here: 00:37:764 - It sounds better. :/ changed!
00:41:545 - Missing circle. Put here. okay
00:48:984 (1,2) - One circle and one repeat slider better. Put circle here: 00:48:984 - , and put 1/2 slider here: 00:49:228 - and add once repeat. Timeline: http://puu.sh/b4DzR/1ff6485465.jpg
I prefer the simplicity of my pattern atm, cause the following part is a tiny bit tricky.
01:29:594 (1) - Remve spinner, and, please, map these parts! Spinner here: start: 01:31:911 - end: 01:33:374 - okay, changed
01:36:179 - Missing circle. Put here. changed
01:55:691 (9) - Remove circle. I'd like to keep it, it goes with the vocals well and plays fine. owo
01:59:960 (5) - Remove slider, and remove 02:00:691 (6) - circle. Put circle here: 01:59:960 -and put 1/1 slider here: 02:00:203 - .
Timeline: http://puu.sh/b4DWt/59e328464a.jpg The slider highlights the vocals. It's better! changed
02:02:155 (4,5,6,7) - Delete objects! --> Put 1/1 sliders here: 02:02:155 - 02:02:886 - Timeline: http://puu.sh/b4E5K/d11f2f4650.jpg
It's so much better! changed differently, cause I want to emphasize the downbeat
02:30:813 - Missing circle. Put here. yup
02:38:252 (1,2) - same as 00:48:984 (1,2) - ^ also >-<
02:51:911 (1,2) - ^ ^

[Normal]

00:23:130 (3,4,1) - Use 1/2 repeat slider! Please! http://puu.sh/b4Ey7/f9792b0c26.jpg
prefer circles here cause I don't want a sliderend on the downbeat
00:45:082 (1,2,3) - This one looks better: http://puu.sh/b4EHo/065339c58d.jpg keeping it as it is, matches better with my style, I think >:
01:18:496 (2) - Remove circle. but there is a beat here. ;_;
01:26:789 (2) - ^ same here >-<
01:29:472 (1) - Remove spinner, map these parts! Same as hard diff. mapped!
01:44:106 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - Hmmhmmhmm. Vocal? Timeline example: http://puu.sh/b4F6K/25382ca5f6.jpg
wanna stick to the beat here c:
02:05:082 (5) - Move circle here: x: 96 y: 260 wanna stack them. the abrupt stopping goes better with the beat imo
02:39:716 (4,5,6,1) - same as above: 01:44:106 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - ^ too >-<

[Easy]
01:28:984 (1) - Same as Normal & Hard mapped
01:47:033 (2,3,4,5) - Hmmmhmmm. idea: http://puu.sh/b4FGo/2d26ecb235.jpg great idea! thanks! owo
03:08:008 (4) - Please do not continue here! Don't put objects behind the slider. Please: http://puu.sh/b4FTT/fb8572e88f.jpg
changed

Good Luck! Thank you! owo

Krfawy wrote:

Squee! Hello Darling! :3 We haven't seen for very long.
Hi there! Sadly, that's true. -buries herself-

Darling you map really nice. Just the only thing I can't accept in your map is... comboing! The rest is really nice, just placing NCs is surprising for me. But I can say that I really like your style because it's calm and cute. :3 Just like a little Squirrel! XD
I KNOW RIGHT! It sucks. I know it's horrible, but I can't do it any better. >___<

Easy
Basically, I'm applying all of what you said below. ;w;

1. 00:03:618 (1,2) - So I advice to replace the place of NC at those two notes since it would match more the music IMO.
2. 00:07:521 (1,2) - As above.
3. 00:09:472 (1,2) - The same thing as above again. xD
4. 00:11:423 (1,3) - This time I'd start new combo at (3) because it follows the vocals more. Now I am not sure if you want to follow the violin or vocals or just both. If the last one, in my opinion it's not a good idea since there's no special moments at the moment (have I just made a mistake or is that correct what I've just said?).
5. 00:15:813 (2,1,2) - I think it's a good idea to create new combos at those two (2)s and remove it from (1) because it just follows vocals better... or I just think I find it better than an accurate composition. D:
6. 00:19:228 (1,2) - Well, again I ask if you could replace the place of NC at those two. :3
7. 00:27:521 (3) - At this moment I feel a bit surprised that you make so long combos when previous were sooo much shorter. So if you want to shorten tha accurate combos, let me show you my idea for that:
   
   1. 00:27:521 (3) - NC
   2. 00:31:423 (4) - NC
   3. 00:35:325 (4) - NC
   So I think it's cool the combos are that long at kiais since you just emphasize the music. Nice thing.
   Yah, I noticed Kiai sometimes is confusing for beginners, so I thought longer combos might help them to read the patterns. But in the end it looks totally inconsistent compared to the non-Kiai parts. '-'
8. 01:18:252 (2) - (Almost) At the beginning I have adviced to create NC at moment like this since the previous note is a long slider. So actually I advice the same thing - to create NC at this note to follow the music and previous comboing.
9. 02:57:764 (1) - At moments like that before there is 'Give your heart a break' you make sliders which has only a whistle at the very beginning without a finish. This time you added a finish, but I think it only breaks a consistency so consider removing this hitsound from the very start of the slider, please.
10. 03:03:618 (5,1,3) - I just think it'd be better for comboing if you create NCs at (5) and (3) instead of (1). Now I just a bit unsure how it works, but maybe it's just a stupid feeling made by my blond hair colour. D:
11. 03:09:472 (1,3) - And I'd feel a bit more comfortable if you replace NCs again. I just think it would be more matching to the accurate composition.
12. 03:17:277 (1,2,3,4) - TBH I am not sure if newer players and less experienced players will be happy when they see this amount of circles. Might you consider replacing them into 2 sliders or something similar? You know, just to make it easier for players to play it. :3 changed this, too. owo

Normal
Same here, new NCs and deleted ones EVERYWHERE ! OwO

1. 00:01:667 (1,1) - Well I think it's not needed to make so many combos at a Normal difficulty since I don't think people are going to break sliders as much as they could at Big Black. XD 00:04:106 (2) - But this one would be a great start for NC, don't you think? :3
2. 00:05:569 (1,1,3) - To be honest I think the (3) is the best moment for NC, not previous ones. Now it's just a bit overusing NCs in Normal. D: And I'd delete NC at 00:09:472 (1,1) -
3. 00:12:399 (3,1) - Maybe replace NC at those two notes because now it's a bit confusing IMO. There's really too many combos ATM. :<
4. 00:17:764 (1,1,2) - And I advice to create NC at (2), not at previous notes. Just try it and listen to the music I think you'll understand what I am showing you. ;3
5. 00:21:667 (1) - So I think this NC is just another which would be removed since there's so many NCs. Even too many.
6. 00:25:569 (1) - The same thing as above.
7. 00:29:472 (1) - And again, I just think there's too many new combos as it is.
8. 00:33:374 (1) - As above.
9. 00:40:691 (1) - As above.
10. 00:45:082 (1) - And again too many NCs IMO.
11. 00:48:984 (1) - And again as above.
12. 00:57:764 (1,3) - So I just think you could replace the place of NC because it'd improve how it follows the music in my opinion.
13. 01:12:399 (1) - So as I said some times before I just think that you overuse NCs in this difficulty, but I know it's because it's a Normal. But believe me, Normal doesn't have to have such short NCs
14. 01:16:301 (1) - The same thing.
15. 01:59:228 (1) - I think you can remove this NC safely. One longer combo won't kill anybody... I guess. xD
16. 02:24:594 (1) - So I think you can remove this NC safely too. I don't think it should be wrong or something.
17. 02:38:252 (1,4) - So I think you can replace NC here. If you do this, I advice to remove NC from 02:42:155 (1) - here too.
18. 03:17:277 (1) - As above. You can delete NC here.
19. 03:19:228 (1) - And here too. The combos shouldn't be too long at those 2 last combos if you delete accuarte moments.

Okay, in the end I changed everything several times, so I don't know if it's exactly how you said it, but it definitely looks better now! @@

Hard

1. 00:38:740 (4) - To be honest I just think this slider would be more blanket. For example I'd move the 2nd point in the slider to X=371 and X=346. And I'd move the 3rd point to X=378 Y=305. An example, but I just think that could be improved a little bit.
   True, changed. owo I moved the whole slider, tho, cause it's a rotated version of 00:37:277 (1) - and I like copypasta-sliders.. 'w'
   also, the jump afterwards matches kindaaa, so I don't have to change anything else.
2. 00:53:130 (1) - I can feel this moment would still work without NC here. It still follows an accurate Demi's voice and it wouldn't harm comboing IMO.
   follows the vocals, but the pattern might be confusing and the NC helps to clarifiy which is the right order xD
3. 00:56:789 (5,4,8) - I know what you're following at the moment when comboing this song, but to be honest... I find it naturally because I feel what you're emphasizing. But to be honest I am not sure if you're doing it as you could. So I want to show you how I imagine it would be made:
   
   1. 00:56:789 (5) - instead of 00:57:277 (1) -
   2. 00:58:740 (1) -
   3. 01:00:691 (8) - Instead of 01:01:423 (1) -
   yup, changed most
4. 01:15:325 (3) - I don't know why, but at moments like this I just want to CTRL + G. But it's just because I like tricky moments so that's just a totally theoretical suggestion since I know it's a Hard diff, not an Insane one. I get what you mean, I prefer when they move in circles, too. but I think the part here is rather boring to play cause it's a ... dunno staccato rhythm? just always the same and so many sliders.. while I think they fit the music I want to make it at least a bit more interesting to play and I prefer the 'weird' movement over a jump. >w<
5. 01:47:764 (1) - I just think it's a bit a bit too much comboing since the previous combo follows the vocals as well as the next does, so I just think you can reduce this one. Similar thing to 00:53:130 (1) - I wanna keep it consistent with the first chorus. owo
6. So now again I just think your comboing could be improved a little bit and I'll show you my vision of comboing:
   
   1. 01:51:423 (5) - NC here instead of 01:51:911 (1) -
   2. 01:53:374 (4) - NC
   3. 01:55:325 (8) - NC here instead of 01:55:813 (1) -
   changed!
7. 02:58:008 (1) - And this time I feel there's just too much NCs if we count this one too. I believe this NC would be removed because it still follows music like before. Still prefer consistency. >-<
8. 03:01:667 (1,2) - Maybe replace NC here? That is a suggestion since this works as it is too. prefer it on downbeat here
9. 03:03:618 (7) - And I think you could NC here instead of 03:04:350 (1) - that moment. changed
10. 03:15:813 (5) - And to be honest I don't understand why you didn't create NC here since it's so much slower moment than at kiai : o added!

Well, so that's all from me! I wish you good luck and have a ranked map soon! I know it's totally hard to find a BAT, but I believe that you can do it! Believe in yourself green nutcracker! :3
Thanks thanks thanks thanks. <33 Diffs look much better now. *_* I'll make you my comboing slave, be prepared!
I gave up on finding BATs. I'll get my maps modded so they look neat and are fun to play and then I let them rest on the graveyard til osu dies. owo It's fun to map anyway. xb

Squee! <3 Wiewióreczka! :3

mancuso_JM_ wrote:

Hi! Random mod (I've seen your map in your signature xD)
Hi there! I didn't think someone actually looks at siignatures.. amazing. O_O Really, thanks!

[General]

1. Disable the Countdown, your map starts too fast and this option is useless during the gameplay. okay
2. Try uncheck the Letterbox during breaks as well. Actually, you've added the video of the song, and looks weird the letterbox with the video activated. uh, right. changed
3. The ''rhythmical breaks'' that you've used in the diffs. don't make sense at all, because they are not following anything in the music. Just leave the break without ''extension'' (unless you have a better idea). I wanted to match them with the vocals. looks like it didn't work. removed!

[Easy]

1. 00:00:204 (1,3) - This overlap is not the best option starting the map, specially for an Easy that can cause a bit of confusion. I'm you can do a nicer pattern than this to start the map. I won't give you any screenshoot because I don't want to impose my style here, but anyway you should give it a try.
2. 00:11:423 (1,2) - Even if the BPM is low, I would avoid this 1/2 here. It is the only one that you've used and this make it inconsistent. In addition, this is an Easy, so I think you can simplify that pattern a little. true, changed.
3. 00:29:472 (4,5,6) - Ugh.. that kind of patterns are pretty hard for a easy :/. Remember that new players are not able to catch that kind of stacks under sliders (in general they can't catch the stacks). Oh well, I highly recommend you to do that, for the sake of the difficulty.
   Actually, I think it's okaaay. But because of the low difficulty increase to Normal I might as well make this even easier. xD changed
4. 00:40:203 (3,4,5) - Same as before, try to unstack this as well pls! changed
5. 00:45:082 (4) - I would expecting a Finisher instead of a whistle at the beginning. Sounds as some other places where you've added finishers, and this one emphasize well the vocals. Blindly trust modders here. xD I suck with hitsounds, changed.
6. 01:20:691 (2) - Unstack this as well, as I've explained before. I think you won't have to do so many changes, with some Ctrl+G and some replacement, you will fix this issue. Well, I think you already catch this point, try to check the rest by yourself and try to fixing it. fixed
7. 01:29:472 (1,1) - The Slider is too close after the Spinner for this kind of difficulty. Maybe reducing the Spinner in 1/1 would be the best option (the spinner length will be a bit short but not that much due to the low BPM). okay
8. 01:59:716 (4,5) - I would avoid the this blanketing because the flow is broken due to this reason. I would place (5) around x:440 y:330 and then you have to do a little re-map in this last part before the break. The break of flow is intentional here. firstly because I feel like the diff gets a bit boring at this point and secondly because it matches with the "break" in the vocals so well (also with the beat, imo).
9. 02:02:155 (2,3,4) - (^) this was not intentional.. '-' fixed
10. 02:05:082 (5) - Try placing this note a bit up, for a better flow. changed due to previous pattern anyway
11. 02:18:740 (1,1) - Try other variety here, as I said before, the slider is too close after the spinner and It'll cause problems for new players. removed spinner and mapped this part instead.
12. 02:34:350 - I was expecting a finish instead a whistle here added
13. 02:54:838 (4) - Are you missing a whistle here? Because it sounds really good for me good catch, fixed!
14. 02:59:716 (1,3) - *A little note*: You can keep that kind of stacks in the whole of the map if you want, they will not a problem I guess Yah, keeping them. ;-; with more than one white tick between them stacks shouldn't be any problem.
15. 03:18:740 (4,1) - Useless and inconsistent stack, try to unstack it, so new players can catch this easier.okay

Some notes before to finish the mod in this difficulty:

1. Well, these stacks mentioned in my mod are really needed to be fixed. In general, normal stacks are a bit Hard for this difficulty, I would say that kind of stacks are something like a ''NO'' for this difficulty. Make sure to change them pls, if you need to remap some little part, do it, because it is for the sake of the map, to make it even better.
   Guess I said this above, but they are okay to play. I tried this with some newbie players and they didn't have much problems with this. But I agree that the diff could be easier, especially since there is a rather easy Normal diff. (I was planning a NH spread, maybe that's why. xD)
2. About the flow, sometimes appear broken because you prefer to do blankets instead to respect a correct flow, flow is pretty important for easy difficulties, is not bad in this map but it could be better. Just keep it in mind for your next maps. Agreed. I'm using flow breaks sometimes to emphasize certain parts of the song, tho, so I won't ever get completely rid of it. :b Sometimes I just do it without thought, when I don't pay attention.. but I'll try to improve on that.
3. Try to avoid long patterns in 1/1 (for example the one that starts in 02:32:399 - and ends in 02:47:521 - in this pattern you can see around 15 secs. mapped in 1/1, and even if the BPM is a bit low, my experience says that this is exhausting for new players). I didn't feel like mentioning things like ''remove a note'' or ''make this slider longer'' but I think you can look at the whole of the map yourself, and following this pattern that I've already given, you can fix some patterns in the diff. to make it a bit easier. I'll take a look for sure at that! It's so hard to ignore beats.. ;n;
4. In general, you didn't try any variety :/. At the same time, the constant 1/1 / 2/1 patterns is not that ''exiting''. I was expecting some 3/2 sliders here, but meh.. is not a must xDD. But keep it in mind for your next maps too! That's true as well. I'm quite inexperienced with mapping Easy so I don't know what to do. XD but I'll try.

- Is not a bad difficulty in general, but looking at all these points, I think this can be better.

[Normal]

1. 00:45:082 (4) - Try something like this for a better flow. I think this linear movement between (3,4) will give a better transition in the following pattern. okay
2. 01:02:643 (8) - Consider adding a New Combo here for consistency with the Easy (?) added
3. 01:10:935 (2) - I think if you move the slider end down (like this) the following pattern will flow better. changed
4. 01:50:203 (2) - Try moving this to x:124 y:196 for a better transition. I see what have you done here, but it doesn't provide any ''stack'' during the gameplay. changed
5. 01:59:228 (3,4) - I don't feel these two notes here, the music pitch is not that higher here, but the rhythm exists, so I recommend you to split these notes into a Slider, sincerely is much nicer when you play the map. changed
6. 02:27:033 (T) - Reduce the hitsounds volume here (? They sound pretty high comparing with the calm section. oh, right. fixed
7. 02:43:130 (4) - I think you're missing a Whistle here. added
8. 03:03:130 (6) - Try something like this for a better flow looks better, indeed
9. 03:11:423 (6) - A bit nazi but try moving this object around 2 grids up for a better transition sure
10. 03:14:350 (3) - Hmm.. Are you missing a Whistle here (?) yes :c

Some things to consider in the future:

1. I haven't checked your comboing properly, but seeing it during a gameplay I found it a bit inconsistent in some parts (specially in the chorus sections), try to give it a look by yourself (to clean all doubts). Okay! I'll enslave Krfawy and get another check! xD
2. Sometimes you've skiped to map some important beats (downbeats) instead you've added a slider end (i.e 01:45:569 - and similars), try to see if you can fix some of that and.. take this in consideration to your future maps as well It's something I love to tell others, but I can't staop doing it myself, haha. I'll try.

- Other than that I've to say you've suprised me with this difficulty, I liked it! It is a well done difficulty, keep it up!
Thank you! c:

[Hard]

1. 00:22:399 (2,3,4,5,6) - I would do something like this for a better flow, but maybe you have a better idea (i was not really inspired ). The thing that I didn't like was the transition between (5,6), maybe you can do a nicer thing than mine
   I don't know what to do here either right now. ;~; I changed it up but I'll see to find some super-amazing pattern!
2. 00:29:716 (x) - Try adding a note here, vocals already started, so I don't see the reason to skip this beat. added
3. 00:41:667 (3) - 01:36:301 (4) - 02:30:935 (4) - In all these points I've expected a 1/2 slider + a note instead of a 1/1 slider because this follow the music much better, I don't want to ruin your patterns but I'm pretty sure you have to consider that. I tried this at first but was quite unhappy with it as it felt overloaded to me. I'll reconsider changing this if some other people say so. c:
4. 00:51:667 (2,1,2) - 01:46:301 (2,1,2) - 02:56:545 (2,1,2) - I think I can accept the first overlaps but those look bad in my opinion. Consider changing the last overlap in all this pattern (? Still.. I think this is just a personal like.) Sorry, but I wanna keep them. ;w; It's fun to play doesn't look bad to me.
5. 00:57:764 (4,5,1,2,3) - LOL! This is weird, I've tones of suggestions in just this pattern.. omg.. I don't know how to compose that xD. Well, this will be the best thing:
   
   • 1st: The Slider (4) looks odd to me.. why not a simpler thing like that? because I don't like half-curved/half-straight sliders. :/ they just look sooooo ugly to me. I know most people like them but I prefer to avoid them completely.
   
   • 2nd: Doing that, try to move (5) around x:36 y:308 for a better flow. changed, works with both slidershapes. :3
   
   • 3rd: The pattern (4,1,3) are too overlapped and looks bad during the gameplay. Change the way of the slider (1) and you'll be fixing all the issues, the slider will appear like this Nuuh, I love the overlap of 4+1! But I'll change the second slider so there's no overlap anymore. owo
   
6. 01:52:399 (4,1) - The slider (1) is almost all covered by the slider (1), the only part visible is the last part, that's why I suggest you to make the slider (1) as visible as you can because I'm not sure if this is completely rankable.
   Same as above, I like the overlap. ;w;
   And if the map is unrankable because of this, so be it. It's fun to play and fun to map, all that matters. >w<
7. 02:27:033 (T) - Try reducing the volume here, the part is really calm, instruments are not acting here at all. changed
8. 02:46:423 (x) - Lol.. I expected a note here because you always added a note to follow the lyrics :/ added

- Almost all the ''semi-stacks'' that you did in the map didn't look as good as they should look (i.e 03:07:521 - and similar ones), sincerely I would have avoided that kind of patterns to make this a better map aesthetically, but well, if you can change at least some of them would be great.
I like them, actually. And they give me great variety, but I'll see what I can do later on.
In general the difficulty is alright, but I think this needs some cleaning, probably you'll make it better with more mods. Btw, This mod in Hard was pretty general as you can see, because is quite late here and I've to sleep now (sorry for that).
I'm happy you took your time to mod it and you helped me a great deal, so thanks for that!

Oh well.. That's all!
I think some more work is needed before to move this map on (specially for easy because Normal looks pretty decent and Hard just need some mods to fix aesthetically issues).
I hope this can help you!
Good Luck!

MoodyRPG wrote:

General

1. More tags maybe? added the producers' names to tags.. can't think of something else.. >:

Easy

• - 00:04:106 (1) - Looks bad this slider, remove the fifth tick changed it up, but I don't wanna have the second part straight.
  - 00:31:423 (1) - Replace this whistle for a finish, sounds really cool I prefer whislte only, the beat doesn't sound strong enough to me for a finish
  - 01:00:691 (4) - ^ ^
  - 01:29:472 (1) - Add a note here and move the slider in the next tick, like this
  It's a nice idea but the spinner will be too short then, imo. Sorry.

Normal

• - 00:54:350 (5,1) - This looks ugly with that overlap, I'd suggest to make this keeping it as it is, cause the other breaks the flow. also it doesn't look ugly to me.
  - 01:19:228 (1) - Remove new combo and add one here in 01:20:203 okay
  - 01:27:521 (1) - Same thing, add the new combo here 01:28:008 sure
  - 01:56:301 (6,7) - Maybe Crtl+J for a better flow?, like this (including the slider (7) too) changed, a bit differently tho
  - 02:18:740 (1) - Short this spinner in 02:20:691 and try to map this section here in 02:21:179 to follow the music I don't want to end the spinner on the downbeat, the beat should either be emphasized by a circle (which would make the spinner too short, imo) or be "ignored".

Hard

• -- 00:50:691 - 01:45:325 and 02:56:545 - I don't agree with these sliders, is not very nice to play, I was waiting to see this pattern like 02:40:082 but anyway, just a comment
  I want to keep this as it is. it might be hard to play for some but it's fun for others.
  - 00:15:569 (5) - Just a suggestion but why you don't try to stack this in the slider (3)? because even experienced players somehow struggled to read the pattern. might be related to the placement cause it's far down in the left, but I don't know. keep it for now

Solid map, good luck
THANKS!

Hollow Wings wrote:

from Scorpiour's Modding Queue
Hi there! >w<

Hard

1. 01:02:155 (5) - touched the top, move a bit down sure!
2. 01:04:594 (5,1) - swap nc setting okay
3. 01:06:545 (5,1) - ^ ^
4. 02:47:277 (3) - slider's track's offscreen only in editor, it's completely visible while playing. does it still need to be changed, or is it fine in that case?
5. yeah i think i can call this a nice map in playing, but the composing still have space to improve. a star for u thou
   thanks! owo I'll try to improve it further!

Normal

1. 00:43:374 (2) - too curve, smooth a bit? sure
2. 01:57:764 (1,2) - blanket perfect (nazi) fixed all!
3. 03:15:813 (2,3) - ^
4. 03:19:716 (2,4) - ^
5. nice

Easy

1. 02:40:691 (1) - offscreen same as in Hard, it's only in editor offscreen. ;-; I'll ask someone if I have to fix it, cause it appears fine while playing
2. good

i think this map's good enough to be ranked, thou it's not to the level of mine, sry for that. u can give a lot better version's maps in the future imo w
Thank you, happy you think so! ;w; I'll try to map better in the future! xD

good luck
and thanks again! :3

Saut wrote:

yo, wie angefordert ein NM o/

• 
  [General]

1. mag den song Ich auch ;w;
2. Genre wäre wohl Dance-pop add ich mal zu den tags. :3
3. Da du ein Video hast würde ich den widescreen support aktivieren nicht nötig, das is für Storyboards o:
4. mehr als 1/3 der map ist mit kai time versehen - müsstest in kauf nehmen das zu reduzieren Ich find die Kiai Time so passend und werd sie erstmal so lassen.
5. könntest vllt ein wenig an den custom colors arbeiten änder ich ständig, konnt mich noch nich festlegen. x-x

• 
  [Easy]

1. 00:11:423 (1,2) - sowas ist kritisch für anfänger (1/2 - tackt), vllt einfach zu nem reverse slider ändern wie hier 00:09:472 (3) (ist auch praktisch das einzige dass mal du das benutzt hast - sticht etwas hervor) stimmt, hab den kurzen Slider ersetzt!
2. 02:05:082 (5) - NC - da du es hier auch gemacht hast 01:02:643 (1) - okay!
3. 01:16:301 (4) - vllt rotieren bis (4) auf (2) liegt und nicht quer über 1 (Bsp: http://prntscr.com/5ade7n&#41; hab's etwas anders abgeändert

Ansonsten ne ziemlich sexy diff - alles gut les- und genießbar

• 
  [Normal]

1. 00:14:838 (6,7,1) - kein fan von dieser konstellation (sehr subjektiv) ich mag sie so, lass ich erstmal solang es keinen Grund gibt das zu ändern
2. 00:39:472 (2) - nazimod - kein prefektes blanket mit (3) fixed
3. 00:48:984 (4) - cm nach oben für eine flüssigere bewegung? okay
4. 00:49:960 (5) - blanket mit 00:51:423 (1) - verbessern fixed
5. 00:52:886 (3) - ^ mit (1) (falls es nicht bewusst war) doch, das war absichtlich eingerückt, da die Bewegung sonst sehr stumpf wirkt, find ich
6. 00:55:569 (2,3) - (5) ?
7. 00:57:277 (6) - cm hoch für perfektes dreieck lass ich wo's ist, bildet nämlich ein Dreieck mit 00:56:301 (4,5) - >w<
8. 01:10:447 (1) - 02:05:082 (1) - sehr schöner part danke! :3
9. 03:11:423 (6) - cm hoch geändert, hab allerdings lieber 03:11:179 (5) - nen Stück runtergezogen statt 6 hoch, dann funktioniert die nachfolgende Combo besser

wundervolle blankets hier, mag diese diff sehr (diese punkte oben ist praktisch nur kleines rumgenörgel, nichts fatales )
in love with blankets. <3 sieht einfach meistens besser aus.. überall!

• 
  [Hard]

1. 00:52:643 (2) - ein wenig mehr krümmen, damit es zu den anderen beiden slidern passt die Krümmung passt so, wenn man den Slider unter die anderen schiebt liegen sie 100% übereinander. es sieht nur nich ganz so aus, weil er halt kürzer is.. passt aber!
2. 00:53:374 (2,3) - vllt parallele slider ziehen? sind eigentlich parallel, hab's nochmal nachgebessert '-'
3. 01:19:228 (4) - vllt ne leichte krümmung einbauen? hab ihn lieber gerade um ein wenig Abwechslung in die Diff zu bringen :3
4. 01:32:033 (1,1) - für ne hard (2,83 stars) denke ist dass der spinner zu nah am nächsten circle ist hab den Spinner gekürzt, vllt nehm ich den noch ganz raus, mal gucken. '_'
5. 01:32:033 (1,1,2,3,4) - why u no perfect square? moar variety. <3 find es sieht so auch gut aus und is mal was anderes als die strikten Drei- und Vierecke

hab nichts mehr zu sagen, map hat mir gefallen und der song ebenfalls also kriegst du auch einen stern Danke dafür! >w<
Viel Glück beim ranken! und nochmal danke!

Saut

misakawax2 wrote:

from my modding queue

Hard

• 
  01:06:545 (1) - cancel NC so can be read by following guiding line I put NCs on downbeats, tho ;_;
  01:07:033 (2) - add NC cause of ^ I won't change this either
  01:24:106 (1) - cancel NC ^
  01:24:594 (3) - add NC ^
  01:51:423 (1,2,3) - awkward movement, stretch out the spacing a little okay!
  01:53:374 (1) - I don't like the slider got overlapped by the previous one here that's intentional, it's the same as 00:57:764 (4,1) - , just a different shape. And while I agree that this might be tricky for some people, it plays fine, so I'm going to keep it.
  01:59:472 (2) - overlapped by previous slider, maybe move to the right a little it's 100% stacked, which is what I do all the time in this diff
  02:47:033 (2,3) - almost overlap with the accuracy meter, move this portion up a bit changed
  02:49:228 (5) - again this overlap is awkward but it's perfectly stacked, too.. :c

Normal

• 01:13:130 - add a circle? okay
  01:24:106 (1) - concider start this slider somewhere else, easy to be hit early true, changed!

Easy

• 00:07:521 (4) - maybe avoid using short repeat slider like this
  00:09:472 (3) - ^same imo they play fine and aren't confusing beginners. but I'll ask other people what they think of it and maybe change it in the future!

Good job in general, very comfortable game play. Good luck! Thanks!

-Bakari- wrote:

Yo, as requested. o/

[General]

1. The tags are not really consistent. Easy has a missing tag, check it, please. fixed
2. Move the preview poin to 00:37:277 - where the vocals actually begin. It will give you a very clear sound for a preview. okay

[Easy]

1. 00:07:521 (4) - the tail of the slider is on the downbeat. The problem is that 00:08:008 - this beat, which is the strongest, becomes unclickable and feels missed out for the players. You have a plenty of ignored 1/2s and i wold ignore these ones as well. You can read more here.
   Note: Try to keep the downbeeats clickable, it will make your rhythm much more logical.
   checked the diff for sliderends on downbeats, I think I removed all..
2. 00:06:057 (3,1) - having them stacked may trick players a little. I am sure that beginners will not expect (1) to be placed right under the slider. This kind of flow is uncommon and therefore, might trick them. changed
3. 00:11:423 (1,2) - I'd rather move NC to (2) asthe stronger beat is here. fixed
   Note: minor - 00:10:447 (4,2) - the overlap looks a bit untidy, so I think you migt want to avoid it.
4. 00:17:277 (3,5) - again, the stack is tricky, it will confuse newbies. Try to avoid such stacks and keep things obvious when you map E-N diffs.
   Note: 00:23:618 (1,3) - 00:32:399 (2,4) this is very important - 00:54:838 (1,4) - 00:59:716 (2,6) - 01:45:082 (6,2) - 02:46:545 (5,1) imporant -
   rearranged the pattern til 00:17:277 , everyting should be playable and not confusing now.
5. 00:48:496 (3,6) - again, you're leavin the downbeats unstressed. Have you checked the rhythm theory I've linked? I'm pretty sure that this is the reason why some of your patterns give a weird feeling while playing.
6. 01:29:228 (1,1) - sorry, but this is unrankable. You should give more recovery-time after the spinner. As the rule says, there should be at least 1500ms of recovery time. More info.
   changed up
7. 01:39:716 (4,1) - again, some newbies may mistakenly hit (1)'s tail and ignore (5). Try to keep your patterns very simple, so beginners will be able to play it easily. changed
8. 02:22:643 (4,5) - either (5) or (4) needs a new combo. The combo chain gets too long at this point. changed, too
9. 02:39:715 (6) - again, unstressed downbeat. I won't point them everywhere, I think you'll be able to check such thing son your own. If you have any questions - just poke me.
   
   Except a few tricky patterns and some missed downbeats, the diff was quite impressive. I liked it.

[Normal]

1. Try CS 3,5. It will look great and improve the balance of the set.
   I thought 3.5 was too hard, but it might work better. '_' changed but I'm not sure if it's okay right now.
2. 00:19:228 (6) - 00:39:472 (2) - 00:40:691 (4) - and so on - same thing about the downbeats. I will not go into the details, but remember to keep the stronger beats clickable when it is possible. I think I've fixed all now..
3. 00:34:106 - 00:36:057 - keep up those 1/2s, it feels sorta confusing when you ignore them for no real reason. The BPM is quite relaxing, so more 1/2s won't hurt too bad. okay '_'
4. 00:43:130 (1,3) - I don't find this stack really readable. Can we keep the numbers visible all the time? example
5. 01:15:325 (4,6) - minor - unstack them completely or make the overlap disappear. It looks untidy comparing with the rest of your great patterns.
6. 01:34:106 (2) - minor - a little overlap with the HP-Bar. Not a real problem, just looks sorta untidy
7. 02:53:862 (5,6,7) - the stack kinda breaks your awesome flow and hurts the movement you've got here. If it's possible, try to unstack the pattern?
   kind of applied all of the above. I re-arranged great parts of the diff to improve clarity, so I'm not entirely sure which of the patterns are present.
   
   Except for a few downbeats which were ignored/unstressed the diff is really nice.

[Hard]

1. 00:14:838 (4,5,6,1) - minor - the transition feels a bit forced here. I'd rather go with a little jump like this.
   Note: if you do this, you'll have to add some more jumps to similar part of the music, but I think it wiill make your diff even better. So, yeah, give it a try! In fact, you can should add some jumps as there are practically no any.
   changed this differently, since flow could have been way better.
   I don't want to put any 'random' jumps, tho. and the points I could change with jumps work fine without them, so I don't see any reason for adding them. x:
2. 00:33:374 (1,2) - minor - a very little (x0,07) DS mistake. not a big deal, but if you want to keep stuff perfect, you might want to fix this one. fixed
3. 00:41:911 - I love the slider here, but I'm afraid we'll have to cut it. The way how you ignore drums and vocals at this point sounds unnatural. others mentioned this before, so I changed it. I'm not really comfortable with how it plays now, tho. gonna try some things til I find a nice pattern..!
4. 01:27:764 (5) - I've already mentioned the downbeats, same again here. ;_; ye, fixed
5. 02:01:667 (2,3) - the stack here kinda broke your magical and amazing flow. Try to keep your awesome flow and break the stack? okay
   
   Just as you've said, the Hard is nicely done and there is nothing to worry about. Good job!

Easier diff might need some more work, but I see a lot of potential in this mapset! Have a star! ~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Best of luck! Thank you! >w<

TicClick wrote:

copy and paste these into Timing Panel

8018,487.80487804878,4,2,1,30,1,0
23598,487.80487804878,4,2,1,30,1,0
63130,487.80487804878,4,2,1,50,1,0
64593,487.80487804878,4,2,1,50,1,0
70436,487.80487804878,4,2,1,50,1,0
78232,487.80487804878,4,2,0,50,1,0
195810,487.80487804878,4,2,0,40,1,0
197273,487.80487804878,4,2,0,40,1,0

in addition, fix SV on Hard in the end:

195810,-133.333333333333,4,2,0,40,0,0
197273,-133.333333333333,4,2,0,40,0,0