from my queue.
This song reminds me so much of the style of [/URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aziPdaZAbs]this as an example[/URL]
anyways,
general
add "tv size" to tags.
your easy is a normal and your normal is an advanced diff, so you should rename it to these.
easy
00:03:724 (1,2) - blanket could be nicer. (i hate pointing those out, but i just did)
01:28:360 (2,3) - this doesn't feel alright, how about deleting those notes and 01:27:380 (1) - map this as an reverse, and a note at 01:28:851 - sounds more appropriate to me. In case you don't know what i meant !!The last note is snapped wrongly on my screen it should be on the blue tick ofc. The song ends on a blue tick btw.
rest seems fine.
normal
00:24:635 (1) - [URL=http://puu.sh/ntqK4/dffa7cfe7e.jpg]If you choose this rhythm u actually have something to click on the last white tick, currently you don't and this sounds better as well.
00:30:909 (1) - ^applies here too.
01:00:909 - add a note? it feels rather empty
01:01:105 (3) - honestly I would just go with what you did before and use 00:59:537 (2) - a reverse like this to represent the vocal better.
01:22:674 (1) - you forgot to nc here
hard
you have some spots in this diff which are visual not the same distance as before, because of sv changes, which could be irritating for this level of play.
01:26:596 (3,4,5) -
01:10:909 (1,2) -
01:23:066 (4,5,6) -
01:26:596 (3,4,5) -
I would advise you to make them at least visual equal.
00:17:086 (2) - why are you starting this on a blue tick? well i kinda get it, but its just wrong lol. move it to the white tick and shorten it to 1/2 and 00:16:792 (1) - make it reverse 2 times and not 1 and it should be fine. this is just at this one spot tbh.
00:56:792 (1) - you get inconsistent with ncing here. you should remove this one
01:04:243 (1,1,1) - these ncs are not necessary you don't change the SV again.
01:03:066 (1) - inconsistency with ncing as before.
01:16:400 (1) - i would just ignore the drumroll here and map the vocal with a long slider, like this here
maruk
00:18:360 (1,2,3) - there are no 1/8 at all o.O
01:05:027 (2) - you don't need to nc them since circles are not affected by sv changes. LOL! no srs, the nc is not neseccary
01:10:125 (1,2,3) - aw sad you didn't do any sv changes here as well, as its a strong part in the song.
01:11:105 (4) - you need to move the note to the blue tick 01:11:007 (4) - here, because you cannot suddenly change the way you emphasize the song. I should explain this a bit more i guess lol. You mapped vocals from 01:10:125 - here to 01:10:713 (3) - here, and now you suddenly decide to map the drums instead, but you could actually do the drums here if you move the note to the blue tick and continue to map the stream this thing here. the blue tick thing is a must, but the stream is secondary.
01:28:556 (2) - no sv change no nc. You don't need to nc stuff you can easily read (stuff like this) or didn't change the SV upon.
insane
00:17:968 (5,6) - that movement doesn't fit at all considering the streaming here indicates you move upwards. If you'd place 6 more on the top right corner it made much more sense, the downbeat slider can stay like it is. The current flow is kinda edgy and doesn't fit the stream.
00:52:478 (1) - nc is not needed.
00:55:419 (6,8) - these are hitting each other if you enable "stacking", so move 6 a bit away for cleaniness.
01:04:243 (1,1) - the ncs are not needed since you don't change sv again, actually like in hard diff if i remember correctly
01:05:027 (1) - ^same as in hard diff.
01:17:576 (1) - nc makes no sense whatsoever
extra
00:24:635 (1,4) - you are not allowed to stack those on top of each other. The player has to be able to see the slider after. How it should look like
00:32:674 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - feels alot overdone, considering the sounds you hear are not even followed with the drum or anything other than the piano, which you don't even follow .. - Map the piano out, and don't do this overdone spacing here, i prolly won't be the only one pointing this thing out.
01:04:047 (2,2,2) - there's literally no sounds on these, why don't you do a 3/4 slider like in insane? :/ it fits the vocal so much.
01:28:556 (1) - considering how you mapped before the flow is more circulare so back and forth flow in the last pattern is really annyoing for the player. How about this. It makes much more sense, as I explained that the movement of the hand before is more circular so this flow would be more fitting.
The diff is a bit overdone, but thats alright - I didn't like that part where you used huge spacing even though there was only a quite piano in the back .
GL kunka!
This song reminds me so much of the style of [/URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aziPdaZAbs]this as an example[/URL]
anyways,
general
add "tv size" to tags.
your easy is a normal and your normal is an advanced diff, so you should rename it to these.
easy
00:03:724 (1,2) - blanket could be nicer. (i hate pointing those out, but i just did)
01:28:360 (2,3) - this doesn't feel alright, how about deleting those notes and 01:27:380 (1) - map this as an reverse, and a note at 01:28:851 - sounds more appropriate to me. In case you don't know what i meant !!The last note is snapped wrongly on my screen it should be on the blue tick ofc. The song ends on a blue tick btw.
rest seems fine.
normal
00:24:635 (1) - [URL=http://puu.sh/ntqK4/dffa7cfe7e.jpg]If you choose this rhythm u actually have something to click on the last white tick, currently you don't and this sounds better as well.
00:30:909 (1) - ^applies here too.
01:00:909 - add a note? it feels rather empty
01:01:105 (3) - honestly I would just go with what you did before and use 00:59:537 (2) - a reverse like this to represent the vocal better.
01:22:674 (1) - you forgot to nc here
hard
you have some spots in this diff which are visual not the same distance as before, because of sv changes, which could be irritating for this level of play.
01:26:596 (3,4,5) -
01:10:909 (1,2) -
01:23:066 (4,5,6) -
01:26:596 (3,4,5) -
I would advise you to make them at least visual equal.
00:17:086 (2) - why are you starting this on a blue tick? well i kinda get it, but its just wrong lol. move it to the white tick and shorten it to 1/2 and 00:16:792 (1) - make it reverse 2 times and not 1 and it should be fine. this is just at this one spot tbh.
00:56:792 (1) - you get inconsistent with ncing here. you should remove this one
01:04:243 (1,1,1) - these ncs are not necessary you don't change the SV again.
01:03:066 (1) - inconsistency with ncing as before.
01:16:400 (1) - i would just ignore the drumroll here and map the vocal with a long slider, like this here
maruk
00:18:360 (1,2,3) - there are no 1/8 at all o.O
01:05:027 (2) - you don't need to nc them since circles are not affected by sv changes. LOL! no srs, the nc is not neseccary
01:10:125 (1,2,3) - aw sad you didn't do any sv changes here as well, as its a strong part in the song.
01:11:105 (4) - you need to move the note to the blue tick 01:11:007 (4) - here, because you cannot suddenly change the way you emphasize the song. I should explain this a bit more i guess lol. You mapped vocals from 01:10:125 - here to 01:10:713 (3) - here, and now you suddenly decide to map the drums instead, but you could actually do the drums here if you move the note to the blue tick and continue to map the stream this thing here. the blue tick thing is a must, but the stream is secondary.
01:28:556 (2) - no sv change no nc. You don't need to nc stuff you can easily read (stuff like this) or didn't change the SV upon.
insane
00:17:968 (5,6) - that movement doesn't fit at all considering the streaming here indicates you move upwards. If you'd place 6 more on the top right corner it made much more sense, the downbeat slider can stay like it is. The current flow is kinda edgy and doesn't fit the stream.
00:52:478 (1) - nc is not needed.
00:55:419 (6,8) - these are hitting each other if you enable "stacking", so move 6 a bit away for cleaniness.
01:04:243 (1,1) - the ncs are not needed since you don't change sv again, actually like in hard diff if i remember correctly
01:05:027 (1) - ^same as in hard diff.
01:17:576 (1) - nc makes no sense whatsoever
extra
00:24:635 (1,4) - you are not allowed to stack those on top of each other. The player has to be able to see the slider after. How it should look like
00:32:674 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - feels alot overdone, considering the sounds you hear are not even followed with the drum or anything other than the piano, which you don't even follow .. - Map the piano out, and don't do this overdone spacing here, i prolly won't be the only one pointing this thing out.
01:04:047 (2,2,2) - there's literally no sounds on these, why don't you do a 3/4 slider like in insane? :/ it fits the vocal so much.
01:28:556 (1) - considering how you mapped before the flow is more circulare so back and forth flow in the last pattern is really annyoing for the player. How about this. It makes much more sense, as I explained that the movement of the hand before is more circular so this flow would be more fitting.
The diff is a bit overdone, but thats alright - I didn't like that part where you used huge spacing even though there was only a quite piano in the back .
GL kunka!