1. Collab Easy (1,27 stars, 194 notes)
2. Collab Normal (1,66 stars, 299 notes)
3. Elvis' Extra (5,63 stars, 1104 notes)
4. Extra (5,5 stars, 1049 notes)
5. Kihhou's Insane (4,71 stars, 844 notes)
6. Marin's Hard (2,82 stars, 707 notes)
7. Noz's Advanced (2,01 stars, 415 notes)
8. Onikakushi (5,76 stars, 1014 notes)
9. Vell's Insane (4,11 stars, 839 notes)

osu! needs more 07th Expansion

Set

1. - me, Diplomatic Immunity style
2. - EvilElvis
3. - me, Pandora's Box style
4. - Kihhou
5. - Vell
6. - Nicole & me
7. - Nozhomi
8. Feerum, J1NX1337, Yuii-, me
9. - Yuii-, Enhu, me
10. Poem - Frederica Bernkastel

Okoratu wrote:

1. - me, done, icon is wrong tho xd

1. My head
2. http://whentheycry.wikia.com/wiki/Higurashi_no_Naku_Koro_ni_(Song)

Okoratu wrote:

why i mean

ok why not

but why

Kihhou wrote:

aw i liked the old bg better :C

Okoratu wrote:

hitsounding makes me want to cut myself

1. 00:01:120 (1,2) - Is this supposed to be a blanket? :s If yes, try again.-.
2. 00:10:262 (1,2,3) - Wouldn't lower spacing look nicer? http://puu.sh/nf4VV/5308f31e30.jpg
3. 00:17:977 (3) - Consider a quiet triplet instead of a reverse.
4. 00:25:992 (1,4) - Why not blanket those instead of the current awkward placement? :O
5. 00:37:134 (8) - I had an odd feeling while playing this, you are putting unnecessary pressure on this note, it's almost non-existent in the song, try this pattern instead http://puu.sh/nf5ky/331a30a820.jpg a stack would work too
6. 00:52:563 (4,5,6,1) - I suggest this pattern - http://puu.sh/nf5vZ/bc63524e6c.jpg Avoids the slightly awkward gap after the slider, plays pretty good.
7. 00:55:563 (2,1) - Can't really enjoy the movement here ._. I'd understand if the slider started at around x11 y16 to go along with the previous pairs, but the current placement is a bit harsh, especially with the fast and long slider.
8. 01:33:242 (2) - Seems like you intended to put the slider head at a 1/16 tick, so might want to fix that, however current pattern is kinda lame and I'd prefer a spinner over what's there now, an alternative would be snapping sliderend and sliderhead to 1/4 and adding a circle at the red tick, creating some better playability.
9. 01:46:277 (2,4) - OVERLAP TRIGGERED
10. 01:55:849 (4,6) - ^
11. 01:58:849 (5) - Same as 00:52:563 (4) -, it probably exists a few more times somewhere, so if you liked it, change those too.
12. 02:06:563 (1) - Rotate the slider clockwise a bit, or change the shape, movement from previous circle is mehh.
13. 02:10:849 (1,2,1) - Looks fancy, but do you really think the playability in the overall pattern is well?
14. 02:47:563 (9,1) - CTRL+G is nicer, even though spacing is decreased a bit, the movement pays off with the better emphasization towards the last note.
15. 03:35:134 (7,8,9,10) - First time I see you are doing something like that in this diff ;o Although I'd prefer something like placing 03:35:563 (10) - at around x208 y48 and rotating 03:35:706 (1) - counterclockwise a bit.
16. 03:40:134 (10) - Higher placement, like at x40 y184 would transit nicer into the next slider.
17. 04:00:849 (1,2) - Same suggestion as before, but what do you say about a slight different looking pattern?

Avishay wrote:

Holy shit, the hitsounds are pretty darn good. yay!

[HANGE HARE HARE E]

1. 00:01:120 (1,2) - Is this supposed to be a blanket? :s If yes, try again.-. ok these were supposed to be so i tried again
2. 00:10:262 (1,2,3) - Wouldn't lower spacing look nicer? http://puu.sh/nf4VV/5308f31e30.jpg even spacing would probably look nicer so i did that
3. 00:17:977 (3) - Consider a quiet triplet instead of a reverse. these wobbly sounds are very likely unsnapped so i'd rather have this simple reverse instead
4. 00:25:992 (1,4) - Why not blanket those instead of the current awkward placement? :O nah this dosn't need a blanket, i increased visual spacing between these to address your issue a bit
5. 00:37:134 (8) - I had an odd feeling while playing this, you are putting unnecessary pressure on this note, it's almost non-existent in the song, try this pattern instead http://puu.sh/nf5ky/331a30a820.jpg a stack would work too a slider doesn't work for sure also i don't want to stack since the next note on the blue tick has some emphasis, so i reduced spacing slightly
6. 00:52:563 (4,5,6,1) - I suggest this pattern - http://puu.sh/nf5vZ/bc63524e6c.jpg Avoids the slightly awkward gap after the slider, plays pretty good. what? why? the rhythm like this is intentional
7. 00:55:563 (2,1) - Can't really enjoy the movement here ._. I'd understand if the slider started at around x11 y16 to go along with the previous pairs, but the current placement is a bit harsh, especially with the fast and long slider. it's that harsh to emphasise vocals and cymbal crash in that place also it plays quite naturally to me so i don't really know what's wrong lol
8. 01:33:242 (2) - Seems like you intended to put the slider head at a 1/16 tick, so might want to fix that, however current pattern is kinda lame and I'd prefer a spinner over what's there now, an alternative would be snapping sliderend and sliderhead to 1/4 and adding a circle at the red tick, creating some better playability. circle on red tick goes against my intended simplicity and spinners were my least favourite gameplay element because they require literally no rhythm when playing
9. 01:46:277 (2,4) - OVERLAP TRIGGERED these didn't even overlap they were just somewhat close
10. 01:55:849 (4,6) - ^ okkk
11. 01:58:849 (5) - Same as 00:52:563 (4) -, it probably exists a few more times somewhere, so if you liked it, change those too. answer is same
12. 02:06:563 (1) - Rotate the slider clockwise a bit, or change the shape, movement from previous circle is mehh. yeah!
13. 02:10:849 (1,2,1) - Looks fancy, but do you really think the playability in the overall pattern is well? yes i think this works well enough with my intentions (same as the last long slider you didn't seem to really like)
14. 02:47:563 (9,1) - CTRL+G is nicer, even though spacing is decreased a bit, the movement pays off with the better emphasization towards the last note. emphasis of last note is fine currently, i think you dislike the somewhat linear movement which i will consider changing when someone else brings this pattern up as well because right now i prefer mine because it does the same thing as 01:31:706 (6,7,8,9,1) - in a more varied way
15. 03:35:134 (7,8,9,10) - First time I see you are doing something like that in this diff ;o 01:15:706 (8,9,10,11) - 01:20:277 (7,8,9,10) - 02:33:420 (8,9,10,11) - o.o Although I'd prefer something like placing 03:35:563 (10) - at around x208 y48 and rotating 03:35:706 (1) - counterclockwise a bit. uhh uhhh i don't see why i should do that
16. 03:40:134 (10) - Higher placement, like at x40 y184 would transit nicer into the next slider. done, this is nicer indeed
17. 04:00:849 (1,2) - Same suggestion as before, but what do you say about a slight different looking pattern? uh idk not sure yet

I bet you want me to mod the other diffs too, I'll do that, but later, hopefully I won't forget lol.