Yohanes wrote:

Heya Pho~! M4M
Omg this song is so soothing
Can you shrink the file size of the spoiler storyboard? it almost 20 Mb ._. Can't do much because of slideshow consisting of transparent .png files. and i cropped them already :/

[Memories]

• Mostly suggestions and nitpick stuff

1. 00:06:872 (1,2) - I think it would be better if you bring them closer, now it's too far and kinda hard to hit imo
2. 00:10:160 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - How about this? I think this has better flow http://puu.sh/lMzl9/295d8ecdb9.jpg and http://puu.sh/lMzmX/ffc6b82869.jpg Looks cryptic lol. I'll keep what I have as these sharp 'jumps' are there on purpose.
3. 00:24:505 (1,2) - I think they're too close considering your spacing in 00:25:404 (2,3,4,5) - Spacing is lower between 1-2 because the music is calmer as well.
4. 00:35:527 (2) - Ctrl + G? better flow imo That'd actually make it worse.
5. 00:38:822 (4) - Why you ignore strong instrument on 00:39:028 - ? Following guitar as music gets calmer again.
6. 00:42:646 (1,2) - Try using this pattern? Because I don't want to waste the piano's resonance sound there http://puu.sh/lMzNg/f6da254654.jpg No, circles are the better option for me.
7. 00:59:013 (2) - I would suggest you to follow vocal here, the piano's sound is really weak Piano's more dominant.
8. 01:01:251 (1,2,3,1) - I would place them like this for better emphasis http://puu.sh/lMA8y/93245fd1a9.jpg Less emphasis on 2, I don't want that.
9. 01:18:341 (3) - Change it into 1/2 slider? No
10. 01:32:904 (5) - ^ No. I don't like having sliders end on nothing, neither resonance.
11. 01:43:489 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - dem spacing too OP :3
12. 02:22:237 - You can put triplet here (Which I think you should) Certainly not, timing is confusing enough here.
13. 02:23:251 (1) - I think you should follow vocal here Timing is focussed on instrumentals :/
14. 02:31:347 (1,2) - Better don't stack them, Vocal kinda screams for a change in movement lol http://puu.sh/lMAxX/0f04520764.jpg At 02:31:788 - yes, before no. Stack gives time for new orientation.
15. 02:32:671 (1,2) - same with this http://puu.sh/lMAD0/e6268824fb.jpg ^
16. 03:17:890 (1) - Come on.... this could be prettier xDD ;-;
17. 03:35:317 (2) - 368|8 ? Too motion-intense.

[Hard]

• I like this diff

1. 02:18:266 (1) - Remove it? I think it would be better xD I'd like to keep it, fits well to the piano.
2. 02:22:399 (1) - Follow vocal? Can't do it more accurate than I already do :/
3. 03:41:714 (1) - Isn't it a bit too late? (if you're following piano) this note is satan's spawn.

I believe in your normal diff, because I'm lazy I don't see anything wrong when playing and when I take a quick look of it
Good luck with this map o/

Bonsai wrote:

Whoohoo I'm finally done with the timing check \:D/ Here's the things I would change, I applied all these changes in this extra diff (and re-snapped all green lines and whatnot):

1. 00:20:885 (4) - The piano on the tail of this slider is about 10ms earlier
2. 00:23:164 (4,5,6,1,2) - That section and the next one is brutal lol - I felt like (4) was 4ms early, and the guitar is generally earlier but at (6) it is especially audible imo so I did -3ms there (causing the two sections here to be the same bpm so I turned the latter into a green one), and (1) was 4ms early again. Now none of these notes here are slidertails so it doesn't change anything 'definite' but makes the bpm-difference bigger so I don't know if you want to actually apply this or not, but that's how it would be more accurate (and maybe the bigger difference makes it easier to read that there is actually a bpm-change happening dunno) Applied with a little tweak cause the timing wasn't smooth.
3. 00:25:824 (3,4,5) - The guitar is getting very early for these notes so I changed the bpm here resulting in -6ms at (5) (I did resnap all green lines and changed greens to red and vice versa so it's all still correct but nothing superfluous) This doesn't seem that necessary to me, the notes should be snapped accurate enough as they are without the changes.
4. 00:38:822 (4) - Made this one +8ms and moved the red lines around so the slider isn't going through multiple sections and the slidertick is gone hence these green lines were superfluous too
5. 00:45:351 (1,2,3,4) - Made (1) -12ms, (2) -6ms, the tail of (3) -14ms and (4) -8ms
6. 00:51:992 (3,4,1,2,3) - Tail of (3) -2ms, (4) -3ms and (1,2,3) -6ms - also, maybe space 00:54:111 (3,4) a bit more to make the change easier to catch?
7. 01:05:985 (2,3,4) - At the tail of (2) the early guitars are very audible again and at (3,4) the vocals are a bit earlier too so I made it yes? xd I think the current timing is fine though, guitar aren't too notable imo compared to the vocals and piano.
8. 01:37:314 (3) - Made the head -14ms bc of the vocals and it's easier to play that way too
9. 01:46:348 (1,2,3) - Those sounds are always really blegh but I feel like (1,2) are both better with -8ms (and easier to play) and (3) is better with -6ms too
10. 02:05:579 (2) - Made the tail 34ms earlier lol Uhh i don't know about that really lol. You set the offset really earlier while the vocalist is still shaping the syllable (denglish lol). The actual 'i' syllable is spoken later, i'd like to keep my version - seems more fitting to me. NVM lol
11. 02:11:802 (4) - Made the tail 52ms earlier lolol
12. 02:22:399 (1) - The bpm should actually be halfed (not that it matters anyways) and I made the head -20ms
13. 02:42:162 (3) - Uhmm dunno why you put a red line in the middle of that, the slidertail sounds perfect when you just apply the 134bpm-section until there (=-49ms lol) and you don't have to mess with manually snapping the length except in Normal (and the sliderticks don't change their position anyways if that's what you were going for) Tried timing to the violin but it's friggen impossible without a clear beat lol.
14. 02:44:857 (1) - Made the tail -70ms lololol this breaks the symmetry though so dunno what you're going to do about that
15. 03:41:492 (1) - I know the strings are kinda on the white tick but their 'beat' is not very audible and sounds really off, I feel like shortening it to 5/16 to land on the strong piano hit sounds way better but that kinda breaks the pattern I guess, dunno what you can do about it but I just wanted to point out that it's pretty confusing imo best song to time

Random other things that came to my mind:

1. 00:42:521 - What about making a 1/4-slider here? That'd mean i'd click to a weaker piano beat than where it'd end. I'd rahter have to click the most emphasized beat here.
2. 02:08:082 (2) - I don't think this is really two notes, sounds like the guitar has just one extra note but is very early, and just having a circle at 02:08:138 sounds just as good imo, dunno what you like better I think 1/8 imitates this extra note somwhat reliable. It may not be perfectly accurate, but it's certainly there for a reason.
3. 02:10:396 (1,2) - Maybe move the NC to (2)? Didn't look at the NC-system for the whole map though so dunno whether that would fit, just pointing it out in case Focus lies on NC per stanza still, even if it's really irregular. And 1 is the more prominent beat, I don't like setting NC to vocals.
4. 03:42:132 (2,1,2,3) - Somehow it feels weird imo to not space the second combo away from that slider since it's a strong bpm-change nvm I think what really bugs me is that at most if not all other parts like this you put the NC and emphasis at 03:43:038 (2) which make more sense to me, I don't know how to solve this in a nice way here but I can only say that it feels weird like this to me : \ It's mostly due to the 3 drumkicks that are only existent at the final part of the music. that's why emphasis has been put on earlier at 1 as well. It's one of these 'special' sections that i'd like to highlight.

I just love this map <3 I hope everything is fine now, good luck!